Canada: GAME ON - USTR Releases Objectives for NAFTA Renegotiations

Last Updated: July 26 2017
Article by Geoffrey C. Kubrick

On July 17, 2017, the United States Trade Representative ("USTR") released a summary of objectives for the United States in NAFTA renegotiations.  The submission of this document to Congress was a necessary precondition to the initiation of trade negotiations.  Most of the document is comprised of boiler plate objectives that would apply to most trade negotiations.  Many of the objectives are already addressed to a certain extent under the various World Trade Organization ("WTO") agreements.

While there is little that is unexpected in this document, there are a few clues as to issues that may be of particular interest to the United States.

There are 22 general issues that are listed.  Rather than address each of these, this analysis will focus on areas of interest to Canada, and on issues where the United States may put particular emphasis.


The USTR document identifies general goals under trade in goods, both industrial and agricultural products.  In respect  of Canada, the agricultural target will primarily be dairy, chicken and eggs.  The objectives do seem to contemplate a reduction in American constraints on the import of agriculture goods, subject to a phase-out of tariffs that currently exist.  American willingness to give on trade in agriculture products will make Canadian defence of supply-managed industries more difficult, particularly given the concessions made by Canada in negotiations for the Trans-Pacific Partnership ("TPP") and Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement ("CETA").  While possibly painful for Canadian producers, an American win on this issue would also be a win for Canadian consumers.

Import Value Thresholds

The United States has also expressly addressed the difference in customs rules pertaining to e‑commerce.  In particular, the United States wishes to see reciprocity in the scope of customs coverage. It currently has a $800 de minimis standard for express delivery shipments.  Canada currently maintains a $20 threshold, in large part to expand the scope of goods subject to sales taxes.  An American win here would benefit Canadian consumers.

Technical Barriers to Trade

In addressing technical barriers to trade, the objectives contemplate a requirement that decisions and recommendations of the WTO Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade be applied.  This is a novel concept since, in the normal course, a member country can decline to apply WTO decisions, subject to the right of the complaining country to withdraw equivalent concessions.  In conjunction with sanitary/phytosanitary standards, the U.S. goal is likely to advance U.S. interests in the agricultural and chemical industries, where acceptance of new strains or new products may be subject to regulatory control in Canada or Mexico, even if approved in the United States.

It is interesting that the United States is limiting adherence to WTO decisions to technical barriers to trade.  If this principle were to be applied more generally to require enforcement of all WTO decisions, that would certainly provide some comfort to the Canadian softwood lumber industry.  While enhancing the enforceability of WTO decisions is an intriguing concept, the reasonable extension of such a rule across all WTO decisions is almost certainly not going to be acceptable to American negotiators.


The objectives signal a goal of obtaining greater access to the telecommunications and financial services sectors.  There will likely be some significant push-back from Canadian providers of internet, cable and cell phone service.  On financial services, Canadian big banks already have an extensive presence in the American market, and U.S. negotiators will likely press for some form of reciprocal treatment for American financial institutions in Canada.

The Cloud

Another key objective that is of little surprise relates to abolishing restrictions on cross-border data flows.  In a nutshell, this is about cloud storage, and the removal of restrictions on the use of data storage facilities located outside of Canada.  Canada has certain laws that currently prevent use of data storage facilities outside of the country on the grounds of privacy concerns.  Canada would likely be able to maintain restrictions on certain government data under the national security exception, but it will be pressed to recognize that privacy can be protected regardless of the physical location of the data storage facility.  This issue was conceded by TPP negotiations, and it will be difficult to refuse similar concessions under NAFTA.


On issues of government procurement, the United States seeks an express exclusion for state and local government from NAFTA procurement obligations.  Sub-federal bodies are not directly included under existing government procurement obligations, though one might argue that a failure to permit open access to procurement at these levels of government might be considered a breach of national treatment obligations, and give rise to a potential remedy under Chapter 11 of NAFTA (though this avenue has not yet been pursued).  A desire to expressly exclude sub-federal American institutions does seem to reflect a potential concern under NAFTA, or in the context of WTO obligations.  Press reports have suggested that Americans are going to go after provincial and municipal procurement in Canada.  Given the American position, such an outcome is most unlikely, particularly given the repeated American goal of reciprocity in the negotiations.

A different plan of attack may come through the objectives relating to state-owned enterprises ("SOE").  A stated goal of the USTR is to require SOEs to accord non-discriminatory treatment with respect to purchase and sale of goods and services.  This might be an alternative means of seeking access to sub-federal procurement in Canada, since there are a number of significant SOEs at the provincial level, particularly in relation to power generation and provision of health services.

Dispute Resolution

Dispute resolution is an issue that is all over the map.  One stated objective is to abolish the Chapter 19 Panels which provide an alternative route to judicial review than in the courts.  Canada had pushed hard for this in the Canada U.S. Free Trade Agreement, with the aim of obtaining an expedited judicial review of American anti-dumping or countervailing duty decisions.  The fear at the time was that the appeal processes under American law would effectively permit an American industry to litigate smaller Canadian industries out of the American market.

The U.S. objective on Chapter 19 is somewhat incongruous given the promotion of NAFTA dispute settlement mechanisms elsewhere in the objectives.  For example, the USTR contemplates incorporating the labour and environmental side agreements into NAFTA, with establishment of enforceable dispute resolution procedures applicable to each.  Some caution may be warranted on the part of Canada and Mexico to the extent that environmental provisions might require active enforcement of obligations under the Paris Climate Accord (such as they are), despite the fact that the United States would not be obliged to do the same.

The U.S. contemplates an overall dispute settlement procedure, which is somewhat ironic, since such a procedure already exists under Chapter 20 of NAFTA.  The United States has undermined the effectiveness of existing measures by repeatedly declining to appoint panelists for disputes under Chapter 20.

A further apparent contradiction on dispute resolution relates to the USTR goals on investment.   One cited goal is to ensure that NAFTA country investors in the United States are not accorded greater substantive rights than domestic investors.  Chapter 11 of NAFTA currently does provide investors of other NAFTA countries higher rights than available to local investors.  For example, a Canadian investor has fewer rights to a remedy for expropriation of its assets in Canada than would be available to an American or Mexican investor.  In this respect, the American goal may effectively mean the end of Chapter 11 of NAFTA.  This dispute resolution procedure has primarily benefitted of American investors over the last two decades; both the Canadian and Mexican governments might be happy to see Chapter 11 gone.

Trade Remedies

For global safeguard remedies, the U.S. is seeking to remove the higher injury standard applicable under NAFTA.  In such cases, NAFTA countries must be demonstrated to be, on their own, a serious cause of injury to domestic producers before safeguard measures may be applied against them.  The United States seeks to essentially remove that exception from NAFTA.

Another trade remedy goal is the possibility of instituting proceedings for third country dumping.  This would mean giving companies under NAFTA a right to bring anti-dumping proceedings in another NAFTA country where their exporters are being harmed by dumping or subsidization from a non-NAFTA country.  NAFTA had originally contemplated further negotiations in this regard, but no further steps were taken at the time.


There are a number of mentions of transparency throughout the objectives defined by the USTR.  One interesting aspect of the American position may result in greater transparency or access to Canadian customs data.  American customs data is accessible through a number of services in which all customs information, with the sole exception of price, may be available.  This information extends to goods that are transhipped to Canada through an American port.  Under the Canada Border Services Agency ("CBSA") interpretation of section 107 of the Customs Act, absolutely no information provided on customs documents can be made public.  The rule is somewhat enigmatic when one considers the extent of information on imports into Canada that may be obtained from the United States, but not from Canadian sources.  If the CBSA were required to provide the same degree of transparency as is currently the case in the United States, this information would be of great interest and use to a wide range of industries throughout Canada.


The document outlining the USTR objectives in NAFTA re-negotiations is a very useful document in a number of respects.  First, the reasoned statement of objectives should dispel the panicked myths propagated by certain members of the press.  Second, it does provide a road map to assist Canadian industry in preparing submissions to government on their particular interests.  Finally, it does allow the governments of both Canada and Mexico to get a sense of where concessions might be made to satisfy U.S. negotiators, while maintaining the substantial benefits accorded to citizens of all three NAFTA countries since the agreement entered into force in 1994.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2017

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Geoffrey C. Kubrick
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions