Canada: Supreme Court Of Canada Upholds Dismissal Of Cocaine-addicted Worker

On June 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the termination of a cocaine-addicted employee, finding that he was terminated for breaching the employer's drug and alcohol policy and not because of his addiction. The Court agreed that the opportunity to self-disclose drug use and access treatment without fear of discipline was a reasonable accommodation in the circumstances of this case. The  Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corp. decision represents a cautious step in the right direction for employers trying to maintain safety standards in dangerous workplaces.

The Facts

Mr. Stewart worked driving a loader in a mine operated by the Elk Valley Coal Corporation. The mine operations were dangerous and Mr. Stewart's position was highly safety-sensitive.

To address its heightened safety concerns in a dangerous workplace, the employer implemented a comprehensive drug and alcohol policy (the "Policy") that required employees to disclose any dependence or addiction issues before a drug-related incident occurred. Employees who voluntarily disclosed would be offered treatment. Those who did not disclose and tested positive for drugs after an incident would be terminated. All employees attended a training session to review the Policy and signed off indicating that they understood the Policy.

Mr. Stewart used cocaine on his days off and did not report his drug use to the employer. He was involved in an accident in the workplace and, pursuant to the Policy, was required to undergo a drug test. He tested positive for cocaine. In the meeting following the positive test, Mr. Stewart said he thought he might be addicted to cocaine.  Nine days later, his employment was terminated for breach of the Policy.

The Tribunal's Original Decision

In its initial decision, the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal found that Mr. Stewart had failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. While he was able to establish that he had a disability, and that his termination would be considered "adverse treatment" by his employer, Mr. Stewart failed to establish that his disability was a factor in the adverse treatment. The Tribunal found that Mr. Stewart was terminated for a breach of the Policy and not because of his addiction.

The Tribunal went on to conclude that even if it was wrong in its conclusion, the Employer did not discriminate because it could not accommodate Mr. Stewart short of undue hardship. The Tribunal indicated that the opportunity to self-disclose and access treatment without fear of discipline was a reasonable accommodation.  Further, to dilute the penalty of discharge in this instance would dilute the deterrence effect and the remedial goals of the Policy, thereby compromising workplace safety; in the context of a dangerous workplace, that alone would amount to undue hardship.

The case wound its way through the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench and Court of Appeal, and Mr. Stewart eventually appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Supreme Court of Canada's Majority Decision

Writing for the majority of the Court, Chief Justice McLachlin dismissed Mr. Stewart's appeal, finding that the Tribunal's decision that the employee's addiction was not a factor in the termination of his employment was reasonable. The Court affirmed the original Tribunal finding that the Policy did not adversely impact the employee because he had the capacity to comply with its terms.

The majority of the Court focused on the letter of termination which stated that the reason for the employee's termination was his violation of the Policy: he used drugs and failed to disclose his use prior to the accident. While the Tribunal accepted that people with addictions may experience denial and that the failure to follow the Policy may be a symptom of the addiction, the expert evidence established that Mr. Stewart had the capacity to disclose his drug use and he made rational choices to use drugs. The Court found this conclusion reasonable and determined that the evidence showed that Mr. Stewart's addiction did not diminish his ability to comply with the Policy.  At paragraph 39, the majority of the Court made the following observation:

 ...It cannot be assumed that Mr. Stewart's addiction diminished his ability to comply with the terms of the Policy. In some cases, a person with an addiction may be fully capable of complying with workplace rules. In others, the addiction may effectively deprive a person of the capacity to comply, and the breach of the rule will be inextricably connected with the addiction. Many cases may exist somewhere between these two extremes. Whether a protected characteristic is a factor in the adverse impact will depend on the facts and must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. The connection between an addiction and adverse treatment cannot be assumed and must be based on evidence.

The Dissenting Judgments

The fact that the Court in Elk Valley was divided, with two separate dissenting judgments in the same decision, demonstrates the complexity of human rights cases involving addictions. The dissent argued that a detailed review of the evidence showed that the real cause of the employee's termination was his addiction and thus the test for prima facie discrimination was met and the Tribunal's conclusion to the contrary was unreasonable. The minority found that the employee's addiction was "characterized by impaired control over the use of a psychoactive substance and/or behaviour". While Mr. Stewart was not wholly incapacitated by his addiction and maintained some residual control, the minority stated that they failed to see how one could agree that an employee has limited ability to make choices yet not find a connection between the failure to disclose the addiction and his termination. The minority found that the fact that Mr. Stewart exercised some control over his drug use did not eliminate it as a factor in his termination.

On the issue of undue hardship, two members of the minority of the Court agreed that the Tribunal's conclusion that there was no discrimination because the Employer could not accommodate short of undue hardship and achieve its goal of deterrence was reasonable. One member of the minority of the Court found the opposite.

Implications for Employers

This case represents a significant step forward in giving employers in safety-sensitive and dangerous workplaces the tools to create and maintain a safe workplace. The majority of the Court said that, based on the evidence in this case, Mr. Stewart's addiction did not preclude his ability to make choices about his drug use or prevent him from self-disclosing his drug use. Of note, the majority acknowledged that other cases may be decided differently based upon the evidence adduced at the initial hearing. Accordingly, independent medical exams are of significant importance. Also important is a thorough and effective cross-examination of the employee to canvass evidence of volition and the day-to-day decision-making ability of the employee.

A second takeaway is the importance of carefully drafting the letter of termination. In this case, the majority of the Court referred to the termination letter in concluding that it was not the addiction per se that was the trigger for the termination, but rather the breach of a Policy that the employee had the ability and capacity to comply with.

The third takeaway for employers in dangerous and safety-sensitive industries is to have a well-vetted and appropriate drug and alcohol policy that treats drug addiction, as opposed to drug use, as a disability and reasonably supports and accommodates those suffering from an addiction. An effective policy will balance accommodation for employees with a disability with deterrence for those who do not self-disclose and put their safety and the safety of others at risk.

This case also represents a reconciliation between workplace safety and privacy rights in dangerous workplaces. Where there is the opportunity to voluntarily disclose an addiction and receive treatment, employees who hide an addiction and are involved in a workplace accident and test positive for alcohol or drugs can be held accountable for putting themselves and their co-workers at risk. For employers who are working hard to create a safe workplace, this is a step in the right direction.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Julie Menten
Events from this Firm
22 Nov 2018, Workshop, Vancouver, Canada

Managing and accommodating employees with disabilities is one of the more complex issues faced by employers today.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Integritas Workplace Law Corporation
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Integritas Workplace Law Corporation
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions