Canada: A Canadian Perspective On The Hague Securities Convention

On April 1, 2017, the Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Certain Rights in Respect of Securities Held with an Intermediary (the "Convention") became effective in the United States. While Canada has not yet ratified the Convention, it is important for Canadian financing practitioners to become familiar with the new rules thereunder.

The Convention's primary objective is to provide for a uniform set of rules applicable to the determination of the law governing the perfection and priority of security interests encumbering security entitlements held in a securities account by a securities intermediary1. While the Convention supersedes the conflict of laws rules of the Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC"), it has no effect on the substantive law that will apply once the choice of law determination has been made2.

UCC Conflict of Laws Rules Applicable Before the Convention3

Before April 1, 2017, the conflict of laws rules applicable to the perfection, the effect of perfection, and the priority of a security interest in security entitlements were determined by Articles 8 and 9 of the UCC. Under such rules, the "local law of the securities intermediary's jurisdiction" governed the perfection, the effect of perfection and the priority of a security interest encumbering security entitlements4. However, the "local law of the jurisdiction in which the debtor is located"5 governed the perfection by filing of such security interest6.

In most cases, the securities intermediary's jurisdiction7 is expressly set out in the agreement8 governing the securities account entered into between the entitlement holder and the securities intermediary.

Conflict of Laws Rules Provided by the Convention

Under the Convention, the relationship between an account holder and its securities intermediary is the determining factor. The objective is to give effect to the express agreement of the parties to an Account Agreement regarding the law governing the issues dealt with by the Convention. Unlike the twofold approach of Articles 8 and 9, the law determined by the Convention will govern the perfection, the effect of perfection as well as the priority of the security interests encumbering security entitlements held by a securities intermediary.

Under the Convention's primary rule9, the applicable law is the governing law of the Account Agreement, unless the parties have expressly chosen another law to apply to the specific issues governed by the Convention (which includes the perfection, effect of perfection and priority of security interests)10.

In order for the Convention's primary rule to apply, the securities intermediary must have an office that deals in securities or engages in the activity of maintaining securities accounts11 in the selected jurisdiction (the "Qualifying Office Requirement").

If the primary rule does not find application, the following three fall-back rules would apply, and the applicable law would be:

  1. the law of the jurisdiction of the office through which the securities intermediary entered into the Account Agreement12, if the securities intermediary otherwise complies with the Qualifying Office Requirement; or
  2. if paragraph (i) does not apply, the law of the jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of the securities intermediary; or
  3. if the law applicable is not determined under either paragraph (i) or (ii) above, the law in which the securities intermediary has its place of business (or if the securities intermediary has more than one place of business, its chief executive office).

Finally, the Convention provides for transitional rules that are only applicable if the securities intermediary meets the Qualifying Office Requirement at the time the Account Agreement was entered into.

Practical Examples of the Impact of the Convention on Cross-Borders Transactions

Generally speaking, Canadian conflict of laws rules on security interests in security entitlements provide for a regime that mirrors Articles 8 and 9 of the UCC. Such rules are set forth in the applicable Personal Property Security Act and Securities Transfer Act13 in most provinces other than Quebec, where the Civil Code of Québec14 applies.

While the Convention aims to simplify the determination of the law applicable to investment securities, the following three examples illustrate the impact of the application of the conflict of laws rules of the Convention on cross-borders secured lending transactions15.

Primary Rule

A debtor located in Ontario has entered into an Account Agreement governed by New York law. The securities intermediary has an office in the State of New York (which meets the Qualifying Office Requirements) and the Account Agreement provides that the securities intermediary's jurisdiction is New York.

Under the New Rules: Considering that the securities intermediary has an office that meets the Qualifying Office Requirements in New York and that the Account Agreement is governed by New York law, the law applicable to the perfection, the effect of perfection and the priority of the security interest in the security entitlements held by a securities intermediary is the law of New York.
Under the Old Rules: Because of the "securities intermediary's jurisdiction" clause, the law applicable was New York law.

However, the perfection of the security interest by filing was governed by the local law of the jurisdiction in which the debtor was located, i.e. the laws applicable in the Province of Ontario.

Fall-Back Rules

A debtor located in Ontario has entered into an Account Agreement governed by Ontario law with a securities intermediary incorporated under the laws of New York. The securities intermediary has an office in the state of New York (which meets the Qualifying Office Requirements) and the Account Agreement provides that the securities intermediary's jurisdiction is New York.

Under the New Rules: Considering that the securities intermediary only has an office that meets the Qualifying Office Requirements in New York, and that the governing law of the Account Agreement is Ontario, the primary rule does not find application. The law applicable is the law of incorporation of the securities intermediary, i.e. New York law.
Under the Old Rules: Because of the "securities intermediary's jurisdiction" clause, the law applicable was New York law.

However, the perfection of the security interest by filing was governed by the local law of the jurisdiction in which the debtor was located, i.e. the laws applicable in the Province of Ontario.

Fall-Back Rules

A debtor located in Quebec has entered into an Account Agreement governed by Quebec law. The securities intermediary has an office in the state of New York (which meets the Qualifying Office Requirements) and it is expressly and unambiguously stated in the Account Agreement that the securities intermediary entered into the Account Agreement through this particular office. The Account Agreement provides that the securities intermediary's jurisdiction for the purpose of the Account Agreement is Quebec.

Under the New Rules: The securities intermediary has an office in New York that meets the Qualifying Office Requirements and the Account Agreement expressly and unambiguously specifies that the securities intermediary entered into the agreement through that office. The law applicable is thus the law of the jurisdiction of the office of the securities intermediary, i.e. New York law.
Under the Old Rules: Because of the "securities intermediary's jurisdiction" clause, the law applicable to the effect of perfection and priority of the security interest was Quebec law.
The perfection of the security interest by filing was governed by the local law of the jurisdiction in which the debtor was located, i.e. the laws applicable in the Province of Quebec

In all of the foregoing examples, unless the Account Agreement is amended to fall within the scope of the primary rule, a secured party would want to perfect its security interest in the State of New York to ensure that same remains validly perfected.

Key Distinctions Between the Rules of Articles 8 and 9 and those of the Convention

Under the Convention, "securities" are specifically defined to exclude "cash"16 held in a securities account. Further, the Convention does not deal with security interests encumbering directly held securities (i.e. not held through a securities intermediary). Accordingly, the conflict of laws rules of Articles 8 and 9 of the UCC continue to apply to both instances.

Conclusion

The Convention's primary objective is to simplify cross-borders transactions by providing certainty and predictability regarding the law applicable to holding and transferring of securities held by an intermediary.

While the modification to the conflict of laws rules does not constitute a major upheaval in the Canadian legislative scheme, practitioners involved in taking a security interest over security entitlements with a nexus to the US should ensure that the application of the Convention will not detract from the outcome that was expected before the implementation of the Convention. To avoid having to rely on the fall-back rules, parties to an Account Agreement may want to amend same to fall within the scope of the primary rule, bearing in mind the Qualifying Office Requirement.

In the future, considering that a secured party does not typically enter into the Account Agreement, it will want the parties thereto to covenant not to amend the governing law of same without notice to (or written consent of) the secured party. As indicated above, an amendment to the governing law of an Account Agreement could have a material impact on the perfection, effect of perfection and priority of the secured parties' security interest.

The Uniform Law Conference of Canada (ULCC) will no doubt take into account United States' adoption of the Convention when it will hold its annual meeting in August 2017. Since Canada participated in the negotiation of the Convention more than ten years ago, and given the overall similarities of its secured lending laws and those of the United States, it is expected that Canada will ratify the Convention in the near future.

Footnotes

1 The Convention was initially signed by the US in July 2006 in an attempt to improve the functioning of investment securities markets and reduce the uncertainty in cross-border transactions.

2 Message from The President of the United States transmitting the Convention on the Law Applicable to Certain Rights in Respect of Securities Held with an Intermediary, done at the Hague on July 5, 2006, and signed by the United States on that same day, 112th Congress, 2d Session, Treaty Doc. 112-6, Authenticated U.S. Government Information, GPO, [On Line], https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Treaty_112-61.pdf.

3 This discussion of the UCC is based on the authors' understanding of the state of the code and not intended to constitute legal advice in any way.

4 UCC, Art. 9-305 (a).

5 Please note that the scope of this articles does not include the analysis of the determination of the "location of the debtor". As a cautionary note, the rules of the UCC applicable to the determination of the domicile of the debtor only apply if a debtor's residence, place of business or chief executive office is located in a jurisdiction whose Personal Property Registry (collectively, with the Quebec Register of Personal and Movable Real Rights, the "PPR")) is considered to be a "notice filing systems for non-possessory security interest", equivalent to those of the UCC jurisdictions (UCC, Art. 9-307 (c)). If the PPR does not meet such threshold, the UCC provides that the debtor is deemed to be located in the District of Columbia. However, if the PPR is considered to be equivalent to the filing systems in place in the UCC jurisdictions, such additional filing would not be necessary. Because of the absence of case law on this specific question, there is no unequivocal answer. It is therefore typical for secured parties to elect to file an additional financing statement in the District of Columbia to be shielded from the potential argument that Quebec is not a UCC equivalent jurisdiction.

6 UCC, Art. 9-305 (c).

7 UCC Art. 8-110 (e). The "securities intermediary's jurisdiction" is (i) if the Account Agreement expressly provides what the securities intermediary's jurisdiction is, such jurisdiction; (ii) if (i) does not apply, the governing law of the Account Agreement, if any; (iii) if (i) and (ii) do not apply, the law applicable in the jurisdiction of the office where the securities account is maintained, provided that such information is expressly set forth in the Account Agreement; otherwise (iv) the jurisdiction in which the office serving the entitlement holder's account is located, if such information is available in an account statement; or (v) if none of the preceding paragraphs apply, the jurisdiction where the chief executive office of the securities intermediary is located.

8 Hereinafter, the "Account Agreement".

9 Convention, Art. 4(1).

10 Convention, Art. 2(1) : The Convention determines the law applicable to the following issues in respect of securities held with an intermediary – (a) the legal nature and effects against the intermediary and third parties of the rights resulting from a credit of securities to a securities account; (b) the legal nature and effects against the intermediary and third parties of a disposition of securities held with an intermediary; (c) the requirements, if any, for perfection of a disposition of securities held with an intermediary; (d) whether a person's interest in securities held with an intermediary extinguishes or has priority over another person's interest; (e) the duties, if any, of an intermediary to a person other than the account holder who asserts in competition with the account holder or another person an interest in securities held with that intermediary; (f) the requirements, if any, for the realisation of an interest in securities held with an intermediary; and (g) whether a disposition of securities held with an intermediary extends to entitlements to dividends, income, or other distributions, or to redemption, sale or other proceeds.

11 Convention, Art. 4(1): The relevant intermediary must have, at the time of the agreement, an office in that State, which (a) alone or together with other offices of the relevant intermediary or with other persons acting for the relevant intermediary in that or another State (i) effects or monitors entries to securities accounts;(ii) administers payments or corporate actions relating to securities held with the intermediary; or (iii) is otherwise engaged in a business or other regular activity of maintaining securities accounts; or (b) is identified by an account number, bank code, or other specific means of identifications maintaining securities accounts in that State.

12 Convention, Sub-paragraphs 5(1) (a) through (e). This fall-back rule only applies if the jurisdiction of the securities intermediary's office is expressly and unambiguously stated in the Account Agreement. Such express and unambiguous provision does not include notice provisions or provisions pertaining to the consent to a jurisdiction to institute legal proceedings.

13 For the purposes of this article, we have referred to the Ontario Personal Property Security Act ("PPSA") and Securities Transfer Act ("STA"). Please note that there are some differences between each PPSA and STA across Canada. Securities Transfer Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 8, Sec. 44 and 45; Personal Property Security Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.10, Sec. 7.1.

14 Civil Code of Québec, CQLR c CCQ-1991, Art. 3108.7 and 3108.8.

15 The determination of the applicable law is only from the stand point of the rules set forth by the Convention. Canadian conflict of laws rules may provide for a different outcome.

16 "securities" means any shares, bonds or other financial instruments or financial assets (other than cash), or any interest therein.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Eve Tessier
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.