Canada: Highlights From The National Energy Board Modernization Report

Last Updated: May 30 2017
Article by Bernard Roth, Laura K. Estep and Dan Collins

On May 15, 2017, the Expert Panel on the Modernization of the National Energy Board (NEB) delivered its report, Forward, Together: Enabling Canada's Clean, Safe, and Secure Energy Future (Report). The Panel was appointed in the fall of 2016 by Canada's Minister of Natural Resources to meet one of the priorities identified in the mandate letter issued to the Minister by the Prime Minister. The Panel was tasked with reviewing the structure, role and mandate of the NEB. This Report comes following a separate report by another expert panel as part of a review of the Canadian environmental assessment process.


The NEB's current core functions include lifecycle regulation of interprovincial and international oil and gas pipelines, international power lines, and designated interprovincial power lines. The NEB is also responsible for publishing information on Canada's energy markets.

The Panel recommends separating these functions by creating two new entities: the Canadian Energy Transmission Commission (CETC) and the Canadian Energy Information Agency (CEIA) to preserve the perceived credibility of the information and to ensure that the new agency can "tell it like it is" on energy matters. The Panel recommends that the CEIA be located close to Statistics Canada, Natural Resources, and Environment and Climate Change Canada, in Ottawa.

The Panel recommends that the CETC inherit the NEB's role as an independent, quasi-judicial body with authority to approve or deny projects based on technical criteria and environmental assessments. The proposed CETC would conduct its review of "major projects" and "significant projects" within its jurisdiction jointly with the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEA Agency). The proposed review process is examined in greater detail below. Like the NEB, the CETC would be responsible for energy imports and exports, as well as compliance verification, enforcement action and emergency response oversight.

The Panel also makes a number of recommendations related to the governance of the CETC and the appointment of hearing commissioners. The Report highlights that a number of parties expressed concern with the National Energy Board Act, RSC 1985, c N-7 (NEB Act) requirement that the NEB head office be located in Calgary, and that any NEB member reside in or within a reasonable commuting distant of Calgary. Participants suggested these requirements raised concerns about the NEB's independence. The Panel resisted suggestions to relocate the entire organization of the CETC to Ottawa. However, the Panel did recommend that the CETC board of directors, as well as staff and resources related to electricity transmission, be based in Ottawa. The Panel also recommends removing the residency requirement for hearing commissions in favour of a "transparent competency model".


Arguably the most significant recommendations in the Report relate to the proposed changes to the process for reviewing new project applications. According to the Panel, the nature of the review should depend to some extent on the nature of the proposed project. The Report identifies three different categories of projects for determining the appropriate review process, with no discussion of the distinction between each category of project:

  1. "Major projects" or "projects of national consequence" would need to complete a two-stage review process. First, a proposed major project would need to receive a "national interest" determination from the Governor in Council (GIC), commonly known as the Federal Cabinet. Following that decision, the proposed major project would need to be licenced following a technical review and environmental assessment conducted jointly by the CETC and the CEA Agency.

    In the first stage of the review, the GIC would decide whether the proposed project was in the "national interest". At a high level, the Panel suggests that a single office (such as the existing Major Projects Management Office) would coordinate a "strategic level" review of the proposed project (i.e. not focused on reviewing detailed design or environmental impacts) by all relevant government departments. The Major Projects Management Office (or other coordinating body) would also carry out consultation with potentially affected Indigenous groups during this review. Following that review process, the Minister of Natural Resources would make a recommendation to the GIC on whether the project aligns with the national interest. The Panel envisions that the time from initial filing to recommendation from the Minister would be about nine months.

    The GIC would make the ultimate determination on whether the proposed project aligns with the national interest after weighing a number of criteria such as net economic benefits, the acceptability of the proposed route, alignment with national policies, among others. The Panel envisions that the GIC would typically need three months from the time it receives the Minister's recommendation to make a decision.

    The Panel explains that a "yes" to a proposed project from the GIC at the first stage means, "yes, subject to further regulatory approval after a detailed project review"; and "no" means "NO".

    Assuming a proposed project receives a positive "national interest" determination from the GIC, the project would then proceed to the second stage: a detailed regulatory review and environmental assessment to be carried out by a joint panel of hearing commissioners appointed by the CETC (2) , CEA Agency (2) , and a fifth "independent" hearing commissioner. It is unclear how the "independent" hearing commissioner would be appointed. The joint panel would conduct widespread engagement and would be informed by Indigenous consultation carried out by the Crown's representative (suggested to be the Major Projects Management Office). The joint panel would address issues including detailed environmental risks and mitigation measures, emergency preparedness plans, Aboriginal and treaty rights, and engineering details. The joint panel would not consider national interest or policy arguments already addressed in the preliminary GIC decision. The joint panel would have the ability to issue or deny a licence, and to impose conditions on a licence. The Panel expects this second stage of the review to take two years to complete.

  2. "Significant projects" would only be subject to a single review. The Report does not address the demarcation point between a "major project" and a "significant project", presumably leaving that distinction to Parliament or to the GIC. From a review process standpoint, the critical difference between "major projects" and "significant projects" is that the latter would not need a preliminary GIC "national interest" determination. Significant projects would only need to go through the licencing process, including detailed regulatory review and environmental assessment carried out by a joint panel comprised of hearing commissioners, as described above.
  3. "Smaller-scale" or "lower risk" projects would be reviewed only by the CETC as part of the licencing process. Once again, the line between a "smaller-scale" project and a "significant project" is not addressed in the Report. In any case, smaller-scale projects would not require a preliminary "national interest" determination by the GIC. They would still need to be licenced by the CETC, and following a review and environmental assessment, commensurate with the risks and impacts of the project. These smaller scale projects would be reviewed by the CETC and not a full joint hearing panel. The Panel recommends repealing section 58(1) of the NEB Act which gave the NEB discretion to exempt shorter pipelines (less than 40 km long) from the certification and GIC approval requirements that apply to longer pipelines. The recommended process for "smaller-scale" projects would be the successor to the section 58(1) process.


The Report includes a number of recommendations to improve relationships with Indigenous peoples, including a recommendation that the government establish and fund a new Indigenous Major Projects Office (IMPO) under the governance of Indigenous peoples. The IMPO would define processes, guidelines and accountabilities for formal consultation. It would also oversee the conduct of consultation and accommodation by the Crown, and be responsible for "assessing compliance" with consultation guidelines.

The Panel states that Crown delegates responsible for consultation with Indigenous groups "must" represent the government and that project proponents should not be delegated responsibilities for formal consultation. The Panel also states that, "the CETC, as the regulator, should not be the agent for the Crown for the purposes of Consultation, and that the Major Projects Management Office is positioned to perform the role."


The NEB Act requires the NEB to consider representations from any person considered to be "directly affected" by an application or who has relevant information or expertise. The Panel recommends repealing those standing criteria and allowing every interested party a "reasonable opportunity to participate". The Panel dismissed concerns that well-organized groups might organize thousands of individuals to flood hearings and disrupt processes.

In the spirit of facilitating public participation in CETC hearing processes, the Panel recommends creating a Public Intervenor Office to inform participants on the mechanics of the hearing process, directly represent their interests, and coordinate scientific and technical studies.


Divergence from the Canadian environmental assessment expert panel report

The Panel recommends that the GIC make a preliminary national interest determination on a proposed project at the beginning of the review process, before detailed design, regulatory review, and environmental assessments are completed. By contrast, the expert panel reviewing the environmental assessment process recommends that the GIC be involved only at the end of the process to hear any appeals from the environmental assessment authority's decision.

The Panel also recommends a single detailed regulatory review process for "major projects" and "significant projects" that integrates the CEA Agency-led environmental assessment with the CETC-led technical review, rather than parallel review processes. The expert panel reviewing the environmental assessment process recommends the opposite approach: that responsibility for environmental assessments (or "impact assessments") be separated from the technical review.

In considering the recommendations in both reports, the government will need to consider how to reconcile these different approaches to conducting project-level environmental assessments.

When is a "national interest" determination required?

As noted above, the Panel recommends that "major projects" or "projects of national consequence" be subject to a preliminary national interest determination by the GIC, while "significant projects" and "smaller-scale" or "lower risk" projects will not require such a preliminary determination. That recommendation, if adopted, would be a significant departure from the existing process where broader policy concerns are frequently raised in NEB proceedings and ultimately considered by the GIC at the end of the process.

At this stage, it is not clear what will trigger the need for a preliminary national interest determination or how such a determination will be made when triggered. Proponents will want to know with some certainty which projects will require the two-stage review process.

What level of information is required for a "national interest" determination?

One of the potential benefits of performing the national interest determination early in the regulatory process is efficiency and cost savings to project proponents. The Panel envisioned that the national interest determination would be performed "before the specific technical details of any project are even developed". However, the Panel suggests criteria such as net economic benefits, impact on and accommodation of Indigenous rights, significant or unique environmental effects, cumulative effects, and climate tests will be considered by the GIC in its national interest determination. Evaluating these criteria and conducting meaningful nation-to-nation consultation with Indigenous groups will require a certain level of information about the project and its potential impacts. It's not clear yet what level of detail might be required to make those determinations or how this information will be provided.


Presumably a large liquids pipeline, such as the proposed Energy East Project, would be considered a "major project" or a "project of national consequence". There may be benefits to this type of project proceeding through the new process where the GIC decision is made early in the process as opposed to the end of the process. This may prevent significant resources being devoted to project review processes by Indigenous groups, the Canadian public, and proponents where, regardless of the merits of the project, the end result may be a political "No". The Report does not address the process for transitioning from the current regime to the proposed new regime and it is unclear how long it may take before the government decides how to implement the Panel's recommendations.


The Government of Canada is accepting comments on the report until June 14, 2017. The Government of Canada will review the Report over the coming months along with reports from other recently-completed environmental and regulatory reviews, and consider potential legislative reform. According to its website, the Government of Canada will also work with Indigenous groups to ensure their feedback informs any potential legislative reform.

Dentons' Energy Regulatory group will continue to monitor developments relating to both the NEB and the environmental assessment reviews and will provide further updates in due course.

About Dentons

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Dentons is pleased to sponsor the Global Property Market Forum taking place November 27, 2018 in Toronto.

27 Nov 2018, Conference, Toronto, Canada
Dentons is pleased to sponsor the Global Property Market Forum taking place November 27, 2018 in Toronto. This one day forum provides participants with an intimate and informative opportunity .
30 Nov 2018, Conference, Toronto, Canada

Dentons is proud to be the presenting sponsor for Autonomous Vehicle P3s: Visions of the Future at this year’s CCPPP conference in Toronto on Nov 5-6, 2018.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions