Between 1945 and 2000, General Electric's factory in Peterborough was the epicenter for many work-related illnesses among employees and retirees, a study of chemical exposures at the plant reveals.
This however, is nothing new. The community has been saying this for quite some time, and the 173-page report confirms this. GE's plant workers built household appliances, fix different technologies and do ac repair Florence sc, also work all the way to diesel locomotive engines and fuel cells for nuclear reactors. The workers were exposed to more than 3,000 toxic chemicals in the process, some of which include 40 to be cancer causing. Workers were exposed to these chemicals at levels hundreds of times higher than what is now considered safe, says the report.
General Electric allowed workers in the past to handle the toxic substances without protective gear, which they were rarely offered. As they were paid by the piece and not by the hour in the 1980s, there was an incentive to cut corners. Seeing as about 500 lbs. of asbestos was used daily and workers did not have respiratory protection or proper ventilation, it is no wonder these employees have had trouble with their health after being exposed. The managers also knew the harm that these chemicals can cause to people without the proper protection, as early as the 1920s and 1930s.
Lead was another huge component that circulated the plant. Workers used about 40,000 lbs. in a week to produce PVC pellets until the 1980s, and also experience daily exposure to:
- Solvents
- Welding Fumes
- Epoxy Resins
- PCBs
- Beryllium
- Uranium
Daily exposure to the above without the proper protection is extremely dangerous. However, around 2000 is when safety measures were being mandated, and since then, GE's plant is a smaller operation, and spotless.
The report will be used to support occupational disease claims that were previously denied by Ontario's Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (the "WSIB"). Hundreds have filed compensation claims, and unfortunately Ontario's worker compensation system does not allow employees to sue their employer when they have been given the ability to claim benefits when they are injured or fall ill because of work.
The WSIB has been given 660 compensation claims from GE workers since 2004, with 280 accepted, more than half withdrawn, abandoned or rejected because of insufficient evidence that the conditions were work related.
"Workers that suffered from working within the plant were forced, for many years, to provide proof of their working conditions, only to be told this is anecdotal," said Sue James, whose father worked at the plant for 30 years and died of lung and spinal cancer, believed to have been caused by exposure to the chemicals used in GE's plant.
A former employee believes he developed colorectal cancer because he worked more than 22 years under asbestos-wrapped pipes, which would occasionally shed while he worked. This employee, Roger Fowler, was one of the former employees who worked on the report.
With this investigation drawing some attention, the provincial labour ministry announced it will be setting up an occupational disease response team by the end of the year to focus on chemical exposure prevention and help sick workers file compensation claims.
11 retirees worked as advisers on this report. Together, this committee along with health researchers Bob and Dale DeMatteo, interviewed over 75 former workers to gather information on working conditions and production processes.
The data collected from these workers was coupled with data from labour ministry inspection reports, joint health and safety committee minutes, company memos, industrial hygiene literature and other documents, gathered by the union.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.