Canada: Expert Panel Releases Its Review Of Canada's Environmental Assessment Process

Last Updated: April 13 2017
Article by Stanley D. Berger

On April 5, 2017 the Federal Minister of Environment and Climate Change received her report from an expert panel of four, comprised of three lawyers with significant environmental and aboriginal law experience as well as a retired senior executive of a resource company.

WHAT'S NEW

Environmental Assessment (EA) becomes Impact Assessment (IA). Moving beyond the biophysical environment to encompass all impacts on matters of federal interest both positive and negative.

Sustainability is central to IA. The five pillars of sustainability are environmental, social, economic, health and cultural well-being. The object of the IA must be an assurance that projects, plans and policies contribute a net benefit to the five pillars of sustainability, recognizing that trade-offs may be necessary.

Triggers for an IA. Likelihood of consequential impacts on matters of federal interest to the five pillars of sustainability should determine whether an IA is required. Federal policies, plans and programs which have consequential implications for a federal project would trigger a strategic IA.

Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous Peoples should be included in decision-making at all stages of IA in accordance with their own laws and customs. Further, Indigenous knowledge should be integrated into all phases of the IA, in collaboration with and with the permission and oversight of Indigenous Groups. The IA must reflect the principles of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Article 32 of UNDRIP enunciates the right of Indigenous Peoples to free, prior and informed consent. The Panel states "While indigenous Peoples have the right to say no, the Panel believes this right must be exercised reasonably"...Parties would have various options including dispute resolution at various decision points to review the reasonableness of all decisions, including the reasonableness of Indigenous Groups withholding their consent to a project going forward.

Participant Funding should be commensurate with the costs associated with meaningful participation in all stages of the IA including monitoring and follow-up.

Preparation of Impact Statement. The Panel has heard that delegation of IA responsibilities to the proponent for collection of data, conduct of studies and analysis of results has resulted "in a clear perception of bias in the results, regardless of whether this is warranted." (p.46) In response, the Panel recommends a significant shift in responsibility for the preparation of the IA document from the proponent to the Impact Assessment authority using a team of consultants and experts retained by the authority. The initial scoping of the IA even before the studies were initiated, would involve a consensus-based approach involving dialogue between interested parties and expert involvement in identifying methodological concerns. Indigenous Groups and other interested parties would provide input on the professionals selected to prepare the Impact Statement. With respect to the Impact Assessment itself, the Panel suggests that "although it would be essential for the IA authority to lead the Impact Statement, the studies that would feed into the Impact Statement could be conducted by various parties." (p.47)

Evidence-Based. IA legislation must require the development of a central consolidated and publicly available database to house all baseline and monitoring data collected for IA purposes. The IA authority should have the power to compel expertise from federal scientists and to retain external scientists to provide technical expertise as required. IA decisions must explain the criteria and trade-offs used to achieve sustainability outcomes.

IA Decision-Making. A single authority - the Impact Assessment Commission, with capacity to act quasi-judicially should conduct and decide upon IA's before any regulatory approvals may follow. This represents a shift from the current Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012 (CEAA). The current law (s. 52) confers decision-making authority for EA's primarily on three authorities - the CEAA Agency and for projects which fall within their jurisdiction, the National Energy Board (NEB) and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) respectively, both of which already have quasi-judicial authority. If any of these authorities, taking into account appropriate mitigation measures, determines that there are likely to be significant adverse environmental effects, the final decision as to whether such effects are justified, presently falls on the federal Cabinet. The Panel proposes that IA decisions should be subject to appeal to Cabinet on the basis of errors in the sustainability decision.

WHAT'S NEXT

Wider Assessment Review: CEAA 2012 narrowed the number of projects subject to review by substituting a list of projects designated by regulation for a list of regulatory approvals which captured a far greater number of projects. The Panel now recommends a potentially far broader scope of review by triggering an IA when there is a likelihood of consequential impacts on matters of federal interest on the five pillars of sustainability.

Building Trust Through Consensus & Collaboration. A consensus-based approach to the study phase and a collaborative approach to the preparation of the Impact Statement would, in the Panel's view, "eliminate the need for a lengthy information request process that frequently stops the regulatory clock and draws out assessment timelines." (p.47) The diffusion of responsibility through the various stages of the IA is a significant departure from the control currently exercised by the proponent over the preparation of the EA. Whether the Panel's recommendation will prove more efficient and achieve greater buy-in to the final product will depend upon participants' acceptance of one another's responsibilities. For example, will Indigenous Groups accept the base-line biophysical data presented by the proponent and will the proponent accept health impact studies of Indigenous Groups? The desire to work together ultimately rests with a set of common beliefs and mutual respect. The regulatory framework may facilitate this process.

Achieving Consensus - Aspiration or Prerequisite? Incorporating UNDRIP in the IA process will be a major challenge. As the Panel heard in their inquiries, for the assessment process to have legitimacy with Canada's Indigenous Peoples, potentially affected Indigenous Peoples must be directly involved in the decision-making process during each stage of the project from planning to regulatory approval and on to implementation. At the same time, while a dispute resolution process and a good understanding of the reasons for saying no to a project may offer opportunities for compromise at various stages of disagreement, there will be times when an impasse will present itself. In such cases there may be more than one Indigenous Group impacted and there may be disagreement between Indigenous Groups on the net benefits of the project. Even if all Indigenous Groups line up against the project, would the test of reasonableness in relation to a refusal to approve of a project fail to be met if the economic benefits to the nation as a whole were considered paramount? The Panel has recognized that free, prior and informed consent is not absolute. This reflects the view held by Canadian Courts in such recent cases as Prophet River First Nation and West Moberley First Nations v. Canada (Attorney General et al.) 2017 FCA 15 at par. 49; Prophet River First Nation and West Moberley First Nations v. British Columbia (Environment) (2017) BCCA 58 at par. 65, both of which upheld assessment decisions in relation to British Columbia Hydro's Site C Dam Project. Moreover, this view also reflects those of James Anaya, the former U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Matthew Coon Come, and other Aboriginal leaders in Canada, that Article 32 of UNDRIP does not endorse an absolute right of veto for Indigenous Peoples in all cases affecting Indigenous lands. As Michael Coyle, wrote in an article in 2016 in 67 University of New Brunswick Law Journal 235 at 242:

"The original draft of article 32 had provided that indigenous peoples had 'the right to require that States obtain their free and informed consent prior to the approval of any project affecting their lands, territories and other resources.' The final version, as noted, provides that states must consult with Indigenous peoples 'in order to obtain' their free and informed consent. This language lies somewhere between the right to require consent and the right to be consulted with a view to obtaining consent."

Broader Review of Alternatives. The Panel states that IA "needs to better address a review of alternatives. There is a need for an open and informed discussion about the nature of developments and including the review of pros and cons of more than one option is essential." (at p. 20) At the same time the Panel has also heard from some participants that long timelines to complete EA's reduce investor certainty, increase project costs and compromise project viability. (p.103) If the IA decision-maker's responsibility is expanded to weigh the net costs and benefits of alternatives to the project in regard to all 5 pillars of sustainability, it will have assumed the oversight role of one or more Parliamentary committees.

Timelines for Completion of Review Process. More involvement in public policy will increase timelines for completion of assessments. The right of a participant to appeal decisions of the IA decision-maker to Cabinet on the basis of sustainability errors will further increase timelines since errors of fact, are, as a general rule, not entertained by courts on judicial review and judicial review to the courts is the only available remedy currently for overturning unfavourable EA decisions. To the extent that sustainability errors are couched as errors of law, an appeal to Cabinet injects duplication and further delay into the system.

IA Authority. Regulatory authorities with specialized expertise like the NEB and the CNSC could be reluctant to relinquish their current authority for precisely the reasons which some proponents and practitioners offered the Panel during their review: technical expertise and seamless transition from the early assessment review to the progressive licensing stages in the lifecycle of a project. The regulators' familiarity with its capacity to manage impacts during the various licensing stages of a project, make it arguably more equipped to understand the actual risks to the 5 pillars of sustainability during the earlier IA, than a separate IA Decision- Making Authority.

Public Comment Period
30 days expires on May 5, 2017

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Stanley D. Berger
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.