Canada: The Growing Cost To Employers For Failing To Accommodate Disabled Employees

Last Updated: April 7 2017
Article by Carman J. Overholt and Victoria Petrenko

Two recent appellate court decisions from BC and Ontario illustrate the significant increase in the damages being awarded where an employer breaches its duty to accommodate a disabled employee. These decisions confirm the broad remedial powers of human rights tribunals, illustrate the importance of a properly formulated disability management program, and emphasize the employer's duty to accommodate a disabled employee.

Remedial Powers of Human Rights Tribunals

In addition to an award for the loss of wages incurred as a result of a discriminatory action, a human rights tribunal has jurisdiction to award a complainant compensation for injury to their "dignity, feelings, and self-respect". These awards are not meant to punish the respondent, but are meant to address the effect of the discrimination on the individual complainant.

Prior to 1992, BC human rights legislation limited damages for injury to dignity to $2,000.00. In 1992, this legislation was amended and the limit was removed. Awards for injury to dignity have steadily increased since that time. In 2008, the Tribunal made an award of $35,000.00 for a complainant's injury to dignity, which remained the highest award until 2013.

In addition to monetary compensation, the Tribunal can make declaratory orders that the respondent engaged in discriminatory conduct, order that the respondent cease and refrain from further discriminatory conduct, and/or make remedial orders, such as ordering that a complainant be reinstated to their position if they were dismissed for discriminatory reasons.

As the cases below illustrate, the financial impact of an employer's discriminatory action – whether that action was intentional or not – can result in very significant damages.

University of British Columbia v Kelly, 2016 BCCA 271

Last year, the BC Court of Appeal upheld the highest ever award for injury to dignity from the BC Human Rights Tribunal1. The complainant was awarded $75,000.00 to compensate him for injury to dignity following his removal from the University of British Columbia's Medical Residency Program.

Dr. Kelly was a resident in family medicine through the UBC Program. He suffered from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ("ADHD") and a non-verbal learning disorder ("NVLD"). He experienced significant difficulty in completing UBC's Program, despite UBC's ongoing attempts to modify the program for him. UBC ultimately determined that Dr. Kelly lacked the requisite skills needed to complete the Program, and could not be further accommodated without undue hardship to UBC. This led to Dr. Kelly's removal from the Program.

Dr. Kelly initiated proceedings against UBC, alleging discrimination in employment in breach of the BC Human Rights Code. The Tribunal found that Dr. Kelly's disabilities were a factor in the decision to terminate his participation in the Program, and that UBC breached its duty to accommodate those disabilities to the point of undue hardship. UBC argued that it had made sufficient modifications to the Program, and any further modifications would have resulted in a fundamental change to the Program at significant cost to UBC. The Tribunal disagreed. It found that there was sufficient evidence that UBC was able to provide further accommodation, "albeit with some inconvenience", and that they failed to do so. In Providence Health Care v Dunkley, 2016 BCSC 1383, the BC Supreme Court provided a benchmark as to what would be considered "undue hardship" when it confirmed that the cost of providing interpreter services to a deaf medical resident, estimated at upwards of 2.5 million dollars, did not amount to undue hardship for the university or the hospital.

In addition to reinstatement to the program and compensation for loss of wages, the Tribunal awarded Dr. Kelly $75,000.00 for the injury to his "dignity, feelings, and self-respect". The Tribunal concluded that Dr. Kelly suffered deep humiliation and embarrassment as a result of the discrimination, and that as a result of the wrongful termination of his participation in the Program he was unable to complete his training and enter into his chosen profession. These factors led to the Tribunal awarding Dr. Kelly $75,000.00, the highest ever award for injury to dignity in B.C.

UBC applied for judicial review of the Tribunal's decision to the Supreme Court of British Columbia2. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that UBC had engaged in discrimination, and that Dr. Kelly was entitled to lost wages. However, the Tribunal's award for injury to dignity was set aside on the basis that the Court found it to be an arbitrary number, not based on principle, and not supported by the evidence that was before the Tribunal. Both UBC and Dr. Kelly appealed the BCSC decision.

The BC Court of Appeal upheld the decisions of the Tribunal and the Supreme Court regarding discrimination and loss of wages. Further, the BC Court of Appeal allowed Dr. Kelly's appeal and reinstated the Tribunal's award for injury to dignity in the amount of $75,000.00. The Court held that there was no basis for interfering with the Tribunal's weighing of Dr. Kelly's evidence and the award for injury to dignity. The BC Court of Appeal held that just because the prior ceiling of injury to dignity awards had been maintained at $35,000.00 for a number of years, it was not unreasonable for the Tribunal to exceed this amount in this particular case. The BCCA confirmed that past precedent should not be so binding as to prevent the Tribunal from adequately compensating a complainant for his or her injury to dignity3.

Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v Fair, 2016 ONCA 421

In Ontario, an employee was reinstated after taking a medical leave and compensated for nearly nine years of unpaid wages, which was the time that had lapsed since the time of her dismissal to the time she was reinstated.

Ms. Sharon Fair was an employee of the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board (the "School Board") where she worked as a Supervisor, Regulated Substances, Asbestos. Ms. Fair took a leave of absence in 2001 to address her generalized anxiety disorder. While on leave, she was also diagnosed with depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and began receiving long term disability benefits. Although she was unable to return to her original position with the School Board due to the demands of the role, her doctors ultimately cleared her to return to work, albeit in an alternative position. However, the School Board argued that they could not place Ms. Fair in an alternative position because of the limitations associated with her disability. Her employment was ultimately terminated in 2004, and she filed a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal.

Under the Ontario Human Rights Code, RSO 1990, c H.19, it is within the Tribunal's jurisdiction to order that an employee be reinstated to their position if they were dismissed from that position due to discrimination. When the Tribunal heard Ms. Fair's complaint in 2012, they found that not only did the School Board fail to accommodate her disability up to the point of undue hardship, but that the best way to remedy Ms. Fair's situation would be to reinstate her with full back pay4. As a result, Ms. Fair was awarded loss of wages from June 26, 2003, to the date of the Tribunal's decision in 2012.

The Tribunal found that the School Board never had a true intention to accommodate Ms. Fair upon her return to work. There was evidence presented during the hearing that the School Board held the position that all jobs with the School Board were demanding, and that there were no other positions that would be less demanding for her should she be able to return to work. As in Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd./Ltée. v Kerr5, where the BC Court of Appeal upheld a finding of discrimination when the employer assumed, without seeking clarification or expert opinion, that a disabled employee could not return to work and perform the duties of her position, the Tribunal here found that the School Board failed to inquire with their own experts or with Ms. Fair's treating psychiatrist as to the kind of employment that Ms. Fair was capable of upon her return to work.

Although the School Board sought judicial review of the Tribunal's decisions, both the Ontario Superior Court of Justice6> and the Court of Appeal upheld the Tribunal's decision. In doing so, the Courts emphasized that the determination of remedy falls within the specialized expertise of the Human Rights Tribunal, and should not be interfered with lightly.

In seeking judicial review, the School Board tried to argue that reinstatement was "unreasonable, unprecedented, and disproportionate", particularly given how many years had passed since Ms. Fair has been dismissed. However, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that the passage of time is not determinative of whether reinstatement should be ordered. The appropriateness of the remedies that the Tribunal can award is context-dependant. In this situation, the Court found that the Tribunal's decision to reinstate, though rarely granted, was not unreasonable.

Human Resources Management – Best Practices

The extraordinary remedies awarded in these recent decisions illustrate the significant financial consequences of discrimination in employment. Where an employee can establish a nexus between their protected characteristic and the termination of their employment (or otherwise adverse treatment), there may be the basis for a significant financial award.

Although the duty to accommodate arises regardless of the nature of the employee's personal and protected characteristic, both the Kelly and Fair decisions involved accommodation of an employee's disability. For an employer faced with accommodating an employee's physical or mental disability, these cases emphasize the need for expert advice and a careful approach in exploring options as to how the duty to accommodate can be appropriately satisfied.

It is important for the employer to obtain information about the employee and their disability. Employers have a duty to inquire where they have reason to believe that an employee's disability or medical condition may be a factor in the employee's ability to perform the duties of their position. If an employee cannot meet a reasonable workplace standard, it will be necessary to determine whether that standard is a bona fide occupational requirement. If it is not, the employer will need to accommodate the employee to the point of undue hardship.

Ending the employment relationship in circumstances where the employee is disabled raises the real prospect of a contravention of human rights legislation. Obtaining expert medical and vocational opinions and identifying ways in which the employee might be accommodated in the workplace is necessary in order for the employer to satisfy the duty to accommodate. Given the findings of the Courts in the Kelly and Fair decisions, employers may be required to make significant changes in how they operate and undertake considerable expense to satisfy their obligations to accommodate a disabled employee.

Footnotes

1. Kelly v University of British Columbia (No. 4), 2013 BCHRT 302.

2. University of British Columbia v Kelly, 2015 BCSC 1731.

3. University of British Columbia v Kelly, 2016 BCCA 271 at para 60, citing Nixon v Vancouver Rape Relief Society, 2002 BCHRT 1, at para 245.

4. Fair v Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board; 2012 HRTO 350 and 2013 HRTO 440.

5. 2011 BCCA 266 (on appeal from 2010 BCSC 427 and 2009 BCHRT 196).

6. Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v Fair, 2014 ONSC 2411.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.