Canada: Site C And The Honour Of The Crown: Prophet River First Nation v Canada (Attorney General)

Last Updated: March 1 2017
Article by Thomas Isaac and Arend J.A. Hoekstra

On January 23, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the approval of the Site C Clean Energy Project (Site C) in Prophet River First Nation v Canada (Attorney General)1. The appeal was made by Prophet River First Nation (PRFN), who contended that the Governor in Council (GIC) failed to consider whether their treaty rights were infringed by Site C in accordance with the Sparrow2 framework. The Court concluded that the Sparrow framework had been superseded by the Haida Nation3 framework, which prioritizes consultation rather than the determination of Aboriginal rights.

Understanding Treaty Rights

Aboriginal and treaty rights are constitutionally protected rights. The protection owed to these rights by the Crown depends on where they fall on a spectrum, between claimed but unaffirmed rights and affirmed and recognized rights.4

The treaty rights asserted by PRFN fall between claimed and affirmed rights. While PRFN is a party to Treaty 8 which provides rights including hunting and fishing rights, "the scope of [treaty rights] on Aboriginal peoples' traditional territories still needs to be delineated."5 PRFN's treaty rights would only cover a fraction of the Treaty 8 lands which cover an area larger than Manitoba. According to the test set out in Sparrow, PRFN argued that it was the duty of the GIC to evaluate and conclude on PRFN's rights, and justify their infringement.6

Sparrow v Haida Nation – an Honourable Evolution

Under the Sparrow test, the impacted Aboriginal right must first be evaluated and proven. Once a right has been established, the Crown must then justify the infringement of the right.7 "[This] approach proved to be complex and often resulted in years of litigation."8

The 2004 Haida Nation decision provided a new and contrasting framework, intended to restore collaboration and the prominence of the honour of the Crown. The Haida Nation framework "imposed on the Crown a duty to consult and accommodate, if necessary, in the event a project might have a significant impact on claimed Aboriginal rights."9 Importantly, the Haida Nation framework does away with the intensive and adversarial requirement to prove Aboriginal rights.

The Court found that the Sparrow approach advocated by PRFN was irreconcilable with the process in Haida Nation as it would "considerably weaken the application of the duty to consult,"10 a fundamental attribute of the honour of the Crown.

The Honour of the Crown and Reciprocal Obligations

The Court noted that the Sparrow framework was not necessary in these circumstances since the PRFN's asserted rights could have been addressed and protected through the Haida Nation framework, with its focus on consultation. One function of consultation is to inform the Crown of the interests and rights of First Nations and to determine how those rights will be impacted. While the Crown has a right under Treaty 8 to take up land from time to time, the honour of the Crown limits how and to what degree Aboriginal rights may be impacted.11

The consultation and accommodation process related to the Project was, from the outset, "set at the deep end of the consultation spectrum."12 Yet the Court noted that the PRFN did not meaningfully engage in the consultation process. For example, a territorial map was provided which showed the aggregate territories of four First Nations covering more than 121,000 km2 and included a legend suggesting additional, unmarked territories.13 The Crown's request for a map specific to PRFN was refused.14 Moreover, among the documentation provided during consultation was evidence suggesting that PRFN principally exercised their treaty rights 200 km north of the Project area.15

The process of consultation set out in Haida Nation "require[s] good faith efforts to understand each other's concerns and move to address them."16 These are reciprocal duties intended to foster reconciliation through dialogue.17 "The appellants had the duty to provide information for the determination of their traditional territories and the scope of their treaty rights in order to demonstrate that the potential impact of the [Project] was so severe so as to constitute infringement."18

Had the PRFN engaged more fully in the Crown's consultations, they could have better informed the Crown. The honour of the Crown would have required the Crown to give additional consideration to this information and, if appropriate, limited its actions accordingly. By acting based on the information it had available and by requesting additional information from PRFN, the Crown satisfied its obligations to act in accordance with the honour of the Crown.

The Court also mentioned that "it is insufficient for the appellants to assert treaty rights by merely alleging preferred areas without any specification with respect to the traditional land use area in which the rights were historically and are currently exercised."19 While this assertion is consistent with the reciprocal duties discussed above, the wording is in direct contrast with the Sparrow framework20 and is further evidence that the Court is attempting shift to a new legal framework.

Other Determinations

Though Prophet River could have been addressed simply on the basis of the evolution from Sparrow to Haida Nation, the Court went on to conclude: (A) that the GIC is not the correct forum for evaluating and assessing treaty rights, as the GIC is not an adjudicative body21 and is "focused rather on a variety of considerations – often referred to as polycentric – and thereby seeks to balance a variety of interests"22; and (B) that a judicial review is not the appropriate forum for determining treaty rights, as the judicial review process "is a summary proceeding and, generally, the only material that is considered by the Court is the material that was before the decision-maker,"23 while an assessment of Aboriginal rights requires "a full discovery, examination of expert evidence, as well as historical testimonial and documentary evidence."24

Conclusions

This decision provides a unique analysis of the shift from the Sparrow framework to the Haida Nation framework and its implications for Aboriginal peoples and the Crown. Consultation consists of reciprocal obligations, the purpose of which are to inform the Crown and foster dialogue. The results of consultation will determine the Crown's obligations to Aboriginal peoples pursuant to the honour of the Crown. In addition to restating the present requirements under the Haida Nation framework, the Court's decision fits in to a larger and consistent theme in Aboriginal jurisprudence: the importance of reconciliation between Aboriginal peoples and the Crown.

Footnotes

1. Prophet River First Nation v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 15 [Prophet River].

2. R. v. Sparrow, [1990] 1 SCR 1075 [Sparrow]

3. Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), [2004] 3 SCR 511 [Haida]

4. Prophet River, supra para 36.

5. Ibid.

6. Prophet River, supra para 1.

7. Sparrow, supra

8. Prophet River, supra para 57.

9. Prophet River, supra para 34.

10. Prophet River, supra para 57.

11. Prophet River, supra para 61.

12. Prophet River, supra para 11.

13. Prophet River, supra para 52.

14. Prophet River, supra para 52.

15. Prophet River, supra para 55.

16. Haida, supra para 49.

17. Prophet River, supra para 49.

18. Prophet River, supra para 51.

19. Prophet River, supra para 50.

20. Sparrow, supra

21. The GIC "lacks the necessary hallmarks associated with adjudicative bodies: public hearings, ability to summon witnesses and compel production of documents and the receipt of submissions by interested parties" [Prophet River, supra para 70].

22. Prophet River, supra para 70.

23. Prophet River, supra para 78.

24. Prophet River, supra para 78.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Thomas Isaac
Arend J.A. Hoekstra
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions