Canada: Have We Reached A Tipping Point?

Last Updated: February 16 2017
Article by Jeremy Schwartz and Frank Portman

Any time that an Ontario construction industry employer is targeted by a union's application for certification, the details are critical.  Filing deadlines are tight and strictly enforced.  The process is heavily reliant on both the union and the employer fully participating and disclosing their knowledge of the workers and worksites at issue. 

Two recent cases demonstrate the difficulties inherent in the substantial informational requirements foisted on employers who must file a complete response to an application within only two days of receiving it.  At a certain point, it may become a question of more than procedural fairness, but of whether the critical accuracy upon which the Ontario Labour Relations Board relies is being sacrificed for unnecessarily early comprehensiveness.  Have we reached the tipping point?

Card Check Certification and the "Day of Application Test"

Construction unions almost always apply for card-check certification, which means they may be certified without a vote if they file membership evidence on behalf of at least 55% of the bargaining unit.  To determine whether a union has the requisite support, the Board takes a snapshot of the application filing date to see which employees performed the work of the bargaining unit for a majority of that day.  This Day of Application Test (the "Test") is not found in the Act – the Board developed it decades ago and has applied it ever since.  The practical application of the Test is that even the most mundane detail of an employee's work may be critical.  Quite literally, an employee may be deemed a painter one day and a labourer the next, depending what tasks he performed for a majority of each day.

In any application for certification, the Act provides that an employer must, within two days of its receipt of the application, file a list of all employees in the bargaining unit.  For an employer with a large workforce and multiple concurrent projects underway, obtaining and sorting the data to determine who performed bargaining unit work for a majority of a particular day can be quite daunting, especially where there may be multiple trades involved.  This requirement alone can therefore be quite onerous.

Nevertheless, over the years the Board has expanded employers' filing obligations beyond the legislated requirements, through rule and response form amendments, to pack a lot of additional "required" information into the already brief two-day response deadline.

For instance, we have written before about the Board's recent decision to impose a new requirement that employers provide detailed information setting out the specific part of each job site on which each employee was working on the application date.  If the employer fails to provide that information, there is a strong possibility that the Board will disregard the work at those sites, and may lead to otherwise eligible employees being excluded from the constituency.

When is Fraud not Fraud?

In the first case, Govan Brown and Associates Limited, the dispute centered around the conduct of a union supporter on the application date.  This supporter had lied to his site supervisor, telling him that his co-worker would not be coming in as scheduled.  In fact, that co-worker had come to the site but was unable to find anyone to work with and had gone home.  The supporter had then repeatedly asked to bring in another co-worker to the worksite, and had eventually done so without permission.  That new co-worker was a union supporter whose presence appears to have been critical to the success of the application – filed that day (the day on which the Board takes the snapshot).

In response to this seemingly unsavoury tactic, the employer argued that the actions of the union resulted in the presence of a worker who "wasn't supposed to be there" and who should therefore not be considered to be part of the constituency of employees for the purposes of the Test.  The employer pointed to a long line of decisions in applications to terminate union bargaining rights, in which the Board held that where an employer brings employees in to work solely for the purpose of voting against the union, those employees do not count.  The employer suggested that the analysis should be no different when the union, through deception, similarly manipulates the workforce to assist in an application for certification.

The employer argued that the union supporter's conduct ought to be considered that of the union.  It argued that this individual's actions irredeemably tainted the application.

The Board rejected the employer's argument, reasoning that employers have no right to know if a potential employee is on site solely to assist in an application for certification.  Moreover, unlike in termination applications, there is no power imbalance to correct as between an employer and the union.  Thus, the Board distinguished the termination application caselaw, finding that the basis for the Board's differential treatment of similar employer tactics in termination applications was the power imbalance between the employer and employees, which was not present in an application for certification where the employer is likely unaware that the application is being filed until after the fact.

The Board has long interpreted a provision in the Act prohibiting fraud and misrepresentation as being limited to fraud and misrepresentation "on the Board".  Generally speaking, misrepresentations between the parties alone are insufficient to bar an application.  The Board held that in this case there was no fraud on the Board. 

Finally, the Board held that there is no special relationship between an employer and a union or from an employee towards its employer that would require the disclosure of information such as that concealed in this case. 

It is important to note that this was a preliminary decision.  The Board has not ruled that the new co-worker was "employed" by the employer and "performed bargaining unit work for a majority of the day".  However, if the employer was aware that the new co-worker came to the site and suffered him to work, and if his work was primarily bargaining unit work, it seems likely the individual will be in for the count. 

Obviously, this is a major victory for unions, who do not want to have their actions in the lead-up to an application for certification closely scrutinized by the Board.

This blind eye also allows for greater manipulation by a union in determining the constituency of the bargaining unit.  Such manipulation may disenfranchising workers who do not support the union, which could compromise the objectivity of the Test.

However, the vulnerability of the system to misrepresentations and omissions is not limited to the date of application.  Another recent decision shows how fragile the process of litigating an application for certification can be where a union does not fully disclose all material facts.

A Sin of Omission

In Kenmore Developments Waterloo, the employer provided in its timely response the names of four individuals who it said constituted the bargaining unit.  It indicated that they had been performing work on a particular worksite.  However, as the case unfolded, it became clear that the employer was also relying on work performed on a second worksite ("Worksite B").  Critically, the employees in dispute had also performed work at the jobsite named in the employer's response ("Worksite A"), or our story would have had a far briefer and tragically mundane ending.

At the case management hearing, the union objected to the admission of any evidence about work performed on Worksite B.  The union alleged that it was irreparably prejudiced by the late disclosure, arguing that it would now be a "waste of effort" to investigate the site due to the passage of time.  

The Board agreed, and held that the employer was not permitted to rely on evidence of work performed at Worksite B on the application date in its case.

This could have ended the issue.  However, there was a critical twist in the story:  The Board's Rules require the parties to make documentary disclosure at least ten days prior to the first day of hearing.  When the employer received the union's documents, it was shocked to discover notes from the union's organizers which not only established that the union was aware of Worksite B – on the application date, but its organizers had actually been present at Worksite B several times that day. 

The Employer immediately brought a Request for Reconsideration of the Board's decision to exclude the evidence, arguing that the organizer's notes showed the union was not prejudiced by the failure to include Worksite B in its response because it had been aware of the site and observed it directly on the application date.

The Board issued a reconsideration decision in which it completely reversed its initial decision.

The Board held that, had it known that the union had investigated Worksite B on the application date, it would have been much less likely to exclude the evidence as to their work.  The Board stated that its understanding at the case management hearing was clearly that the union was totally unaware of the existence of the site, and that this supported the union's argument that it had suffered prejudice.  This understanding, the Board said, was apparent to all present.  The Board found that it was incumbent on the union to have advised the Board of the presence of its organizers on Worksite B, as it clearly went to the central issue of what prejudice the union suffered.

As a result of the union's failure to disclose, the Board exercised its discretion to allow evidence from Worksite B, even though it was late filed and the employer had not offered a reason for failing to initially disclose the information.  The union's failure to correct the Board's clear misunderstanding of central facts that were only within the union's knowledge damaged the union's claims of prejudice to the degree that the evidence would not be excluded on that basis.

Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of the reconsideration decision is that it very nearly never happened.  If the disputed employees had not also performed work on Worksite A, they would likely have been excluded from the constituency at the case management hearing when the evidence of their work on Worksite B was barred.  Had the union not disclosed the Worksite B related documents, neither the employer nor the Board would likely ever have become aware of the organizers' presence at Worksite B.  This could have disenfranchised all or some of those disputed employees.

What Can Be Done?

The problems faced by the employers in these cases are unlikely to arise in every case.

However, they illustrate the challenges with the Board's historically harsh approach towards employers seeking to correct even innocent errors or omissions in the application response.   As the information that employers must provide becomes more and more detailed, the likelihood of such an error or omission increases substantially.  If these errors or omissions continue to be treated in such a strict way, this increases the likelihood of the disenfranchisement of some employees.  This is contrary to the stated purposes of the Act.

Likewise troubling to the employer community, is the legitimization of tactics that a lay person would no doubt view as unscrupulous gerrymandering.  Given the probability that the Board will preclude the introduction of evidence when the disclosure of a site is late, unions will be more likely to avoid mentioning facts that may impact their assertions of prejudice. 

For employers, these decisions underscore the need to have an organizational plan in place to respond to union organizing drives and applications.  This plan will include training for supervisors on some of the underhanded tactics employed by some organizers and supporters, and ensuring that the organization is ready and able to respond quickly and accurately to an application for certification.  That will almost certainly involve engaging labour relations counsel at the earliest time in the process – or better yet – before there is a process.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Jeremy Schwartz
Frank Portman
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.