Canada: It's Personal: Board Refusal Of A Requisition Of A Meeting Of Shareholders

Last Updated: February 15 2017
Article by Mark Wilson

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the "Court") in its recent decision in Koh v. Ellipsiz Communications Ltd. has contributed to the line of cases defining the ability of a shareholder to exercise the right to requisition a meeting of shareholders under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) (the "OBCA"). 


In November 2015, Ellipsiz Communications Ltd. ("ECL") became a public company following the completion of a reverse takeover. The principal asset of ECL is a wholly-owned Taiwanese operating subsidiary, Ellipsiz Communications Taiwan Ltd. ("ECTW"). ECTW operates an engineering services business that provides technical engineering services to major telecommunications companies in Taiwan. 

On May 18, 2016, ECL's board of directors (the "Board") unanimously approved a management information circular for ECL's annual meeting of shareholders to be held on June 30, 2016 (the "Meeting"),which included a proposed slate of directors comprised of the largest shareholder of ECL (the "Requisitioner"), the president of ECL and ECTW, three resident Canadians (the "Canadian Directors") and another individual. 

On or about June 29, 2016, the Requisitioner (who owned approximately 42% of the outstanding shares of ECL) changed his mind and attempted to withhold his votes in respect of the Canadian Directors at the Meeting. At the Meeting, the scrutineer rejected the Requisitioner's proxy, and the slate of directors proposed by ECL was elected, including the Canadian Directors. 

In August 2016, the Requisitioner demanded that the Canadian Directors resign, failing which he would requisition another shareholders meeting to remove them. When the Canadian Directors failed to resign, the Requisitioner submitted a requisition (the "Requisition") pursuant to the OBCA seeking a shareholders meeting to be convened to consider two resolutions -  a resolution to remove the Canadian Directors and, if approved, a further resolution to elect three new directors identified in the Requisition. 

The Board rejected the Requisition. The basis for its decision was its assertion that the Requisition was for the primary purpose of redressing a personal grievance of the Requisitioner against ECL and its directors. In particular, among other items, the Board claimed that the Requisitioner: (i) wanted to be chairman of ECL and ECTW; (ii) wanted to be ECL's negotiator in respect of a potential ECL acquisition; (iii) wanted to arrange financing for ECL; and (iv) insisted on reimbursement of expenses related to ECL. As such, the Board asserted that it was entitled to decline the Requisition pursuant to the OBCA. 

The Requisitioner applied to the Court seeking, among other relief, a declaration that the Requisition was valid.               

The Requisition Right

Under the OBCA, the  holders  of  not  less  than  five per  cent  of  the  issued  shares  of  a corporation that carry the right to vote at a meeting sought to be held may requisition the directors to call a meeting of shareholders for the purposes stated in the requisition. Upon receiving the requisition, the directors must call a meeting of shareholders to transact the business stated in the requisition unless: (i) a record date has been fixed and notice thereof has been given; (ii) the directors have called a meeting of shareholders and have given notice thereof; or (iii) the business of the meeting as stated in the requisition includes certain prescribed matters, including those in which it clearly appears that the primary purpose of the requisition is to enforce a personal claim or redress a personal grievance against the corporation or its directors, officers or security holders. The Board refused the Requisition on the basis of (iii). 

The Contending Positions of the Parties

In support of the rejection of the Requisition, ECL submitted to the Court that the fundamental cause of the dispute between the Requisitioner and ECL was that the Requisitioner objected to what he perceived to be a lack of respect for him, particularly in his capacity as the largest shareholder of ECL. ECL contended that the evidence demonstrated that the Requisition was primarily directed to redressing this personal grievance against the Canadian Directors, whom the Requisitioner believed had frustrated or impeded his personal agenda. 

The Requisitioner claimed that there was nothing on the face of the Requisition that supported the Board's view that the primary purpose of the Requisition was to redress a personal grievance. The Requisitioner characterized the purpose of the Requisition as being the reconstitution of the Board and submitted that this purpose related entirely to the business and affairs of ECL. The Requisitioner claimed that there was no evidence to support the Board's determination that the Requisition was for the primary purpose of allowing the Requisitioner to seek personal retribution or redress of a personal grievance against the Canadian Directors, and that the Canadian Directors were attempting to entrench themselves as directors in breach of their duties to ECL's shareholders. 

The Decision of the Court

In answering the question of what constitutes a personal grievance for the purposes of the requisition right in the OBCA, the Court stated that a personal grievance "involves a dispute that does not entail an issue of corporate policy or operations, but rather involves an issue primarily pertaining to the personal interest of the complainant." The Court further stated that relevant considerations could include "not only the nature of the dispute at issue, but also: (i) the extent to which such dispute is properly the subject of a shareholders meeting, or lies within the domain of the directors; and (ii) the extent to which the complainant acted alone or with the support of other like-minded individuals." 

The Court also set out the following principles in evaluating whether the rejection by a board of a requisition as a personal grievance is justified: 

  • The OBCA requires that a board must call a requisitioned meeting unless it is "clearly apparent" that the business proposed by the requisitioner is proposed for the primary purpose of redressing a personal grievance.
  • It is necessary for a board to look beyond the language of a requisition to determine the primary purpose for which the requisition is put forward. In making this determination, a board is not making a business decision. Rather, the board's determination must be made on the basis of objective evidence in the form of the requisitioner's actions, including an examination of any documentation prepared and delivered by the requisitioner. The objective evidence cannot be limited only to an examination of the resolutions in the requisition.
  • A determination of the requisitioner's primary purpose must be made against a standard of what a director would reasonably find based on the evidence before the directors.
  • The OBCA imposes a high threshold of proof (the onus of the proof being on the board) by virtue of the requirement that it must be clearly apparentthat the primary purpose of a requisition is to enforce a personal claim or redress a personal grievance. A board's authority to refuse to call a meeting depends on such a finding. This reflects, among other things, the fact that the right of dissident shareholders to requisition a meeting of shareholders is a fundamental right in respect of corporate governance afforded by the OBCA. 

With respect to the evidence before the Court, ECL submitted affidavits of each of the Canadian Directors and the president of ECL and ECTW, which included correspondence from the Requisitioner, minutes of meetings of the boards of ECL and one of its subsidiaries, and other documentary evidence. The Requisitioner did not submit any evidence regarding his purpose in making the Requisition. The Court noted that the Requisitioner's letter demanding the resignation of the Canadian Directors did not set out any specific issues of corporate policy in dispute between the Requisitioner and the Canadian Directors, and that "there is no evidence before the Court that the Board had functioned in a dysfunctional manner nor that any directors had engaged in clandestine activity. Nor is there any evidence of any complaints from any shareholders other than the applicant [the Requisitioner]." 

Based on this evaluation of the evidence, the Court found that the Board had properly exercised its right to reject the Requisition, and declined to issue a declaration that the Requisition was valid:

"The foregoing evidence collectively supports the conclusion that the applicant's alleged concerns were never credible. Accordingly, I conclude that the evidence regarding the applicant's opposition to the reconstitution of the board of directors does not reveal any serious difference of opinion among the directors regarding the corporate governance or operations of ECTW. Instead, I find that the applicant was, in fact, principally concerned to maintain his position as a director and chairman of ECTW." 

"In a larger sense, the acrimony between the applicant and the Canadian Directors reflects a conflict between the applicant's sense of his entitlement as the largest shareholder of ECL and the Canadian Directors' position that these matters are properly addressed by the Board and that, as a director, the applicant should act in the best interests of ECL. The important point is that the evidence described above regarding the five matters in dispute demonstrates that the applicant's position reflected his own personal interests rather than any larger sense of the best interests of ECL. In other words, the dispute does not reflect a significant difference between the parties regarding corporate policy or corporate operations."


Koh v. Ellipsiz Communications Ltd. is an important decision because in it the Court sets out principles in examining whether a requisition has been validly rejected by a corporation's board on the grounds that it is a personal grievance. The parties to the case agreed that until this decision of the Court, there was no case law directly on point. 

There have been a number of cases in recent years in which shareholders whose requisitions have been rejected, or hindered, by boards have complained to the courts. The results of these cases have been generally unfavourable to the requisitioning shareholders. For example, courts have taken a strict statutory interpretation approach in judging whether shareholders have properly followed prescribed procedures to exercise the requisition right. This literal approach has enabled boards to thwart substantively valid requisitions on technical grounds. Courts have also deferred to the business judgement of boards as to when a requisitioned meeting should be held; this deference has given boards strategic advantages as to the timing of putting contentious matters to votes of shareholders. 

For activist investors, Koh v. Ellipsiz Communications Ltd. gives some welcome relief from this board-friendly trend. The decision puts the onus on the board to clearly prove that it had reason to block the requisition. Critically, the appropriateness of a board's actions will be judged objectively, and not by giving deference to the business judgement of the board. Also, the decision gives practical guidance respecting behavior that will fall into the "personal grievance" category. Presumably, in most instances, this behavior should not be problematic to avoid. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.