Canada: Alberta Court Of Appeal Speaks To Owner's Discretion In The Bid Process

The Alberta Court of Appeal1 has recently considered the limits on a company's discretion to award the general contract in the tendering process. The teaser is that a company does not have sole and unfettered discretion to award the general contract to any bidder. Rather, the assessment of the bids must be based on the bid criteria provided to the bidders.


In the summer of 2010 the South Fish Creek Recreation Association (Fish Creek) solicited tenders for a planned expansion to the South Fish Creek Recreation Complex, including the addition of two ice surfaces and multi-purpose rooms (the Project). Fish Creek received 11 tenders, 10 of which it deemed compliant with the bid criteria.

The Instruction to Bidders outlined an evaluation matrix that would be the basis for assessing the 10 compliant bids. Up to 100 points were to be allocated under 4 categories: (a) price (35 points); (b) completion date (35 points); (c) experience with arena projects (20 points); and (d) references for arena experience (10 points).

The Instruction to Bidders indicated that August 11, 2011 was the desired completion date, so that the ice surfaces would be ready for the upcoming hockey season. The tender process came down to 2 bids — one from Elan Construction Limited (Elan) and the other from Chandos Construction Ltd. (Chandos). Fish Creek awarded the contract to Chandos.

Elan sued Fish Creek for approximately $700,000 in damages, alleging that Fish Creek wrongfully awarded the general contract to Chandos. Elan specifically challenged Fish Creek's method of awarding points under both the completion date and experience headings.

In the completion date category, Fish Creek awarded 25 points to Elan and 34 points to Chandos. This allocation was made by Fish Creek in spite of Elan proposing an earlier substantial completion date (August 1 vs. August 31) and less time to correct deficiencies (14 days vs. 30 days).

In the experience category, Fish Creek awarded 12 points to Elan and 20 points to Chandos. Elan took issue with Chandos introducing a new site supervisor for its bid after the bid submission deadline had passed. Fish Creek wanted the new site supervisor involved in the Project, and Elan argued that this desire influenced the points allotted under the experience heading, and ultimately improperly motivated Fish Creek to award the contract to Chandos.

The Trial Decision — Elan Wins a Nominal Moral Victory

At trial, the Court found that Fish Creek wrongfully awarded the contract to Chandos. However, the trial judge awarded only the nominal sum of $1,000 to Elan in damages. This was because Chandos had suffered significant losses, approximately $600,000, during the course of the Project. Chandos completed the Project 158 days after its scheduled completion date due in part to poor weather, issues with subcontractors and design flaws in the Project. The trial judge determined that Elan could not have avoided the same losses experienced by Chandos.

The Appeal — Elan is Vindicated and Awarded Significant Damages

Elan appealed the damages award. Fish Creek cross-appealed the trial judge's finding that it wrongfully awarded the general contract to Chandos.

Court of Appeal agreed with trial judge on liability

The Alberta Court of Appeal considered Fish Creek's claim that the privilege or exclusion clause in the Instruction to Bidders allowed it to award the general contract to any bidder without consequence. It found that even a robust privilege or exclusion clause did not give Fish Creek unfettered discretion to award the general contract to any bidder.

The Court of Appeal noted that the privilege clause was strongly worded, providing Fish Creek with "considerable room to manoeuvre" when assessing bids:

5.1 The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all Bids received and also reserves the right, if it is in its interest to do so, to waive informalities in the Bid or failure to comply with all bidding requirements. The lowest Bid will not necessarily be accepted.

5.2 By submitting a Bid, the bidder acknowledges and agrees that the Owner has, and is hereby entitled to exercise, the sole and unfettered discretion to award the points for the evaluation of the criteria noted below.

5.3 By submitting a Bid, each bidder acknowledges and agrees that it waives any right to contest any legal proceedings regarding the decision of the Owner to award points under the criteria noted below. (emphasis added)

However, even with a robust privilege clause, the Court of Appeal would not interpret the "sole and unfettered" discretion to mean that Fish Creek could assess bids based on criteria which were not disclosed in the Instruction to Bidders. The Court of Appeal reasoned that this would be contrary to bidders' reasonable expectations and would undermine the legitimacy of the tendering process.

Applying this reasoning, the Court of Appeal agreed with the trial judge that assigning points for Completion Date based on proximity to a date other than the desired completion date was contrary to bidders' expectations and a breach of contract. Rather than rewarding Elan for submitting a completion date which was earlier than Fish Creek's desired completion date, it actually penalized Elan for doing so.

When allotting the Completion Date points, Fish Creek removed 4 bids with the same or earlier completion dates than Elan, and then averaged the remaining 6 proposed completion dates. This created a notional date of September 5, 2011. Fish Creek then allotted points based on proximity to the notional date rather than the desired completion date. Further, Fish Creek had no explanation for why it removed 4 bids when it calculated the notional date.

Because Fish Creek had so arbitrarily awarded points for the completion date category, both the trial judge and the Court of Appeal concluded that Elan should have received the general contract.

The Court of Appeal awarded substantial damages

The Court of Appeal overturned the trial judge's $1,000 damage award.

Driving this decision was the Court of Appeal's view that Fish Creek was required to prove that Elan would have experienced the same losses that Chandos did in performing the general contract, rather than Elan having to prove that it would not have experienced the same difficulties as Chandos.

The Court of Appeal found that trial judge's approach to damages was problematic for 3 reasons:

  • Fish Creek did not plead in its Statement of Defence that Elan should be denied damages because it would have lost money just like Chandos. This was unfair because Elan reasonably did not submit evidence to rebut a claim that had not been pled.
  • There was no factual basis to conclude that Elan would have experienced the same losses as Chandos on the Project. Elan's burden was to prove its expected profit on the Project, a burden that was met. The onus then turned to Fish Creek to prove that Elan would have experienced the same problems as Chandos, an onus Fish Creek did not meet.
  • No expert evidence was submitted by Fish Creek to address the likely fate of Elan which was necessary based on the lackluster factual comparison.

The Court of Appeal likened the factual deficiency in fish Creek's arguments to comparing apples to "invisible oranges" since the arguments about Elan's likelihood of losing money were almost all speculative and lacking in factual basis.

In the end, the Court of Appeal did find sufficient factual foundation to allow for 2 small reductions to Elan's $700,000 claim. It lowered the amount by $70,000 to reflect the cost of replacing an insolvent subcontractor that both Elan and Chandos planned to use. Further, it reduced the claim by an additional $62,000 because a subcontractor had underestimated its quote to Elan. The reduction reflected the gap between the underpriced quote and the next lowest quote.

With those reductions, the Court of Appeal awarded $577,000 to Elan.


  • Privilege clauses are not a license to ignore the bidding criteria.
    • The Court of Appeal was very clear that there are limits to a "sole and unfettered" discretion to award the general contract. Assessment of bids should be carried out in accordance with the bid criteria. If certain factors are important to a project owner, they should be included in the bid documents.
  • Owners facing legal action stemming from its award of the general contract need to specifically plead as a defence that the aggrieved bidder is not entitled to damages because the project was not profitable for any bidder.
  • Project owners need evidence to prove the defence that an aggrieved bidder would not have profited from being awarded the general contract. Keeping detailed records of issues that caused the general contractor to incur greater expense than expected will assist with forming the proper foundation to establish this defence.


1 Elan Construction Ltd. v South Fish Creek Recreation Assn, 2016 ABCA 215.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.