Canada: Yes - Corporations DO Have Rights

Last Updated: December 21 2016
Article by Jeremy Schwartz and Ryan Conlin

We have written before on the groundbreaking decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jordan (see our previous blog post on that case here). In Jordan, the Supreme Court of Canada set hard caps on the time it takes to process a criminal (or regulatory) prosecution to trial. The time limit under the cap is determined by the court procedure elected by the Crown in prosecuting the offence.

If the actual time to the end of trial exceeds the cap, then absent certain defined circumstances, the right of the accused to be tried within a reasonable time under section 11(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is considered to have been breached. This invariably results in a stay of proceedings, which has the effect of dismissing the charges and preventing the Crown from laying them again.

In the Ontario Court of Justice, where offences under the Occupational Health and Safety Act ("OHSA"), Employment Standards Act, and other breaches of the Provincial Offences Act ("POA") are prosecuted, Jordan mandates that trials conclude within 18 months of the charges being laid.

As is often the case with watershed decisions, Jordan raised as many questions as it answered – among those key questions: 1. Jordan was a criminal case – is it applicable to non-criminal offences? 2. The defendant in Jordan was an individual charged with a criminal offence, would it apply to corporations facing OHSA and other charges under the POA? Historically, the protection against long delays in processing charges was different for corporate defendants than for individuals. Does that distinction still exist post-Jordan?

A recent case from the Ontario Court of Justice goes a long way towards answering those questions.

In R v Live Nation, an as-yet unpublished decision by Justice Nakatsuru of the Ontario Court of Justice, three corporate defendants and an individual defendant were charged with breaches of the OHSA. The charges stemmed from the June 16, 2012 collapse of the stage at a Radiohead concert in Toronto that killed one person and seriously injured several more.

Two of the corporate defendants and the individual defendant brought an application to stay the prosecution because of the delay in finishing the trial, citing Jordan. At the time of the application, it was estimated that 44 months would pass from the laying of the charges to the end of the trial.

When the Supreme Court issued Jordan, it provided certain exceptions to prevent a stay being ordered in exceptional circumstances and in certain "transitional" cases that began before Jordan was issued. Ultimately, the court in Live Nation ruled that the delay was not unreasonable, applying the exceptions. But the Court drew some important conclusions about the application of the Jordan test that may have significant ramifications for employers charged with breaches of the Occupational Health and Safety Act and other regulatory legislation.

Jordan Applies to Corporations

Perhaps the most important finding of the Court was that the new test from Jordan applies to corporations, not just individuals. The Court found that the interest of the public and participants in the justice system to timely resolution applies equally to corporations. Historically, corporations were acknowledged to have rights under section 11(b), although the bar for measuring a breach was set much higher than for an individual accused, pursuant to a 1992 Supreme Court decision called R v CIP.

Although CIP was based on the cases that Jordan overruled, the Supreme Court did not explicitly say in Jordan that CIP was no longer of force and effect. The Crown argued in Live Nation (as it has in every case since Jordan was issued) that this meant that CIP was still good law.

The Court disagreed. Critically, the Court held that the decision in CIP was an application of the test that existed for individuals under the old regime, in the context of a charge against a corporation. As such, the law on which both the old regime for individuals and CIP were based was the same, with different factors considered due to the differences between individual and corporate defendants. Since the underlying law had been overturned in Jordan, it meant that CIP, being based on that law, must also be overruled.

There was no rationale in the reasons in Jordan for any notion that the caps set out therein should not apply to corporations as well as individuals. Consequently, the Court found that Jordan applies to corporate defendants just as it does for individual defendants.

The Complex Case Exception: When Is Complexity Not Enough?

In Jordan, the Supreme Court ruled that particularly complex cases might not be subject to the strict time cap, if the case's complexity warranted or necessitated that more time be taken.

The Crown argued in Live Nation that this was exactly such a case.

The Court agreed. It ruled that the case was particularly complex, even in the world of prosecutions under the Occupational Health and Safety Act. There were significant questions about the cause of the collapse, reconstruction experiments, and multiple expert witnesses. In addition, highly technical evidence was required to speak to various disputed evidentiary matters. The four defendants were represented by three representatives, each of whom along with the Crown had an opportunity to call evidence and question each witness.

Thus, it was anticipated that the trial would take nine weeks to complete. This was up from an earlier estimate by the Crown which had forecast a six-week trial.

The Court found that the complexity of the case was linked to the delay, a necessary finding for the Court to relieve the Crown from the 18-month Jordan cap applicable to those proceedings.

Interestingly, the Court found that this was the end of the analysis, and stated that solely on this basis that this was a complex case, the application must fail. It did not analyze if, even given the complexity of the case, the delay was excessive. The Court suggested that, hypothetically, a long enough delay would eventually warrant a stay regardless of the complexity of the proceedings, but it did not offer any method by which this should be determined, nor did it explain why it found that the delay in this case was not excessive despite the complexity of the case.

The Court found that this was enough to dispose of the application. It also analyzed the transitional exception, finding that it too applied to relieve against the Jordan cap. However, this finding was not necessary to dispose of the application.

What Employers Need to Know

It is worth noting that prior to being appointed to the bench, Justice Nakatsuru was a senior lawyer with the Ministry of the Attorney General's Constitutional Law Branch. Due to this background and his expertise in the area, it seems likely that this decision will carry significant weight, although it is not technically binding on other courts.

The decision confirms what many lawyers have suspected since the release of Jordan, that the hard caps on bringing offences to trial set out in that decision apply to corporations as well as individuals. Of course, there are some nuances in terms of this analysis as it applies to defendants who were already charged at the time of Jordan's release in July. However, it appears that, if this aspect of Justice Nakatsuru's decision were followed by other courts going forward, corporations will have equal resort to Jordan.

Indeed, in our practice we have already seen Crown prosecutors, including in cases with only corporate defendants, taking a more proactive, almost aggressive approach to moving matters along quickly to trial. It is likely that Crown counsel will increasingly propose more aggressive timelines and demand that defendants waive their procedural rights if they require more time to respond. They may also seek quicker pre-trials and more proactively look to address pre-trial issues, such as disclosure, on an expedited basis.

Another interesting challenge will be for the Provincial Offences Court system itself, which is run by individual municipalities in Ontario. In many smaller centers, there is frequently only one courtroom to hear provincial offences matters. This can make it difficult to schedule lengthier matters expeditiously. We expect that the Provincial Offences Court system will require more resources and possibly access to more space to ensure that lengthier prosecutions can be scheduled within the timeframe mandated by Jordan. The Crown may also be forced to elect to have cases tried in the Provincial Court system in front of a judge if insufficient resources are available in the Provincial Offences Court.

It will be particularly important to ensure that corporations charged with offences, and their representatives, take extra care not waive rights unnecessarily nor take steps that could lead to delay.

Overall, this decision is helpful for employers faced with long delays in prosecutions of health and safety and other regulatory offences. It provides much needed substance to the guarantee in section 11(b) of a trial without undue delay, and offers some reassurance that significant prosecutions will be pursued with alacrity and will therefore be resolved more quickly. While extraordinarily complex cases may lead to longer timeframes, such cases are very much the exception rather than the rule. Thus, in most cases corporate defendants ought to now have a sense of the timeframe within which they can expect their cases be heard, and a measure to defend themselves against undue delay.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions