Canada: The Law of Unintended Consequences: Supreme Court Rules On Rectification

Last Updated: December 19 2016
Article by Marco P. Falco

At common law, Courts have always had the power to correct mistakes in a contract or written legal instrument where that instrument incorrectly records the parties' agreement. Known as rectification, this equitable remedy has been used for centuries to amend a written document that inaccurately reflects the parties' intentions.

Canadian Courts have spilled much judicial ink on the scope of rectification. It has always been the case that rectification is available to correct an instrument that does not reflect an agreement between the parties, where that agreement's terms are definite, clear and ascertainable.

But what about the case where an instrument fails to reflect a party's general intentions, i.e. where those intentions are not "definite, clear and ascertainable", and where leaving the instrument in its current flawed form will produce unintended consequences?

In such cases, should the Court be allowed to amend the instrument and, in effect, correct the agreement between the parties to reflect their intentions and to avoid the unfavorable result?

A recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, Attorney General of Canada v. Fairmont Hotels Inc., 2016 SCC 56, weighs in on the debate.

In Fairmont, the majority of the Court reinforced the limits of rectification. The majority held that while rectification can be used to change an instrument which inaccurately reflects a party's agreement as to what was to be done, it cannot be used to change the agreement to salvage what the parties hoped to achieve. This distinction is fine, but important.

The dissent in Fairmont would have applied rectification more broadly, allowing the remedy to be used to amend an instrument to reflect the continuing, ascertainable intentions of the parties, even if those intentions were not "definite".

Fairmont involved complicated financing arrangements in which Fairmont Hotels had always intended to unwind these arrangements on a tax-neutral basis. The arrangements involved Fairmont's and its subsidiaries' participation in the financing of Legacy Hotels' purchase of two hotels in U.S. currency. Legacy Hotels was a real estate investment trust in which Fairmont held a minority interest. Fairmont's participation in the arrangement exposed it to a potential foreign exchange tax liability, because the financing was arranged in U.S. dollars.

Fairmont was ultimately acquired by other companies. As a result of this acquisition, Fairmont's desired intent of tax neutrality was frustrated. The acquisition would trigger a foreign exchange loss on the part of Fairmont and its subsidiaries. To avoid any tax exposure, the parties involved in Fairmont's acquisition agreed on a plan in which Fairmont would hedge itself against any tax exposure. However, the plan did not protect Fairmont's subsidiaries.

Legacy Hotels later requested that its financing arrangement with Fairmont be terminated to allow for the sale of the two hotels. Accordingly, Fairmont redeemed its shares in its subsidiaries by way of a directors' resolution. The directors' resolution resulted in an unintended tax liability. Fairmont then applied to Court and sought rectification of the directors' resolution to avoid the liability.

The Ontario Superior Court and Court of Appeal both allowed rectification of the directors' resolution to preserve the parties' intended tax neutrality.

On appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, the majority of the Court allowed the appeal and held that rectification was not available in the circumstances.

Rectification Unavailable to Correct Unintended Consequences

Writing for the majority of the Court, Justice Brown upheld the more traditional and conservative approach to rectification. The theory is that rectification is a narrow doctrine, limited to correcting errors in a written instrument where that instrument fails to correctly reflect the parties' agreement. However, the Court made it clear that rectification cannot be employed to undo the unintended consequences of that agreement:

Rectification is not equity's version of a mulligan. Courts rectify instruments which do not correctly record agreements. Courts do not "rectify" agreements where their faithful recording in an instrument has led to an undesirable or otherwise unexpected outcome.

The Court's reasoning was based on the fact that rectification is a powerful tool that has the potential to be misused. In particular, rectification allows the Courts to rewrite "what the parties had originally intended to be the final expression of their agreement".

A broad and relaxed approach to rectification would undermine the necessary due diligence the parties should exercise when executing the document. Moreover, a broad approach would undermine the commercial world's confidence in the certainty of written contracts. The traditional approach to rectification keeps the Courts out of the agreement reached between the parties.

Rectification Requires "Definite and Ascertainable" Terms

The majority of the Court further identified the two types of mistakes that could give rise to the rectification of a written instrument.

Where there is a common mistake, in which both parties agree to a document that inaccurately records their prior agreement, rectification is only available if the following prerequisites are met: (i) the parties reached a prior agreement whose terms are "definite and ascertainable"; (ii) the agreement was still effective when the instrument was executed; (iii) the instrument fails to record accurately the prior agreement; and (iv) the instrument would carry out the agreement if it were rectified.

The second type of mistake to attract rectification is a unilateral one, i.e. where the document "formalizes a unilateral act (such as the creation of a trust)" or where the document was meant to record an agreement between the parties, but the parties each dispute whether the document accurately does so. In the case of a unilateral mistake, an additional precondition to rectification is added. The party resisting rectification must know or ought to have known about the mistake. Allowing the party to take advantage of it would amount to "fraud or the equivalent of fraud".

The analysis above has significant implications. According to the majority of the Court, where rectification is sought in the case of a common mistake, the preconditions set out above must be met, including the requirement that there was a "prior agreement whose terms are definite and ascertainable".

Applying these principles to the facts in Fairmont, the majority held that rectification was not available for two reasons.

First, the majority concluded that Fairmont was seeking not to correct an inaccurate directors' resolution, but to alter the resolution to avoid the unintended tax liability. Rectification is not available to assist the parties to avoid the unintended consequences of their agreement.

Second, Fairmont's intention was a general one, i.e. to avoid the tax liability. As a common mistake, this plan lacked the "definite and ascertainable" terms of a prior agreement, which are a necessary precondition to rectification. The "plan was not only imprecise: it really was not a plan at all, being at best an inchoate wish to protect, by unspecified means, [Fairmont's subsidiaries] from foreign exchange tax liability".

Is Rectification Too Narrow a Doctrine?

The Court's reasoning in Fairmont upholds the traditional approach to rectification. Although the majority properly recognized the potential for Courts to misuse rectification by rewriting the written document between the parties, the Court may have been overly cautious.

The majority arguably fails to give effect to the parties' intentions, where those intentions are reasonably ascertainable. As Justice Abella observed for the dissent, "[w]hat matters instead is that the substance of the intention 'can be ascertained with a reasonable level of comfort'". Definite and ascertainable terms of a prior agreement may not always be required in order to give effect to the parties' intentions and to apply rectification.

The debate regarding the scope of rectification is clearly not over, though it has been muted somewhat by Fairmont. For now, rectification remains a corrective doctrine only, with strict prerequisites before it can be applied. It remains to be seen if new cases will once again push the boundaries of this doctrine in order to honour the parties' general intentions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Marco P. Falco
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions