Canada: Proposed Changes To The Construction Lien Act: What Do They Mean For The Construction Industry?

The long-awaited report (the Report) on potential amendments to the Construction Lien Act (the CLA), which was commissioned by the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General (the Ministry 1), has now been released. Among other things, the Report recommends the following:

  • the adoption of a prompt payment regime requiring payment within 28 days of submission of a proper invoice (subject to specific set-off notices)
  • mandatory speedy adjudication of construction disputes, wherein a decision will be rendered within 30 days
  • mandatory holdback release (subject to specific set-off notices), with permissible phased release of holdback on lengthy or segmented projects

The current CLA was enacted in 1983 and has not undergone a holistic review since its enactment, until now. Significant lobbying efforts by the construction industry, together with developments in the industry that include the increasing popularity of public-private partnerships, necessitated a critical appraisal of the effectiveness of the CLA in achieving its policy objectives within the modern context.

The Report was preceded by the attempted passage of Bill 69, the Prompt Payment Act, 2013 (Bill 69), which had resulted from the prompt payment movement in Ontario and other jurisdictions. While Bill 69 was not passed, the province decided that a broader review of the CLA was warranted. Extensive consultation with industry stakeholders followed, and culminated in the Report.

Issues considered by the Report

The Report was undertaken with the intent to perform a thorough and comprehensive assessment of the CLA, which was reflected in the breadth and scope of the substantive issues examined.  

The Report divided these issues into distinct chapters addressing: (1) lienability; (2) preservation, perfection and expiry of liens; (3) holdback and substantial performance; (4) summary procedure; (5) construction trusts; (6) promptness of payment; (7) adjudication; (8) surety bonds; (9) technical amendments; and (10) industry education and periodic review. The Report generated 100 individual recommendations.

This Osler Update will focus on the three key chapters of the Report: promptness of payment, mandatory adjudication, and holdback and substantial performance. The remaining seven chapters of the Report are significant in their own right, including recommendations such as mandatory surety bonding for all public projects regardless of size, and lengthening the time periods to preserve and perfect liens.   

In fact, as a result of the breadth and scope of all of these issues, when considered together, the Report recommends replacing the CLA, which primarily focuses on liens and trusts, with new legislation suggestively titled the "Construction Act: An Act respecting Security of Payment and Efficient Dispute Resolution in the Construction Industry."

Prompt payment

The Report recommends the enactment of a default statutory regime for prompt payment. The elements of the prompt payment regime are outlined below.

To which types of contracts would prompt payment apply?

  • The statutory prompt payment regime would apply to all construction contracts at all levels of the construction pyramid, in both the public and private sectors. Parties would be free to draft their own contractual payment provisions, provided they are consistent with the statutory regime. The mandatory provisions would be implied by law into any contracts that do not contain equivalent provisions.

What is the trigger for payment and what is the payment period?

The Report recommends the following:

  • Between the owner and the general contractor, payment must be made within 28 days of the submission of a "proper invoice" as described below.
  • Between the general contractor and the subcontractor, payment must be made within a further seven days from the date of the owner's payment (with an extra seven days added for each level down the construction pyramid).
  • Payment obligations will be triggered by the delivery of a proper invoice, which means a properly documented invoice. Proper information and documentation would be defined by the contract, or by the legislation by default.
  • Certification of payment by the payment certifier, if applicable, would follow submission of a proper invoice, and cannot be a precondition to the starting of the clock for payment.
  • Parties would have the freedom to negotiate the payment cycle, but a monthly payment cycle would be implied if they fail to do so.
  • Milestone-based payment mechanisms are permissible, but must be disclosed to subcontractors during the bidding stage.

On what basis can payment be withheld, and when?

  • Payers would be allowed to withhold disputed amounts (but not undisputed amounts) by delivering a "Notice of Intention to Withhold Payment," setting out the amount being withheld and the reasons for the withholding within seven days of receipt of a proper invoice.
  • Payers would be allowed to set off all outstanding debts, claims or damages, but only relating to the contract at issue, and not relating to other projects as is the case under the current CLA.
  • Essentially, the new approach would require payers to "get on with it" – in other words, to evaluate the payment application quickly, and either pay or assert a well-defined, specific set-off claim.

What remedies would be available in the event of non-payment?

  • Late payments would attract mandatory non-waivable interest at a rate that is the greater of the contractual rate and the pre-judgment interest rate in the Courts of Justice Act.
  • The payee's right to suspend work would arise if the payment dispute has been adjudicated and the payer refuses or fails to comply with the adjudicator's direction to pay.

Adjudication

The Report proposes the implementation of mandatory adjudication as a dispute resolution mechanism applicable to all construction contracts at all levels of the construction pyramid, in both the public and private sectors. In this regime, the parties would be free to negotiate contractual provisions in respect of adjudication so long as they are consistent with the statutory regime. Otherwise, the default statutory adjudication scheme (to be set out in a regulation to the CLA) would apply. The Report also recommends the creation of a single authority tasked with certifying, training and administering the appointment of adjudicators. Some of the additional elements of the adjudication regime are outlined below.

Who can require an adjudication?

  • Any party to a construction contract or subcontract would be entitled to refer disputes arising under that contract or subcontract to adjudication. Adjudications would typically involve a single issue. Multiple issues/disputes would only be addressed simultaneously in a single adjudication with the consent of the parties.
  • Back-to-back adjudications would be permitted in respect of disputes between an owner and a general contractor that flow down to a subcontractor.

Who can adjudicate a dispute and how is the adjudicator nominated?

  • Adjudicators would be members of a self-regulating profession (e.g., lawyer, engineer, quantity surveyor, accountant or architect); have at least seven years' relevant experience working with the Ontario construction industry; and have completed certain standardized training and certification with the government authority. Initially, a temporary roster of highly qualified adjudicators would be selected until the authority implements the training and certification system.
  • Adjudicators would receive immunity from liability in respect of their decisions and not be compelled to testify in civil proceedings.
  • The adjudicator would be nominated when a dispute arises by the party delivering notice of the adjudication. The parties would then agree on an adjudicator within two business days after delivery of the notice, failing which the authority would step in to appoint an adjudicator within five business days.

Which disputes get adjudicated?

  • Adjudication would apply to disputes that arise from a claim for payment under a proper invoice submitted in respect of a construction contract or subcontract, including the following

(i) valuations of the subject matter of the invoice

(ii) monetary claims made pursuant to the contract (e.g., change orders)

(iii) claims in relation to security held for a construction contract

(iv) withholding and set-off in respect of amounts owed under the invoice

(v) delay issues relating to claims for payment 

  • It is not entirely clear from the Report which claims would be excluded from mandatory adjudication, though it appears that the intent is to exclude negligence claims against design professionals as well as delay claims related purely to schedule extensions.
  • Disputes under $25,000 may be referred by the parties either to adjudication or to the small claims court.

What process and at what cost?

  • The default adjudication process would set out minimum standards for notice of adjudication, appointment of the adjudicator, timelines for the adjudication, duties and powers of the adjudicator (including establishing the adjudication process) and the binding interim nature of the adjudicator's decision.
  • The Report recommends that the total period of time for the adjudication process would be 30 days, from the initial referral of the dispute through appointment of the adjudicator, submission of relevant documents, interviewing of witnesses, retaining of experts, submissions by the parties, holding of a hearing and rendering the adjudicator's decision. For large and complex claims, compliance with this time period may be a challenge.
  • As a general rule, the parties would apportion the costs of the adjudicator equally and each would be responsible for its own legal costs, subject to the adjudicator's ability to adjust the default apportionments based on a party's bad faith, frivolous or vexatious conduct.

How are adjudicated decisions enforced?

  • Decisions would be binding on the parties on an interim basis (i.e., until the dispute is resolved by arbitration or formal legal proceedings or until the parties agree that the adjudication decision is final and binding). Interestingly, the Report notes that the vast majority of adjudications conducted in the United Kingdom under a similar regime have, in practice, been accepted by the parties, effectively treating them as final.
  • Decisions would be enforceable by way of application to the Superior Court of Justice in a similar manner that awards under the Arbitration Act, 1991 are enforced.

How would adjudication interface with the CLA?

  • The parties' lien and trust rights under the CLA would not be affected by the adjudication regime. Therefore, if a party elects to have a dispute resolved through a lien proceeding, it can follow the traditional preservation and perfection process under the CLA and proceed with a lien action. Trust claims can still be pursued through the courts, as well.

Holdback and substantial performance

In its discussion of holdback and substantial performance, the Report considered the key sub-issues outlined below.

Amount of holdback

  • The quantum of holdback would be maintained at the current rate of 10%.

Definitions of substantial performance and completion

  • The substantive criteria for a contract to be substantially performed should remain the same, but the formula in section 2(1)(b) of the CLA should be amended to increase the maximum cost of completion/correction to 3% of the first $1 million of the contract price, 2% of the next $1 million and 1% of the balance.
  • The "deemed completion" provision in section 2(3) should be similarly amended to increase the maximum cost of completion/correction to not more than the lesser of (a) 1% of the contract price and (b) $5,000 (from its current $1,000).
  • These changes are designed to reflect the effects of inflation over time.

Finishing holdback

  • The finishing holdback provisions of the CLA would remain unchanged.

Mandatory release of holdback, subject to set-off

  • The CLA should be changed from the current permissive release of holdback, to make holdback release mandatory. However, the payer may assert a right of set-off by publishing a notice of non-payment/set-off, which specifically identifies the issues, and related dollar values, upon which the set-off is based.

Phased, annual and segmented release of holdback

  • Parties would be allowed to contract for partial release of holdback on either an annual or phased basis (only for longer/larger projects surpassing certain monetary and duration thresholds).
  • To address the concerns of design professionals, who have pushed for the release of the holdback on the design portion of their work, the designation of a design phase should be allowed in the contract for consulting services, but is not mandatory. This would facilitate the phased release of holdback for design professionals.
  • In addition, projects involving clearly separable segments, including public private partnerships and other alternative financing and procurement projects in particular, would be allowed to segment their projects to provide for segmented holdback release.

Deferral agreements

  • Subject to an appropriate threshold, owners and contractors should be allowed to enter into deferral agreements, whereby portions of the work are deleted from the substantial performance calculation, for the purpose of allowing earlier certification and publication of substantial performance.

Deficiency holdback

  • Parties should not be restricted from contracting for a deficiency holdback, but the CLA should not make deficiency holdbacks a requirement.

Use of financial instruments or cash for holdback purposes

  • Letters of credit or demand-worded repayment bonds should be allowed as a replacement for cash holdbacks.

Next steps

The Ministry is currently undertaking consultations with key stakeholder groups to gauge reaction to the recommendations contained in the Report. Depending in part on the outcome of those consultations, the Ministry has suggested that it may propose draft legislation as early as the spring of 2017 to address the main principles in the Report.   

In the meantime, other provinces and the federal government are closely watching developments in Ontario as they unfold, including British Columbia with the law institute's proposed reform of the Builders' Lien Act as well as the federal government with the introduction of Senate Bill S-224 (the proposed Canada Prompt Payment Act).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Pallett Valo LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Pallett Valo LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions