Canada: Police And Crime Commissioner In High Court Win After Pensions Ombudsman's Intervention

Last Updated: November 16 2016
Article by Hannah Beacham and Ian J Gordon

Most Read Contributor in Canada, October 2018

The High Court has today overturned a Determination of the Pensions Ombudsman (PO-6773) in the case of Catherine Butterworth and Police and Crime Commissioner for Greater Manchester and the Pensions Ombudsman (as intervener) which had directed the Police and Crime Commissioner for Greater Manchester (the "Commissioner") to pay a "bridging pension" from its own funds to the claimant.

Gowling WLG acted for the Commissioner.

The claimant was formerly employed by the Commissioner's predecessor, the Greater Manchester Police Authority (the GMPA). She left the GMPA's employment in 2011 pursuant to a compromise agreement. The present case turned on clause 4.2 of this compromise agreement which said:

"To the extent that it is and remains lawful for the Employer to do so and upon receipt of a written request from the Employee in accordance with the Local Government Pension Scheme (Benefits, Membership and Contributions) Regulations 2007 (or any other provision having similar effect which is in force at that time in relation to the Scheme) the Employer will allow the Employee to access her Greater Manchester Pension Fund pension without reduction or abatement when she reaches 55 years of age on 22 February 2014..."

In anticipation of her 55th birthday in 2014, the claimant requested an unreduced pension. The Commissioner notified her that the GMPA had not been legally entitled to give the commitment contained in clause 4.2 because, under the relevant Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) regulations, the award of an unreduced pension required not only the employer's consent, but also a determination that "on compassionate grounds" the pension should not be reduced. The Commissioner said that, having considered the arguments advanced by the claimant, there were no sufficient, compassionate grounds and the unreduced pension would not be awarded.

The claimant complained to the Pensions Ombudsman, who investigated the complaint and issued two Preliminary Decisions before giving his final Determination on 21 April 2016.

In his final Determination, the Ombudsman held that clause 4.2 was void and unenforceable because it amounted to an unlawful fetter on the exercise of a public authority of its own discretion. He went on to find that nonetheless a contractual estoppel had arisen, the effect of which was that the Commissioner could not go back on the promise to provide the benefit. On that basis, the Ombudsman directed the Commissioner to pay, from its own funds, a bridging pension equivalent to the unreduced benefit with retrospective effect from the claimant's 55th birthday. He also directed the Commissioner to pay £2,000 for the distress and inconvenience caused to the claimant as a result of the GMPA's maladministration in promising to confer on her a benefit which was not in its power to provide.

The Commissioner appealed on five grounds:

  1. the Ombudsman's reliance on estoppel was misconceived because (i) a party cannot achieve by estoppel what it could not achieve by express agreement, and (ii) in any event estoppel has no role to play in public law;
  2. on the correct interpretation of clause 4.2, the GMPA had in any event not contracted to do anything that was unlawful;
  3. the circumstances of this case did not give rise to any contractual estoppel (assuming the doctrine was in principle capable of applying);
  4. the Ombudsman's direction required the Commissioner to commit an ultra vires act, in that he had no power to make pension payments, or their equivalent, from his own funds;
  5. the award of £2,000 for maladministration was misconceived.

The claimant did not participate in the appeal but the Ombudsman was given permission to intervene (pursuant to a more activist policy announced on 27 July this year).

The Ombudsman provided written and oral submissions on some of the issues raised by the Commissioner. He also asked the Court to uphold the Determination on a new ground (namely, that clause 4.2 was not, as a matter of private law, unenforceable) or alternatively to remit the matter back to him to consider a new point (namely, whether the claimant had a complaint based on legitimate expectation).

Jonathan Crow QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court, held that the Ombudsman had misinterpreted clause 4.2 of the compromise agreement. He decided that by clause 4.2 the GMPA had irrevocably agreed to give the claimant access to an unreduced pension at age 55, but only to the extent it was lawful for the GMPA to perform that commitment when the time for performance arrived. As such, the Commissioner had not breached the contractual commitment in 4.2 when he refused the claimant's request for an unreduced pension.

The High Court therefore didn't need to expressly consider whether the Ombudsman should be allowed to introduce into the appeal a new argument which he had not identified in producing his determination.

In relation to the Ombudsman's finding of a "contractual estoppel", the High Court found that the necessary elements of this were missing. There was no warranty by the GMPA that it was, or would be, legally empowered to facilitate guaranteed access to an unreduced pension at age 55. In fact, the commitment in clause 4.2 was expressly contingent on its ability, lawfully, to provide such access when the relevant time arrived.

Separately, the High Court found that the Determination was flawed because it mandated a result which was entirely different from the contractual commitment (a bridging pension paid from the employer's own funds instead of a pension from the pension fund).

Although it was strictly unnecessary for him to do so, the Deputy Judge also expressed the following views:

  • contractual estoppel could not be used to give effect to a commitment which the GMPA had no power to give;
  • the GMPA had no power to make pension payments from its own funds; and
  • the Ombudsman's direction to pay a bridging pension from the Commissioner's own funds was unlawful because the Ombudsman has no power to order public authorities to make pension payments that they have no lawful power to make.

Finally, the High Court overturned the finding of maladministration (and the order to pay £2,000 compensation) and declined to remit the matter back to the Ombudsman to investigate a new issue (legitimate expectation) which had not been raised by the claimant at any point. This would amount to substantially "re-litigating" the matter on new grounds.

What it means

The case has numerous interesting features. Having been given permission to intervene in the appeal, and consistent with his stated aim of seeking to assist the Court, it was notable that the Ombudsman made written and oral submissions to the Court which he accepted were contrary to the legal analysis he had adopted in the determination being appealed.

Accordingly, parties wishing to appeal from the Ombudsman's determinations should be mindful of the possibility that, on appeal, the Ombudsman may seek to run arguments which did not form the basis of his original decision.

However, the Ombudsman will no doubt have observed (in considering in future whether to intervene in appeals) that the High Court ordered him to pay the costs the Commissioner had incurred in bringing the appeal.

Find out more about Gowling WLG's pensions services.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions