Canada: Fifth Protocol to the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention – Strategies for a New Era In Canada-U.S. Transactions

Last Updated: November 13 2007
Article by Ken Snider

The fifth protocol (the "Protocol") to the Canada–U.S. Income Tax Convention ("the Convention") was signed by the Canadian Minister of Finance, James Flaherty, and the U.S. Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson, Jr. on September 21, 2007. It will have a significant impact on many types of cross–border transactions that will have to be assessed on case–by–case basis. The Protocol must be ratified in both countries and will enter into force on the date that is the latter of the notification of ratification, or January 1, 2008. Various provisions have different effective dates after the Protocol enters into force. The changes will have to be considered in respect of existing structures and transactions to be entered into prior to entry into force. This bulletin focuses on a few of the changes expected to have broad application and some practical strategies to consider in response. There are other important changes in the Protocol that are beyond the scope of this bulletin. For further information, please contact any of the names listed at the end of the document.

Elimination of Withholding Tax on Cross–Border Interest Payments

Currently, the Income Tax Act (Canada) (‘ITA’) imposes a withholding tax of 25% on interest paid to a non–resident of Canada, unless an exemption applies or the rate is reduced under a tax treaty. Currently, the Convention generally limits withholding tax on cross–border interest payments to 10%.

The Protocol will eliminate withholding tax on interest and guarantee fees. The exemption for non–related–party interest will be effective at the beginning of the second month following the month the Protocol comes into force. If the payer of the interest and the beneficial owner of the interest are "related", the withholding tax will be reduced to 7% in the first calendar year, to 4% in the second calendar year, and then eliminated completely in subsequent years following the entry into force of the Protocol.

The term "related" is not defined by the Convention. An annex to the Protocol clarifies the interpretation of undefined terms. It provides that any undefined term shall, unless the context otherwise requires or the competent authorities otherwise agree to a common meaning, have the meaning which it has at that time under the laws of the particular country for purposes of the taxes to which the Convention applies. This meaning will prevail over the meaning of the term under the laws of the other country.

The definition of "related persons" in the ITA is very lengthy and is based on legal control regardless of whether the persons deal on arm’s length terms.

In addition, draft legislation released by the Canadian Department of Finance on October 2, 2007 states that once a treaty provides an exemption from Canadian withholding tax, there will not be withholding tax paid to any arm’s length lender. This exemption, once enacted, will apply to loans entered into on or after March 19, 2007.

Contingent interest arising in the U.S. of a type that does not qualify as "portfolio interest" will not be exempt. Interest arising in Canada that in general is "participating" will not be exempt. In both cases such interest will be subject to a 15% withholding tax.

Practical Considerations

Until the Protocol enters into force, the primary Canadian exemption for withholding tax on interest remains the "5/25" exemption. This is an exemption for interest payable by a corporation resident in Canada to an arm’s length person if the borrower is not obligated to repay more than 25% of the principal within five years, unless there is an event of default. While the draft amendments to the ITA provide an exemption from withholding tax on arm’s length interest, as noted above it will still be important to structure new loans to comply with the "5/25" exemption prior to entry into force of the exemption. Once the new provisions enter into force, lenders and borrowers will be able to negotiate their loan transactions without regard to the limitations imposed by the "5/25" exemption, and over time non–arm’s length loans between U.S. and Canadian residents will become more tax efficient. Consequently, Canadian borrowers will have greater access to U.S. and other foreign capital markets subject to regulatory considerations. New creditor opportunities may arise for non–resident investors making short term loans (e.g. revolving loans), loans to non–corporate entities (e.g. income trusts, and REITS), and acquiring distress loans and mortgage–backed securities.

Treaty Relief for U.S. LLCs

Based on the administrative policy of the Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA"), limited liability companies (‘LLCs’) that are treated as fiscally transparent for U.S. tax purposes are not eligible for benefits under the Convention. Alternate ownership structures for Canadian investments have generally been required to avoid double taxation. This has led to considerable frustration.

The Protocol will extend treaty benefits, not to fiscally transparent LLCs directly, but to U.S. resident members who derive income through an LLC. The Convention currently provides for a 5% withholding rate on dividends paid to a corporate shareholder which owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the payor corporation. For this purpose, the Protocol provides that a U.S. resident corporate member of an LLC shall be considered to own the voting stock of the Canadian payor corporation owned by the LLC in proportion to its ownership interest in the LLC. Therefore, it is possible for a U.S. corporate member of an LLC to qualify for the 5% rate. However, the Convention will not apply where the income is not taxed directly in the hands of the U.S. residents, or where the income of an LLC is taxed in the hands of members of the LLC who are not U.S. residents. Where the income or gain will not be treated as derived by the U.S. person, the income or gain of the LLC will not be subject to treaty protection.

Practical Considerations

The question will arise whether it is advisable for an LLC to make a direct investment in Canadian property once the Protocol enters into force. An LLC may be a viable entity for making investments in Canada provided all the members are U.S. residents who are subject to U.S. tax on their income. However, while not clear at this point, we expect that the U.S. members of the LLC will be subject to the same Canadian tax compliance obligations that would apply to members of a partnership. An example would be the requirement to file notices and obtain clearance certificates under section 116 of the ITA on a sale of "taxable Canadian property" and the obligation to file a Canadian tax return reporting the gain even if it is exempt from Canadian tax by reason of the Convention. Consequently, unless the compliance issue is favourably resolved, use of an LLC by a U.S. private equity fund with many members may not be an acceptable investment vehicle for certain Canadian investments, even if all the members were entitled to treaty protection.

Where there are LLC members who are not entitled to the benefit of the Protocol, it may not be advisable to use a LLC. In particular, it appears that CRA’s long standing policy that LLCs are not entitled to treaty benefits will continue to apply. Therefore, to the extent members are not protected by the Protocol, an LLC (and its non–U.S. members) will not enjoy any treaty benefits. Alternate investment vehicles should be considered.

LLC agreements entered into both before and after the Protocol takes effect should be reviewed to assess the impact if less than all the income or gains of the LLC is considered to be derived by residents of the U.S. This might necessitate allocating some of the Canadian taxes not reduced by the Protocol to non–U.S. members.

The wording of the Protocol does not expressly refer to LLCs. It refers to deriving income through an entity other than an entity that is a resident of the source country. Therefore, the rule may apply to any fiscally transparent entity (not resident in the source country) and could apply to shareholders of a U.S. "S" corporation and beneficiaries of U.S. grantor trusts. This requires further clarification from the government.

Denial of Treaty Benefits for Certain Hybrid Entities

The Protocol unexpectedly includes two complex provisions which will adversely affect certain widely–used cross–border structures involving "hybrid" entities. A "hybrid" is an entity that is treated as a taxable entity in one jurisdiction but fiscally transparent in another jurisdiction. Hybrids and "reverse hybrids" have been used to obtain favourable tax consequences which the U.S. and Canada wanted to stop.

A "reverse hybrid" is legally a partnership in one country that is treated as a corporation in another country. This would include a partnership that has "checked–the–box" to be treated as a corporation for U.S. tax purposes but remains a partnership for Canadian legal and tax purposes.

It is understood that these provisions in the Protocol are unique for a Canadian tax treaty. While it is understood that these provisions are intended to stop "double dips", they in fact go much further, perhaps unintentionally. In particular, the provisions do not depend on the purposes for which the hybrid is used.

These changes have effect on the first day of the third calendar year that ends after the Protocol enters into force.

First Rule Reverse Hybrid

The first rule applies to amounts derived by a person otherwise entitled to treaty benefits through a reverse hybrid unless certain tests were not satisfied. Specifically, Canada will deny treaty benefits in respect of income, profit or gain paid to a resident of the U.S. if (i) the U.S. resident is considered under Canadian tax law to have derived such amounts through an entity that is not a resident of the U.S., and (ii) because the entity is not fiscally transparent in the U.S., the U.S. tax treatment of the amount is not the same as its treatment would be if the amount had been derived directly by that person.

A common example would be a Canadian limited partnership (which is fiscally transparent in Canada) that elected under the U.S. "check the box" rules to be treated as a corporation for U.S. tax purposes. This is illustrated below.

There will be Canadian withholding tax at the rate of 25% rather than 10% on the interest.

These structures were a tax–efficient way for a U.S. parent to finance its Canadian subsidiary. This change will not impact arm’s length interest that will not be subject to withholding tax because of an exemption under the ITA.

Similarly, the U.S. will deny treaty benefits in mirror circumstances. Consequently, the U.S. will deny treaty benefits in respect of income, profit or gain paid to a resident of Canada if (i) the Canadian resident is considered under U.S. tax law to have derived those amounts through an entity that is not a resident of Canada, and (ii) because the entity is not fiscally transparent in Canada, the Canadian tax treatment of the amount is not the same as its treatment would be if the amount had been derived directly by that person. An example is a Canadian resident earning U.S. source income through a U.S. LLC or a Barbados SRL. This is illustrated below.

Second Rule – Hybrid

The second rule applies to amounts derived from a hybrid in the other country. Consequently, Canada will deny treaty benefits in respect of income, profit or gain derived by a U.S. resident where (i) the U.S. resident is considered under U.S. tax law to have received an amount from an entity resident in Canada, and (ii) because the entity is treated as fiscally transparent under U.S. tax law, the U.S. tax treatment is different than if that entity were not fiscally transparent under U.S. tax law.

A common example is a Canadian unlimited liability company (a "ULC") which is fiscally transparent for U.S. residents. This is illustrated below.

The Protocol will not affect the payment of interest that is otherwise exempt from withholding tax under the ITA. If interest or dividends were paid to the U.S. parent, there would be Canadian withholding at 25%.

This provision should not affect treaty protection for capital gains realized on the sale of the shares of a ULC as generally it will not be a gain paid to or derived through the entity.

The U.S. will deny treaty benefits in the mirror circumstances. Consequently, the U.S. will deny treaty benefits in respect of income, profit or gain derived by a resident of Canada where (i) the Canadian resident is considered under U.S. tax law to have received an amount from an entity resident in the U.S., and (ii) because the entity is treated as fiscally transparent under Canadian tax law, the Canadian tax treatment is different than if that entity were not fiscally transparent under Canadian tax law. An example would be a Canadian resident that receives amounts from a U.S. partnership which is treated as a corporation for U.S. tax purposes but treated as fiscally transparent for purposes of the ITA. This is illustrated below.

Practical Considerations

These changes will affect a wide variety of existing inbound and outbound structures involving hybrids. The future impact of the loss of treaty benefits should be assessed, and planning strategies identified well before the changes take effect. The loss of treaty benefits may have a material cost. While a detailed discussion of the various structures and the alternatives is beyond the scope of this bulletin, a few observations are warranted.

First, prior to the changes becoming effective, it may be desirable to undertake transactions that are currently subject to treaty benefits, such as paying dividends, and related party interest where such favourable treatment may not be available after the Protocol becomes effective.

Second, restructuring ownership may be beneficial. For example, rather than directly using a ULC to carry on business in Canada, a U.S. resident could carry on a branch business in Canada, use a U.S. partnership, use a regular Canadian corporation or interpose a Luxembourg SARL as the direct parent of the ULC.

Third, depending on the circumstances, restructuring the non–arm’s length interest and royalty payments so they are paid to an affiliate in a third country with a favourable tax treaty with Canada should be considered. Domestic Canadian anti–avoidance rules will have to be canvassed.

Fourth, in the case of a ULC, one could consider "unchecking" the box for U.S. purposes so the ULC is not fiscally transparent for U.S. tax purposes in order to access treaty benefits. There may, however, be adverse U.S. tax implications in doing so.

There may also be immediate tax costs of a restructuring and incremental taxation in alternative structures. Depending on the circumstances, foreign exchange gains and losses in respect of related and non–related party debt could be realized on a restructuring.

While "hybrids" will still enjoy treaty benefits for a few years, careful consideration must be given to whether it is advisable to use a hybrid in new transactions. This would generally depend on whether there will be perceived adverse implications of reorganizing prior to the effective date.

Limitation on Benefits Clause

The limitation on benefits ("LOB") clause in the current Convention was introduced in 1995 and was "one–sided". It would enable only the U.S. to deny treaty benefits in respect of certain Canadians. Canada had chosen not to rely on an LOB provision and instead had relied on the "general anti–avoidance rule" in the ITA. CRA, however, has been unsuccessful in applying this rule in the courts. The change to the LOB provision will, however, not prevent CRA from attempting again to apply the "general anti–avoidance rule" in the ITA or common law anti–avoidance rules.

The Protocol provides a comprehensive LOB provision replete with many definitions. In order to obtain treaty benefits, a person not only has to be a resident of one of the Contracting States, but must also satisfy the "qualifying person" test. A qualifying person will include a natural person, a company or trust whose principal class of shares or units (and any disproportionate class of shares or units) is primarily and regularly traded on one or more recognized stock exchanges, and certain corporations and trusts that satisfy ownership tests. A fiscally transparent person (such as an LLC) may not be a qualifying person based on the CRA position that it is not a resident of the U.S. for purposes of the Convention.

If the above tests cannot be met, the Convention is extended to non–qualifying persons who are engaged in the active trade or business in that country where they are resident; however, it will only extend to income derived in connection with that business, and where that business is "substantial" in relation to the activities carried on in the other country.

Treaty benefits for dividends, interest and royalties can also be extended to companies controlled (i.e. at least 90% owned in terms of vote and value), directly or indirectly, by a qualifying person, or where they qualify under the derivative benefits rule as follows: where they are a resident of a third state (with which Canada or the U.S. has a treaty), they would meet the qualifying person test, the rate of withholding tax is comparable to the rate under the Convention, and the amount of deductible expenses (which was payable to non–qualifying persons) is less that 50% of gross income.

Practical Considerations

It will be necessary to ascertain whether the U.S. person who is otherwise a resident of the U.S. for purposes of the Convention will be entitled to treaty benefits under the Convention. This will be necessary for current ownership structures that will be extant when the LOB comes into force and new transactions entered into both before and after the effective date. In regard to current agreements, there may be situations where certain payments benefiting from treaty benefits will no longer qualify. The gross–up provisions, if any, in these agreements will become relevant.

Due diligence will be necessary to confirm that the LOB provision will not deny benefits and interpretive issues will arise. For example, it is not clear whether there will be protection in respect of capital gains realized on the sale of a Canadian subsidiary under the "active business" exception. In addition, we anticipate that many compliance issues will arise, such as determining the appropriate rate of withholding where a public corporation pays a dividend. U.S. administrative practices in this regard will no doubt be considered by Canadians.

If the LOB provision would apply in a particular case, consideration should be given to restructuring by using an affiliate in a third country with a favourable tax treaty with Canada, subject to review of Canadian anti–avoidance rules.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.