Canada: "Best" Be Careful - Rare Injunction Ordered To Stop Cogeco Advertising The "Best Internet Experience In Your Neighbourhood" - 6 Reasons This Case Is Noteworthy

Last Updated: November 8 2016
Article by Jennifer McKenzie, Catherine Lovrics and Amy Dam

Last August, as part of a rebrand, Cogeco renamed its Internet packages "UltraFibre" and implemented a new homepage for its website, which included the tagline "Enjoy unlimited entertainment with the best Internet experience in your neighbourhood." Both the package name and tagline were recently challenged by Bell Canada who was seeking injunctive relief against Cogeco on the basis of several causes of action, including under a criminal provision of the Competition Act. "UltraFibre" withstood the challenge, but the "best ... experience" claim did not.

The case is noteworthy for a number of reasons. In no particular order (as the authors have changed their minds on the relative importance of each point below).

To set the stage, Section 52 of the Competition Act makes it a criminal office to knowingly or recklessly make a false or materially misleading representation to the public. Section 36 of the Act provides a "special remedy", namely a private right of action to anyone who suffered loss or damage as a result of a violation of the criminal provision. (There is no private right of action for violations of the parallel civil prohibition against misleading representations.)  Section 36 does not expressly provide for an injunction (unlike other "special remedies" in the Act). Nonetheless, the misleading advertising cause of action was among the reasoned bases for awarding the injunction. 

First, the injunction was granted applying what appeared to be a relatively soft application of the 3-part test for issuing interlocutory injunctions. Trademark claims also were at issue, and in trademark proceedings, interlocutory injunctions are notoriously difficult to obtain, with the need to prove "irreparable" harm being the biggest hurdle. In this case, the Court was satisfied that Bell had established that there would be irreparable harm that could not be compensated for in damages, stating that: "It would be difficult, if not impossible, to determine with any certainty which potential or existing customers were misled by the claim that Cogeco is the best, and which customers or potential customers made their choices for reasons unrelated to this advertising claim".

Second, the court raises an interesting issue as to what constitutes a single advertisement on a website. The court considered whether it constituted the entire homepage, which can include several pages of text, graphics and links, etc.  Without expressly ruling on the issue, the court reasoned that minimally an online advertisement should be defined as what a consumer would see on a single screen of the homepage.  This issue could have significant consequences for advertisers, particularly when presenting information on mobile devices where "a single screen" is so small, and will no doubt be fodder for further litigation.    

Third, the court provided insight on the substantiation necessary when using a word popular among advertisers: "best". Cogeco argued that the "best Internet experience in your neighbourhood" is a qualitative claim that is subjective to the consumer and based on many factors such as customer service and not just speed and performance. Bell argued that it is a quantitative claim requiring evidence of best speed and performance in every neighborhood, and Cogeco did not have the best speed and performance in every neighbourhood – a fact conceded by Cogeco.

The Court found the claim needs to be qualified based on all factors relevant to the consumer's experience, including speed and performance.  The court was not convinced that claiming "best internet experience" was qualitativeexempt Cogeco from providing substantiation that included Internet speed and performance. This is a reminder that even if your claim is substantiated for one possible impression it may leave with consumers, your claim may well be false and misleading if you don't have substantiation for other impressions. 

Also, as noted, violation of the criminal provision requires a mens rea component namely, an advertiser must knowingly or recklessly make the misleading representation.  Even though Cogeco had a coherent argument on the interpretations of its "best" claim, the court nevertheless concluded there was a serious question to be tried regarding whether Cogeco's misrepresentation was made knowingly or recklessly. There was evidence that Cogeco knew and approved of a report by the CRTC which compared different internet technologies and found that FTTH technology outperformed other existing technologies (cable or DSL) in terms of speed and performance, but Cogeco offered that superior technology in only a limited number of neighbourhoods.

Fourth, in assessing whether a claim is false or materially misleading, courts must look at the general impression as well as the literal meaning of the claim to the relevant average consumer. In Richard v. Time Inc. [2012] 1 S.C.R. 265, the Supreme Court clarified that the average consumer is someone who is "credulous and inexperienced" and not particularly experienced at detecting the falsehood or subtleties found in commercial representations. In this case, the court held that the relevant consumer was a credulous and technologically inexperienced consumer of Internet services. This is a reminder that when advertising, you must presume your audience is naïve. This could have a significant impact when advertising technology or technology based services, where delivering information in an easy-to-understand and readily digestible way to the average "dummy" may be impossible.   

Fifth, among advertising lawyers there is often a debate over what constitutes a claim requiring substantiation and what is hyperbole or puffery.  The court found that the use of "ULTRA" in this context was likely a "puff".  Canadian law has only a handful (if that) of cases addressing the concept of when a claim is likely to be considered a "puff", so this finding should be noted.

Sixth, it is significant that the court intervened at all. Historically, Canadian courts have been reluctant to intervene in advertising cases. Despite the court's general reluctance to intervene in a very competitive marketplace, it did so since Cogeco had altered that marketplace by claiming to be the "best". The public interest appears to have played a factor in the court stepping in.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Jennifer McKenzie
Catherine Lovrics
Amy Dam
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions