ARTICLE
21 October 2016

The Supreme Court Of Canada Facilitates Multijurisdictional Class Action Proceedings

BL
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Contributor

BLG is a leading, national, full-service Canadian law firm focusing on business law, commercial litigation, and intellectual property solutions for our clients. BLG is one of the country’s largest law firms with more than 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals in five cities across Canada.
This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down its anticipated decision on sister cases Parsons v Ontario and Endean v British Columbia​, which both ask what powers provincial judges have in multi-jurisdictional class actions.
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down its anticipated decision on sister cases Parsons v Ontario and Endean v British Columbia, which both ask what powers provincial judges have in multi-jurisdictional class actions.

The cases concern a pan-Canadian settlement agreement reached between parties to a class action proceeding. The settlement agreement assigned a supervisory role to the superior courts of British Columbia, Quebec, and Ontario, and in 2012 the parties requested that related motions be heard by the three judges sitting together in one location.

The provinces opposed the proposal on the basis that judges did not have jurisdiction to conduct hearings outside of their home provinces, and motions were brought to determine the issues. The three motions judges held that the proposal was acceptable, and Ontario and British Columbia appealed - the Ontario Court of Appeal held that a video-link was required to connect back to the judge's home court, and the BC Court of Appeal held that a BC judge cannot conduct hearings that take place outside the province; a judge may be located out of the province only if the hearing is in a BC courtroom and heard by the judge by telpehone, video or other means of communication. The issue was appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The SCC now holds that both statutory and inherent powers enable a judge who has subject-matter and personal jurisdiction over a pan-national class action to hold a hearing outside her territory in conjuction with the other managing judges. So long as the hearing is not contrary to the law of the place in which it is held, and provided that the judge does not have to employ the court's coercive powers in order to convene the hearing (the court declined to address whether any coercive powers could be exercised in the course of the hearing), the court has discretion to hold such a hearing in the interests of the administration of justice.

Click here to read Lessa Nosko's more detailed analysis of the decision.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More