As we have
previously reported, Bill 132's amendments to the workplace
harassment provisions of the Ontario Occupational Health and
Safety Act came into force on September 8,
On September 13, 2016, the Ministry of Labour published an
updated version of its guide, Workplace Violence and
Harassment: Understanding the Law (the "Guide"),
which now includes guidance on the Bill 132 amendments. The
Guide seeks to explain, in plain language, "what every worker,
supervisor, employer and constructor needs to know about workplace
violence and harassment requirements in the Occupational Health and
Safety Act" and also answers frequently asked questions about
the OHSA. In particular, the Guide clarifies the following points
about the OHSA's workplace harassment provisions:
The suggested content of a workplace harassment policy, which
is not otherwise set out in the OHSA;
Examples of "reasonable action" that do not
constitute workplace harassment under the OHSA;
That employers can combine their workplace harassment policies
and programs into one document or combine both documents with other
workplace policies of the employer (e.g. workplace violence
policies, anti-harassment or anti-discrimination policies, etc.),
as long as all of the OHSA's requirements are complied
That someone either internal or external to the organization
can receive reports of workplace harassment, as long as the report
is addressed objectively and investigated in an appropriate
The characteristics of an "appropriate"
investigation, including: who can investigate complaints, suggested
stages of a complex investigation, and suggested timeframes for
Examples of "corrective action" and how to provide
the results of the investigation to involved parties in situations
where the alleged harasser has left the organization;
When and how employers should conduct a review of their
existing workplace harassment programs;
The scope of the employer's duty to provide workers with
"information and instruction"; and
Who is an "impartial person" who could conduct a
harassment investigation ordered by a Ministry of Labour inspector
under the OHSA's new enforcement mechanism.
The Ministry of Labour confirms that, unlike the Ministry's
Code of Practice for Workplace Harassment (which we reported on
here), adherence to the contents of the Guide does not
constitute compliance with the law. However, the Ministry also
notes that its health and safety inspectors may refer to the Guide
when enforcing compliance with the OHSA. As such, the Guide is a
helpful resource for employers when creating, reviewing and
implementing their workplace harassment policies and programs. The
Guide can be accessed here.
Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A
top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm
is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent
and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways.
Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the
communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows
that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully
completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business
challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons'
global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local,
national and global needs of private and public clients of any size
in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances. Specific Questions relating to
this article should be addressed directly to the author.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Join our partners Karen Martin and Ryan Chalmers at the Pacific Business & Law Institute’s program, where they will be presenting a session titled "Procurement: Compliance with AIT, NWPTA, TILMA, NAFTA, TPP, CETA and the Statutes." This forum assembles leading government advisors to provide insights on key issues in local government today.
The arbitrator's decision covered a number of issues including whether the termination was appropriate and whether the City had breached the grievor's human rights. The following, however, will focus on the privacy issue raised.
In my December 15, 2016 article, Federal Government's Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?, I noted the Report's1 suggestion that there was a lack of research to reliably determine when individuals are impaired by cannabis.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).