Canada: "Such Consent Not To Be Unreasonably Withheld …"

Last Updated: October 3 2016
Article by Richard Dusome

Most commercial enterprises believe that they act reasonably in conducting their business affairs and operations. However, reasonableness, like beauty, can often be in the eye of the beholder. What seems reasonable to an entrepreneur borrower looking to expand its operations may not be seen as reasonable in the eyes of a lender that would prefer its borrower to follow a slower and more sustainable growth plan.

Credit Agreements typically contain a series of covenants that restrict or limit certain activities of borrowers. Recognizing their likely future need for a waiver of a particular limitation or prohibition to permit a specific one-time action, borrowers will often request carve-outs from the covenant pattern by adding a link to the words “unless the Lender otherwise consents”. Borrowers will also typically try to tie down the discretion of their lenders when it comes to providing their consent. The addition of the words, “such consent not to be unreasonably withheld”, is a frequent borrower request. It is important for lenders to understand the implications of any agreement to allow this reasonableness standard to be imported into a future request for consent to a particular covenant variation. 

Surprisingly, there are very few reported cases in Canada shedding any light on this issue in the context of the borrower-lender relationship. Rather, the leading Canadian cases relating to commercial consents have arisen in connection with the landlord-tenant relationship. Specifically, the courts have examined the obligations on a landlord asked to consent to a lease assignment, where the lease provided that such consent “shall not be unreasonably withheld”. 

In Cudmore1, the British Columbia Supreme Court considered Petro-Canada’s obligation to consent in the context of an assignment of a service station lease. The lessee was seeking an answer to the question, “Is the remedy of damages available to the Plaintiff (lessee) in an action against the Defendant (lessor) for unreasonable refusal of consent?”.2  

The court concluded that the phrase “which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld” should not be construed as a qualification of the tenant’s covenant. Rather it is essentially a covenant on the part of the landlord not to “refuse his consent arbitrarily or unreasonably”, which is subject to a remedy of damages if that covenant is not fulfilled.3

In the later case of Welbow4, the Ontario Superior Court offered the following additional guidelines in determining whether a landlord had unreasonably withheld its consent in refusing to consent to an assignment of the lease:

(1) The burden is on the tenant to show that the refusal to consent was unreasonable.

(2) Only the information available to the landlord at the time, and the reasons given by the landlord at the time, are relevant to the determination of reasonableness, not any facts or reasons subsequently provided to the court.

(3) The landlord is not entitled to require amendments to the lease that will provide it with more advantageous terms, but it may reasonably withhold consent if the assignment will diminish the value of its rights under it.

(4) A probability that a proposed assignee will default may, depending on the circumstances, be reasonable grounds for refusal of consent.

(5) The financial position of the assignee may be a relevant consideration.

(6) The question of reasonableness is essentially one of fact that must be determined on the circumstances of the particular case, including the commercial realities of the market place and the economic impact of an assignment on the landlord.5

Several Ontario cases involving landlords and tenants have followed Welbow. In some instances the courts have assisted tenants challenging landlords who have had ulterior motives for withholding their consent. In others, the courts have recognized there can be legitimate business reasons for a landlord withholding consent to an assignment, especially where the proposed assignee tenant’s covenant is perceived not to be as strong as that of the existing tenant.

Fortunately, courts in the United Kingdom have examined the withholding of consent in commercial transactions outside of the landlord-tenant relationship. In Porton Capital6, the purchaser under a share purchase agreement had agreed that it would not stop marketing and developing a product without the consent of the vendors, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld. When sales of the product slumped, the purchaser sought the vendors’ consent to stop manufacturing the product. When the vendors refused to provide the consent, the purchaser stopped the manufacture anyways. The English High Court agreed with the vendors’ interpretation of the phrase as follows:

(A) The burden is upon the party that requested consent to show that the other party’s consent was unreasonably withheld.

(B) The party withholding consent is not required to show that their refusal of consent was right or justified, simply that it was reasonable in the circumstances.

(C) In determining what is reasonable, the party withholding consent is entitled to have regard to its own interests (in this case, its interests in earning as large of an Earn Out Payment as possible).

(D) The party withholding consent is not required to balance its own interests with those of the party requesting consent.7

Ultimately the court in Porton Capital found that the vendors’ consent was not unreasonably withheld, after taking into account the fact that giving consent would mean that the vendors would receive only a small proportion of their expected profits. Moreover, due to the vendors’ limited involvement with the development and marketing of the product after closing, they would have reasons to doubt the purchaser’s explanations for the drop in sales.8

Finally, in Unicredit Bank9, the English Court of Appeal considered certain guarantees which contained a provision that allowed Unicredit to terminate the guarantees with the consent of Barclays Bank plc (“Barclays”), which consent was required to be exercised in a “commercially reasonable manner”. Barclays offered to give consent only if it received five years of fees. The court held that this was reasonable, finding that Barclays could take into account its own interests, as Barclays was not in a position to assess and measure the other party’s interests.10 The test was that of a reasonable commercial man and the court found that “any commercial man whose consent to a course of action is required but to whom the determination (whether to give that consent) is entrusted would think it commercially reasonable to have primary regard to his own financial interests”.11 The court added that if Barclays had required 11 years payment, or if it had refused to consent at any price, this may have rendered the withholding of consent unreasonable.12

It seems somewhat likely that the English case law will be followed in Canada in the borrower-lender scenario, and that the Canadian courts will allow lenders to consider their own interests in making decisions to grant or withhold consent to waivers and covenant variations even when those interests do not align with those of their borrowers. However the following factors might be considered by any lender considering a borrower’s request to add the “such consent not to be unreasonably withheld” phrase into any particular covenant:

  • Limit the number of times the phrase is inserted into the Credit Agreement. Although clearly not every request for consent needs to be granted, the phrase will impose a higher level of scrutiny of the lender’s actions and draw increased attention to its decision-making process. Consider restricting the addition to those situations where it is needed to preserve a good lender/borrower relationship.
  • Be prepared to comply with the words and the added formality in the decision making process that the words entail when a request for consent is made. Some internal notes of the analysis undertaken by a lender considering a request for consent should be documented to support any denial, in case the reasonableness of the refusal is challenged by the Borrower.
  • Avoid the addition in any situation where the lender wishes to maintain an overriding discretion in making any decision on account of special circumstances relating to the Borrower’s business, or a change in market practice or industry standards.
  • Refrain from the addition in any situation where it might lead the lender to make a decision that is contrary to the reasonable expectations of the borrower as already communicated during the course of discussions or negotiations of the credit agreement where an anticipated “difference of opinion” may very well exist.
  • Keep in mind that recent decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada have suggested that contracting parties have “a duty of honesty in contractual performance”, and have “good faith as an organizing principle” in the common law of contract.13 The application of those concepts has not yet been fully played out in the lower courts, and their extension to matters of consent is not yet known.

Then when a request for consent comes in, a lender will want to ensure it obtains from the borrower all of the information that it would like to have in considering whether to grant consent to a borrower’s request to waive compliance with a particular covenant in order to make a fully informed decision. As requests for consent to a variation in any covenant sought by a borrower from a lender may cover a broad spectrum, additional information may take the form of pro forma financial statements, budgets and other financial data and materials to assist the lender in the exercise of its decision.

* The author acknowledges the assistance of Travis Evens, Articling Student, and Emily Dies, Summer Law Student, with the research for and preparation of this article.

Footnotes

1 Cudmore v. Petro-Canada Inc., 1986 CarswellBC 93 [Cudmore].

2 Cudmore, at para. 3.

3 Cudmore, at para. 21.

4 1455202 Ontario Inc. v. Welbow Holdings Ltd., [2003] OJ No. 1785 [Welbow].

5 Welbow, at para. 9.

6 Porton Capital Technology Funds v. 3M Holdings Ltd., [2011] EWHC 2895 [Porton Capital].

7 Porton Capital, at para. 223.

8 Porton Capital, at paras. 233 and 234.

9 Barclays Bank plc v Unicredit Bank AG, [2013] EWHC 3655 (Comm) (High Court Decision) and [2014] EWCA Civ 302 (Court of Appeal Decision) [Unicredit Bank].

10 Unicredit Bank, at paras. 15 and 17.

11 Unicredit Bank, at para. 16.

12 Unicredit Bank, at para. 18.

13 Bhasin v. Hrynew 2014 SCC 71.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions