On September 14, 2016, the Alberta Securities Commission (ASC)
published for comment proposed amendments to National Instrument
58-101 – Disclosure of Corporate Governance
Practices and Form 8-101F1 – Corporate Governance
Disclosure that establish disclosure requirements regarding
the representation of women on boards of directors and in executive
officer positions of non-venture issuers as well as with respect to
term limits or other mechanisms of board renewal for board
directors (Proposed Amendments).
The Proposed Amendments were previously adopted by the
securities regulators of all of the other provinces and territories
of Canada, other than British Columbia and Prince Edward Island,
and came into effect in those jurisdictions on December 31, 2014.
For further information, see our previous Blakes Bulletins:
The ASC had not initially adopted the Proposed Amendments
because it was not persuaded that the composition of board and
senior management teams, from a gender diversity perspective, fell
within its mandate. However, the ASC said it is now proposing to
adopt the Proposed Amendments given that it has been revealed that
the Proposed Amendments' objective is to "increase
transparency for investors and other stakeholders regarding the
representation of women on boards and in executive officer
positions" and to "assist investors when making
investment and voting decisions". In addition, the ASC
indicates that the new Minister of Finance and President of
Treasury Board had encouraged it to reconsider its position.
The Proposed Amendments, as we further described when they were
Ontario and certain other jurisdictions in 2014, require
issuers, other than venture issuers and investment funds, to
provide disclosure on an annual basis regarding the representation
of women on boards and in executive positions using a "comply
or explain" approach, but do not contain any mandatory gender
diversity targets or other affirmative steps to increase gender
diversity at the board or executive management level. Given that
the vast majority of Alberta issuers who would become subject to
the Proposed Amendments through the ASC's adoption are already
subject to them by virtue of being reporting issuers in Ontario, we
anticipate few practical implications if the Proposed Amendments
are adopted in Alberta in their current form.
This seminar will provide a broad cross-country update on major domestic and cross-border filings, topics of interest and judicial decisions in 2016, across a number of industries, including oil and gas, mining, real estate, retail, and others.
Join leading experts from Blakes to discuss the latest trends in class actions and jurisprudence in Canada. This interactive discussion will span a cross-section of recent developments and hot-button topics in areas such as:
Following the plenary discussion, we will host breakout group sessions focusing on specific considerations in the following industries:The seminar will focus on practical ways to develop appropriate strategies to efficiently manage your class action exposure and defence, while limiting your potential reputational risk.
The stakes have never been higher for defendants facing civil and enforcement proceedings relating to their capital market activities. New take-over bid rules, securities class action developments and an ever-changing regulatory landscape pose continuous challenges for public issuers and their directors and officers.
Please join our panel of securities and litigation practitioners to address recent trends and developments in securities litigation and hear from the Ontario Securities Commission’s new Director of Enforcement, Jeff Kehoe.
Pursuant to several recent legislative amendments and enactments, Ontario corporations holding a legal or beneficial interest in real property in Ontario are now subject to more onerous record-keeping requirements.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).