Canada: Pensions Regulator Opens The Discussion On What "21st Century Trusteeship" Should Look Like

Last Updated: August 26 2016
Article by Christopher Stiles

Most Read Contributor in Canada, October 2018

The Pensions Regulator has recently published a discussion paper inviting views on 21st century pension trusteeship.

The paper invites views on what drives effective trusteeship and governance, and sets out what the Regulator has learned from its recent surveys of occupational pension schemes, and what it is considering doing to help schemes improve their governance.

For trustees and sponsors of occupational pension schemes, it makes interesting reading, and many may wish to consider responding - the deadline for responses is 9 September 2016.

It is also timely, given that the European Union is close to agreeing the text of a revised directive (IORP II) regarding "Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision" in which the requirements for fit and proper management and governance of a scheme are considered.

No doubt the outcome of this process will lead to the next instalments of regulatory guidance and possibly also statutory governance requirements, to complement the structure previously introduced for defined contribution schemes in 2015.

In this analysis we do not summarise or repeat the entire paper, but we draw out some of the key themes which emerge from it, together with our comments.

Professionalisation

Historically, being a trustee has been a lay occupation - an extension of the British tradition of the "gentleman amateur". That may have been appropriate at the time for the Victorian family trusts from which much of trust law derives, but modern occupational pension schemes are very different - in general, they are large and complex savings vehicles, which exist in a more sophisticated financial services world, and on which their many members rely almost entirely for an income in old age. As with their corporate counterparts, evidence suggests that they benefit from an increased diversity of skills.

Until about 20 years ago, however, occupational pension schemes were, by modern standards, largely unregulated. That has changed, with the creation of regulatory bodies (first OPRA, now the Pensions Regulator) and an ever-increasing volume of statute, regulation and guidance. However, one area in which it has not changed is that there are still no formal requirements to be a trustee (although there are statutory rules which prohibit individuals from acting as trustees in certain circumstances).

That gap has been filled by an increasing market for professional trustees, and the Regulator's paper clearly marks a trend towards greater professionalisation of trusteeship. The Regulator's evidence suggests that there is a correlation between schemes that have a professional trustee and the likelihood of a scheme being well-governed, as a result of the knowledge, experience and independence which a professional trustee brings to the board.

Should trustees be professionals?

The test for what makes a suitable trustee has historically been character or position, not qualifications. To the extent that professional skills are required, trustees rely on advisers, rather than seeking to gain those skills themselves.

The gap in the market which professional trustees are well-placed to fill is a broad knowledge and experience of occupational pension schemes and, in some circumstances, specific experience of what a scheme is actually going through, e.g. a company takeover or restructuring, or complex investment decisions.  It is not the role of a professional trustee to be a substitute for advisers, and so legal or actuarial training is not essential to being a professional trustee (though it may well be an asset). What is required is knowledge of pensions- so if an issue arises, it may be similar to something they have seen before on other schemes, meaning they are not learning on the job but instead helping to educate the lay trustees on the board.

Also, they have the advantage of independence, which is always a benefit, and especially so during difficult times (e.g. where the sponsoring employer is in a distressed condition).

Consider for example a board that contains the following hypothetical trustees:

  • a professional trustee who brings independent and specialist knowledge of pensions and experience of working on other schemes;
  • engaged member-nominated lay trustees who have a sound working knowledge of the needs of the membership, many of whom they know personally, and;
  • company-nominated trustees with a knowledge of the employer's business at a senior, strategic level.

It can be seen that this is a balanced, diverse board and in our experience it is a structure which is most likely to be well-governed and successful.

Incidentally, it also is one of the best safeguards against conflicts of interest affecting decision-making. Everyone involved in a pension scheme will have some conflicts of interest, so one way to manage them is to ensure that there is a sufficient diversity of interests that the conflicts cancel each other out.

The above example demonstrates that the professional trustees and lay trustees can be complementary to one another. While having a sole professional trustee has its advantages, in particular, speed of action, there remain benefits for many schemes in having the mix described above.

However, all schemes have different needs and it is impossible to design the perfect trust board - there should be flexibility to adapt the structure to the needs of the scheme and the employer's business. We see many schemes that do not have professional trustees and are well-governed, although we endorse the Regulator's observation that the appointment of a suitable professional trustee almost always has a positive effect.

What qualifications should a professional trustee have?

The paper also raises the concern that anybody can hold himself out as a "professional trustee" - there are no formal requirements to be satisfied to enable the title to be used.

It follows from the thoughts above that there are two possible entry routes into professional trusteeship that appear attractive:

  • an experience-based qualification (a certain number of years of working in pensions, even without formal qualifications), or;
  • formal qualifications which relate specifically to pensions, such as those offered by the Association of Professional Pension Trustees and the Pensions Management Institute.

Clearly professional trustees who can offer both will have an advantage in the market.

Firms of professional trustees (or their respective professional associations) will no doubt wish to respond to the Regulator with their thoughts on these issues.

We think that the requirements need to be carefully thought through so that they do not stop professional trustees with different backgrounds (e.g. investment, finance, governance) being able to qualify. That said, those with a non-pensions background should need to demonstrate learning in the specifics of pension schemes before they can act.

Chairman's role

Most defined contribution schemes are already required by law to have a chairman of trustees, although his statutory role is limited to being the one who signs the annual governance statement - but the entire trustee board is responsible for what that statement actually says.

The Regulator is looking at extending similar principles to defined benefit schemes, and also asks what if anything should be done to raise the standards of chairmanship, for example by requiring chairmen to have particular qualifications, experience or membership of a professional body.

In our experience, where the role of chairman is most valuable is in ensuring good governance - i.e. ensuring all trustees are given the opportunity to express their views whilst also ensuring that business is dealt with efficiently, managing conflicts of interest, being the face of the scheme in dealings with the employer, etc.

That ability to manage the scheme efficiently but with good governance seems to us to be the most important quality for a chairman, at least as important as any specialist knowledge he may bring to the table.  On trustee boards that have a professional trustee, it follows that the professional trustee does not need to be the chairman (and if he is, he will need to be careful not to be seen to be assuming too dominant a role).

In our experience, it is difficult to have good governance without an effective chairman, but this should not detract from the fact that good governance comes from a well-balanced trust board acting collectively - concentrating too much importance on the chairman is not always constructive to good decision-making.

However, different compositions work for different schemes and individuals and the Regulator would no doubt be grateful for views and experience on this. Our view is that it would be wrong to be too prescriptive about the requirements for the chairman.

Training and development

The Regulator already has guidance on initial training for new trustees, with the trustee toolkit and the Trustee Knowledge and Understanding (TKU) framework, although it expresses concerns that not all trustees adhere to this.

More interestingly, the Regulator raises the possibility of more formal continuing professional development (CPD) requirements for trustees once they are in post, as is common in the professions. Views on the extent to which this will raise standards, or make the burden of trusteeship unbearable, will be interesting.

Certainly in our experience most trustees do voluntarily seek out continued training opportunities to keep their knowledge up-to-date - not to do so puts them at serious risk of breaching their trustee duties given the pace of change in the wider pensions world.

While we do not favour excessively prescriptive requirements for training, we see the benefits of an obligation to submit training logs to the Regulator on an annual basis and/or a requirement for a minimum number of hours of learning per year.

Small schemes

The Regulator expresses concern about the governance of smaller pension schemes, and this has been a consistent theme from the Regulator for some time now.

Whilst it is certainly not true to say that all small schemes have poor governance (many have excellent governance), the Regulator's research indicates that of the schemes exhibiting poor governance, many are, in fact, the smaller schemes. This is perhaps understandable in that the trustees of such schemes are less likely to have the time or resources to devote to them.

The Regulator therefore asks what it can usefully do to enforce its standards in respect of such schemes.

One solution is to merge small schemes into larger schemes and then wind up the small scheme. For defined contribution schemes, that can be done relatively easily by transferring the benefits into master trusts or similar vehicles. For defined benefit schemes that cannot be done, although if an employer has a small defined benefit scheme and a larger defined benefit or hybrid scheme, there is the prospect of greater efficiency, and often significant cost savings, to be derived from merger, quite apart from the governance benefits.

Another solution is to encourage small schemes to make greater use of professional trustees and advisers - whilst being mindful of the fact that they will be more cost-sensitive than larger schemes.

What happens next?

We will be submitting a response to the Regulator's discussion questions, with a view to aiding their understanding of the role of a trustee from our observations in practice, and would be interested in the thoughts of our clients and fellow professionals on the issues raised.

Trustees (including firms of professional trustees) and employers may also wish to respond directly. The deadline for responses is 9 September 2016 - take a look at the discussion paper, which includes details for responding.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions