Canada: Arbitrations, Class Actions, Consumer Contracts And The Internet – The Dell Case

Last Updated: September 7 2007

Article by Sunny Handa, Marie-Hélène Constantin and Oana Dolea (law student), © 2007, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Informational Technology, August 2007

The Supreme Court of Canada recently released its decision in Dell Computer Corporation v. Union des consommateurs and Olivier Dumoulin, which has come to be known as the "Dell case". The decision offers valuable guidance on, among other issues, the legal status of clauses accessible by hyperlink in online consumer contracts, the arbitration of consumer disputes in Quebec and, importantly, whether an arbitration clause will trump a class action.


The dispute in the case arose when two Dell Computer Corporation (Dell) hand-held computer models were erroneously listed at significantly discounted prices on the company’s English-language website. Olivier Dumoulin, a Quebec resident, successfully placed an order at the discounted prices. When Dell announced it would not process orders made at the erroneous prices, the Union des Consommateurs and Mr. Dumoulin filed a motion for authorization to institute a class action against Dell. In response, Dell filed a motion to refer Mr. Dumoulin’s claim to arbitration, in accordance with an arbitration clause included in the Dell terms and conditions of sale governing online orders made through its website.

The Superior Court of Quebec and the Court of Appeal of Quebec both held that Mr. Dumoulin was not subject to the arbitration clause in question. The Superior Court decision focused on the applicability of Quebec’s private international law rules, specifically the rule of Article 3149 of the Civil Code of Quebec (C.C.Q.) reserving exclusive jurisdiction for the Quebec Courts in the context of international consumer contracts. The Court made it clear that the presence of an arbitration clause governed by the procedural rules of a U.S.-based institution introduced an international element into the consumer contract. In view of Article 3149 C.C.Q., the Court ruled that Mr. Dumoulin could not be subject to the Dell arbitration clause. Dell appealed the finding to the Court of Appeal of Quebec.

The Court of Appeal’s 2005 ruling touched on a number of issues, including the applicability of Quebec’s private international law provisions. Unlike the decision of the Superior Court, the Court of Appeal ruled that an agreement to refer a consumer dispute to arbitration did not constitute a waiver of the jurisdiction of Quebec’s courts, since the arbitration could still be held in Quebec and governed by the laws of Quebec. The Court of Appeal also rejected the argument that consumer disputes are an issue of public order and thus are not subject to arbitration under Article 2639 C.C.Q.

The Court of Appeal held, however, that an arbitration clause accessible via a hyperlink is considered to be "external" to the online contract which contains the hyperlink. It further ruled that Dell had not proven that its arbitration clause was brought to the consumer’s attention. On the basis of Article 1435 C.C.Q. – the requirement that an external clause in the context of a consumer contract is only valid if it is brought to the consumer’s attention – the Court of Appeal upheld the conclusion of the Superior Court that the Dell arbitration clause was not applicable in the case of Mr. Dumoulin.

Supreme Court Of Canada

The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision addressed a number of issues, including (i) the nature of external clauses for the purposes of Article 1435 C.C.Q. in the context of electronic consumer contracts; (ii) the arbitration of consumer disputes versus class actions in the context of the Article 2639 C.C.Q. prohibition on the use of arbitration in matters of public order; (iii) the arbitration of consumer disputes in light of the recent Bill 48 (2006) amendments to the Quebec Consumer Protection Act; (iv) the applicability of rules on the jurisdiction of Quebec Courts in the context of consumer contracts; and (v) jurisdiction over challenges to the validity of an arbitration agreement. Each of these issues is discussed below.

External Clauses And Online Consumer Contracts

The Supreme Court decision noted that the Dell case is the first instance where the Quebec Court of Appeal has had to consider the applicability of the Article 1435 C.C.Q. rule on external clauses in the context of an electronic consumer contract. The Court addressed the issue of whether an online contractual clause that is accessible by hyperlink should be characterized as a clause external to the contract. Quebec’s Act to establish a legal framework for information technology confirms the legal equivalence of paper and electronic contracts. The traditional test for an external clause in the context of paper contracts is whether the clause in question is physically separate from the contract, or is an integral part of it. The Court acknowledged that, given the technical nature of electronic contracts, the physical separation test cannot be applied literally in that context. The difference between clicking in order to access a clause via a hyperlink and scrolling down an Internet web-page to do the same was deemed insufficient for a finding that a clause accessible by hyperlink was external to the contract while one accessible by scrolling through the contract was not. A clause contained in a document found online to which an electronic contract refers but for which no hyperlink is provided would, however, be deemed to be an external clause. According to the Court, the physical separation test should be interpreted as standing for the principle that it should be no more difficult to access a clause of an electronic contract than to access its paper equivalent. The Court pointed out that the link to the terms and conditions containing the arbitration clause appeared on every page accessed by the consumer; as such, the consumer had access to the arbitration clause that was functionally equivalent to the clause being in the same paper document. The ruling of the Supreme Court on this issue is an important clarification of the meaning of Article 1435 C.C.Q. in a consumer environment where electronic contracts are increasingly prevalent.

Will Arbitration Clauses Trump Class Actions?

The Court rejected the argument that an arbitration clause cannot prevent an individual from commencing a class action in Quebec because it would mean the arbitration of an issue of public order. As was held in the case of Desputeaux v. Éditions Chouette, the Court insisted that issues designated as being of public order must be limited to matters that are analogous to those enumerated in Article 2639 C.C.Q. Just as copyright issues were not found to constitute an issue of public order in Desputeaux, the Court in Dell found no reason to include consumer disputes in that group.

The Court also found, importantly, that although class actions are of public interest, the mere fact that a claim is brought before the courts under a class action procedure rather than by way of an individual action does not change the character of a dispute which may otherwise be subject to arbitration. The class action is a procedure and its purpose is not to create a new right. The Court, accordingly, held that the mandatory arbitration clause trumped the class action rules in Quebec in this case. The Court’s decision on this point could have an impact in other provinces with mandatory arbitration statutes and class action statutes, absent express provision otherwise (i.e., in consumer protection legislation). A number of provincial courts previously held that an arbitration clause will not necessarily trump a class action. Those decisions will now have to be reconsidered in light of the Dell case.

Bill 48

The Quebec Act to amend the Consumer Protection Act and the Act respecting the collection of certain debts, also known as Bill 48, came into force just days after the Supreme Court appeal hearing was held. The Supreme Court had to decide on the applicability of s. 11.1 of the newly amended Consumer Protection Act, which provides consumers with the choice of referring a dispute to either arbitration or the courts even in the presence of a valid arbitration clause. The Court held that s. 11.1 did not apply in Dell, because the arbitration agreement was concluded before the coming into force of the new provision and the presumption against retroactivity of new laws was not rebutted. However, it is important to underscore that the changes to the Consumer Protection Act effected by Bill 48 will govern arbitration agreements concluded in Quebec after its coming into force. Under the changes imposed by Bill 48, arbitration clauses in contracts involving Quebec consumers will still be valid in form but only enforceable against a consumer if s/he agrees to submit to arbitration when a dispute arises.

Applicability Of Quebec Rules Of Private International Law

The Supreme Court established that the applicability of the C.C.Q. provisions dealing with the international jurisdiction of Quebec authorities must be limited to situations containing "a relevant foreign element". The majority explained that only an element that is legally relevant to a foreign country and plays a role in determining whether a particular court has jurisdiction can be considered sufficient to fulfill this "foreign element" requirement.

The Court found that Article 3149 C.C.Q. has such limited application because it constitutes part of the title on the international jurisdiction of Quebec authorities. Article 3149 C.C.Q. establishes the jurisdiction of Quebec authorities over actions involving a consumer contract or contract of employment if the consumer or worker has his domicile or residence in Quebec. The article also renders ineffectual any waiver of this jurisdiction by the consumer or worker.

The majority ruled that the existence of an arbitration clause in a consumer contract does not trigger the applicability of Quebec rules of private international law such as Article 3149 C.C.Q. The Court defined arbitration as an "institution without forum and without a geographical basis" (para. 28) that is focused on party choice of governing law rules, regardless of the origin of those rules. As such, there can be no possible connection with a foreign state and so no relevant foreign element as defined by the Court exists in the context of arbitration.

Bastarache, Le Bel and Fish JJ. disagreed with the majority on this point, stating that forum selection and arbitration clauses can in fact trigger the applicability of Quebec rules of private international law. In the case at issue, the fact that the designated arbitration authority was bound by American law clearly constituted a relevant foreign element. Such an institution could not be considered a Quebec authority. The arbitration clause thus constituted, in the dissenting justices’ view, an illegal waiver of the jurisdiction of Quebec authorities as set out in Article 3149 C.C.Q. The majority’s binding interpretation of this point is encouraging for enterprises engaged in contracts with consumers as they can have increased confidence that, with an arbitration clause, the contractual obligations they fashion will not be displaced by Quebec’s private international law principles.

Jurisdiction Over Challenges To The Validity Of An Arbitration Agreement

The decision also touched on the appropriate procedure for resolving challenges to an arbitrator’s jurisdiction. The majority and dissenting judges agreed that an agreement to arbitrate must be respected by the courts, which must refer any disputes over the agreement’s validity to arbitration at first instance. The Court also unanimously agreed that there exist exceptional circumstances in which courts should be able to review such a challenge directly. The majority and dissenting judges disagreed, however, on the extent of review courts should be allowed to undertake under such exceptional circumstances. The majority’s narrower interpretation led it to conclude that as long as there are any arguments requiring an analysis of the facts, a challenge to an arbitration tribunal’s jurisdiction must be remitted to arbitration.


With the decision in Dell, the Supreme Court has taken an important step in clarifying the law in the context of Internet contracts as well as various rules applicable to arbitration in the context of class actions and consumer dealings. Many of the rules touch on specific Quebec legislation but the Court’s decision is generally framed in language that is broad enough to be useful when interpreting similar statutes in other provinces.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.