Canada: Precautionary Tale? BC Environmental Appeal Board Says "Polluter-Pays" And "Precautionary" Principles Not Applicable To The Permitting Process Under The BC Environmental Management Act

The British Columbia Court of Appeal in J.I. Properties Inc. v PPG Architectural Coatings Canada Ltd, 2015 BCCA 472 ("JI Properties") affirmed the "polluter pays" principle in the context of remediation cost recovery actions under the Environmental Management Act, SBC 2003, c 53 (the "EMA") However, in a recent decision by the BC Environmental Appeal Board it was held that neither the polluter pays nor precautionary principles apply to section 16 of the EMA which deals with granting permits for the discharge of waste.

In Toews v. British Columbia (Ministry of Environment) [2015] B.C.E.A. No. 25, the Environmental Appeal Board addressed, in part, the application of the precautionary principle and the polluter-pays principle to the interpretation of section 16 of the EMA which deals with granting permits for the discharge of waste. The Board confirmed that the polluter-pays principle was imported to Part 4 of EMA (i.e. the cost recovery framework) but refused to extend its application to section 16. The Board also distinguished the precautionary principle from a precautionary approach. The Board held that a cautious and technically rigorous approach should be adopted in assessing the potential risk of injury to human health and damage to the environment.


Between 1950 and 1954, Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. (formerly Aluminum Company of Canada) ("Rio Tinto"), established an aluminum smelter in Kitimat. Rio Tinto owned much of the land in the Kitimat valley and over time sold parcels to commercial and residential development. The residential lands retained an easement in favour of Rio Tinto allowing Rio Tinto the right to emit discharges into the air. Eventually, the Province moved to a "multi-media" approach to permitting, which resulted in a single authorization for permit holders to discharge different forms of waste. In 1999 Rio Tinto received a multi-media permit P2-00001 (the "Permit"), which authorized the discharge of effluent, emissions and waste. The permit specified a maximum daily discharge of 27 tons of SO2.

In or about 2007, Rio Tinto sought to amend the Permit in order to increase production at the Kitimat Smelter. In April 2013, pursuant to section 16 of the EMA, the Director amended the allowable emissions and increased the permissible amount to 42 metric tons per day subject to Rio Tinto's submission and implementation of an Environmental Effects Monitoring Plan ("EEMP") (the "2013 Amendment"). The Director confirmed specific impact threshold criteria in the fall of 2014 in a letter approving Rio Tinto's EEMP. This letter set out the "Key Performance Indicators", stipulating quantitative thresholds in relation to the impact on vegetation, on soils, and on water, but no such quantitative thresholds were set out in relation to human health.

In May 2013, Emily Toews and Elisabeth Stannus (the "Appellants") filed separate appeals against the decision of the Director, and Northern Region - Skeena, Ministry of Environment (the "Ministry"), to amend the Permit and the EEMP. Five other applicants also filed appeals. The Board held that the Appellants were indeed "person aggrieved" within the meaning of section 100(1) of the Act and allowed their request to appeal but declined to hear the merits of the five other appeals.

In October 2014, the Appellants applied to amend their appeal to include the 2014 letter. Unifor Local 2301 ("Unifor") also appealed the 2014 letter. The Board declined the amendment and to hear the appeal on procedural grounds stating that the fall of 2014 letter was not an appealable decision under the Act. Unifor successfully applied for judicial review [Unifor Local 2301 v. British Columbia (Environmental Appeal Board), 2015 BCSC 1592].

The British Columbia Supreme Court ("BCSC") determined, based on the standard of review of reasonableness, that it was unreasonable for the Board to have determined that Unifor should have appealed the Amendment increasing emissions as opposed to the 2014 letter outlining the Key Performance Indicators. To hold otherwise, the Court determined, would require anyone who thinks they may be adversely impacted by a second stage decision to bring a "prophylactic appeal" at the first stage.

The matter was remitted back to the Board for reconsideration in accordance with the BCSC's reasons. Unifor originally appealed the Letter of Approval on six grounds, one of which is that the Director erred in concluding that the Environmental Effects Monitoring Plan adequately protected human health and the environment. Of particular concern to the union, was the impact of the plan on the health of its union members at the Rio Tinto smelter. On re-hearing, the Panel found that Unifor was a "person aggrieved" within the meaning of section 100(1) of the Act [Unifor Local 2301 v. British Columbia (Ministry of Environment) [2015] B.C.E.A. No. 22]. The merits appeal does not appear to have been heard to date, nor is the matter listed in Boards hearing lists for 2016.

Following the BCSC's decision on Unifor, the Board voluntarily decided to reconsider its decision on the Toews and Stannus' appeals of the 2014 letter which were heard together [Toews v. British Columbia (Ministry of Environment) [2015] B.C.E.A. No. 21] (despite neither having appealed the Boards decision to decline to hear their original appeals of the 2014 letter). In the appeal on the merits [Toews v. British Columbia (Ministry of Environment) [2015] B.C.E.A. No. 25] the Appellants argued, in part, that the Director failed to apply, or improperly applied, the "precautionary principle or approach" and the "polluter pay principle" in exercising his discretion under section 16 of EMA.

The Board's Decision

The Polluter Pays Principle

The Board held that while it had previously determined that the polluter-pays principle was to be incorporated into Part 4 of EMA, with respect to liability for remediating contaminated sites (and upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada in Columbia Hydro and Power Authority v. British Columbia (Environmental Appeal Board), 2005 SCC 1), this appeal did not involve "contaminated sites" within the meaning of the EMA. By implication, the Board declined the applicability of the polluter-pays principle to the permitting process for the discharge of waste.

As the Appellants appeared to have abandoned this argument, the Board did not give any further details as to what distinguished the cost recovery regime from the permitting of waste discharges.

The Precautionary Principle

In discussing the application of the precautionary principle or approach to the interpretation of section 16 of EMA, the Board relied on its previous decisions wherein it held that the precautionary principle did not inform the interpretation of the permitting provisions in the EMA. In reviewing the general application of the precautionary principle and approach, the Board noted that phrases such as "precautionary principle" and "precautionary approach" although used in international treaties and Canadian environmental studies, have no uniform definition and, are not found in the EMA or its predecessor. Referring to the definition of the principle by the Supreme Court of Canada in 114957 Canada Ltée (Spraytech, Société d'arrosage) v. Hudson (Town), 2001 SCC 40, the Board further concluded that there is a difference between the precautionary principle and a precautionary approach. It held that had the legislature intended that decision makers apply either of the principles in exercising their discretion to approve permits for waste discharge, they would have drafted the legislation accordingly.

In reviewing the SCC's comments, the Board observed that the precautionary principle has been characterized by the Supreme Court of Canada as an "emerging" principle of international law. The Panel determined that none of the decisions before it stood for the principle that the precautionary principle is a widely accepted principal so as to become customary international law that should inform the interpretation of Canadian environmental statutes. The Board confirmed that because the EMA creates a scheme that addresses the competing interest of permitting waste to be introduced into the environment but also requiring protection of the environment, the "cautious" approach should be adopted in assessing applications to emit waste:

... a cautious approach is not the same as a "zero tolerance" approach. The Act provides a legislative scheme that authorizes the introduction of waste into the environment provided that any risk to the environment can be properly controlled, ameliorated and, to the extent possible, eliminated.


This decision clarifies that these international law principles cannot be randomly used and are only applicable to the extent they are domesticated by legislation. Further, where they are imported in a statute, there may not be a blanket application of those principles to the entire legislation. In such scenarios, interpretation and construction principles will be applied to determine which projects or processes the principles are meant to apply. This will vary from one statute to another and in different jurisdictions.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.