Canada: Stretching The Limits Of Statutory Interpretation: The Implications Of College Of Nurses Of Ontario v Mark Dumchin On The Jurisdiction Of Regulated Health Colleges Over Former Members

Co-authored by Natalie Carrothers, 2015-2016 Articling Student.

On April 4, 2016, the Divisional Court released its decision in College of Nurses of Ontario v Mark Dumchin[1]. The decision has significant implications for regulated health professionals engaged in proceedings before the discipline committees of the various regulated health colleges across the province. In short, Dumchin stands for the proposition that a discipline committee has the authority to revoke, suspend, or impose terms, conditions or limitations on a non-existent certificate of registration (for example, for a member whose certificate of registration has expired or been revoked).

It is important to note that Dumchin is the first judicial pronouncement on this issue. Until now, there has been no judicial authority on the matter; rather, the issue has been adjudicated in an ad hoc and rather confused manner by the discipline committees of the various regulated health colleges. Consequently, given the novel issue involved in this case, and the confusion that preceded it, Dumchin promised at last to provide a rigorous analysis and a clear, consistent line of judicial reasoning on the significant issues at play. Unfortunately, the decision is mired with confusing statements regarding the purpose and role of regulatory health colleges. In the end, Dumchin leaves the reader with more questions than answers.

The Decisions Below

Dumchin involved a hearing before a Panel of the Discipline Committee of the College of Nurses of Ontario. Although this decision is specific to the College of Nurses of Ontario, it is applicable to the discipline committees of the other regulated health colleges as a result of the Health Professions Procedural Code.[2]

At the time of the hearing, the Member had resigned his membership after having been found criminally guilty of possessing child pornography and making child pornography available in the form of a video file. Understandably, the Panel found that the acts in question constituted professional misconduct. College counsel submitted that the appropriate penalty was an oral reprimand and revocation of the Member's certificate of registration, should such a certificate of registration ever come to exist in the future. College counsel argued that revocation was warranted to ensure that the public was adequately protected and that public confidence in the College would be maintained, since the Member had resigned "by his own election" and was able to seek re-registration.

Independent Legal Counsel ("ILC") to the Committee advised that while the Panel has jurisdiction to order the Member to be reprimanded, the Panel did not have jurisdiction to order the Registrar to revoke, suspend and/or impose terms, conditions or limitations because the Member did not have a current certificate of registration; to do so would be to impose a prospective penalty. ILC noted that if the Member sought to return to the practice of nursing, he would be required to apply to the Registration Committee for reinstatement and the Registration Committee would have before it all the information regarding the Panel's findings of professional misconduct, including any comments by the Panel on the appropriate penalty that would have been ordered had the Member held an active certificate of registration.

After considering the submissions of ILC and the parties, the Panel concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to impose revocation on a non-existent certificate. It expressly rejected College Counsel's argument that the continuing jurisdiction of the College (pursuant to the Code) to investigate and adjudicate on matters referable to a time when a person was a member of the College extended so far as to permit the Committee to impose revocation on a non-existent certificate. Further, the Panel held that it could not set terms, limitations, and/or conditions on an inactive certificate of registration, as it was unable to impose limitations on re-registration, and trusted the judgment and authority of the Registration Committee in that respect.

The College of Nurses appealed the decision to the Divisional Court arguing that the Discipline Committee did in fact have the jurisdiction to order revocation even in circumstances where a member does not hold an active certificate of registration. The Federation of Health Regulatory Colleges of Ontario, a federation comprised of Ontario's health regulatory colleges, intervened to support the position advanced by the College of Nurses.

The Court agreed with the position of the College of Nurses and found that the Committee's interpretation of its governing statute was unreasonable, as it "failed to give effect to the statutory context in which the Committee's sanctioning powers exist, and failed to interpret them in a manner that was consistent with that context and the purpose of s. 14."[3] The germane portions of the Court's decision are as follows:

Section 14 makes a person who has resigned "subject to the jurisdiction of the College for professional misconduct." The only limitation on the College's continuing disciplinary jurisdiction is that the alleged conduct must be "referable to the time when the person was a member." If the legislature had intended to limit the College's express continuing disciplinary jurisdiction to restrict the range of available penalties, it would have done so clearly and unambiguously.[4]


The [Discipline Committee] panel's interpretation not only limits but removes the College's important sanctioning powers which include suspension and the imposition of conditions as well as revocation. ... To allow such an interpretation to stand is antithetical to the overarching public protection purposes of the statutory Disciplinary Regime: ensuring that members are held accountable to their regulator for the prime objective of protection of the public.[5]

Unanswered Questions

As set out above, the decision of the Divisional Court in Dumchin raises several questions. Pursuant to section 14 of the Code, the health regulatory colleges have continuing jurisdiction over former members to investigate, refer matters to the discipline committee and prosecute alleged misconduct that occurred while a person was a member. However, in Dumchin, the Divisional Court went further and held that this jurisdiction includes the authority to impose the entire range of penalties available, including those penalties that rely upon the existence of an active certificate of registration (revocation, suspension, and the imposition of terms, conditions, and limitations).

On account of Dumchin, former members facing disciplinary proceedings are subject to having their non-existent certificates of registration revoked, suspended or subject to terms, conditions and limitations. For example, a former member who has not held a certificate of registration for ten years could be ordered to undergo education and remediation in respect of professional misconduct committed during the time the person was a member. The fact that the former member may have retired, moved to another country or never intends to practice again is irrelevant.

This reasoning potentially creates a bizarre scenario that raises significant concerns. Unfortunately, the Court does little in its decision to address these concerns. Rather, its exercise in statutory interpretation raise more questions than answers.

First, the Court states that the relevant penalty provisions of the Code include the words "member" and "former member". This, in the Court's view, supports the interpretation that the Legislature intended to make former members subject to the same penalties as current members. This reasoning is troubling because the word "former" is not used at all within the relevant provision of the Code. What then do we make of the Court's conclusion? Perhaps it could be argued that the actual use of the word "former" is not required since section 14(1) of the Code extends jurisdiction over a person whose certificate of registration is revoked or expires or who resigns as a member. Yet this does not address the fundamental issue of the difference between a "person" and a "certificate of registration". Section 14(1) of the Code extends jurisdiction of a "person"; it does not say anything about jurisdiction over a non-existent "certificate of registration." The Court does not appear to have considered the implications of this subtle but significant distinction.

Second, the Court states that if the Legislature had intended to limit the College's express continuing disciplinary jurisdiction to restrict the range of available penalties, it would have done so clearly and unambiguously. However, it could also be reasoned that if the Legislature intended to extend the College's jurisdiction over non-existence certificates of registration, it could have done so clearly and unambiguously by stating that the panel may revoke a member's formerly held certificate of registration. This is precisely what it did in section 14(1) over persons who were previously members; and this is precisely what the Quebec Legislature did in its comparable legislation.

Third, the Court determines that the RHPA and the Code must be given a broad and purposive interpretation in keeping with the College's obligation to protect the public. This supports the view that the Discipline Committee has the jurisdiction to order the full range of penalties, regardless of the existence of a certificate of registration. In the Court's view, the alternative interpretation suggested by the Committee would lead to absurd results, such as the ability of a member to circumvent the penalty of revocation by resigning, and thereby undermine the College's ability to carry out its duties. However, the Court does not address the very conclusion by the Committee that the judgment and authority of the Registration Committee ought to be trusted. The Registration Committee is another body of each College created by statutory decree and can fulfil the duty to protect the public by refusing to grant a certificate of registration in any subsequent application.

Fourth, the Court interprets "certificate of registration" to mean the "entitlement to practice in a regulated profession." Why then is "certificate of registration" defined in section 1 of the RHPA as "a certificate of registration issued by the Registrar"? The Court does not answer this question. In fact, it does not even acknowledge the section 1 definition. Perhaps most important, if a health professional does not have an active certificate of registration, then they do not have an entitlement to practice in a regulated profession. The Court therefore leaves unanswered the same fundamental question: how can a non-existent entitlement be restricted, suspended, or revoked?

Finally, Dumchin raises questions about the Court's application of the reasonableness standard of review. The Court suggests that a higher standard (although still the reasonable standard) applies where the decision review is fundamentally one of statutory interpretation. Yet is it not squarely within the expertise of the Discipline Committee to determine how its regulatory body will best be able to fulfil its functions and duties? The reader is left with the distinct impression that a correctness standard has been applied despite the very nature of the decision urging deference.


The Divisional Court's decision in Dumchin has resulted in wide ranging implications and has left those affected by the decision with several unanswered questions, including "what exactly did the Legislature intend" and "will the Legislature seek to amend the Code to unambiguously state whether jurisdiction extends to the imposition of penalties against a non-existent certificate of registration?" Only time will tell whether the decision will stand the test of time.


[1] 2016 ONSC 626 [Dumchin].

[2] Schedule 2 to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, SO 1991 c18 [the Code], which is deemed by the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 [the RHPA] to be part of the legislation applying to each of the 26 health professions governed by the RHPA.

[3] Supra note 4 at para 44.

[4] Ibid at para 39.

[5] Ibid at para 42.

Originally published by Ontario Bar Association.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.