Canada: Alberta Holds Its Breath: Regulatory And Insolvency Laws Clash In Re Redwater Energy Corporation

Last Updated: May 31 2016
Article by Carole Hunter and Randon Slaney


At a time of a myriad of challenges facing the oil and gas industry, one of the biggest developments in 2016 is the Court of Queen's Bench decision in Redwater Energy Corporation (Re) (Re Redwater).1 Adding to an already difficult cycle for producers, Re Redwater enables receivers and trustees to renounce any interest in real property (i.e. insolvent estates' uneconomic wells and facilities) and avoid the associated abandonment and reclamation (A&R) obligations. The Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) is left unable to enforce its regulatory scheme or require security deposits in such instances.


The case arose out of the insolvency proceedings of Redwater Energy Corporation (Redwater), a publicly-listed junior oil and gas company. Redwater had credit facilities with the Alberta Treasury Branches (ATB) and owed ATB about five million dollars at the commencement of insolvency proceedings in May of 2015. Grant Thornton Limited was appointed receiver and eventual trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of Redwater (the Receiver).

Following its appointment, the Receiver assessed the economic marketability of Redwater's wells, facilities and pipelines, and renounced any interest in the majority of the assets (the Renounced Assets), pursuant to section 14.06 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA).2 The Renounced Assets were non-producing and had substantial liabilities related to A&R that outweighed any value associated with them. Section 14.06 is a somewhat awkwardly worded provision in the BIA that allows trustees and receivers to renounce any interest in real property where environmental liability exists.3 The Receiver advised the AER that it or the estate of Redwater had no further obligations pertaining to the Renounced Assets.

The AER emphatically disputed this course of action by the Receiver. Under the AER-administered legislation, regulations and directives (the Regulatory Scheme), a receiver and a trustee in bankruptcy are clearly within the definition of "licensee" of the Renounced Assets, and as such, the AER argued that the Receiver must comply with the provincial Regulatory Scheme in its administration of Redwater's estate.4 This involves such things as attempting a sales process with the Renounced Assets, using funds from the estate to pay for A&R obligations and paying security deposits to maintain Redwater's Licensee Management Rating (LMR).5 Because of the position taken by the Receiver, the AER issued closure and abandonment orders relating to the Renounced Assets (the Orders).


The fundamental issue in Re Redwater was whether the Receiver was able to do as it did with the Renounced Assets. To answer this question, the Court had to resolve several inter-related issues such as:

  • whether the federal and provincial laws were truly in conflict in these circumstances or whether it was possible to comply with both – in other words, could the Receiver fulfil its obligations under the BIA and, at the same time, fulfil the obligations under the Regulatory Scheme;
  • whether the provincial law, being the Regulatory Scheme, frustrated the purposes of the federal BIA;
  • whether the AER's security deposits, the Orders and the A&R costs for the Renounced Assets are provable claims under the BIA; and
  • whether the AER can refuse to allow licence transfers associated with the assets retained by the Receiver due to Redwater's LMR or through the Regulatory Scheme in the context of a sales process in bankruptcy.6


The Court ruled in favour of the Receiver and found that the Receiver could properly disclaim any interest in the Renounced Assets before taking possession and control, ending any responsibility with regard to A&R costs. The case turned on the doctrine of paramountcy, which the Court described as being applicable where:

"[...] otherwise validly enacted federal and provincial legislation cover the same or similar subject matter, but there is a conflict or genuine inconsistency between the legislation or the operational effects of the provincial legislation are incompatible with the federal legislation, the federal legislation prevails and the provincial law is rendered inoperative to the extent of the conflict or inconsistency with the federal law."7

Notwithstanding the high standard of proof generally required to invoke paramountcy successfully, the Court ruled that there was an operational conflict between section 14.06(4) of the BIA and the definition of "licensee" within the Regulatory Scheme. The Court's interpretive approach meant that section 14.06 of the BIA allowed a receiver and trustee to renounce assets and not be responsible for A&R activities, whereas the Regulatory Scheme did not permit the renunciation of licensed assets whatsoever. The Court determined that dual compliance with both sets of laws was not possible and that the position of the Receiver in such a situation was untenable. As such, section 14.06 of the BIA must prevail over the Regulatory Scheme to the extent of the conflict.

The Court also held that there were several instances where the provincial Regulatory Scheme frustrated the legislative purpose of the federal BIA including:

  1. The definition of the "licensee" within the Regulatory Scheme frustrated the legislative purpose of section 14.06 of the BIA since requiring licensee (in this case, the Receiver) to pay security deposits or comply with the Orders created a super-priority over any other creditor claims, in violation of the distribution scheme set out in the BIA.
  2. Disallowing the renouncement of non-economic assets had the potential of putting the Receiver at personal financial risk, a result which section 14.06 of the BIA specifically disallows.
  3. Requiring compliance with the Orders in respect of the Renounced Assets or the payment of security deposits for the AER to approve licence transfer applications frustrated the legislative purpose of section 14.06 of the BIA, which allowed for the disclaimer to all interest in the Renounced Assets.

The Court also found that the Orders were intrinsically monetary in nature and thus provable claims in bankruptcy – this means that the AER ranks as an unsecured creditor. The question here is whether it was "sufficiently certain" that the AER would seek reimbursement for the costs of compliance from the Receiver or Redwater's estate.8 The Court ruled that since no other party existed who could carry out the work and it would fall to the AER to do so,9 a purposive approach to section 14.06 applied to find that the Orders were provable claims.

In reaching this decision, the Court's analysis has two major takeaways. Section 14.06 of the BIA goes beyond mere protection from personal liability for receivers and trustees. The Court's role, as it interpreted the provision, was to follow Parliament's law by ascertaining its purpose and properly applying it.10 The other was that in the bankruptcy context, claims from provincial regulators for A&R costs should not receive a super-priority when such priority is not provided in the BIA. To side with the AER in this respect would in essence be replacing the "polluter-pay" principle with a "third-party-pay" principle.11


This decision, subject to any potential appeal, effectively ends the deadlock between receivers and the AER regarding the sale of assets of an insolvent company. In the insolvency world, this is a welcome decision that will assist receivers and trustees in conducting successful sales processes that, without the need to include non-producing assets and pay security deposits, should significantly increase recoveries for all stakeholders.

In the oil and gas industry, this decision is unlikely to be met with much fanfare. In the continued low-price environment where many small (and even large) producers are teetering on the edge of insolvency, the potential for a significant number of wells to be designated as "orphans" as a result of a bankruptcy or receivership is very real. Since industry is the sole contributor to the fund utilized to deal with the A&R costs when a licensee is unable to fund such costs themselves, it is very possible that the cost to industry will increase substantially due to this decision. During the application, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers openly questioned whether producers might balk at such increases in the current economic climate, potentially collapsing the entire orphan well system.12

The conflict discussed in this decision between insolvency procedures and holding a party accountable for environmental liabilities has been described as a collision course.13 The practical reality in the commercial sphere could be quite a collision indeed. Yet, as with most challenges, the tested parties tend to find solutions.

First published in BD&P Client Bulletin, May 2016


1 Redwater Energy Corporation (Re), 2016 ABQB 278. Materials related to the proceeding are available at Grant Thornton Limited's website.

2 RSC 1985, c B-3. Renunciation effected either through section 14.06(4)(a)(ii) or 14.06(4)(c), both of which the Receiver purported to effect. The provision in-full is available here.

3 See discussion in Re Redwater, at para 124-128.

4 In particular, Oil and Gas Conservation Act, RSA 2000, c O-6, s. l(l)(cc), 24, 27, 29, 30, 106; Pipeline Act, RSA 2000, c P-15, s. l(l)(n), 18, 23, 25, 26, 51; Directive 006: Licensee Liability Rating (LLR) Program and Licence Transfer Process, effective May, 2013 [Directive 006]; Directive 011: Licensee Liability Rating (LLR) Program: Updated Industry Parameters and Liability Costs, effective August 1, 2015. Legislation, regulations and directives are available on the AER's website.

5 The LMR as described in Directive 006 is the ratio of a licensee's "deemed assets" divided by its "deemed liabilities." A ratio of <1.0, meaning greater liabilities than assets, triggers potential restrictions on transfers and requiring security deposits.

6 Re Redwater, at para 85.

7 Re Redwater, at para 95; citing, inter alia, Alberta (AG) v Moloney, 2015 SCC 51, at para 16, 29; Saskatchewan (AG) v Lemare Lake Logging Ltd., 2015 SCC 51, at para 16.

8 Re Redwater, at para 143, citing Newfoundland and Labrador v. AbitibiBowater Inc., 2012 SCC 67; Nortel Networks Corp. (Re), 2013 ONCA 599 at para 31, leave to appeal refused.

9 With the exception of a minority of the Renounced Assets wherein responsibility would fall to the other working interest participants for their proportionate share; See Re Redwater, at para 171.

10 Re Redwater, at para 133.

11 Re Redwater, at para 173.

12 Re Redwater, at para 65.

13 Re Redwater at para 149, citing Tori Crawford, "The 'Collision Course' Continues: Recent Developments in the Intersection Between Insolvency Law and Environmental Law," Insolvency Institute of Canada (May 9, 2014).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions