Canada: Alberta Holds Its Breath: Regulatory And Insolvency Laws Clash In Re Redwater Energy Corporation

Last Updated: May 31 2016
Article by Carole Hunter and Randon Slaney


At a time of a myriad of challenges facing the oil and gas industry, one of the biggest developments in 2016 is the Court of Queen's Bench decision in Redwater Energy Corporation (Re) (Re Redwater).1 Adding to an already difficult cycle for producers, Re Redwater enables receivers and trustees to renounce any interest in real property (i.e. insolvent estates' uneconomic wells and facilities) and avoid the associated abandonment and reclamation (A&R) obligations. The Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) is left unable to enforce its regulatory scheme or require security deposits in such instances.


The case arose out of the insolvency proceedings of Redwater Energy Corporation (Redwater), a publicly-listed junior oil and gas company. Redwater had credit facilities with the Alberta Treasury Branches (ATB) and owed ATB about five million dollars at the commencement of insolvency proceedings in May of 2015. Grant Thornton Limited was appointed receiver and eventual trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of Redwater (the Receiver).

Following its appointment, the Receiver assessed the economic marketability of Redwater's wells, facilities and pipelines, and renounced any interest in the majority of the assets (the Renounced Assets), pursuant to section 14.06 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA).2 The Renounced Assets were non-producing and had substantial liabilities related to A&R that outweighed any value associated with them. Section 14.06 is a somewhat awkwardly worded provision in the BIA that allows trustees and receivers to renounce any interest in real property where environmental liability exists.3 The Receiver advised the AER that it or the estate of Redwater had no further obligations pertaining to the Renounced Assets.

The AER emphatically disputed this course of action by the Receiver. Under the AER-administered legislation, regulations and directives (the Regulatory Scheme), a receiver and a trustee in bankruptcy are clearly within the definition of "licensee" of the Renounced Assets, and as such, the AER argued that the Receiver must comply with the provincial Regulatory Scheme in its administration of Redwater's estate.4 This involves such things as attempting a sales process with the Renounced Assets, using funds from the estate to pay for A&R obligations and paying security deposits to maintain Redwater's Licensee Management Rating (LMR).5 Because of the position taken by the Receiver, the AER issued closure and abandonment orders relating to the Renounced Assets (the Orders).


The fundamental issue in Re Redwater was whether the Receiver was able to do as it did with the Renounced Assets. To answer this question, the Court had to resolve several inter-related issues such as:

  • whether the federal and provincial laws were truly in conflict in these circumstances or whether it was possible to comply with both – in other words, could the Receiver fulfil its obligations under the BIA and, at the same time, fulfil the obligations under the Regulatory Scheme;
  • whether the provincial law, being the Regulatory Scheme, frustrated the purposes of the federal BIA;
  • whether the AER's security deposits, the Orders and the A&R costs for the Renounced Assets are provable claims under the BIA; and
  • whether the AER can refuse to allow licence transfers associated with the assets retained by the Receiver due to Redwater's LMR or through the Regulatory Scheme in the context of a sales process in bankruptcy.6


The Court ruled in favour of the Receiver and found that the Receiver could properly disclaim any interest in the Renounced Assets before taking possession and control, ending any responsibility with regard to A&R costs. The case turned on the doctrine of paramountcy, which the Court described as being applicable where:

"[...] otherwise validly enacted federal and provincial legislation cover the same or similar subject matter, but there is a conflict or genuine inconsistency between the legislation or the operational effects of the provincial legislation are incompatible with the federal legislation, the federal legislation prevails and the provincial law is rendered inoperative to the extent of the conflict or inconsistency with the federal law."7

Notwithstanding the high standard of proof generally required to invoke paramountcy successfully, the Court ruled that there was an operational conflict between section 14.06(4) of the BIA and the definition of "licensee" within the Regulatory Scheme. The Court's interpretive approach meant that section 14.06 of the BIA allowed a receiver and trustee to renounce assets and not be responsible for A&R activities, whereas the Regulatory Scheme did not permit the renunciation of licensed assets whatsoever. The Court determined that dual compliance with both sets of laws was not possible and that the position of the Receiver in such a situation was untenable. As such, section 14.06 of the BIA must prevail over the Regulatory Scheme to the extent of the conflict.

The Court also held that there were several instances where the provincial Regulatory Scheme frustrated the legislative purpose of the federal BIA including:

  1. The definition of the "licensee" within the Regulatory Scheme frustrated the legislative purpose of section 14.06 of the BIA since requiring licensee (in this case, the Receiver) to pay security deposits or comply with the Orders created a super-priority over any other creditor claims, in violation of the distribution scheme set out in the BIA.
  2. Disallowing the renouncement of non-economic assets had the potential of putting the Receiver at personal financial risk, a result which section 14.06 of the BIA specifically disallows.
  3. Requiring compliance with the Orders in respect of the Renounced Assets or the payment of security deposits for the AER to approve licence transfer applications frustrated the legislative purpose of section 14.06 of the BIA, which allowed for the disclaimer to all interest in the Renounced Assets.

The Court also found that the Orders were intrinsically monetary in nature and thus provable claims in bankruptcy – this means that the AER ranks as an unsecured creditor. The question here is whether it was "sufficiently certain" that the AER would seek reimbursement for the costs of compliance from the Receiver or Redwater's estate.8 The Court ruled that since no other party existed who could carry out the work and it would fall to the AER to do so,9 a purposive approach to section 14.06 applied to find that the Orders were provable claims.

In reaching this decision, the Court's analysis has two major takeaways. Section 14.06 of the BIA goes beyond mere protection from personal liability for receivers and trustees. The Court's role, as it interpreted the provision, was to follow Parliament's law by ascertaining its purpose and properly applying it.10 The other was that in the bankruptcy context, claims from provincial regulators for A&R costs should not receive a super-priority when such priority is not provided in the BIA. To side with the AER in this respect would in essence be replacing the "polluter-pay" principle with a "third-party-pay" principle.11


This decision, subject to any potential appeal, effectively ends the deadlock between receivers and the AER regarding the sale of assets of an insolvent company. In the insolvency world, this is a welcome decision that will assist receivers and trustees in conducting successful sales processes that, without the need to include non-producing assets and pay security deposits, should significantly increase recoveries for all stakeholders.

In the oil and gas industry, this decision is unlikely to be met with much fanfare. In the continued low-price environment where many small (and even large) producers are teetering on the edge of insolvency, the potential for a significant number of wells to be designated as "orphans" as a result of a bankruptcy or receivership is very real. Since industry is the sole contributor to the fund utilized to deal with the A&R costs when a licensee is unable to fund such costs themselves, it is very possible that the cost to industry will increase substantially due to this decision. During the application, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers openly questioned whether producers might balk at such increases in the current economic climate, potentially collapsing the entire orphan well system.12

The conflict discussed in this decision between insolvency procedures and holding a party accountable for environmental liabilities has been described as a collision course.13 The practical reality in the commercial sphere could be quite a collision indeed. Yet, as with most challenges, the tested parties tend to find solutions.

First published in BD&P Client Bulletin, May 2016


1 Redwater Energy Corporation (Re), 2016 ABQB 278. Materials related to the proceeding are available at Grant Thornton Limited's website.

2 RSC 1985, c B-3. Renunciation effected either through section 14.06(4)(a)(ii) or 14.06(4)(c), both of which the Receiver purported to effect. The provision in-full is available here.

3 See discussion in Re Redwater, at para 124-128.

4 In particular, Oil and Gas Conservation Act, RSA 2000, c O-6, s. l(l)(cc), 24, 27, 29, 30, 106; Pipeline Act, RSA 2000, c P-15, s. l(l)(n), 18, 23, 25, 26, 51; Directive 006: Licensee Liability Rating (LLR) Program and Licence Transfer Process, effective May, 2013 [Directive 006]; Directive 011: Licensee Liability Rating (LLR) Program: Updated Industry Parameters and Liability Costs, effective August 1, 2015. Legislation, regulations and directives are available on the AER's website.

5 The LMR as described in Directive 006 is the ratio of a licensee's "deemed assets" divided by its "deemed liabilities." A ratio of <1.0, meaning greater liabilities than assets, triggers potential restrictions on transfers and requiring security deposits.

6 Re Redwater, at para 85.

7 Re Redwater, at para 95; citing, inter alia, Alberta (AG) v Moloney, 2015 SCC 51, at para 16, 29; Saskatchewan (AG) v Lemare Lake Logging Ltd., 2015 SCC 51, at para 16.

8 Re Redwater, at para 143, citing Newfoundland and Labrador v. AbitibiBowater Inc., 2012 SCC 67; Nortel Networks Corp. (Re), 2013 ONCA 599 at para 31, leave to appeal refused.

9 With the exception of a minority of the Renounced Assets wherein responsibility would fall to the other working interest participants for their proportionate share; See Re Redwater, at para 171.

10 Re Redwater, at para 133.

11 Re Redwater, at para 173.

12 Re Redwater, at para 65.

13 Re Redwater at para 149, citing Tori Crawford, "The 'Collision Course' Continues: Recent Developments in the Intersection Between Insolvency Law and Environmental Law," Insolvency Institute of Canada (May 9, 2014).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.