Canada: Stakeholder Claims For Unfair Corporate Conduct: Courts Affirm D&O And Affiliate Liability And Confirm High Leave Hurdle For Derivative Actions

The Securities Litigation Group is pleased to report on two recent successes before the courts.

Success Story One: Injunction and Derivative Action Commenced by Disgruntled Shareholder and Former Director Defeated

Cassels Brock litigators successfully defeated a motion for leave to commence a derivative action and for various heads of injunctive relief commenced by a disgruntled shareholder and former director. The motions were dismissed and the defendants were awarded costs in the amount of $50,000.

The decision highlights the "high onus" on parties seeking leave to commence a derivative action under s.246 OBCA and their obligation to satisfy the requirements of good faith and the best interests of the company. The onus does not lie on the directors and officers defending the derivative action to prove bad faith.

The decision also demonstrates the Court's willingness to give effect to commercial realities: the Court refused to compel unwilling parties to work together and refused to grant extraordinary injunctive and equitable relief to a disgruntled shareholder who did not come to court with clean hands. Instead, the Court encouraged a corporate divorce.

The Litigation

Cassels Brock acted on behalf of Vacuum Metallizing Limited (VML) and the two officers and directors of Powder Coating Solutions Inc. (PCS). The plaintiff is a former director of PCS and also a lawyer by trade who, at one time or another, acted on behalf of VML, PCS and its shareholders.  The plaintiff and the two defendant directors of PCS are the only shareholders of PCS.

The plaintiff commenced an action seeking relief under the oppression remedy and damages for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty against VML and the two officers and directors of PCS. In particular, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants misappropriated PCS' corporate opportunities through VML and that VML was competing with PCS in breach of a non-compete (that the plaintiff had drafted). The plaintiff then moved for leave to commence a derivative action on behalf of PCS and for various injunctive relief.

In Justice Penny's decision, his Honour denied the plaintiff's relief across the board and found in favour of the defendants.

Derivative Action

In denying the plaintiff's motion for leave to commence a derivative action, the Court agreed that a derivative action was an extraordinary remedy and that the plaintiff failed to meet the high onus required under s.246 of the OBCA.

Significantly, in finding that the good faith requirement had not been satisfied, the Court pointed to the plaintiff's "clear potential conflict" as a personal shareholder of PCS and as counsel for the defendants. The Court also found that a derivative action was not in PCS' best interests on the basis that a "shareholder divorce" was required and encouraged the parties to work to achieve this end.


The Court also denied the four injunctions sought against the defendants. The Court's analysis offers guidance to officers and directors who may be faced with any one of these injunctions and demonstrates that the Courts are willing to come down hard on disgruntled shareholders, despite the severity of the accusations alleged:

i.     Injunction to preclude the defendants from competing with PCS: While the Court held that VML was not competing with PCS, the Court further found that the non-compete drafted by the plaintiff was unreasonably broad in scope and geography such that it was void. 

ii.     Injunction to compel the defendants to pay money into court: The Court ruled that a requirement for monies to be paid into Court is akin to a Mareva injunction and requires proof of a real risk that assets will be removed from the jurisdiction or that the defendant will dissipate assets so as to render a future tracing of assets remote, if not impossible. The mere fact that the funds may have been used by the defendants to foster VML was insufficient to grant the injunction.

iii.     Injunction to compel the defendants to protect PCS' intellectual property: The Court accepted the defendants' argument that PCS had no intellectual property such that they were not required to take active steps to protect it.

iv.     Injunction to preclude the defendants from distributing funds from PCS and to compel the plaintiff's participation in PCS: The Court gave effect to the commercial realities of PCS and refused to grant the injunction when it was clear that the parties could not work together.

Lorne Silver and Carly Cohen of Cassels Brock's Securities Litigation Group acted on behalf of the defendants. Read the full handwritten decision here.

Success Story Two: Director and Affiliate Liability for Oppressive Corporate Conduct and Breach of Trust Upheld on Appeal

In a ruling released on April 19, 2016, in the case of T. Films S.A. v. Cinemavault Releasing International al, 2016 ONSC 404, the Ontario Divisional Court upheld a decision of a lower court in which the lower court found that the director (Nicolas Stiliadis) of a judgment debtor, Cinemavault Releasing International (CRI), as well as affiliated companies of that judgment debtor ( Inc. and Cinemavault International Inc.) were each liable for an arbitral award previously obtained by creditors against CRI, even though there was no privity of contract between the director of CRI or its affiliated companies with any of the creditors. The underpinning of the Divisional Court's ruling was both the affirmation of the rights of corporate creditors to engage the oppression remedy to address unfair conduct and the application of long-standing legal principles pertaining to breach of trust.

Creditor Oppression

In the facts of the case, the creditors sought to enforce, as against the director of CRI and affiliated companies, an arbitral award issued solely against CRI of approximately US$500,000 arising from CRI's failure to properly account for film distribution revenues received pursuant to and in breach of a sales agency agreement. Ultimately, the lower court found that it was established "beyond peradventure" that the film distribution business of CRI was wound down and that there was a "virtual tsunami of documentary evidence that CRI's assets and business were transferred to other Cinemavault companies owned or controlled by Mr. Stiliadis." Consequently, the lower court found that the director of CRI and CRI's affiliated companies were each liable due to their collaborated and oppressive conduct, which had the effect of impairing the ability of the creditors to collect on the arbitral award. The Divisional Court upheld these findings on appeal; in doing so, the Divisional Court affirmed that corporate creditors may use the oppression remedy against directors and affiliated corporations in cases of improper corporate conduct which has the effect of impairing the collection efforts of corporate creditors.

Breach of Trust

Additionally, the lower court had to decide whether unpaid distribution revenues collected by CRI (and not paid to the creditors) were impressed with a trust, despite the fact that the sales agency agreement did not expressly refer to those distribution revenues as "trust funds" or expressly provide for the establishment of a trust account by CRI. The lower court found that there was abundant evidence to support a finding that the distribution revenues were impressed with a trust, which evidence included a covenant in the sales agency agreement that prohibited CRI from the "cross-collateralization" of distribution revenues and expenses relating to different films. The lower court then found that Stiliadis and CRI's affiliated companies were each liable for knowingly participating in a breach of trust and for knowingly receiving trust funds belonging to the creditors. Once again, the Divisional Court upheld these findings on appeal; in so doing, the Divisional Court affirmed that trust obligations may be created, even in the absence of express contractual language referencing the creation of a trust.

The T. Films S.A. v. Cinemavault case is also noteworthy in that the Divisional Court refused to allow the appellants (CRI, Stiliadis and CRI's affiliated companies) to adduce fresh evidence on the appeal by which they sought to provide an innocent explanation (through accounting evidence) for the transfer of CRI's assets to other Cinemavault companies, and to suggest that the transfer of CRI's assets did not materially impair the ability of the creditors to collect on the arbitral award. In dismissing the motion to adduce such fresh evidence, the Appellate Court found that the appellants could have adduced this evidence in advance of the initial hearing (but likely chose to withhold this evidence for tactical reasons); therefore, the appellants did not meet the legal requirement to show that the fresh evidence could not have been tendered earlier through the exercise of reasonable diligence. Further, the Divisional Court also dismissed the appellants' motion because the fresh accounting evidence had a number of inconsistencies, making it unreliable, and had no bearing on a central issue raised in the litigation, namely whether the distribution revenues collected by CRI for the film were impressed with a trust.

Robert B. Cohen of Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP acted for the successful creditors in T. Films S.A. v. Cinemavault. Read the full decision here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Carly Cohen
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions