Canada: PPSA 2007: What’s Changing

Last Updated: June 17 2007

Article by Michael Burke, © 2007, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Financial Services, May 2007

The year 2007 is an exciting time from a business law reform perspective. Two-thirds of the Ontario Government’s threephase plan to modernize and reinvigorate Ontario’s business laws will come into force during this year.

The first phase involved the introduction of the Securities Transfer Act, 2006 (STA) and a number of complementary changes to the Ontario Business Corporations Act (OBCA) and the Ontario Personal Property Security Act (PPSA). The STA and these complementary changes came into force on January 1, 2007. Bill 152, entitled An Act to modernize various Acts administered by or affecting the Ministry of Government Services, 2006, represents the second phase. As its title suggests, Bill 152 will amend a number of statutes, including making a number of long-overdue reforms to the PPSA. The third phase is primarily intended to modernize the laws that govern the not-for-profit sector. These laws are seriously out of date, not having been substantively revised in almost 50 years. During this month, the Ontario Government plans to release for comments a consultation paper on a new not-for-profit act.

This Blakes Bulletin will focus on the PPSA amendments in Bill 152 as well as many changes in practice that the STA will require be made when taking security in all types of securities.

Bill 152 makes approximately 15 changes to the PPSA. Four of the most significant changes to the PPSA relate to: (i) the inclusion of true leases within the scope of the PPSA, (ii) facilitating accounts receivable financing and securitization, (iii) simplifying the rules for determining where to register security interests in certain types of collateral, such as mobile goods, intangibles and documentary intangibles, and (iv) eliminating the "check-box" collateral classification system. The first three of these changes are described in separate articles in this bulletin.

All of the PPSA changes will come into force on August 1, 2007, except for the third and fourth changes mentioned above. The Ontario Government has indicated that it will not bring this third change into force until a critical mass of other PPSA jurisdictions have agreed to introduce the same rules in their jurisdictions. The elimination of the "check-box" collateral classification system will not be implemented until the PPS Registry’s computer system has been re-programmed, which is expected to take at least two years to complete.

Most of the other changes to the PPSA can be classified into the following three categories:


There are some technical amendments that enhance debtor protections.

(a) Sales in the Ordinary Course of Business.

Section 28(1) of the PPSA, which protects a buyer when a seller sells goods in the ordinary course of business, has been amended to ensure that the buyer is protected whether or not (i) the buyer took possession of the goods, (ii) the seller was in possession of the goods at any point in the transaction, (iii) title to the goods was transferred to the buyer or (iv) the seller took a security interest in such goods, so long as the goods were identified and agreed upon by the parties at the time the contract was made or were marked or designated to the contract.

(b) Leases in the Ordinary Course of Business.

Similar amendments are being made to the corresponding protection given under section 28(2) of the PPSA to lessees of goods from a lessor who leases the goods in the ordinary course of business.

(c) Importation of Execution Act Exemptions from Seizure.

Section 62 of the PPSA has been amended to prevent a secured party from seizing property that would be exempt from seizure under the Execution Act (Ontario). This amendment will reverse the 1995 Ontario General Division decision in Re Vanhove, which held that the exemptions provided by the Execution Act (Ontario) do not apply to a secured creditor seeking to enforce its security against the personal property and household goods of a debtor. This new exemption will not apply to a secured party who holds either a purchase-money security interest in such goods or a possessory security interest in such goods.


A number of amendments are being made that reflect the new methods of communication that have been introduced since the last major reform of the PPSA in 1989 and the significant reductions in the cost of data storage since the 1970s.

(a) Electronic Filings Only.

All future PPSA registrations must be made electronically. It will no longer be possible to do a paper filing. One of the advantages of eliminating paper filings is that the gap period between the date of the search and the currency date of the search results will be measured in minutes rather than in days.

(b) Methods of Sending Notices.

Prior to Bill 152, in order to take advantage of the 10-day deemed receipt provision in section 68, it was necessary for notices and other documents given under the PPSA to be given or delivered by personal service or registered mail. Bill 152 will permit such notices and other documents to also be sent by prepaid courier, facsimile and by e-mail. Any notice or other document sent by facsimile or by e-mail will be deemed to have been given on the earlier of (i) the day on which the addressee actually receives the notice or document and (ii) the first business day following the day that such facsimile or e-mail was sent.

(c) Elimination of "Check-Box" Collateral Classification System.

Under the PPSA, the primary method of describing a secured party’s collateral has been to check up to five boxes on the financing statement. The five boxes are "consumer goods", "inventory", "equipment", "accounts" and "other". No other jurisdiction in Canada or the United States has a personal property security registry that uses the "check-box" system. Apparently, the early use by Ontario of a computerized registry is responsible for the current Ontario system. In the 1970s, data storage space was extremely expensive. Accordingly, it was necessary to develop collateral description rules that would minimize data storage requirements as much as possible.

As we know, over the last 30 years, data storage costs have dropped sharply. Because the current registration system imposes real costs on completing transactions in Ontario that do not exist in other jurisdictions, the Ontario Government has indicated its willingness over the next couple of years to replace the "check-box" collateral classification system with a system that requires the secured party to describe the collateral by item or type. It is not known at this time whether the special collateral description rules found in the other PPSA jurisdictions – some of which are a trap for the unwary – will be adopted in Ontario. It is also not known how these new rules will be made public, because these rules will made by orders of the Minister and not by Regulation.


A number of PPSA provisions are being amended for clarification and/or harmonization purposes.

(a) Definition of "Debtor".

The definition of "debtor" will be clarified to include not only the person who owes payment or performance of an obligation secured, but also a person who owns or has rights in the collateral and makes the collateral available as security without assuming any obligations under the security. (A similar definition of "debtor" is found in the other PPSA jurisdictions.) This clarification will permit, for example, a pledgor of shares to be a debtor under the PPSA even though the pledgor did not give the secured party a guarantee. Such arrangements are particularly common in the United States and are occasionally utilized in cross-border financings. However, notwithstanding this clarification, it is still considered to be "best" practice to obtain a guarantee as well from the pledgor.

(b) Repeal of Curative Provision for Non-Misleading Errors in Security Agreement.

Prior to Bill 152, section 9(2) of the PPSA provided that a security agreement is enforceable against a third party despite a defect, irregularity, omission or error therein or in the execution thereof, unless the third party is actually misled. In the 1998 Submission of the Personal Property Security Law Committee of the Ontario Bar Association (the 1998 Submission), the PPSL Committee recommended that this provision be deleted because it believed that this provision was seriously defective for two reasons. (A similar recommendation had been made by the Minister’s Advisory Committee in its Supplementary Report of 1985.) The first problem with this section is that it was based on a curative provision that was used in pre-PPSA statutes to deal with errors in the security agreement and supporting affidavits of bona fides and execution, all of which had to be registered and, therefore, became part of the public record. Under the PPSA, affidavits requirements have been abolished and only the financing statement is required to be registered. For errors in a financing statment, section 46(4) of the PPSA is the curative provision that applies to such errors.

The second problem with this section is that it potentially conflicts with section 11(2)(a) of the PPSA. That section requires security agreements to be in writing and contain a description of the collateral that is sufficient to identify it. If read literally, section 9(2) could totally undermine the writing requirement in section 11(2)(a) by excusing even substantial errors or omissions. However, the worst fears of the PPSL Committee have not been realized. In Astral Communications v. 825536 Ontario Inc. (Trustee of) (2000), the Ontario Court of Appeal held that an unsigned agreement failed to meet the writing requirement of section 11(2) and such omission was not cured by section 9(2). The court also said that where there is a conflict between section 9(2) and section 11(2)(a), the latter section should prevail.

(c) Reduction in the Period within which to Object to Proposal to Foreclose.

Pursuant to section 65(2) of the PPSA, a secured party must serve notice on certain parties if it proposes to "foreclose" on its collateral in full satisfaction of the obligation secured thereby. The period by which a person entitled to notification under section 65(2) must deliver to the secured party a written objection to such proposal has been reduced from 30 days to 15 days. This change means that the objection period is the same in the other PPSA jurisdictions.


Unfortunately, Bill 152 does not include all of the items on our PPSA wish list. Two of the more significant omissions from this latest PPSA reform process are (i) the failure to expressly include governmental licenses and quotas as property under the PPSA and (ii) the failure to create a permanent advisory committee to work with Ministry staff to continue the process of modernizing the PPSA in an organized and principled manner.

Inclusion of Governmental Licenses and Quotas.

Since 1987, there has been a great deal of uncertainty on whether the PPSA applies to certain types of governmental licenses and quotas. The issue came to the forefront when the Ontario Court of Appeal held, in Re National Trust Co. and Bouckhuyt (1987), that a "basic production quota" to grow tobacco granted under the Ontario Farm Products Marketing Act only amounted to a license or permission to do that which would otherwise be unlawful. Because the tobacco quota was so "transitory and ephemeral in its nature" and was subject to such discretionary control by the Tobacco Growers’ Marketing Board, it did not qualify as personal property and, therefore, could not be the subject of a security interest. The fact that the tobacco quota could be exchanged, sold, pledged or leased in limited circumstances, such as to another licensed producer of tobacco, was not sufficient to make it property.

Subsequent Ontario court decisions – including a few by the Ontario Court of Appeal – have generally attempted to soften the harshness of this ruling, without reversing it. These cases indicate a greater willingness on the part of Ontario courts to consider the commercial realities of the underlying value of licenses and quotas in a regulated business. Serious gaps, however, remain in the viability of governmental licenses and quotas as a commercial form of collateral.

Because of the uncertainty caused by these gaps, the 1998 Submission recommended to the Ontario Government that the definition of "intangible" in the PPSA be amended to include "a license" and that a broad definition of "license" be added to the PPSA. A similar approach has been taken in Saskatchewan and in certain other PPSA jurisdictions. The effect of such amendments would be to make all licenses, howsoever created, personal property for the purpose of the PPSA. The broad definition of license would have been qualified, however, by the express recognition in the PPSA that all contractual or statutory restrictions pertaining to such license would continue to apply. The PPSL Committee concluded that it should be up to the secured party, as a matter of commercial judgment, to determine whether a particular license or quota is suitable collateral having regard to the contractual or statutory restrictions that are applicable to such license or quota. The PPSL Committee’s recommendation has not been adopted by the Ontario Government, because the recommendation continues to be rejected by representatives of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture and by some Ontario agricultural marketing boards.

It is possible, however, that in the next year or so this gap could be reduced further without a legislative amendment. Late in 2006, the Supreme Court of Canada in Royal Bank v. Saulnier granted leave to appeal from a decision of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court of Canada will be considering whether a federal fishing license constitutes personal property under the Nova Scotia PPSA.

Creation of Permanent Advisory Committee.

It is clear that the old way of relying on the recommendations of a committee of the Ontario Bar Association, which is made up of volunteers and which has limited financial and other resources, is no longer appropriate. In earlier times, changes to the PPSA were discrete and were often being made to fix by statute problems that arose out of the case law. It is apparent that this approach is and will continue to be inadequate given the pace, scope and complexity of the recent and expected changes in personal property security-related laws, both within and outside Canada. Ontario needs a process that is more organized and that actively encourages the participation of stakeholders.

In connection with this second phase of reform, the PPSL Committee recommended that the PPSA provide for the creation of a permanent advisory committee, which would work with the Ministry staff to continue the modernization process. The establishment of such an advisory committee would signal to the rest of Canada that Ontario intends to once again take an active role in reforming personal property security law in the common law jurisdictions of Canada.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

3 Nov 2016, Other, Vancouver, Canada

“Risk” is the new black. It’s on the lips of every CEO, CFO, GC and board member — as it should be. Can you spot it? How do you analyze it? Are you equipped to manage it?

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.