Canada: McDonald's: U.S. "Joint Employer" Case Sounds Alarm For Canadian Franchisors

An ongoing case in the U.S. has garnered much media attention1 and caused much anxiety for U.S. franchisors.  Canadian franchisors should be worried as well.

The U.S. Proceeding

The case, currently before a New York court, was brought by the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and will determine whether McDonald's is a "joint employer" of its franchisees' employees for the purposes of U.S. labour legislation.  The case follows two important developments in U.S. law:

  • The 2014 recommendation by the NLRB's Division of Advice that McDonald's USA, LLC be named a joint employer in several complaints brought by McDonald's employees;2 and
  • An NLRB decision in 2015 in the Browning Ferris case,3 in which a waste management company was found to be a joint employer of its subcontractor's employees.

The Browning Ferris decision immediately prompted speculation that similar rulings might be made against franchisors in general, and fast food franchisors in particular. 4

The thrust of the NLRB's argument in the McDonald's case is that the franchisor controls the working conditions of franchise employees—setting out details ranging from restaurant cleaning procedures, to questions to be asked in the hiring of franchise employees, to minutiae of the food order-taking process—to such a minute degree that, in the words of the NLRB's counsel, "it is responsible for what happens to workers subject to those conditions."5

Could it Happen Here?

The picture in Canada is complicated but it would be fair to say that a principle similar to the argument advanced by the NLRB in the current U.S. case is already at work in certain areas of the law in some Canadian jurisdictions.

In Ontario, for example, the Labour Relations Act, 19956 and itspredecessor(s)(the "LRA") allows "associated or related activities or businesses" to be treated as a "one employer" where they are found to be "under common control or direction."7  In such a scenario, the company related to the actual employer company is deemed to be a "related employer." In 1993, Second Cup (a franchisor bound to a labour union by collective agreement) and its franchisee were found to be "one employer" in connection with grievances under the Act, but only with respect to instances in which the franchisee was performing obligations under franchisor's collective agreement that it was required to perform with the franchisor (in this case, the identification of the two entities as one worked to the disadvantage of the franchisee rather than the franchisor).8 

Labour relations is not the only area of law addressing the concept of "related employer" from a statutory perspective.  In Ontario, the Employment Standards Act, 20009 (the "ESA") will treat separate entities as "one employer" if associated or related activities or businesses are or were carried on by or through an employer and one or more other persons, and the intent or effect in their doing so is or has been to directly or indirectly defeat the intention and purpose of the statute.10 The test would thus not be whether a franchisor exercises control over the franchise workplace, but whether the franchisor and franchisee had structured their relations in order to avoid liability for either under the ESA.  Given that franchisees are standalone businesses, separate in law and in ownership from franchisors and with their own revenue streams and assets, it is nearly impossible to imagine a franchise scenario where the test would apply.  A review of Ontario case law under the ESA reveals no instances in which a franchisor has been held liable for the actions of an franchisee; indeed, it reveals that franchisors are more likely to be found liable when they step out of their normally limited involvement in the businesses and directly assume the functions of the franchisee.11

Canadian common law also recognizes that business entities may be treated as a "common employer" for the purposes of liability for employee claims in civil actions where the businesses act as a "single, integrated unit,"12 typically where companies are aligned vertically or horizontally through ownership.  A company may be found liable for employee claims where it exercises "effective control" over the employees, regardless of whether the employees contracted with a different, legally separate company in the corporate structure.13  The principle does not yet appear to have been applied in the context of a franchisor-franchisee scenario, where the relationship between companies is contractual rather than rooted in common ownership.  While it might not greatly tax the imagination of an activist court to determine that a franchise agreement so extensively controls the franchise workplace as to bring the franchise employees under the franchisor's "effective control," the practical rationale for doing so is weak.  Unlike the common scenario of an intentionally thinly capitalized company with employees, controlled by a parent company in which the assets of the business are hidden, the direct employer in the franchise context is typically a functioning business with its own assets and revenue stream capable of satisfying a civil judgment.

Finally, in Ontario at least, panels have expressed a willingness in principle to find franchisors liable in the human rights context, where the facts of the case warrant such a finding.  Liability may attach to a franchisor where the terms of the franchise agreement, the operational support provided by a franchisor to a franchisee, or the exercise of a franchisee's obligations under the franchise agreement are connected to discriminatory conduct.14  A more recent case states the franchisor will not be liable unless "the franchisor [is] vicariously liable from a contractual perspective or [has] itself committed an act that [is] arguably discriminatory."15  Unlike the "related employer" test under the LRA or the connection-and-intent test under the ESA, the test in human rights cases appears to be one of causation rather than control over workplace conditions.

While the "related employer" and "common employer" concepts work separately in different areas of the law and there is no across-the-board correlation of control via the franchise agreement with liability for the franchisor, the common thread of a notion that there are circumstances where it is appropriate to treat franchisors and franchisees as one opens the door to possible future extensions of the principle.

Consequences of a Joint Employer Regime in Canada

Presuming the worst case scenario—the emergence of a generalized principle of joint responsibility for the actions of franchisees in Canadian law—a number of worrisome consequences come to mind.

Most obviously, franchisors would be forced to defend disputes between employees and franchisees, and face penalties and / or damages awards where employees' complaints succeed.  Franchisors would, in essence, be liable for working conditions over which they have indirect (via remedies against franchisees in their franchise agreements) but not direct control. 

Such decisions would severely circumscribe a main advantage of the franchise model for franchisors, i.e. allowing them to limit their capital and labour costs.  If franchisors are not permitted to use the franchise model to limit their risk, and instead may be put at risk by the behaviour of franchisees, franchisors may be safer owning and operating the businesses themselves.  Otherwise, to limit their risk, franchisors would need to incur the cost of monitoring franchises very closely and exercising contractual remedies against misbehaving franchisees very aggressively.  As noted by the response of the International Franchise Association (IFA) to the 2014 NLRB ruling against McDonald's, such findings also upend years of jurisprudence upholding the franchise model of doing business, frustrate the intent of franchise legislation, and could have a chilling effect on a job growth (the IFA notes that, in the U.S. at least, new business and job growth in the franchise sector had outpaced the non-franchise sector for years16). 

The far more practical alternative to abandoning the franchise model in the face of a joint employer regime would be for franchisors to relax the degree of control exercised over the franchisee's operations in order to avoid rulings such as the one sought by the NLRB in the U.S. case. This, again, would seem to diminish the value of the franchise model.  One great advantage of the franchise model is that it holds out to the consumer the promise of a uniform customer experience, regardless of who owns the restaurant or store.  Eliminating the franchisor's ability to maintain such uniformity through the franchise agreement also reduces the predictability that is part of the attraction for the consumer (a predictability that is especially important in the restaurant context, where cleanliness and food safety are at stake). The dangers in such a scenario are disappointed consumers and damage to the brand.  Nonetheless, as we have recommended before,17 reducing the degree of control exercised in the franchise agreement to only the degree necessary to maintain the integrity of the brand is the best and probably only way of avoiding the consequences of a joint employer regime in Canada, should a more fulsome one emerge.


1 See e.g. J. Weston Whippen, "Is McDonald's Responsible for Its Franchise Workers?," The Atlantic, online:

2 NLRB Office of Public Affairs, "NLRB Office of the General Counsel Authorizes Complaints Against McDonald's Franchisees and Determines McDonald's, USA, LLC is a Joint Employer," online:

3 The text of the NLRB decision is available here:

4 Dave Jamieson, "The Labor Ruling McDonald's Has Been Dreading Just Became a Reality," Huffpost Business, online:

5 Karen Freifeld, "McDonald's squares off against NLRB in worker retaliation trial," Reuters, online:

6 Labour Relations Act, 1995, SO 1995, c 1, Sch A,

7 Labour Relations Act, 1995, SO 1995, c 1, Sch A, at s.1(4).

8 United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 785 v. Second Cup Ltd., 1993 CanLII 7903 (ON LRB), at para. 38.

9 Employment Standards Act, 2000, SO 2000, c 41,

10 Employment Standards Act, 2000, SO 2000, c 41, at ss.4(1) and (2).

11 Capital Franchising Ltd. (c.o.b. Jani-King Ottawa), [2014] O.L.R.D. No. 863.

12 For a recent example, see the discussion in King v. 1416088 Ontario Ltd., 2014 ONSC 1445 (CanLII), starting at para. 34.

13 King v. 1416088 Ontario Ltd., 2014 ONSC 1445 (CanLII), at paras. 47 and 40.

14 See e.g. Lindsey v. McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited, 2014 HRTO 372 (CanLII), at para. 10 and Philip v. Giant Tiger Stores, 2009 HRTO 1227 (CanLII), at para. 3.

15 Dacosta v. 2383914 Ontario Inc., 2014 HRTO 1047 (CanLII), at para. 15.

16 International Franchise Association, "IFA Statement on NLRB Declaring McDonald's Corporation a "Joint Employer"," online:

17 Debi M. Sutin, "Are Franchisors Joint Employers with Their Franchisees?," Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
8 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

The prospect of an internal investigation raises many thorny issues. This presentation will canvass some of the potential triggering events, and discuss how to structure an investigation, retain forensic assistance and manage the inevitable ethical issues that will arise.

22 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

From the boardroom to the shop floor, effective organizations recognize the value of having a diverse workplace. This presentation will explore effective strategies to promote diversity, defeat bias and encourage a broader community outlook.

7 Dec 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

Staying local but going global presents its challenges. Gowling WLG lawyers offer an international roundtable on doing business in the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia. This three-hour session will videoconference in lawyers from around the world to discuss business and intellectual property hurdles.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.