Canada: Searching For A Conflict In An Ontario Arbitration

Last Updated: April 4 2016
Article by Kyle Magee and Keith Geurts

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently confirmed its support for private international arbitration, indicating that it was prepared to award substantial indemnity costs against a disappointed party who launched a "baseless" challenge to the arbitrator's impartiality.

The Facts

Typhoon Capital B.V., a Dutch company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Typhoon Offshore B.V. ("Typhoon"), develop energy projects. Jacob Securities, a Canadian investment bank, introduced Typhoon to a prospective source of financing, Northland Power Inc. and Northland Capital Inc. ("Northland"). Northland ultimately invested in one of Typhoon's projects, Project Gemini. Jacob Securities then claimed it was entitled to compensation from Typhoon for making the introduction.

In October 2013, Jacob Securities commenced an arbitration to recover the claimed compensation. When Thomas Heintzman, an experienced litigator, was nominated as arbitrator, he advised the parties that he had no previous dealings with the companies or with their individual principals. However, he did not undertake a conflict search with the law firm from which he had recently retired.

After the arbitrator issued an award dismissing the claim in October 2015, Jacob Securities hired new lawyers to challenge the award and discovered that the arbitrator's former law firm had previously acted in a number of transactions involving Northland. In particular, while he was still senior counsel, the arbitrator's former firm had represented the underwriters in the Project Gemini transaction.

To challenge the award, Jacob Securities argued there was a reasonable apprehension of bias, given the arbitrator's former firm's involvement with the Project Gemini transaction.

Reasonable apprehension of bias

As an international arbitration the dispute was governed by the International Commercial Arbitration Act, which incorporates the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Arbitration. In Jacob Securities v. Typhoon Capital B.V.[1], Justice Graeme Mew determined that challenges to an arbitral award based on reasonable apprehension of bias amounted to claims of unequal treatment contrary to Article 18 of the Model Law and that he had jurisdiction to entertain the application under Articles 34 and 36.

There is a strong presumption that arbitrators, like judges, are impartial. The same test applicable to a court is applicable to an arbitrator acting in a judicial capacity: "what would an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically – and having thought the matter through – conclude. Would he think that it is more likely than not that [the arbitrator], whether consciously or unconsciously, would not decide fairly"?

The Court noted that it was not uncommon for arbitrators to be members of law firms and that, in some circumstances, it was appropriate for arbitrators to be removed on the ground of a reasonable apprehension of bias because of work undertaken by lawyers in their firms.

However, in this case, the evidence was that the arbitrator was not personally associated with any of the work done by his former firm relating to Project Gemini. The Court rejected the proposition that the fact that the arbitrator had failed to disclose that his former firm had a relationship with one of the witnesses in the arbitration was sufficient to raise a reasonable apprehension of bias.

An arbitrator's duty to investigate

The Court also rejected Jacob Securities' argument that the arbitrator had failed to adequately investigate possible conflicts of interest. Jacob Securities' position was that he had an obligation to investigate possible conflicts with his former firm, which would include not only the parties but also (potential) witnesses.

While the Court accepted that an arbitrator who is a member of a law firm has a duty to investigate possible conflicts with their firm, the obligation does not extend to searching conflicts at their former law firm(s). The Court noted that arbitrators "cannot possibly know or be expected to know every client that their former firms acted for" and that it would be burdensome and wholly disproportionate to require an arbitrator to search for conflicts from their former firms, assuming that it were practically possible.

Cost consequences

Having rejected all of Jacob Securities' arguments, Justice Mew highlighted that one of the benefits of commercial arbitration is finality and that parties agree to arbitrate precisely because of the very limited grounds upon which to challenge an award.

In this case, the Court found that the application was a "thinly disguised attempt to avoid the consequences of an adverse decision of the merits" and that an award of substantial indemnity costs was likely appropriate to deter losing parties in international commercial arbitrations from launching baseless challenges to an arbitrator's impartiality.

Take away points

Litigants can expect that arbitrators will search for, and disclose, possible conflicts before accepting a nomination and Jacob Securities provides some guidance as to the scope of the conflict search. However, they should keep in mind that arbitrators are, ultimately, appointed by them and there is nothing to prohibit a party from requesting that the arbitrator undertake a more expansive conflict search if they think it is necessary in the circumstances of the case.

The Court's decision in Jacob Securities decision also highlights two of the often cited advantages of arbitration: (a) the ability to choose the decision maker and (b) certainty in the result given very limited appeal rights.

First, the decision highlights the importance of the selection of the decision maker. Litigants should ensure that they think carefully about proposed arbitrators and take the opportunity to investigate their experience and qualifications. In this case, it was notable that the alleged grounds for the reasonable apprehension of bias were discovered by an employee of Jacob Securities reviewing publically available documents. Assuming Jacob Securities' bias concern was legitimate, a thorough investigation of the arbitrator's background at the outset may have avoided the issue.

Second, parties considering arbitration should keep in mind that the "advantage" of certainty in the result cuts both ways. The jurisprudence is clear that the court is inclined to respect the arbitration process and is reluctant to interfere with arbitral awards. By indicating that it was prepared to award substantial indemnity costs, the Court in Jacob Securities reaffirmed that it respects the parties' right to engage in private dispute resolution and will not tolerate attempts to upset an arbitration process without good reason. Therefore, before agreeing to arbitrate, a party should seriously consider whether it is prepared to live with an unfavourable arbitral award or whether it would prefer to hedge its bets and proceed in court to better preserve the possibility of an appeal.


12016 ONSC 604

Searching For A Conflict In An Ontario Arbitration

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions