Canada: The WTO Doha Negotiations – Will the Impasse be Broken?

Last Updated: April 18 2007
Article by David K. Wilson and Anne M. Tardif

Despite signs of modest progress in recent weeks, the WTO Doha negotiations are facing serious difficulties. Political leaders around the globe, including Canada, have expressed a commitment to an ambitious deal. However, after more than five years of negotiations, major differences remain and there is no sign of a breakthrough. The next few months may decide the success or failure of the Doha Round.

Why has it been so difficult to get a deal? What is at stake if the negotiations succeed or fail? What can we expect in the coming weeks and months?

Perspectives on the Doha Negotiations

The difficulties in the Doha Round can be traced to its launching in November 2001 - the ninth such round of trade liberalizing negotiations since the international trading system was founded in 1947. A central goal of the "Doha Development Agenda" is to address the needs of developing countries by promoting economic development and alleviating poverty. The commencement of the Doha Round was also intended to restore confidence in an international economy badly shaken in the immediate aftermath of 9/11.

In a recent interview, former U.S. Trade Representative, Charlene Barshefsky, was forthright in her assessment of the Doha Round, suggesting it was launched under "essentially false pretences". She contends that, but for the desire to show solidarity with the U.S. and the global economy in the aftermath of 9/11, the Round "almost certainly would not have been launched". Moreover, despite the laudable intention of leaders of wealthy nations to make this a Development Round, "their ability to execute has always, in important respects, been absent – something clear from the outset, rhetoric aside"1.

Like the 1986-1994 Uruguay Round that preceded it, the Doha Round is ambitious in scope, extending well beyond the agricultural trade issues for which it is best known. The core elements of the negotiations include:

  • A series of implementation and special and differential treatment issues of concern to developing countries. These issues cover a variety of problems stemming from the Uruguay Round, and the need to strengthen and clarify rights specificallyaccorded to developing countries.

  • Reforming the three pillars of agricultural trade regulation – market access, export subsidies and domestic support.
  • Opening markets for service industries, including banking, insurance, telecommunications and transportation, particularly in developing countries.
  • Lowering tariffs and other measures affecting manufactured goods, again particularly in developing countries.

Other sensitive areas covered in the Doha mandate, to mention just a few, are: intellectual property rights; anti-dumping and subsidy rules, the WTO dispute settlement system and trade-environment issues.

Most of the Doha issues are part of what is known as a "single undertaking", meaning that, in principle, nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. Agricultural trade is the lynchpin of the negotiations, although the importance of other issues, such as new disciplines in the fast growing area of trade in services, cannot be underestimated. Services are estimated to currently account for 60 percent of global production and employment, but only 20 percent of total trade2.

The volume of trade in goods and services affected by the negotiations is truly staggering, prompting WTO Director General Pascal Lamy to describe the Doha Round as "the most ambitious attempt that governments have made to open trade multilaterally …and lock-in reform on an unprecedented scale"3.

As an exporting nation, Canada has a greater stake than most countries in the outcome of the Doha negotiations. Over and above the impacts of the Round on agricultural trade, the areas that are of special strategic significance for Canada include:

  • Financial services: The Canadian government will be looking for higher ceilings on equity participation and a loosening of limitations on banking and insurance licenses, especially in advanced developed economies and China;
  • Other services: Canada is pressing for enhanced market access and non-discrimination guarantees in various other service sectors not currently protected by WTO disciplines in most countries, such as construction and engineering, research and development, transportation and environmental services;
  • Autos: High tariffs in fast-growing Asian markets continue to be an irritant to the Canadian auto industry (prompting Canada, along with the U.S. and EU to recently launch a WTO challenge against China);
  • Telecommunications: Legislative requirements that carriers providing telecommunications services in Canada be Canadian-owned have been a long-standing trade issue, although the federal government has recently signaled that it may be open to additional foreign investment. Conversely, Canadian companies stand to benefit if telecom investment restrictions in advanced developing countries are eased.

Despite the ambitious Doha agenda, from the outset the Round has been plagued with problems. Following a failed ministerial meeting in Cancun Mexico in 2003, trade ministers of member countries met again in Hong Kong in late 2005 to attempt to inject new energy into the flagging negotiations. Some relatively modest commitments were agreed to in Hong Kong, notably, a commitment to eliminate export subsidies by 2013, but all of the more challenging issues were deferred.

Along the way, a number of issues that were part of the initial Doha Declaration have been dropped and some others have been spun out to WTO committees. Notable among the early Doha casualties were the following "Singapore issues" (so named because the issues were placed on the trade agenda at a ministerial meeting in Singapore in 1996):

  • Expanded disciplines on the regulation of foreign investment;
  • Principles affecting competition laws, including export cartels; and
  • Promoting greater transparency in government procurement.

In July 2006, after the main participants failed to bridge differences on key issues, Lamy suspended the negotiations rather than allow them to descend into further acrimony. He referred to a "triangle of issues" as key to breaking the deadlock: a commitment by the U.S. to make further cuts in domestic support to farmers, increased market access by the E.U. to its agricultural markets and lower tariffs on manufactured goods by advanced developing countries such as Brazil and India4.

In February of this year, talks formally resumed following informal meetings linked to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. However, despite a variety of meetings of senior and mid-level officials, progress has been modest.

Adding to the urgency of the negotiations is the imminent expiry of the U.S. Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) in July. Formerly known as fast-track authority, it allows Congress to approve or reject an international trade agreement, but not to amend it or filibuster the ratification and implementation process. There are a number of obstacles to the renewal of TPA, without which a Doha deal will likely be delayed by a number of months if not years. In addition to the weakened political position of President Bush in the face of a Democrat-controlled Congress, issues such as the record American trade deficit and concerns over the protection of labour rights have complicated the debate. The TPA renewal is also closely tied to the new Farm Bill which is currently before Congress. A breakthrough in Doha would provide the greatest incentive for renewal of TPA in Washington.

Challenges

To a significant degree, the challenges involved in securing a deal are political, as the situation in the United States illustrates. Of all the major players in the negotiations, the U.S. has come under the most criticism as being unwilling to move significantly off its opening negotiating position. However, the EU faces its own divisions over the prospect of having to open up their agricultural markets to greater imports, as recent statements by outgoing French President Chirac illustrate5.

The negotiating context has changed significantly compared to previous rounds. Historically, the EU and U.S. dominated international trade negotiations, framing the main issues and the terms on which those issues would be addressed. The 1992 Blair House Accord between the EU and U.S., which formed the basis of the Uruguay Round agreements, is a case in point.

This strategy – and the brinksmanship that goes with it - is more difficult to pursue in a Round that is stated to be aimed at addressing development issues. The result has been a much more complex negotiating agenda and a more visible role for leading developing countries, notably, Brazil, India, China and South Africa.

Furthermore, developing countries themselves have highly diverse and often contradictory interests. Some, such as Brazil in agriculture and China in manufactured goods have a compelling interest in gaining greater access to markets in both developed and developing countries. Others, such as CARICOM countries, express primarily defensive interests aimed at protecting their markets from imports. India is an example of a country that exhibits both characteristics, as a growing powerhouse in manufacturing that is also compelled to protect its 650 million mostly small-scale farmers from import competition.

Intersecting these issues is the unease of growing segments of civil society with globalization. This trend has increasingly put the WTO and its proponents on the defensive, particularly in respect of trade-development and trade-environment issues.

For many years, through the predecessor to the WTO, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), considerable trade liberalization was accomplished with minimal public attention. The GATT process for dealing with trade disputes placed a premium on consultation and conciliation over adjudication. Since the creation of the WTO in 1995, stronger disciplines in a number of areas have been accompanied by a much more robust, and legalistic, dispute settlement system. This had led to accusations directed at WTO dispute settlement bodies of judicial activism, gap-filling or expansive interpretations of the often ambiguous language crafted by trade diplomats and negotiators. The more legalistic nature of the system also makes it more difficult for negotiators to bridge differences through what some refer to as "constructive ambiguity".

Exacerbating these challenges is the limited institutional capacity of the WTO to respond to cases in which dispute settlement decisions are seen as having gone too far, or to adapt to changing global trends. As economist Sylvie Ostry noted, the WTO suffers from "a serious asymmetry between its extremely weak legislative and executive powers, and its extremely strong judicialized dispute system"6.

In addition, as a result of demands for greater transparency, the WTO has been subject to far more public scrutiny than in the GATT era. In the process, trade diplomacy is frequently yielding to political grand-standing. Some fear the WTO is drifting toward becoming a UN-style organization that is long on speeches and short on concrete action.

Ironically, globalization is another trend that adds to the challenges facing the WTO. The fast pace of economic changes driven by technology, capital flows and rising economies such as China is outpacing the capability of the WTO to respond. As the experience in the Doha negotiations shows, the WTO is beginning to lose control of the international trade agenda.

Looking Ahead

Notwithstanding these challenges, the Doha Round is far from being doomed to collapse. The Uruguay Round experienced its share of deadlocks and missed deadlines. In that sense the current Round is not unique. Despite the remaining areas of difference, considerable progress has been made on modalities for further negotiations. Most media reports fail to capture the degree of convergence on a large number of points. With some movement by key players on the "triangle of issues", a deal is still well within reach.

The scope of any deal is another issue. As each month passes it becomes increasingly less likely that will be a comprehensive deal of the type that was contemplated by the 2001 Declaration. If a deal of any kind can be reached, trade ministers are likely to defer a number of other issues for future discussions. The complex area of trade in services is particularly vulnerable to being watered down to a deal specific to limited sectors (notably, telecommunications and financial services). This has prompted lobbying by service sector groups such as the U.S. Coalition of Service Industries and the European Services Forum to insist on maintaining a high level of ambition in the service negotiations7.

The negotiations can be expected to heat up in May and June as the U.S. TPA deadline draws near. The EU has its own reasons to press for a breakthrough while the rotating presidency is still held by German Chancellor Andrea Merkel (the term of her EU presidency finishes at the end of June). Developing countries such as India will be leaned on to show movement on services and tariffs on industrialized goods in return for reduced farm subsidies and improved agricultural market access by developed countries.

Even if there is a breakthrough, it will take a considerable amount of time to flesh out the details and formalize the agreements. Pascal Lamy was being optimistic in recently suggesting that if a breakthrough was achieved in the first half of 2007, a new global trade deal could be concluded in early 2008.

If the Doha negotiations fail, the WTO will remain an important international institution, but there will be an unprecedented crisis of confidence in the WTO and the multilateral trading system it oversees. More member countries will resort to trade litigation and the losers in trade battles will be more likely to resist compliance with dispute settlement rulings.

The failure to reach a deal on the Doha agenda will also accelerate the already burgeoning growth of regional trade agreements. To put this trend in perspective, in 1995 some 130 such agreements were notified to the WTO. As of the end of 2005, some 300 regional trade agreements were in operation or under negotiation.

In this regard Canada is playing catch-up, recently announcing its intention to negotiate a Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA) with India, and talking openly about a Plan B – negotiating a free trade agreement - depending on the outcome of the Doha Round. A proposed trading bloc of 21 Asia-Pacific economies is likewise being presented as a fall back solution if the WTO negotiations fail.

The proliferation of regional deals is having a serious impact on the structure and integrity of the WTO and on the international trading system. More regional agreements means more rules, greater detail and a larger number of moving parts. Integrating these deals into the overarching structure of the WTO is proving increasingly difficult and augmenting the potential for conflict. The proliferation of such arrangements creates a complex web of preferential trade rules that weaken the principle of non-discrimination which is at the heart of the rules overseen by the WTO.

In short, the next few months may play a key role in shaping future multilateral trade policies.

Footnotes

1 International Herald Tribune, January 31, 2007

2 WTO GATS website

3 Pascal Lamy Speech, October 11, 2006

4 U.S. Government Accountability Office, Congress Faces Key Decisions as Efforts to Reach Doha Agreement Intensify, March 2007, p. 9

5 The Guardian, March 5, 2007, Chirac Rails at Mandelson’s Trade Strategy

6 March 2002, Doha and After, Presentation to Kananaskis Conference, p. 2

7 Inside US Trade, February 21, 2007

www.fasken.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions