Canada: The WTO Doha Negotiations – Will the Impasse be Broken?

Last Updated: April 18 2007
Article by David K. Wilson and Anne M. Tardif

Despite signs of modest progress in recent weeks, the WTO Doha negotiations are facing serious difficulties. Political leaders around the globe, including Canada, have expressed a commitment to an ambitious deal. However, after more than five years of negotiations, major differences remain and there is no sign of a breakthrough. The next few months may decide the success or failure of the Doha Round.

Why has it been so difficult to get a deal? What is at stake if the negotiations succeed or fail? What can we expect in the coming weeks and months?

Perspectives on the Doha Negotiations

The difficulties in the Doha Round can be traced to its launching in November 2001 - the ninth such round of trade liberalizing negotiations since the international trading system was founded in 1947. A central goal of the "Doha Development Agenda" is to address the needs of developing countries by promoting economic development and alleviating poverty. The commencement of the Doha Round was also intended to restore confidence in an international economy badly shaken in the immediate aftermath of 9/11.

In a recent interview, former U.S. Trade Representative, Charlene Barshefsky, was forthright in her assessment of the Doha Round, suggesting it was launched under "essentially false pretences". She contends that, but for the desire to show solidarity with the U.S. and the global economy in the aftermath of 9/11, the Round "almost certainly would not have been launched". Moreover, despite the laudable intention of leaders of wealthy nations to make this a Development Round, "their ability to execute has always, in important respects, been absent – something clear from the outset, rhetoric aside"1.

Like the 1986-1994 Uruguay Round that preceded it, the Doha Round is ambitious in scope, extending well beyond the agricultural trade issues for which it is best known. The core elements of the negotiations include:

  • A series of implementation and special and differential treatment issues of concern to developing countries. These issues cover a variety of problems stemming from the Uruguay Round, and the need to strengthen and clarify rights specificallyaccorded to developing countries.

  • Reforming the three pillars of agricultural trade regulation – market access, export subsidies and domestic support.
  • Opening markets for service industries, including banking, insurance, telecommunications and transportation, particularly in developing countries.
  • Lowering tariffs and other measures affecting manufactured goods, again particularly in developing countries.

Other sensitive areas covered in the Doha mandate, to mention just a few, are: intellectual property rights; anti-dumping and subsidy rules, the WTO dispute settlement system and trade-environment issues.

Most of the Doha issues are part of what is known as a "single undertaking", meaning that, in principle, nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. Agricultural trade is the lynchpin of the negotiations, although the importance of other issues, such as new disciplines in the fast growing area of trade in services, cannot be underestimated. Services are estimated to currently account for 60 percent of global production and employment, but only 20 percent of total trade2.

The volume of trade in goods and services affected by the negotiations is truly staggering, prompting WTO Director General Pascal Lamy to describe the Doha Round as "the most ambitious attempt that governments have made to open trade multilaterally …and lock-in reform on an unprecedented scale"3.

As an exporting nation, Canada has a greater stake than most countries in the outcome of the Doha negotiations. Over and above the impacts of the Round on agricultural trade, the areas that are of special strategic significance for Canada include:

  • Financial services: The Canadian government will be looking for higher ceilings on equity participation and a loosening of limitations on banking and insurance licenses, especially in advanced developed economies and China;
  • Other services: Canada is pressing for enhanced market access and non-discrimination guarantees in various other service sectors not currently protected by WTO disciplines in most countries, such as construction and engineering, research and development, transportation and environmental services;
  • Autos: High tariffs in fast-growing Asian markets continue to be an irritant to the Canadian auto industry (prompting Canada, along with the U.S. and EU to recently launch a WTO challenge against China);
  • Telecommunications: Legislative requirements that carriers providing telecommunications services in Canada be Canadian-owned have been a long-standing trade issue, although the federal government has recently signaled that it may be open to additional foreign investment. Conversely, Canadian companies stand to benefit if telecom investment restrictions in advanced developing countries are eased.

Despite the ambitious Doha agenda, from the outset the Round has been plagued with problems. Following a failed ministerial meeting in Cancun Mexico in 2003, trade ministers of member countries met again in Hong Kong in late 2005 to attempt to inject new energy into the flagging negotiations. Some relatively modest commitments were agreed to in Hong Kong, notably, a commitment to eliminate export subsidies by 2013, but all of the more challenging issues were deferred.

Along the way, a number of issues that were part of the initial Doha Declaration have been dropped and some others have been spun out to WTO committees. Notable among the early Doha casualties were the following "Singapore issues" (so named because the issues were placed on the trade agenda at a ministerial meeting in Singapore in 1996):

  • Expanded disciplines on the regulation of foreign investment;
  • Principles affecting competition laws, including export cartels; and
  • Promoting greater transparency in government procurement.

In July 2006, after the main participants failed to bridge differences on key issues, Lamy suspended the negotiations rather than allow them to descend into further acrimony. He referred to a "triangle of issues" as key to breaking the deadlock: a commitment by the U.S. to make further cuts in domestic support to farmers, increased market access by the E.U. to its agricultural markets and lower tariffs on manufactured goods by advanced developing countries such as Brazil and India4.

In February of this year, talks formally resumed following informal meetings linked to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. However, despite a variety of meetings of senior and mid-level officials, progress has been modest.

Adding to the urgency of the negotiations is the imminent expiry of the U.S. Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) in July. Formerly known as fast-track authority, it allows Congress to approve or reject an international trade agreement, but not to amend it or filibuster the ratification and implementation process. There are a number of obstacles to the renewal of TPA, without which a Doha deal will likely be delayed by a number of months if not years. In addition to the weakened political position of President Bush in the face of a Democrat-controlled Congress, issues such as the record American trade deficit and concerns over the protection of labour rights have complicated the debate. The TPA renewal is also closely tied to the new Farm Bill which is currently before Congress. A breakthrough in Doha would provide the greatest incentive for renewal of TPA in Washington.


To a significant degree, the challenges involved in securing a deal are political, as the situation in the United States illustrates. Of all the major players in the negotiations, the U.S. has come under the most criticism as being unwilling to move significantly off its opening negotiating position. However, the EU faces its own divisions over the prospect of having to open up their agricultural markets to greater imports, as recent statements by outgoing French President Chirac illustrate5.

The negotiating context has changed significantly compared to previous rounds. Historically, the EU and U.S. dominated international trade negotiations, framing the main issues and the terms on which those issues would be addressed. The 1992 Blair House Accord between the EU and U.S., which formed the basis of the Uruguay Round agreements, is a case in point.

This strategy – and the brinksmanship that goes with it - is more difficult to pursue in a Round that is stated to be aimed at addressing development issues. The result has been a much more complex negotiating agenda and a more visible role for leading developing countries, notably, Brazil, India, China and South Africa.

Furthermore, developing countries themselves have highly diverse and often contradictory interests. Some, such as Brazil in agriculture and China in manufactured goods have a compelling interest in gaining greater access to markets in both developed and developing countries. Others, such as CARICOM countries, express primarily defensive interests aimed at protecting their markets from imports. India is an example of a country that exhibits both characteristics, as a growing powerhouse in manufacturing that is also compelled to protect its 650 million mostly small-scale farmers from import competition.

Intersecting these issues is the unease of growing segments of civil society with globalization. This trend has increasingly put the WTO and its proponents on the defensive, particularly in respect of trade-development and trade-environment issues.

For many years, through the predecessor to the WTO, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), considerable trade liberalization was accomplished with minimal public attention. The GATT process for dealing with trade disputes placed a premium on consultation and conciliation over adjudication. Since the creation of the WTO in 1995, stronger disciplines in a number of areas have been accompanied by a much more robust, and legalistic, dispute settlement system. This had led to accusations directed at WTO dispute settlement bodies of judicial activism, gap-filling or expansive interpretations of the often ambiguous language crafted by trade diplomats and negotiators. The more legalistic nature of the system also makes it more difficult for negotiators to bridge differences through what some refer to as "constructive ambiguity".

Exacerbating these challenges is the limited institutional capacity of the WTO to respond to cases in which dispute settlement decisions are seen as having gone too far, or to adapt to changing global trends. As economist Sylvie Ostry noted, the WTO suffers from "a serious asymmetry between its extremely weak legislative and executive powers, and its extremely strong judicialized dispute system"6.

In addition, as a result of demands for greater transparency, the WTO has been subject to far more public scrutiny than in the GATT era. In the process, trade diplomacy is frequently yielding to political grand-standing. Some fear the WTO is drifting toward becoming a UN-style organization that is long on speeches and short on concrete action.

Ironically, globalization is another trend that adds to the challenges facing the WTO. The fast pace of economic changes driven by technology, capital flows and rising economies such as China is outpacing the capability of the WTO to respond. As the experience in the Doha negotiations shows, the WTO is beginning to lose control of the international trade agenda.

Looking Ahead

Notwithstanding these challenges, the Doha Round is far from being doomed to collapse. The Uruguay Round experienced its share of deadlocks and missed deadlines. In that sense the current Round is not unique. Despite the remaining areas of difference, considerable progress has been made on modalities for further negotiations. Most media reports fail to capture the degree of convergence on a large number of points. With some movement by key players on the "triangle of issues", a deal is still well within reach.

The scope of any deal is another issue. As each month passes it becomes increasingly less likely that will be a comprehensive deal of the type that was contemplated by the 2001 Declaration. If a deal of any kind can be reached, trade ministers are likely to defer a number of other issues for future discussions. The complex area of trade in services is particularly vulnerable to being watered down to a deal specific to limited sectors (notably, telecommunications and financial services). This has prompted lobbying by service sector groups such as the U.S. Coalition of Service Industries and the European Services Forum to insist on maintaining a high level of ambition in the service negotiations7.

The negotiations can be expected to heat up in May and June as the U.S. TPA deadline draws near. The EU has its own reasons to press for a breakthrough while the rotating presidency is still held by German Chancellor Andrea Merkel (the term of her EU presidency finishes at the end of June). Developing countries such as India will be leaned on to show movement on services and tariffs on industrialized goods in return for reduced farm subsidies and improved agricultural market access by developed countries.

Even if there is a breakthrough, it will take a considerable amount of time to flesh out the details and formalize the agreements. Pascal Lamy was being optimistic in recently suggesting that if a breakthrough was achieved in the first half of 2007, a new global trade deal could be concluded in early 2008.

If the Doha negotiations fail, the WTO will remain an important international institution, but there will be an unprecedented crisis of confidence in the WTO and the multilateral trading system it oversees. More member countries will resort to trade litigation and the losers in trade battles will be more likely to resist compliance with dispute settlement rulings.

The failure to reach a deal on the Doha agenda will also accelerate the already burgeoning growth of regional trade agreements. To put this trend in perspective, in 1995 some 130 such agreements were notified to the WTO. As of the end of 2005, some 300 regional trade agreements were in operation or under negotiation.

In this regard Canada is playing catch-up, recently announcing its intention to negotiate a Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA) with India, and talking openly about a Plan B – negotiating a free trade agreement - depending on the outcome of the Doha Round. A proposed trading bloc of 21 Asia-Pacific economies is likewise being presented as a fall back solution if the WTO negotiations fail.

The proliferation of regional deals is having a serious impact on the structure and integrity of the WTO and on the international trading system. More regional agreements means more rules, greater detail and a larger number of moving parts. Integrating these deals into the overarching structure of the WTO is proving increasingly difficult and augmenting the potential for conflict. The proliferation of such arrangements creates a complex web of preferential trade rules that weaken the principle of non-discrimination which is at the heart of the rules overseen by the WTO.

In short, the next few months may play a key role in shaping future multilateral trade policies.


1 International Herald Tribune, January 31, 2007

2 WTO GATS website

3 Pascal Lamy Speech, October 11, 2006

4 U.S. Government Accountability Office, Congress Faces Key Decisions as Efforts to Reach Doha Agreement Intensify, March 2007, p. 9

5 The Guardian, March 5, 2007, Chirac Rails at Mandelson’s Trade Strategy

6 March 2002, Doha and After, Presentation to Kananaskis Conference, p. 2

7 Inside US Trade, February 21, 2007

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.