Canada: Agricultural Law NetLetter - Monday, March 21, 2016


* The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal has reviewed the Saskatchewan law regarding the partition of jointly owned land in a case in which two brothers held joint ownership of 10 quarter sections of farmland. In Saskatchewan the partition of land is governed by old English statute law - The Partition Act, 1539; The Partition Act 1540 and The Partition Act, 1868. These partition statutes provide that a single co-tenant of land may apply to Court to have land partitioned as of right between or among them or sold unless there is a good reason not to order a sale. The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of a Chambers Judge who awarded 6 quarter sections to one brother and 4 quarter sections to the other brother and concluded that there were no grounds to interfere with the Judge's decision with respect to which brother got the home quarter. The Court did not comment on the Chambers Judge's conclusion that he had no authority under the Partition Acts to divide the home quarter between the two co-owners because the issue had not been raised by either party on appeal. The Chambers Judge also directed one brother to make an equalization payment to the other to account for a difference in property values. The Court of Appeal adjusted the amount of the payment to correct an error. (Raymond v. Raymond, CALN/2016-006, [2016] S.J. No. 60, Saskatchewan Court of Appeal)

* The Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Divisional Court, has upheld the decision of Ontario Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal that Regulations under the Farm Implements Act (Ontario) which require all Dealership Agreements to contain terms which require distributors to not unreasonably withhold renewal or transfer of Dealership Agreements, have retroactive effect. As a consequence, a renewal provision in a Dealership Agreement between CNH Canada Ltd. and Chesterman Farm Equipment Inc. was held void. The majority of the Divisional Court upheld the  Tribunal's decision that CNH had breached the renewal provisions mandated by the Regulation. Damages were awarded for breach of contract, however the amount awarded was reduced, and the Court concluded that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to award damages for the value of obsolete tools which had been purchased by the dealer from CNH. The Court also upheld the Tribunal's authority to award pre-judgment interest but directed that it reconsider its award for legal costs. The case contains a thorough discussion of the law with respect to the regulation of the renewal of farm equipment dealership agreements in Ontario. (Chesterman Farm Equipment Inc. v. CNH Canada Ltd., CALN/2016-007, [2016] O.J. No. 1183, Ontario Superior Court of Justice)


Raymond v. Raymond;


Full text: [2016] S.J. No. 60;

2016 SKCA 16,

Saskatchewan Court of Appeal,

R.K. Ottenbreit, N.W. Caldwell and J.A. Ryan-Froslie JJ.A.,

February 10, 2016.

Partition and Sale of Farmland -- Saskatchewan Law.

Barry Alfred Raymond ("Barry") appealed to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal from a decision of a Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench Chambers Judge who distributed ownership of 10 quarters of jointly owned farmland between Barry and Barry's brother, Alan Raymond ("Alan"). Alan and his son David Raymond appealed the amount of an equalization judgment in the sum of $42,000.00 in favour of Barry.

Barry's appeal primarily concerned the Chambers Judge's decision to award the historical home quarter to Alan.

Barry and Alan grew up on the historical home quarter.

Alan began residing on the east side of the home quarter in 1976. Barry and his wife live across the road on their own quarter.

For a time Barry and Alan farmed together, however this ended in 1984. Thereafter they each farmed on their own although they continued to farm the 10 quarter sections of land owned as joint owners through an arrangement pursuant to which one or the other of them farmed each quarter. Alan and Barry each held a 50% interest in 8 of the 10 quarter sections. Barry held a 75% interest, and Alan held a 25% interest in 2 quarters, including the historical home quarter.

A partition application was made to a Queen's Bench Judge in Chambers for the purpose of separating the joint ownership interests of Barry and Alan. The application was based on Affidavit evidence and some cross-examination evidence.

On June 3, 2015, the Chambers Judge issued a decision ( 2015 SKQB 164 (CanLII)) which directed that 6 of the 10 quarter sections be transferred to Barry and that 4 of the 10 quarter sections, including the historical home quarter, be transferred to Alan.

The Chambers Judge concluded that he had no power to divide the home quarter by giving 80 acres to Alan and 80 acres to Barry, however no appeal was taken from this decision. The Chambers Judge also directed Alan to pay Barry $42,000.00 in equalization having regard to the appraised values of the land including some buildings on the land.

A number of errors in the initial Judgment were addressed in a July 6, 2015 corrigendum issued by the Chambers Judge.

The issues on appeal primarily dealt with the decision to award the historical home quarter to Alan, and the amount of the equalization payment.

Decision: Caldwell, JA, Ottenbreit and Ryan-Froslie, JJA concurring, dismissed the appeal and allowed the cross-appeal [at para. 38].

Caldwell, JA summarized the law with respect to partition of jointly owned land in Saskatchewan as follows, at para. 11 to 12:

[11] In that they address the partition of land, this appeal and cross-appeal deal with old English statute law, namely, The Partition Act, 1539, 31 Hen VIII, c 1 (UK), The Partition Act, 1540, 32 Hen VIII, c 32 (UK) and The Partition Act, 1868, 31 & 32 Vict, c 40 (UK). This law was received in Saskatchewan by reason of s. 11 of The North-West Territories Act, 1886, SC 1886, c 50 and s. 16 of The Saskatchewan Act, 1905, SC 1905, c 42 (See: Matovich Estate v. Matovich, 2015 SKCA 130 (Can)LII); Blacklaw v. Beverage, 1939 CanLII 158 (SK CA), [1939] 3 WWR 511 (Sask CA); Wagman v Obrigewitsch, 2010 SKQB 84 (CanLII), [2010] 9 WWR 462 (Wagman], varied on other grounds 2011 SKCA 68 (CanLII); Bay v Bay (1984), CanLII 2315 (SK QB), 38 Sask R 101 (QB); and Grunert v Grunert (1960), 1960 CanLII 230 (SK QB), 32 WWR (NS) 509 (Sask QB)). Although long-since repealed and replaced in the United Kingdom and many Canadian provinces, the Imperial partition statutes remain in effect in Saskatchewan and are part of our law.

[12] Originally written in old English, the partition statutes together provide that a single co-tenant of land may apply to court to have the land partitioned as-lf-right as between or among the co-tenants or sold unless there exists a good reason not to order a sale -- rights that did not exist at common law, other than for co-parceners. The two earlier statutes empower a court to  partition lands upon application by a co-tenant; where, The Partition Act, 1868 empowers a court to sell it, "unless it sees good reason to the contrary".

Caldwell, J did not comment on the Chambers Judge's conclusion that he had no authority to partition the home quarter, stating at para. 13:

[13] While the parties' application and this appeal were expressed in terms of The Partition Acts, the matter of the judge's power thereunder to divide the properties in question as between the parties was not canvassed or argued before us and we leave that to another day.

With respect to the Chambers Justice's decision to award the home quarter to Alan, Caldwell, JA observed at para. 18 that this decision was made primarily on the ground that Alan lived and operated a veterinary clinic on the home quarter, stating at para 18:

[18] The judge found the circumstances tipped in favour of Alan receiving title to the historical home quarter, chiefly by reason that he lives and operates a veterinary clinic on that quarter section but also because the judge had ruled he could not "impose a completely different ownership structure on the parties [than] that which is specified by title". That is, he found the powers of partition and sale under The Partition Acts did not empower him to divide the historical home quarter by giving the most easterly 80 acres to Alan the most westerly 80 acres to Barry; and, no appeal was taken from this legal conclusion. On the other hand, although Barry also owns buildings on the historical home quarter, the judge found Barry had actually made limited use of that quarter section. For these reasons, the judge found it more equitable to transfer the historical home quarter to Alan and to require him to compensate Barry for Barry's 3/4 interest in it.

Caldwell, JA concluded, at para. 19 and 20 that this decision was a discretionary one, and that there was no material before the Court to conclude that the Chambers Judge had abused his discretion, erred in principle, or disregarded a material fact or failed to act judicially.

With respect to the amount of the equalization payment, Caldwell, JA held [at para. 30 to 37] that the Chambers Judge had made errors in his calculation. The equalization payment was adjusted from $42,000.00 to $24,250.00.

To continue reading this article, please click here

Previously published by LexisNexis

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions