Worldwide: Private International Law: Does The Filing Of A Lawsuit In A Foreign Court Stop Limitation?

A foreign plaintiff files a lawsuit against a defendant in the latter's jurisdiction to exercise a right governed by the law of the jurisdiction of the foreign plaintiff.  Does the filing of such lawsuit stop the limitation period?

On the basis of the rule existing in civil matters across Canada, in the U.K. and in France, to the effect that limitation is governed by the law applicable to the merits of the dispute, the jurisdiction seized of the lawsuit would be obliged to apply the limitation rules of the foreign jurisdiction.

An important rule in limitation which exists in most legal systems is that the filing of, commencing or bringing, a lawsuit before a court will stop or interrupt limitation until the judgment is rendered. 

Where a lawsuit is filed with the courts of the jurisdiction whose laws govern the merits and hence limitation, it will be quite clear that this rule, where it exists, will apply and interruption will take place.

But, does it take place if the lawsuit is filed with the courts of another jurisdiction, a jurisdiction whose laws do not govern the merits?

Of course, the answer depends on what the rules of limitation of the jurisdiction whose law governs the merits, say.


In the province of Quebec, the rule pertaining to the interruption of limitation is found in Article2892 of the Quebec Civil Code which reads, in part, as follows:

"Art.2892. The filing of a judicial demand before the expiry of the ..."

What constitutes a "judicial demand"?

Those are the key words.  Indeed, if it is not a "judicial demand", there will be no interruption and limitation will continue to run. 

The leading case on point, in Quebec, is the case of Drouin vs. Centre Hospitalier Fleury [1988] R.R.A.102 (Quebec Superior Court).

The facts are as follows: A physician, who had been dismissed by a clinic, appealed the decision of the clinic to a specialized administrative government board which allowed his appeal.  The physician then decided to sue the clinic before the regular courts, essentially for wrongful dismissal. At the date of filing of his lawsuit, the applicable limitation period had run out.  The defendant clinic sought the dismissal of the lawsuit on that basis.  The physician argued that the filing of his appeal with the administrative government board, years before, had interrupted the limitation period.

The court ruled that the expression "judicial demand" in Article 2224 of the then "Civil Code of Lower Canada" (now Art.2892 of the new Quebec Civil Code) should be interpreted as meaning only a court named in the Quebec Code of Civil Procedure.  Since the administrative government body was not a court named in the Code of Civil Procedure, the filing of the appeal with that board had not interrupted limitation.

In essence, with only a few exceptions described in other provisions of the Quebec Civil Code (submitting a dispute to arbitration and filing a proof of claim in a bankruptcy process), only a lawsuit filed with a Quebec court interrupts limitation under Quebec law.

If we follow this reasoning, the filing of a claim governed by Quebec law both as to merits and limitation with a foreign court, would not cause interruption of limitation under Quebec law, as it is not a Quebec court.  As a result, limitation would continue to run while the case winds its way through the court system of the foreign jurisdiction.

Therefore, it is important to know first what the applicable rule relating to interruption of prescription says, for if the applicable rule is the same as in Quebec, the lawsuit filed with the courts of a foreign jurisdiction would not interrupt limitation and it would become an excellent ground of defense.  And for the plaintiff, it would be prudent to seek a judicial suspension or extension of limitation before proceeding or if such remedy is not available, seek measures in the foreign jurisdiction for the process to move as fast as possible.

Following is an illustration of this.

It is the case of Ginsbow Inc. vs. Pipe and Piling Supplies Ltd [R.E.J.B. 2000-17539] (Quebec Superior Court).  A State of Washington, U.S.A., company obtains a judgment in its state court condemning a Quebec company to pay a sum of money to the Washington State company.  Ostensibly unsuccessful at collecting the money, the U.S.A. company sought recognition of its judgment from the Quebec Superior Court.  At the time of filing its application with the Quebec Superior Court, only days were left before the Washington States' ten (10) year limitation period for enforcing a judgment, would run out.  The application was contested by the Quebec company on various grounds.  By the trial date, a few years later, over ten (10) years had then elapsed since the U.S.A. judgment was rendered.  The morning of the trial, the Quebec company sought and obtained the dismissal of the application on the basis that the limitation period of ten (10) years for enforcing the U.S.A. judgment, had expired.

Plaintiff had argued that, under Quebec law, the filing of the application for recognition of the Washington State judgment had interrupted the limitation period within the ten (10) years.  But the court took a different view and instead applied Washington State law under which the beneficiary of a judgment has the right, prior to the expiration of the limitation period, to seek from the court, an extension of the limitation period.  The U.S.A. company had sought such an extension but it had been denied by the Washington court.

The court ruled that the ten (10) year Washington State limitation period had therefore continued to run and had expired by the date of the trial.  The application was dismissed.

The court explicitly applied Article 3131 of the Quebec Civil Code which stipulates that limitation is governed by the law applicable to the merits of the dispute.  The court concluded that "the merits of the dispute", in the case of recognition of a foreign judgment, is the foreign judgment and that, as a result, the applicable rules of limitation are those of the jurisdiction where the judgment was rendered, namely Washington State.

There is no provision in the Quebec Civil Code giving power to a court to extend the limitation period.

The outcome was disastrous.  Of course, it was not prudent to wait almost ten (10) years before seeking the recognition of the U.S.A. judgment.

We will now look at what the rules of interruption of limitation say in certain other provinces in Canada and in certain selected countries such the U.K., France and Germany.

As in Quebec, the basic rule in other provinces in Canada is that the limitation period stops running once a proceeding is commenced by issuance of a writ or statement of claim.

Does it mean that in order to operate interruption of limitation a proceeding must be commenced before a court of the province where the lawsuit is filed?

Though I have not gone through all the provincial limitations statutes in Canada, it would appear to be the case.


The Limitations Act 2000 of Alberta, section 2, clearly states that the Act is applicable in respect of "a proceeding before a court created by the Province".


The Limitation Act of British Columbia uses the expression "bringing of an action" as the moment upon which limitation stops running.  "Action" is defined as any "proceeding" in a "court" but the act contains no definition of the words "proceeding" or "court".  But by inference, one could conclude that "court" means a British Columbia Court. Indeed, in many sections, the Act states that the "court may apply" one section or another of the Act and this necessarily means a British Columbia Court.


The Limitation Act of Nova Scotia also uses the expression "bringing an action" as operating interruption of limitation.  The word "action" is also defined as a "proceeding in a Court" but contains no definition of the words "proceeding" or "court".  However, section 23 of the Act which deals with conflicts of laws, states that the Act "applies to actions in the province".  This would necessary mean actions brought before a Nova Scotia Court.


The Ontario Limitation Act 2002 uses the expression "commencement of a proceeding" as operating interruption of limitation.  The word "proceeding" is not defined in the Act.  But the Act lists certain specific proceedings to which the Act does not apply or where there is no limitation period and all of those proceedings refer to proceedings governed by Ontario Law.  It can therefore be inferred that only the commencement of a proceeding in an Ontario court would stop limitation.

Graeme Mew, in his "The Law of Limitations" (2nd Edition) on Canadian law of limitations, Butterworth 2004, at page 3, states the following:

"The party seeking a remedy must commence an appropriate proceeding in a court or tribunal having jurisdiction over the case in order to preserve its remedies and/or rights."

In other words, a provincial court. 


In the U.K., limitation is governed by the Limitation Act 1980.

The limitation periods mentioned in the Act stop running once an action is "brought", as stipulated in section 1 which reads, in part, as follows,:

"1. – (1) This Part of this Act gives the ordinary time limits for bringing actions of the various classes mentioned in the following provisions of this Part."

The word "action" is defined in section 38 of the Act as including "any proceeding in a court of law, including an ecclesiastical court".

"Court of law" is not defined in the Act.  But a reading of the Act leads one to interpret it as meaning a domestic court in the U.K.


Under the French law of limitation, a lawsuit filed in the court of a foreign jurisdiction will interrupt limitation.

In France, the rule that limitation is interrupted by the filing of a lawsuit is found in Article2241 of its Civil Code which reads, in part, as follows:

"Article 2241. La demande en justice, même en référé, interrompt le délai de prescription ..."

The expression "demande en justice" could be translated as a judicial demand or lawsuit, filed with a court.  Just as in Quebec, the notion of "demande en justice" is not well defined in French law.

But a 1975 decision of the highest court in France, the Cour de Cassation [Ch. Civile I, 21janvier1975, no. 73-13851], interpreted this provision (formerly article 2244 of the Civil Code) as including a lawsuit filed in a foreign court.  France, therefore, does not restrict this limitation rule to only its own domestic or local courts.


Germany, as France, does not restrict the interruption of limitation to the filing of a lawsuit before its own courts.  A lawsuit governed as to the merits by German law commenced before a foreign court will stop limitation but under certain conditions.

Following a decision by the German High Court of Justice, the rule, in essence, is that the court proceeding filed in the foreign jurisdiction must bear a functional equivalence to that which could have been filed before a German court and that it reveal the Plaintiff's intention to enforce the right governed by German law.

In conclusion, under the laws of certain jurisdictions, the filing of a lawsuit in a foreign court will not stop limitation but in others, it will.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions