Worldwide: Private International Law: Does The Filing Of A Lawsuit In A Foreign Court Stop Limitation?

A foreign plaintiff files a lawsuit against a defendant in the latter's jurisdiction to exercise a right governed by the law of the jurisdiction of the foreign plaintiff.  Does the filing of such lawsuit stop the limitation period?

On the basis of the rule existing in civil matters across Canada, in the U.K. and in France, to the effect that limitation is governed by the law applicable to the merits of the dispute, the jurisdiction seized of the lawsuit would be obliged to apply the limitation rules of the foreign jurisdiction.

An important rule in limitation which exists in most legal systems is that the filing of, commencing or bringing, a lawsuit before a court will stop or interrupt limitation until the judgment is rendered. 

Where a lawsuit is filed with the courts of the jurisdiction whose laws govern the merits and hence limitation, it will be quite clear that this rule, where it exists, will apply and interruption will take place.

But, does it take place if the lawsuit is filed with the courts of another jurisdiction, a jurisdiction whose laws do not govern the merits?

Of course, the answer depends on what the rules of limitation of the jurisdiction whose law governs the merits, say.


In the province of Quebec, the rule pertaining to the interruption of limitation is found in Article2892 of the Quebec Civil Code which reads, in part, as follows:

"Art.2892. The filing of a judicial demand before the expiry of the ..."

What constitutes a "judicial demand"?

Those are the key words.  Indeed, if it is not a "judicial demand", there will be no interruption and limitation will continue to run. 

The leading case on point, in Quebec, is the case of Drouin vs. Centre Hospitalier Fleury [1988] R.R.A.102 (Quebec Superior Court).

The facts are as follows: A physician, who had been dismissed by a clinic, appealed the decision of the clinic to a specialized administrative government board which allowed his appeal.  The physician then decided to sue the clinic before the regular courts, essentially for wrongful dismissal. At the date of filing of his lawsuit, the applicable limitation period had run out.  The defendant clinic sought the dismissal of the lawsuit on that basis.  The physician argued that the filing of his appeal with the administrative government board, years before, had interrupted the limitation period.

The court ruled that the expression "judicial demand" in Article 2224 of the then "Civil Code of Lower Canada" (now Art.2892 of the new Quebec Civil Code) should be interpreted as meaning only a court named in the Quebec Code of Civil Procedure.  Since the administrative government body was not a court named in the Code of Civil Procedure, the filing of the appeal with that board had not interrupted limitation.

In essence, with only a few exceptions described in other provisions of the Quebec Civil Code (submitting a dispute to arbitration and filing a proof of claim in a bankruptcy process), only a lawsuit filed with a Quebec court interrupts limitation under Quebec law.

If we follow this reasoning, the filing of a claim governed by Quebec law both as to merits and limitation with a foreign court, would not cause interruption of limitation under Quebec law, as it is not a Quebec court.  As a result, limitation would continue to run while the case winds its way through the court system of the foreign jurisdiction.

Therefore, it is important to know first what the applicable rule relating to interruption of prescription says, for if the applicable rule is the same as in Quebec, the lawsuit filed with the courts of a foreign jurisdiction would not interrupt limitation and it would become an excellent ground of defense.  And for the plaintiff, it would be prudent to seek a judicial suspension or extension of limitation before proceeding or if such remedy is not available, seek measures in the foreign jurisdiction for the process to move as fast as possible.

Following is an illustration of this.

It is the case of Ginsbow Inc. vs. Pipe and Piling Supplies Ltd [R.E.J.B. 2000-17539] (Quebec Superior Court).  A State of Washington, U.S.A., company obtains a judgment in its state court condemning a Quebec company to pay a sum of money to the Washington State company.  Ostensibly unsuccessful at collecting the money, the U.S.A. company sought recognition of its judgment from the Quebec Superior Court.  At the time of filing its application with the Quebec Superior Court, only days were left before the Washington States' ten (10) year limitation period for enforcing a judgment, would run out.  The application was contested by the Quebec company on various grounds.  By the trial date, a few years later, over ten (10) years had then elapsed since the U.S.A. judgment was rendered.  The morning of the trial, the Quebec company sought and obtained the dismissal of the application on the basis that the limitation period of ten (10) years for enforcing the U.S.A. judgment, had expired.

Plaintiff had argued that, under Quebec law, the filing of the application for recognition of the Washington State judgment had interrupted the limitation period within the ten (10) years.  But the court took a different view and instead applied Washington State law under which the beneficiary of a judgment has the right, prior to the expiration of the limitation period, to seek from the court, an extension of the limitation period.  The U.S.A. company had sought such an extension but it had been denied by the Washington court.

The court ruled that the ten (10) year Washington State limitation period had therefore continued to run and had expired by the date of the trial.  The application was dismissed.

The court explicitly applied Article 3131 of the Quebec Civil Code which stipulates that limitation is governed by the law applicable to the merits of the dispute.  The court concluded that "the merits of the dispute", in the case of recognition of a foreign judgment, is the foreign judgment and that, as a result, the applicable rules of limitation are those of the jurisdiction where the judgment was rendered, namely Washington State.

There is no provision in the Quebec Civil Code giving power to a court to extend the limitation period.

The outcome was disastrous.  Of course, it was not prudent to wait almost ten (10) years before seeking the recognition of the U.S.A. judgment.

We will now look at what the rules of interruption of limitation say in certain other provinces in Canada and in certain selected countries such the U.K., France and Germany.

As in Quebec, the basic rule in other provinces in Canada is that the limitation period stops running once a proceeding is commenced by issuance of a writ or statement of claim.

Does it mean that in order to operate interruption of limitation a proceeding must be commenced before a court of the province where the lawsuit is filed?

Though I have not gone through all the provincial limitations statutes in Canada, it would appear to be the case.


The Limitations Act 2000 of Alberta, section 2, clearly states that the Act is applicable in respect of "a proceeding before a court created by the Province".


The Limitation Act of British Columbia uses the expression "bringing of an action" as the moment upon which limitation stops running.  "Action" is defined as any "proceeding" in a "court" but the act contains no definition of the words "proceeding" or "court".  But by inference, one could conclude that "court" means a British Columbia Court. Indeed, in many sections, the Act states that the "court may apply" one section or another of the Act and this necessarily means a British Columbia Court.


The Limitation Act of Nova Scotia also uses the expression "bringing an action" as operating interruption of limitation.  The word "action" is also defined as a "proceeding in a Court" but contains no definition of the words "proceeding" or "court".  However, section 23 of the Act which deals with conflicts of laws, states that the Act "applies to actions in the province".  This would necessary mean actions brought before a Nova Scotia Court.


The Ontario Limitation Act 2002 uses the expression "commencement of a proceeding" as operating interruption of limitation.  The word "proceeding" is not defined in the Act.  But the Act lists certain specific proceedings to which the Act does not apply or where there is no limitation period and all of those proceedings refer to proceedings governed by Ontario Law.  It can therefore be inferred that only the commencement of a proceeding in an Ontario court would stop limitation.

Graeme Mew, in his "The Law of Limitations" (2nd Edition) on Canadian law of limitations, Butterworth 2004, at page 3, states the following:

"The party seeking a remedy must commence an appropriate proceeding in a court or tribunal having jurisdiction over the case in order to preserve its remedies and/or rights."

In other words, a provincial court. 


In the U.K., limitation is governed by the Limitation Act 1980.

The limitation periods mentioned in the Act stop running once an action is "brought", as stipulated in section 1 which reads, in part, as follows,:

"1. – (1) This Part of this Act gives the ordinary time limits for bringing actions of the various classes mentioned in the following provisions of this Part."

The word "action" is defined in section 38 of the Act as including "any proceeding in a court of law, including an ecclesiastical court".

"Court of law" is not defined in the Act.  But a reading of the Act leads one to interpret it as meaning a domestic court in the U.K.


Under the French law of limitation, a lawsuit filed in the court of a foreign jurisdiction will interrupt limitation.

In France, the rule that limitation is interrupted by the filing of a lawsuit is found in Article2241 of its Civil Code which reads, in part, as follows:

"Article 2241. La demande en justice, même en référé, interrompt le délai de prescription ..."

The expression "demande en justice" could be translated as a judicial demand or lawsuit, filed with a court.  Just as in Quebec, the notion of "demande en justice" is not well defined in French law.

But a 1975 decision of the highest court in France, the Cour de Cassation [Ch. Civile I, 21janvier1975, no. 73-13851], interpreted this provision (formerly article 2244 of the Civil Code) as including a lawsuit filed in a foreign court.  France, therefore, does not restrict this limitation rule to only its own domestic or local courts.


Germany, as France, does not restrict the interruption of limitation to the filing of a lawsuit before its own courts.  A lawsuit governed as to the merits by German law commenced before a foreign court will stop limitation but under certain conditions.

Following a decision by the German High Court of Justice, the rule, in essence, is that the court proceeding filed in the foreign jurisdiction must bear a functional equivalence to that which could have been filed before a German court and that it reveal the Plaintiff's intention to enforce the right governed by German law.

In conclusion, under the laws of certain jurisdictions, the filing of a lawsuit in a foreign court will not stop limitation but in others, it will.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.