Canada: Agricultural Law NetLetter - Monday, March 7, 2016


A Justice of the Provincial Court of Saskatchewan has dismissed the claim of a Saskatchewan farmer against a municipality for damage caused to the farmer's lands. The municipality installed a culvert which resulted in substantial flooding of the farmer's lands and a corresponding loss in crop yield. The Court held that the claim was statute-barred because it fell outside of the relevant statutory limitation period. The farmer argued that the limitation period began to run when it became obvious that the land could not yield crops the following season, which would put his claim within the relevant period. However, the Court concluded that, based on the farmer's experience and specialized knowledge, he ought to have known that his cause of action arose on the date the flooding occurred, and that the limitation period therefore began at that time. Thus, the farmer's claim fell outside of the relevant limitation period, and the claim was dismissed accordingly. (Lohse v. Lake Alma No. 8 (Rural Municipality), CALN/2016-005, [2016] S.J. No. 81, Saskatchewan Provincial Court (Civil Division))


Lohse v. Lake Alma No. 8 (Rural Municipality);


Full text: [2016] S.J. No. 81;

2016 SKPC 25,

SaskatchewanProvincial Court (Civil Division),

L. Wiegers Prov. Ct. J.,

February 22, 2016.

Limitation Periods -- Discoverability -- Damage -- Date Cause of Action Arose.

The Plaintiff, Mr. Lohse, farmed land near Lake Alma, Saskatchewan for 42 years. The Defendant municipality was responsible for the roadways around Mr. Lohse's farmland. In particular, the Defendant was responsible for two roads forming a T-intersection along the southern boundary of Mr. Lohse's farmland. The adjacent ranch land to the southeast of the T-intersection was owned by Mr. Lohse's brother (the "adjacent land").

Historically, in years of heavy rainfall, the low areas of Mr. Lohse's land and the adjacent land would collect water and form sloughs. Notably, large amounts of water would collect around the northeast corner of the adjacent land where it meets the T-intersection.

In the summer of 2013, a councillor for the Defendant received complaints from landowners regarding the large water buildup in that area. When he attended the area, the councillor observed that the water level was within three or four inches of the road's surface. The councillor raised the issue with the Defendant's other councillors, who shared the fear that the road may get washed out. The decision was therefore made to install a culvert beneath the road.

Installation of the culvert began on the morning of August 12, 2013, and was concluded around noon. As a result of its installation, a large amount of water rushed through the culvert northward onto Mr. Lohse's farmland. Mr. Lohse was never notified of the Defendant's intention to install the culvert. Within an hour, Mr. Lohse approached the councillor on site and remarked that he would be hearing from Mr. Lohse's lawyer.

Mr. Lohse was concerned about the potential damage this flooding would cause to his land. He was aware that there was an unusually high level of precipitation leading up to the 2013 crop growing season. However, he had been travelling that road for 40 years and had never seen it washed out. As such, he did not believe the culvert was necessary. He also contended that the large volume of water on the adjacent land would have benefited his brother's cattle ranching operations.

Mr. Lohse indicated that if he would have received notice of the Defendant's' intention to install the culvert, he could have proposed a more appropriate alternative. He pointed out the existence of a second slough on the adjacent land into which the Defendant could have drained the water via trench or pump.

Mr. Lohse testified that nine acres of his land were immediately flooded upon installation of the culvert, eight acres of which were normally seeded with organic crops. With those areas under water, Mr. Lohse could not effectively address the weeds growing on them, which were about to go to seed. He consequently foresaw substantial long-term weed control issues. Furthermore, in the spring of 2014, the eight acres were still not dry enough to be seeded. There was also a large alkali deposit on the affected acres.

According to Mr. Lohse, the estimated cost of the corresponding crop loss in 2014 was $6,289, less input costs.

Mr. Lohse admitted under cross-examination that the affected land was too wet to seed in 2013, prior to installation of the culvert. He further admitted that he typically seeds areas every second year, and that in 2014 the affected land was not actually scheduled to be seeded. However, he explained that because of his inability to seed in 2013, he intended to seed in 2014.

Mr. Lohse brought a claim against the Defendant for compensatory and punitive damages based on statutory non-compliance, negligence and trespass. The Defendant responded that Mr. Lohse's claim was statute-barred, and that he failed to establish liability as alleged.

Decision: Wiegers, J. dismissed Mr. Lohse's claim, finding that it was statute-bared.

Wiegers, J. referred to s 344(1) of the Saskatchewan Municipalities Act, which precludes an action against a municipality which is initiated over one year "from the time when the damages were sustained" [at para. 15]. In other words, a plaintiff in Saskatchewan has one year from the date in which damages were sustained to file and serve a Statement of Claim upon a defendant municipality.

Mr. Lohse's land was flooded on August 12, 2013. His Statement of Claim was issued on September 24, 2014, and was not served on the Defendant until November 20, 2014. This date was one year and 100 days after the installation of the culvert.

Wiegers, J. noted, however, that the limitation period under the Municipalities Act did not necessarily begin on the date the culvert was installed. He explained that limitations periods generally begin on the date in which the plaintiff discovered, or ought to have discovered, the cause of action, having exercised due diligence [at para. 17]. This is known as the "discoverability principle."

Wiegers, J. further explained that the discoverability principle is typically read into statutory limitation periods, unless clear statutory language displaces it [at para. 17]. Where a defendant raises the limitation period as a defence, the plaintiff bears the onus of establishing the date in which the cause of action was discoverable, that the limitation period should be extended based on that date, and that the claim falls within the adjusted limitation period [at para. 17].

Mr. Lohse's position was that the damage he suffered was his inability to grow crops on the flooded land in 2014. He argued that his cause of action was therefore not discoverable until the spring of 2014, when it became obvious that the affected land was too wet to seed. Thus, he submitted that the limitation period commenced at that point in time.

Conversely, the Defendant argued that the limitation period commenced on August 12, 2013, because that was the date in which Mr. Lohse became aware that the installation of the culvert had caused the flooding and the corresponding damage to his land. The Defendant argued in the alternative that the limitation period commenced no later than October 28, 2013, when Mr. Lohse had filed a claim against the Defendant with the Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities.

Wiegers, J. reduced the issue to a single question: "how much detail regarding his or her damages must a plaintiff possess before the damage has been discovered?" [at para. 20].

Relying on the Supreme Court of Canada decision, K(M) v H(M), 1992 CanLII 31, Mr. Lohse argued that a plaintiff must have a "substantial awareness" of his or her damage. In K(M) v H(M), the plaintiff had suffered continuous abuse from her father between the ages of 8-17 years old, but only commenced legal proceedings against him when she was 28 years old. However, the Court held that it was only when the daughter had undergone therapy in her 20s that she came to understand that her father was responsible for her damage. Based on the facts in that context, the Court held that the limitation period only began upon that understanding occurring.

Wiegers, J., however, held that Mr. Lohse's reliance on K(M) v H(M) was misplaced. He found that in that case the connection between the abuse and the damage was only perceived by the plaintiff well after the abuse occurred. In contrast, Wiegers, J. found that Mr. Lohse was "a clear-minded adult with abundant farming experience" and therefore was quite able to perceive the connection between the installation of the culvert and the risk of damage to his lands [at para. 23].

Wiegers, J. also drew attention to another Supreme Court of Canada decision, Peixeiro v Haberman, 1997 CanLII 325, in which the Court noted that a plaintiff need not know the exact extent of the damage suffered, only that some damage had occurred as a result of the defendant's actions..

Accordingly, Wiegers, J. found that Mr. Lohse knew that he had suffered some damage on August 12, 2013, when his land was flooded [at para. 27]. Indeed, Wiegers, J. noted that Mr. Lohse immediately indicated to the councillor on site that he was contemplating legal action, and promptly admitted to being concerned about the damage. Even in his Statement of Claim, Mr. Lohse suggested that he was aware his land was damaged when the flooding occurred, and argued that the Defendant ought to have anticipated that damage as well.

Wiegers, J. further held that if Mr. Lohse did not discover his cause of action on August 12, 2013, then he did by October 28, 2013, when he filed his claim with the Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities. The content of that claim was found to clearly support the fact that Mr. Lohse understood he had suffered damage as a result of the flood by that date [at para. 30]. Wiegers, J. also held that a farmer with 42 years of experience would very much understand the relationship between uncontrolled weeds and crop yield, and therefore he did not require more specific knowledge [at para. 30].

Wiegers, J. also commented that if the Court were to accept Mr. Lohse's argument, it would allow him to commence a claim against the Defendant in the future whenever he is able to connect some form of damage to the August 12, 2013 flood [at para. 32]. Wiegers, J. noted that this would effectively render the limitation period meaningless.

In conclusion, Wiegers, J. held [at para. 33]:

[33] On 12 August 2013, Mr. Lohse became aware the defendant's culvert installation caused flooding on part of his land. At the same time, he was aware he had incurred damage because he expected the defendant's actions to have a negative effect on future crop yields. This was sufficient knowledge to trigger the relevant limitation period. As his statement of claim was not served on the defendant until 20 November 2014, the one year limitation period had expired and his claim is statute-barred.

Previously published by LexisNexis

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions