Canada: Agricultural Law NetLetter - Monday, March 7, 2016


A Justice of the Provincial Court of Saskatchewan has dismissed the claim of a Saskatchewan farmer against a municipality for damage caused to the farmer's lands. The municipality installed a culvert which resulted in substantial flooding of the farmer's lands and a corresponding loss in crop yield. The Court held that the claim was statute-barred because it fell outside of the relevant statutory limitation period. The farmer argued that the limitation period began to run when it became obvious that the land could not yield crops the following season, which would put his claim within the relevant period. However, the Court concluded that, based on the farmer's experience and specialized knowledge, he ought to have known that his cause of action arose on the date the flooding occurred, and that the limitation period therefore began at that time. Thus, the farmer's claim fell outside of the relevant limitation period, and the claim was dismissed accordingly. (Lohse v. Lake Alma No. 8 (Rural Municipality), CALN/2016-005, [2016] S.J. No. 81, Saskatchewan Provincial Court (Civil Division))


Lohse v. Lake Alma No. 8 (Rural Municipality);


Full text: [2016] S.J. No. 81;

2016 SKPC 25,

SaskatchewanProvincial Court (Civil Division),

L. Wiegers Prov. Ct. J.,

February 22, 2016.

Limitation Periods -- Discoverability -- Damage -- Date Cause of Action Arose.

The Plaintiff, Mr. Lohse, farmed land near Lake Alma, Saskatchewan for 42 years. The Defendant municipality was responsible for the roadways around Mr. Lohse's farmland. In particular, the Defendant was responsible for two roads forming a T-intersection along the southern boundary of Mr. Lohse's farmland. The adjacent ranch land to the southeast of the T-intersection was owned by Mr. Lohse's brother (the "adjacent land").

Historically, in years of heavy rainfall, the low areas of Mr. Lohse's land and the adjacent land would collect water and form sloughs. Notably, large amounts of water would collect around the northeast corner of the adjacent land where it meets the T-intersection.

In the summer of 2013, a councillor for the Defendant received complaints from landowners regarding the large water buildup in that area. When he attended the area, the councillor observed that the water level was within three or four inches of the road's surface. The councillor raised the issue with the Defendant's other councillors, who shared the fear that the road may get washed out. The decision was therefore made to install a culvert beneath the road.

Installation of the culvert began on the morning of August 12, 2013, and was concluded around noon. As a result of its installation, a large amount of water rushed through the culvert northward onto Mr. Lohse's farmland. Mr. Lohse was never notified of the Defendant's intention to install the culvert. Within an hour, Mr. Lohse approached the councillor on site and remarked that he would be hearing from Mr. Lohse's lawyer.

Mr. Lohse was concerned about the potential damage this flooding would cause to his land. He was aware that there was an unusually high level of precipitation leading up to the 2013 crop growing season. However, he had been travelling that road for 40 years and had never seen it washed out. As such, he did not believe the culvert was necessary. He also contended that the large volume of water on the adjacent land would have benefited his brother's cattle ranching operations.

Mr. Lohse indicated that if he would have received notice of the Defendant's' intention to install the culvert, he could have proposed a more appropriate alternative. He pointed out the existence of a second slough on the adjacent land into which the Defendant could have drained the water via trench or pump.

Mr. Lohse testified that nine acres of his land were immediately flooded upon installation of the culvert, eight acres of which were normally seeded with organic crops. With those areas under water, Mr. Lohse could not effectively address the weeds growing on them, which were about to go to seed. He consequently foresaw substantial long-term weed control issues. Furthermore, in the spring of 2014, the eight acres were still not dry enough to be seeded. There was also a large alkali deposit on the affected acres.

According to Mr. Lohse, the estimated cost of the corresponding crop loss in 2014 was $6,289, less input costs.

Mr. Lohse admitted under cross-examination that the affected land was too wet to seed in 2013, prior to installation of the culvert. He further admitted that he typically seeds areas every second year, and that in 2014 the affected land was not actually scheduled to be seeded. However, he explained that because of his inability to seed in 2013, he intended to seed in 2014.

Mr. Lohse brought a claim against the Defendant for compensatory and punitive damages based on statutory non-compliance, negligence and trespass. The Defendant responded that Mr. Lohse's claim was statute-barred, and that he failed to establish liability as alleged.

Decision: Wiegers, J. dismissed Mr. Lohse's claim, finding that it was statute-bared.

Wiegers, J. referred to s 344(1) of the Saskatchewan Municipalities Act, which precludes an action against a municipality which is initiated over one year "from the time when the damages were sustained" [at para. 15]. In other words, a plaintiff in Saskatchewan has one year from the date in which damages were sustained to file and serve a Statement of Claim upon a defendant municipality.

Mr. Lohse's land was flooded on August 12, 2013. His Statement of Claim was issued on September 24, 2014, and was not served on the Defendant until November 20, 2014. This date was one year and 100 days after the installation of the culvert.

Wiegers, J. noted, however, that the limitation period under the Municipalities Act did not necessarily begin on the date the culvert was installed. He explained that limitations periods generally begin on the date in which the plaintiff discovered, or ought to have discovered, the cause of action, having exercised due diligence [at para. 17]. This is known as the "discoverability principle."

Wiegers, J. further explained that the discoverability principle is typically read into statutory limitation periods, unless clear statutory language displaces it [at para. 17]. Where a defendant raises the limitation period as a defence, the plaintiff bears the onus of establishing the date in which the cause of action was discoverable, that the limitation period should be extended based on that date, and that the claim falls within the adjusted limitation period [at para. 17].

Mr. Lohse's position was that the damage he suffered was his inability to grow crops on the flooded land in 2014. He argued that his cause of action was therefore not discoverable until the spring of 2014, when it became obvious that the affected land was too wet to seed. Thus, he submitted that the limitation period commenced at that point in time.

Conversely, the Defendant argued that the limitation period commenced on August 12, 2013, because that was the date in which Mr. Lohse became aware that the installation of the culvert had caused the flooding and the corresponding damage to his land. The Defendant argued in the alternative that the limitation period commenced no later than October 28, 2013, when Mr. Lohse had filed a claim against the Defendant with the Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities.

Wiegers, J. reduced the issue to a single question: "how much detail regarding his or her damages must a plaintiff possess before the damage has been discovered?" [at para. 20].

Relying on the Supreme Court of Canada decision, K(M) v H(M), 1992 CanLII 31, Mr. Lohse argued that a plaintiff must have a "substantial awareness" of his or her damage. In K(M) v H(M), the plaintiff had suffered continuous abuse from her father between the ages of 8-17 years old, but only commenced legal proceedings against him when she was 28 years old. However, the Court held that it was only when the daughter had undergone therapy in her 20s that she came to understand that her father was responsible for her damage. Based on the facts in that context, the Court held that the limitation period only began upon that understanding occurring.

Wiegers, J., however, held that Mr. Lohse's reliance on K(M) v H(M) was misplaced. He found that in that case the connection between the abuse and the damage was only perceived by the plaintiff well after the abuse occurred. In contrast, Wiegers, J. found that Mr. Lohse was "a clear-minded adult with abundant farming experience" and therefore was quite able to perceive the connection between the installation of the culvert and the risk of damage to his lands [at para. 23].

Wiegers, J. also drew attention to another Supreme Court of Canada decision, Peixeiro v Haberman, 1997 CanLII 325, in which the Court noted that a plaintiff need not know the exact extent of the damage suffered, only that some damage had occurred as a result of the defendant's actions..

Accordingly, Wiegers, J. found that Mr. Lohse knew that he had suffered some damage on August 12, 2013, when his land was flooded [at para. 27]. Indeed, Wiegers, J. noted that Mr. Lohse immediately indicated to the councillor on site that he was contemplating legal action, and promptly admitted to being concerned about the damage. Even in his Statement of Claim, Mr. Lohse suggested that he was aware his land was damaged when the flooding occurred, and argued that the Defendant ought to have anticipated that damage as well.

Wiegers, J. further held that if Mr. Lohse did not discover his cause of action on August 12, 2013, then he did by October 28, 2013, when he filed his claim with the Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities. The content of that claim was found to clearly support the fact that Mr. Lohse understood he had suffered damage as a result of the flood by that date [at para. 30]. Wiegers, J. also held that a farmer with 42 years of experience would very much understand the relationship between uncontrolled weeds and crop yield, and therefore he did not require more specific knowledge [at para. 30].

Wiegers, J. also commented that if the Court were to accept Mr. Lohse's argument, it would allow him to commence a claim against the Defendant in the future whenever he is able to connect some form of damage to the August 12, 2013 flood [at para. 32]. Wiegers, J. noted that this would effectively render the limitation period meaningless.

In conclusion, Wiegers, J. held [at para. 33]:

[33] On 12 August 2013, Mr. Lohse became aware the defendant's culvert installation caused flooding on part of his land. At the same time, he was aware he had incurred damage because he expected the defendant's actions to have a negative effect on future crop yields. This was sufficient knowledge to trigger the relevant limitation period. As his statement of claim was not served on the defendant until 20 November 2014, the one year limitation period had expired and his claim is statute-barred.

Previously published by LexisNexis

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.