Canada: St. Paul Croatian: U.S. District Court Applies Termination Provision To Claim On Credit Union's Fidelity Bond

Last Updated: January 29 2016
Article by David S. Wilson and Christopher McKibbin

On January 14, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio released its decision in National Credit Union Administration Board v. CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc., following a trial that focused on the issue of the application of the termination provision in a fidelity bond issued to a credit union. The Court held that, based on facts known to the president of the credit union's Board of Directors, the provision applied to terminate coverage. The decision is significant in that knowledge of the manager's dishonesty was effectively imputed to the president, even though the president was not aware of any one specific dishonest act by the manager. The more traditional view is that the termination clause is triggered only by subjective knowledge of dishonesty (in contrast with discovery provisions, which are typically based on a "reasonable person" standard). The Court's decision in NCUAB v. CUMIS suggests that, in some cases, an objective standard may implicitly be applied to a supervisor's subjective knowledge for the purposes of the termination provision.

The Facts

In 1989, St. Paul Croatian Federal Credit Union ("SPC") hired Anthony Raguz as a loan officer. Raguz worked his way up and became manager in 1996. SPC provided real estate, motor vehicle and other forms of secured loans. Historically, SPC had had a delinquency rate of approximately 1 to 2 per cent.

In 2000, Raguz began making fraudulent loans in exchange for kickbacks. Many of these loans quickly became delinquent. To conceal this, Raguz began to manipulate SPC's books to ensure that the loans would not be recorded as delinquent, so as to avoid having to report them to SPC's Board and to SPC's regulator, the National Credit Union Administration ("NCUA"). Raguz engaged in several forms of concealment:

  • Covering Loans: to cover a loan, Raguz would create a loan for a fictional entity and then use those loan proceeds to make payments on delinquent (or imminently delinquent) loans, thus keeping them off reports to NCUA;
  • Resetting Loans: Raguz would take an existing loan balance, plus accrued interest, and "reset" it as a new loan. Removing the interest component would keep the loan off certain delinquency reports; and,
  • Burning Loans: making the loans appear to have been paid off by setting up another fraudulent transaction.

Raguz's concealment had the effect of ensuring that the reports provided to the Board and to NCUA recorded a delinquency rate of zero, for the entire loan portfolio, for the entire period from 2002 to 2010. Each month during that period, Raguz reported the zero delinquency rate to the Board, and provided the Board with fraudulent reports to substantiate that figure.

SPC's loan portfolio expanded at a tremendous rate, growing from $42 million in 2001 to $240 million in 2010. At some point, the Board became concerned about the rapid expansion of the loan portfolio, and asked Raguz for a breakout of each loan and the nature of the security held. Raguz refused to provide this information, and the Board did nothing to discipline him. The Board also expressed concerns with respect to the reported zero delinquency rate and asked Raguz about it "from time to time" but "never got a straight answer."

In early 2010, NCUA began to have concerns about SPC's operations. In April 2010, NCUA put SPC into conservatorship and liquidated it. NCUA then submitted a claim to CUMIS under SPC's bond. CUMIS denied the claim on several bases, including the ground that the president of the Board, Robert Calevich ("Calevich"), had been aware that Raguz had reported zero delinquencies on all loans, of all types, since 2002 and that Raguz failed to respond to the Board's repeated inquiries concerning the zero delinquency rate, the volume of loans, and specific details of particular types of loans.

The CUMIS Coverage

The CUMIS bond carried coverage for Employee Dishonesty which included a provision providing coverage for fraudulent loans in certain limited circumstances. The focus of the trial was on the bond's termination provision:

Termination Or Limitation Of Coverage For Employee Or Director

This Bond's coverage for an "employee" or "director" terminates immediately when one of your "directors," officers or supervisory staff not in collusion with such person learns of ... [a]ny dishonest or fraudulent act committed by such "employee" or "director" at any time, whether or not related to your activities or of the type covered under this Bond; ...

Termination of coverage for an "employee" or "director" ... terminates our liability for any loss resulting from any act or omission by that "employee" or "director" occurring after the effective date of such termination.

At trial, CUMIS contended that Calevich's knowledge of the historical delinquency rates (1 to 2 per cent), coupled with Calevich's failure to follow up on the Board's requests for explanations from Raguz in the face of Raguz's implausible representations, amounted to knowledge of Raguz's dishonesty.

NCUA made two counterarguments. First, NCUA contended that, as a factual matter, there were no "delinquencies" because Raguz's manipulations ensured that no loan, as recorded on SPC's books, ever went into delinquency. Thus, when Raguz told the Board that there were no delinquencies to report, he was, technically speaking, not being dishonest. The Court rejected this argument as "circular logic", holding that, irrespective of Raguz's manipulations, there were reportable delinquencies throughout the relevant time period, and that Raguz's false reports to the Board were "dishonest in every sense of the word."

NCUA also contended that, although Raguz made implausible representations to the Board, the Board did not learn of Raguz's fraudulent loans until 2010, with the result that the termination provision was not engaged until then. The Court rejected this argument as well, holding that the termination provision was broader than the indemnity provision and extended to any dishonest or fraudulent act, whether or not related to SPC's activities and whether or not covered by the bond. In this regard, the Court's reasoning mirrors the 2009 decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in Iroquois Falls Community Credit Union.

The Court then got to the nub of the case, i.e., whether knowledge of Raguz's dishonesty could effectively be imputed to Calevich based on what amounted to wilful blindness. CUMIS did not point to any one specific delinquent loan known to Calevich. However, the Court carefully weighed Calevich's evidence at trial and noted that:

Calevich ... testified that, during the entire seven year time period that he served as St. Paul's secretary/treasurer ... there were delinquencies at St. Paul. The Board, including Calevich, became concerned when the reported delinquencies suddenly "stopped." This was because, based on his long-time experience as a Board member, Calevich "knew in fact there had to be at least some delinquencies" at St. Paul. The Board was so concerned, in fact, that it raised this issue directly with Raguz "from time to time," which implies the Board questioned Raguz regarding the zero delinquency rate on more than one occasion. Raguz, however, never provided a "solid answer that [the Board] could rely on."

Taken as a whole, the above testimony and evidence shows that Calevich knew Raguz was falsely representing that St. Paul had a zero delinquency rate in financial reports to the Board. [citations omitted]

As a result, the termination provision applied in respect of Raguz.


The Court's decision in NCUAB v. CUMIS calls to mind the White Queen of Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking-Glass, who claimed that she could believe "six impossible things before breakfast". Although CUMIS could not point to any one specific dishonest act known to Calevich, the evidence supported the finding that Calevich had to have known that Raguz's representations and reports to the Board were implausible, to the point of impossibility. Based on this, the Court was willing to conclude that there was sufficient knowledge of dishonesty to engage the termination provision. NCUAB v. CUMIS provides fidelity claims personnel with an example of a court willing to bridge the gap between a known fact and a fact that certainly (or almost certainly) must be true, based on other available evidence. The result suggests that a court may be prepared to use an objective test to decide whether knowledge of dishonesty can effectively be imputed on this basis.

National Credit Union Administration Board v. CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc., 2016 WL 165379 (N.D. Ohio)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

David S. Wilson
Christopher McKibbin
Events from this Firm
8 Nov 2018, Conference, Toronto, Canada

This year’s program is entitled “An Analysis of Fidelity Claims for the Modern World.” The program will address important substantive and practical issues germane to today’s fidelity claims handling.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions