Canada: Agricultural Law NetLetter - Thursday, January 7, 2016 - Issue 339


  • A Justice of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia has issued a decision which clarifies the obligations of the Nova Scotia Minister of Agriculture, concerning appeals from decisions of animal protection inspectors in relation to the seizure and detention of livestock "in distress". The Minister is not required to consider whether or not the seizure or detention by inspectors were lawful and may uphold a seizure and removal even if the seizure was unlawful. The Nova Scotia Animal Protection Act is primarily concerned with animal welfare. The Minister must conduct a fresh review of all circumstances regarding the wellbeing and fitness of owners to care for their animals. (Brennan v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Agriculture), CALN/2016-001, [2015] N.S.J. No. 548, Nova Scotia Supreme Court)


Brennan v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Agriculture); CALN/ 2016-001, Full text: [2015] N.S.J. No. 548; 2015 NSSC 361, Nova Scotia Supreme Court, M.J. Wood J., December 18, 2015.

Animal Possession -- Seizure and Taking of Animals in Distress -- Appeal to Minister in Nova Scotia.

Annette Brennan ("Brennan") applied to the Nova Scotia Supreme Court for judicial review of the decision of the Nova Scotia Minister of Agriculture (the "Minister").

The Minister's delegate, the Deputy Minister of Agriculture (the "Deputy Minister"), issued a decision on June 24, 2015 in which he concluded that 5 ponies that had been seized by provincial inspectors should not be returned to Brennan.

This decision was made pursuant to a previous judicial review decision dated June 10, 2015 [reported at CALN/2015-15; [2015] N.S.J. No. 239; 2015 NSSC 171] in which Wood, J. had allowed Brennan's application for judicial review from a decision issued by the Deputy Minister on March 10, 2015 and directed the Minister to reconsider the decision.

An inspector, acting under the authority of the Animal Protection Act, 2008 S.N.S., c. 33 (the "Act") had refused to return 5 Newfoundland ponies that had been seized from Brennan's farm, which the inspector concluded were in distress.

Inspectors had visited the Brennan farm on 14 occasions between 2011 and 2014. They found animals in distress on these occasions and gave Brennan directions to alleviate the distress.

On December 14, 2014, an inspector again visited the Brennan farm. On this occasion the inspector decided to seize 5 ponies and to not return them to Brennan, without giving Brennan an opportunity to relieve the distress.

Section 23(1) of the Act permits an inspector who finds an animal in distress to, among other things, take custody of the animal. Section 23(2) of the Act provides that before doing so, the inspector must find the owner and attempt to obtain the owner's cooperation to relieve the animal's distress. It provides:

(2) Before taking action pursuant to subsection 91), an inspector or peace officer shall take reasonable steps to find the owner or person in charge of the animal and, where the owner is found, shall endeavour to obtain the owner's co-operation to relieve the animal's distress.

Section 26(5) of the Act provides that when an inspector concludes that the owner is "not a fit person to care for the animal" the owner shall be notified that the animal will not be returned but that the owner may, within 72 hours, request a review of the decision by the Minister.

In his first decision, the Deputy Minister concluded that:

  1. The animals were in distress when they were seized.
  2. The Act does not require the inspector to provide the owner with an opportunity to relieve distress if there is a demonstrated pattern of causing distress.
  3. The inspectors were correct in placing the horses in the custody of the Department of Agriculture.
  4. That he "must find that Annette Brennan is not `a fit person to care for' the seized animals as defined in s. 26 of the Act. Accordingly, the seized horses will not be returned."

In the June 10, 2015 decision referred to above, Wood, J. granted the first application for judicial review and directed that the matter be returned to the Minister for further review under s. 26(7) of the Act.

In that decision, Wood, J. relied on the recent decision of Moir, J. in Rocky Top Farm v. Nova Scotia (Agriculture) 2015 NSSC 21 (CanLII) in which the Court concluded, among other things, that the Deputy Minister was required by the Act to consider all information, old and new, to determine whether a person was fit to care for animals; that the standard of review under the Act was correctness, and that it was not sufficient for the Deputy Minister to uphold a decision when the Deputy Minister concluded the inspector's decision was "reasonable".

In his first decision, Wood, J. concluded:

  1. That the Deputy Minister must independent consider the broader decision of whether seized animals should be returned [at para. 24] and that it would be an error to only consider whether the initial seizure was lawful [at para. 26].
  2. That:

    [26] The Act does not "require" the Deputy Minister to make any such finding. What he is required to do is to decide whether the animals ought to be returned and, as part of that, he may assess Ms. Brennan's fitness to care for them.
  3. That:

    [28] I believe that the Deputy Minister was wrong in defining the review as limited to the correctness of the seizure decision and whether Ms. Brennan was fit to care for the ponies. It should have been described as a broad consideration of whether the animals should be returned to her.
  4. That:

    [39] For the reasons outlined above, I am satisfied that the Deputy Minister was wrong in his formulation of the question to be decided on his review. He was also wrong in his interpretation of s. 23 and in particular his conclusion that s. 23(2) had no application where an owner had previously demonstrated a pattern of causing or permitting an animal to be in distress...

When the matter was returned to the Deputy Minister for review, the Deputy Minister made no further comment concerning the inspector's decision to seize the ponies or whether the inspector contravened s. 23(2) of the Act in doing so.

The Deputy Minister limited his review to the issue of whether the 5 ponies should be returned to Brennan and concluded in a decision dated June 24, 2015 that "based upon my fresh and independent review of the evidence, I am satisfied that these 5 ponies should not be returned to Ms. Brennan". The Deputy Minister's reasons included his review of the previous directives given to Brennan over a 3 year period concerning how to care for her ponies as well as advice and nutrition and general management from inspectors and her own veterinarian practitioner. He concluded that Brennan's actions had demonstrated that she did not have the ability to act on the information and directives she had received concerning the care for the ponies and to avoid distress. This evidence satisfied him that the ponies should not be returned to her.

Decision: Wood, J. dismissed Brennan's application for a judicial review of the Deputy Minister's second decision [at para. 19].

Wood, J. rejected Brennan's argument that the ponies had to be returned to Brennan as the inspector's seizure was illegal stating, at para. 13:

[13] Ms. Brennan argues that if a seizure takes place without the prerequisite required by s. 23(2) it is illegal and the animals must therefore be returned without consideration of any other issues, including the fitness of the owner to care for them. I disagree with this suggestion. The Animal Protection Act is directed to animal welfare and the authority to seize and detain animals is governed by their wellbeing and the fitness of owners to care for them. It would be unreasonable and incorrect to interpret the legislation as dictating that the failure to follow the statutory procedure for seizure must override the best interests and welfare of the animals.

Wood, J. concluded that even though the question of whether the seizure was lawful was not included in the Deputy Minister's second decision, the decision was nevertheless was reasonable and should not be interfered with, stating at para. 17 and 18:

[17] An administrative decision maker is not required to deal with every argument raised before them and failure to do so does not automatically mean that the decision will be set aside. This should only take place where the decision is unreasonable because it falls outside the range of acceptable outcomes taking the entire circumstances into account (Newfoundland and Labrador Nurses' Union v. Newfoundland and Labrador (Treasury Board), 2011 SCC 62 (CanLII) at para. 16-17).

[18] Although I am surprised by the Deputy Minister's decision to ignore the seizure issue, I cannot say that his emphasis on the fitness of Ms. Brennan to care for the ponies and his conclusion not to return them is unreasonable in all of the circumstances. The interests of animals and their wellbeing are appropriate matters for the Deputy Minister to prioritize in deciding how to deal with seized animals.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions