When working with independent contractors or the self-employed,
companies should be aware that the Human Rights Code protections may
still apply. A
recent decision of the Human Rights Tribunal reiterates the
fact that discrimination and harassment can be found "with
respect to employment" even in the absence of a traditional
The decision dealt with the application of a self-employed
commission salesperson who worked under the supervision of a man
who was the broker of record at the brokerage firm that the
saleperson worked at. The salesperson alleged that she was harassed
by the supervisor, beginning at a holiday party, and following with
many inappropriate comments and unwanted physical approaches the
next year. She confronted him, and eventually resigned.
The tribunal found that even when a relationship is considered
one of self-employment or independent contractor for taxation or
other legislative purposes, human rights statutes should be given a
fair, large, and liberal interpretation to fulfill their purpose.
As such, the salesperson was entitled to the protections of the Human Rights Code that were laid out
"with respect to employment", including protection
against sexual harassment. The fact that she could have worked out
of any brokerage was not decisive, given that she was in fact only
working exclusively for the one brokerage under the supervision of
the broker of record.
This decision reinforces that while a person may not be
considered an employee for some purposes (such as taxation), they
may still be entitled to other employee rights like those provided
by human rights statutes.
Written with the assistance of Kira Misiewicz, articling
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice. We provide
the world's pre-eminent corporations and financial institutions
with a full business law service. We have more than 3800 lawyers
based in over 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada,
Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central
Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all
the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy;
infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and
innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.
Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global
business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to
provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of
our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of
Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia,
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South
Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright &
Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members
('the Norton Rose Fulbright members') of Norton Rose
Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein
helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright
members but does not itself provide legal services to
The content of this article is intended to provide a
general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be
sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The arbitrator's decision covered a number of issues including whether the termination was appropriate and whether the City had breached the grievor's human rights. The following, however, will focus on the privacy issue raised.
In my December 15, 2016 article, Federal Government's Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?, I noted the Report's1 suggestion that there was a lack of research to reliably determine when individuals are impaired by cannabis.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).