Canada: Supreme Court Of Canada Restores Decision Of Ontario Court Of Appeal In Sharma v. Timminco Limited

In a 4-3 majority decision, the Supreme Court of Canada (the "SCC" or the "Court") has overturned the decision of a five-judge panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal from 2014 in three securities class actions against CIBC, IMAX and Celestica (the "Trilogy")1, and expressly restored the Ontario Court of Appeal's 2012 unanimous decision (per Goudge J.A.) in Sharma v. Timminco Limited ("Timminco") dealing with the limitation period under section 138.8 of the Securities Act (Ontario) (the "OSA").2

In Timminco the Court of Appeal found, in 2012, that the three-year limitation period applicable to secondary market securities class actions brought under Part XXIII.1 of the OSA continues to run until a plaintiff obtains leave to commence the action and issues a Statement of Claim asserting the statutory cause of action. The OSA, at section 138.8, requires a proposed plaintiff to obtain leave to commence the statutory cause of action by demonstration the action is brought in good faith and has a "reasonable possibility of success." In a 2014 decision, a five-member Court of Appeal panel reconsidered the issue in the Trilogy and decided that subsection 28(1) of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 (Ontario) (the "CPA") suspends the running of the limitation period when the proposed plaintiff merely issues a Statement of Claim that mentions an intention to seek leave under section 138.8 of the OSA, therefore allowing the limitation period to be suspended prior to the court granting leave.

The SCC, by a majority of four judges to three3, restored the Court of Appeal's original determination, finding, consistent with the Court of Appeal in Timminco and contrary to the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in the Trilogy, that subsection 28(1) of the CPA does not suspend the running of a limitation period until leave has been obtained and a Statement of Claim subsequently issued asserting the statutory cause of action. The minority decision agreed with the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in the Trilogy that subsection 28(1) of the CPA could suspend the running of the limitation period under section 138.14 of the OSA before leave to commence the action was granted under section 138.8.

The limitation period in section 138.14 of the Securities Act

The SCC majority decision on the three-year limitation period under the OSA and its endorsement of the Timminco decision will likely have limited impact on secondary market securities class actions commenced after 2014, because the OSA was amended in 2014 to provide that the running of the three-year limitation period is suspended upon the filing by a proposed plaintiff of a notice of motion for leave to commence an action under section 138.8 of the OSA.

The limitation period is a key issue in the disposition of the three class actions subject to the appeals and for other cases subject to the pre-2014 OSA amendments. The Court's decision is based upon (i) the interaction of the applicable provisions of the OSA and the CPA, and (ii) the clear legislative intent that leave motions under Part XXIII.1 to be brought "as early as possible" in the litigation process.

Justice Côté found that there was "no ambiguity" in subsection 28(1) of the CPA which suspends "any limitation period applicable to a cause of action asserted in a class proceeding". Similarly, she observed that subsection 138.8(1) was "clear" that "no action may be commenced under s. 138.3 without leave of the court". Consequently, she concluded that "Unless leave is granted, a statutory action may not be commenced under Part XXIII.1 OSA, and it is not until the action commences that a limitation period can be suspended under s. 28 CPA".

The majority concluded that the Court of Appeal's framework in the Trilogy "not only contradicts the ordinary and grammatical meaning of the words used but also displaces the balance struck by the legislature in Part XXIII.1." The majority acknowledged that the requirement for leave to be sought expeditiously balances the plaintiff's statutory right of action against the competing public concern of protecting a putative defendant's long-term shareholders "who are unfairly affected by the volatility of share prices that result from spurious claims" and who might be forced into "an unjust settlement when the leave application is pending - potentially during many years - and thus negatively affect the corporate defendant's share value."

Granting orders nunc pro tunc

Having determined that the Timminco reasoning was the correct interpretation of the limitation period, the majority of the Court proceeded to determine whether the nunc pro tunc doctrine (literally, "now for then") could apply to the cases at bar to provide relief to the plaintiffs from the expiry of the applicable limitation periods. Nunc pro tunc was in issue for different reasons as among the Trilogy plaintiffs. In IMAX, the limitation period expired following hearing of the leave application but prior to leave being granted. In CIBC, the limitation period expired before the leave hearing had been concluded. In Celestica, the limitation period expired before the leave motion had been served.

The SCC was unanimous that judges have inherent jurisdiction to grant orders nunc pro tunc in appropriate circumstances to provide relief from strict application of limitation periods when unfairness would result, but disagreed on the application of the doctrine. In her decision, Côté JJ. (with McLachlin C.J. and Rothstein JJ. concurring) determined that the doctrine should not be applied in the CIBC and Celestica cases, but should apply to allow the IMAX case to proceed in respect of certain defendants. Cromwell JJ. agreed with these three judges on affirming the Timminco principles and that the doctrine should not be applied in the Celestica case, but concluded that it should be applied in CIBC and in respect of all defendants in IMAX. The remaining judges, Karakatsanis JJ., Moldover JJ. and Gascon JJ., did not provide reasons on the doctrine of nunc pro tunc, but because they would have dismissed the appeals. The result is that the CIBC and IMAX class actions are allowed to proceed.

Despite the disagreement among the judges on the application of the doctrine of nunc pro tunc on the application to specific facts of the cases before them, three main principles appear to have been accepted by the majority of the Court when applying the doctrine in the context of secondary market securities class actions under Part XXIII.1 of the OSA:

  • First, the motion for leave must have been served before the limitation period expired (this makes its application consistent with the amendments to the OSA);
  • Second, the doctrine is not limited to being applied in circumstances where there has been a slip or oversight; and
  • Third, the proposed plaintiff must have been proceeding with diligence.

Whether the CIBC plaintiff had acted with sufficient diligence was where the judges disagreed. Cromwell JJ. accepted the determination of the motions judge that "unlike the situation in Timminco Ltd., the plaintiffs have been diligently pursuing the motion for leave..." and determined that the motions judge was in the best position to make the assessment, and his assessment was entitled to deference. The facts in CIBC were not comparable to the circumstances in both Timminco and Celestica where the limitation period had expired prior to the filing of motions for leave. Accordingly, based on Cromwell JJ.'s application of the doctrine of nunc pro tunc the CIBC class action has been allowed to proceed.

Special circumstances

The motions judge in Celestica had relied on both the special circumstances doctrine and his inherent authority to grant orders nunc pro tunc in order to relieve the plaintiff from the expiry of the limitation period in section 138.14 of the OSA. In essence, the special circumstances doctrine allows a court to "temper the potentially harsh and unfair effects of limitation periods by allowing a plaintiff to add a cause of action or a party to a statement of claim after the expiry of the relevant limitation period." The majority of the SCC concluded that the special circumstances doctrine could not be used to override the limitation period in section 138.14 of the OSA because no amendment is possible without first obtaining leave under s. 138.8. The minority decision did not address the special circumstances doctrine but stated that its silence should not be read as agreement with the majority decision.

The leave threshold

The SCC was unanimous in finding that the threshold for determining whether a proposed action has a "reasonable possibility of success" for purposes of granting leave under s. 138.8 of the OSA is the same as the threshold under section 225.4 of the Securities Act (Quebec), which was addressed by the Court in its decision earlier this year in Theratechnologies inc. v. 121851 Canada inc.4 In Theratechnologies, the Court said that the leave requirement was more than a "speed bump" and that judges should undertake "a reasoned consideration of the evidence to ensure that the action has some merit." The "reasonable possibility" threshold requires that there be a "reasonable or realistic chance that the action will succeed."

In her reasons, on a point endorsed by rest of the Court, Côté JJ. highlighted that the "wrong threshold" had been applied by the motions judge in Green v. CIBC. The motions judge's characterization of the threshold as "relatively low" was subsequently endorsed by the Court of Appeal in CIBC, which seemed to equate the leave requirement to the "no cause of action" pleading test and the requirement at certification that a proposed class action disclose a cause of action under subsection 5(1)(a) of the CPA. Accordingly, while the Court found that the plaintiff in CIBC had met the threshold in Theratechnologies for establishing a reasonable possibility of success, it was also clear that the applicable threshold is a more stringent test than the Court of Appeal set out in CIBC.

The result

In the result, by a plurality of four judges to three, and for different reasons for each, the class actions against CIBC and IMAX were allowed to proceed and the appeals dismissed, whereas, also by a plurality of four judges to three, the Celestica appeal was allowed and the class action against it dismissed.

* The authors were counsel for the defendants in the Timminco matter and for the Insurance Bureau of Canada in the Trilogy discussed above.


1 Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Green, IMAX Corp. v. Silver and Celestica Inc. v. Trustees of the Millwright Regional Council of Ontario Pension Trust Fund, 2014 ONCA 90.

2 2012 ONCA 107.

3 McLachlin C.J. and Rothstein, Cromwell and Côté JJ. concurring.

4 [2015] 2 S.C.R. 106.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions