Canada: Picking Your Judge Is Not So Radical

Last Updated: December 20 2006
Article by Barry Leon

Originally published in The Lawyers Weekly, December 15, 2006.

In a recent article, columnist and lawyer Karen Selick proposes what she terms a "radical solution" and suggests that litigants should be free to pick their judge (The Globe and Mail "Comment", Nov. 15, page A25).

In the context of the recent proposals to reform the judicial appointment process, she says, "No matter whom the committees include or exclude, someone can always allege bias." She then proposes a solution – one that she calls "radical" but that she says "would resolve the current issue and many other concerns about bias in the judiciary."

The concern for which the solution is proposed is "bias". She seems to believe that judicial bias – actual or perceived – is a significant concern for litigants. Her examples are judges who favour the Crown in criminal trials, or wives in matrimonial trials. Whether bias is in fact a significant concern of litigants is left for supposition. In my experience, bias is not their main concern about those who adjudicate their cases, although it may be a concern in some cases.

The concern about the judges who adjudicate litigants’ cases is much broader – litigants want adjudicators with a range of attributes, skills, experiences and knowledge. What they want depends on the particular case and on the litigants. More often litigants want their cases to be determined by individuals who understand the particular subject matter, industry and field of law, and individuals who run an efficient, courteous and fair hearing (which is not just about the absence of bias). They also are concerned when the court system is not "user friendly", when judges and the court administration fail to take a business like approach and fail to reflect a reasonable "customer service" attitude.

But whether Selick has found the right concern, she may have identified the right problem when she says that the "problem lies not in the character or opinions of the individuals chosen to be judges ... The problem lies in the fact that judges are assigned to cases without any input or veto power on the part of the litigants … who appear before them."

"The solution", proposes Selick, "is to allow the litigants on both sides of the case … to select a judge ..." She notes that this would effectively turn judicial positions "into a series of contract positions" and that "[l]awyers who wanted to become judges would have to take a training course and pass an exam … Judges would be paid according to the amount of work they actually did ... . "

Selick concludes by saying, "This fundamental change in the manner of selecting judges will, no doubt, be frightening to many. But as the issues placed before judges become ever more politically charged, this is a solution that must be considered."

As radical as Selick may think her proposal may be, it is not radical at all. Her proposed system exists today and increasing numbers of litigants are benefiting from it.

It’s called arbitration.

In arbitration, the parties agree on their judge (called an arbitrator), just as Selick proposes for the courts. Or they may choose to have a panel of three arbitrators. If they can’t agree, they can ask an arbitration institution or other appointing authority to make the choice for them. They can also decide in advance on criteria for their arbitrator (for example, certain kinds of expertise).

Just as Selick contemplates, arbitrators work under contract for the specific job; usually they have taken training and may be certified; and they are obligated to be independent and impartial.

Not only can the parties select their arbitrator but, with few limitations, together they can tell the arbitrator how fast the case should proceed, what procedural rules will be used, the extent of prehearing examination for discovery and document disclosure that they want, what types of evidence can be considered, what kind of hearing will take place and how long the arbitrator can take to produce a decision. The parties can decide on almost complete confidentiality for their arbitration and they can agree to rule out certain types of remedies, such as punitive damages.

Parties can agree to have almost every type of private dispute determined through arbitration.

Of course one difference from using the court system is that the parties are the ones to pay their arbitrator. But in many situations the numerous advantages of arbitration outweigh that cost by a considerable margin.

Arbitration has been growing rapidly in Canada in recent years – so much so that leading judges are well aware that they are losing business to arbitration, and they, along with leading courtroom lawyers, are questioning the ways that the courts operate and what the court system can learn from arbitration.

It is true that the court system may be able to adapt some aspects of arbitration. In a recent article "Messages from the market: What the public civil justice system can learn from the private system" in The Advocates’ Society Journal (September 2006), Ontario’s Associate Chief Justice Dennis O’Connor suggests that "the public system can learn from the private system, so it can aim to improve the public system and ensure its continued vitality. I think it behooves us to understand why many cases are going private these days." He goes on to discuss six "lessons", all of which are sound and would improve the public system if they could be implemented. Associate Chief Justice O’Connor stresses, "From my own experience, when I was still practising, I found that the ability to select the judge was the single most important factor in clients’ decisions to go private." (Most likely he was thinking more of the domestic context than international context, in which choice of adjudicator is but one of several important factors that leads parties to choose international arbitration in the vast majority of situations.) He concludes, "The market is sending us clear messages. The challenge is to listen."

So litigants seeking to choose their judge and obtain the many other advantages available in arbitration should agree to arbitrate. Arbitration is something that all those who draft contacts, and all litigants and their counsel, should consider.

But just because there are benefits to parties being able to choose their judge, should our courts copy the arbitration model and require parties to agree on their judge? Perhaps not.

Should our courts not build on their own competitive advantages, albeit with improvement to the current "product" that they offer? There are some dimensions – such as offering diversity in the judges available to try cases – in which our courts appear to have made greater progress than arbitration has made.

We also need to consider the implications of bringing a complete free market to the judicial system. Do we want our judges promoting themselves, even in a tasteful manner, as arbitrators may do?

There are alternatives to adopting a system in which parties need to agree on who will be their judge. One alternative, as Associate Chief Justice O’Connor suggests, is that "perhaps we ought to consider some further, modified specialization in our public court system – more specialty branches or simply making judges available who are known specialists" in an subject. Doing that would provide expertise for litigants and at the same time develop the law in specialized fields in a coherent and reasonably consistent manner. A second alternative would be to give each party one veto of the judge assigned to their case.

Karen Selick has made a meaningful contribution to an important debate that should be continued by both those interested in improving our courts and those involved in the world of arbitration.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.