Canada: Insurers Continue Success With Limitation Period Defences

Following the Court of Appeal's decisions in Sietzema v. Economical Insurance, 2014 ONCA 111 (CanLII), 118 O.R. (3d) 713 and Sagan v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company, 2014 ONCA 720 (CanLII), insurers have continued to see success with the use of limitation period defences on summary judgement motions throughout 2015.

In a superior court decision involving six plaintiff all of whom brought individual actions against Aviva for accidents benefits arising out of motor vehicle accidents that occurred in 2004 and 2005 were all dismissed by way of summary judgement motion by Baird J. in Straus v. Aviva, 2015 ONSC 4589. The plaintiff's argued that Aviva had failed to comply with the informational requirements pursuant to section 32(2) of the SABS by failing to provide a written description of benefits and should not be entitled to rely on the limitation period in the circumstances. Each claim can be briefly summarized as follows:


  • Accident occurred in 2004
  • Initial Disability Certificate indicated Straus did not meet criteria for NEB
  • Explanation of Benefits sent by Aviva on December 9, 2004 indicated claimant was entitled to IRB and denied NEBs because claimant was employed at the time of the accident
  • On February 21, 2005 Aviva sent an Explanation of Benefits denying further entitlement to IRBs
  • Statement of Claim issued on November 1, 2011


  • Accident occurred in 2004
  • OCF-1 indicated claimant was employed and working
  • Disability Certificate concluded claimant was not substantially disabled from employment and NEB was not applicable
  • On August 26, 2005 an Explanation of Benefits was sent indicating claimant not entitled to IRB based on the Disability Certificate and not eligible for NEBs because claimant was employed at the time of the accident
  • Statement of Claim issued on August 12, 2012


  • Accident occurred in 2004
  • Disability Certificate of January 2005 indicated claimant not substantially disabled from working but that claimant suffered a complete inability to carry on a normal life
  • Explanation of Benefits of February 8, 2005 indicated claimant not eligible for IRBs based on Disability Certificate and also indicated that she was not eligible for NEBs because "you must suffer a complete inability to carry on a normal life as a result of and within 104 weeks of the accident. There is a 26 week waiting period for this benefit"
  • Statement of Claim issued on August 2, 2012


  • Accident occurred in 2005
  • Disability Certificate indicated claimant not entitled to NEB
  • On October 31, 2005 an Explanation of Benefits was sent indicating claimant not eligible for NEBs because claimant was working at the time of the accident
  • On November 9, 2005 another Explanation of Benefits was sent this time stating not eligible for NEB because you must suffer a complete inability to carry on a normal life as a result of and within 104 weeks of the accident
  • Statement of Claim issued April 9, 2013


  • Accident occurred in 2004
  • OCF-1 indicated claimant employed at time of accident
  • Explanation of Benefits sent October 12, 2004 indicating not eligible for NEBs because claimant was employed at the time of the accident
  • Statement of Claim issued April 12, 2013


  • Accident occurred in 2004
  • Explanation of Benefits sent on October 12, 2004 indicating claimant eligible for NEB or CG benefits and requested an election of benefits
  • Claimant elected CG benefits which were terminated by Aviva following receipt of an In Home insurer examination. The denial was never disputed
  • On February 28, 2012 claimant's counsel write to Aviva stating the letter should be considered an "application for NEB"
  • Statement of Claim was issued on March 21, 2013

Justice Baird held that the Court of Appeal has repeatedly said that so long as the insurer provides a valid refusal, the limitation period should be strictly applied. It does not matter if the reason provided for the refusal of a benefit is incorrect or inaccurate at law. During the summary judgement motion, none of the plaintiffs provided any reason for why NEBs were not disputed during the two year limitation period.

The Explanation of Benefits provided to each of the plaintiffs were found to be "clear denials" of the benefit by stating that the insureds were not entitled to the benefit, a reason was provided for the lack of eligibility and a description of the dispute resolution process and a warning of the two year limitation period were also given. Justice Braid relied upon the reasoning in Smith v. Co-operators to find that the limitation period began to run at the time of the denial of the benefit and all six actions were brought outside of the limitation period.

The plaintiffs argued that they had not been provided with a description of the NEB and therefore the denial was invalid. Braid J. found that although Aviva did not provide a separate informational document during the initial application process with respect to NEBs the failure to do so did not prevent a timely and fulsome application for benefits. Aviva had provided descriptive information regarding NEBs in the various forms provided to each of the plaintiffs.

Braid J. also dismissed the plaintiffs' claims for relief from forfeiture and mental distress and bad faith.

The Court of Appeal granted another summary judgment motion and the claim was dismissed in the case Bustamante v. Guarantee Co. of North America, 2015 ONCA 530.

In this case, the plaintiff was injured in an accident on June 3, 2004 and elected to received IRB. The plaintiff was advised that she did not qualify for NEB on September 1, 2004 and Guarantee began paying IRB, only terminating entitlement following post 104 assessments. On September 25, 2009 plaintiff's counsel notified Guarantee that she intended to pursue a claim for NEB as there had been no denial. On June 17, 2010 Guarantee again notified the plaintiff that she was not entitled to NEB.

When litigation pursued, Guarantee moved for summary judgement which was granted by Ramsay J. based on the passage of the limitation period. On appeal, the Court of Appeal held that the OCF-9 form provided to the plaintiff back in 2004 gave clear notice of her rights of dispute as well as a warning of the two year limitation period. As such the limitation period was triggered and the claim was out of time.

Finally, in the case Machaj v. RBC General Insurance Company, 2015 ONSC 4310, summary judgement was brought by RBC on the basis that the plaintiff's claim was statute barred because mediation was not commenced within two years of the denial of the benefit claimed.

The plaintiff applied for Determiantion of Catastrophic Impairment on January 6, 2009. RBC conducted insurer examinations and responded on May 25, 2009 with an Explanation of Benefits stating "the assessors have formed the consensus opinion that you have not sustained a catastrophic impairment and therefore you do not qualify for the increased benefits".

Mediation was applied for on July 18, 2011. During the summary judgment motion, the case of Do v. Guarantee Insurance Company, 2015 ONSC 1891, was contended (recall this case held that the limitation period does not begin to run based on a finding that an insured is not catastrophically impaired because this is not a denial of a benefit). Whitten J. found that this case was distinct from Do, supra, as RBC stated in its OCF-9 that the claimant did not qualify for the increased benefits thus flushing out the consequences of the denial of the status of catastrophic impairment; namely that enhanced benefits were not available. The action was dismissed on the basis that there was no genuine issue for trial.

The courts have consistently applied the limitation period in a strict manner with respect to accident benefits claims. As long as insurers are diligent in their denials by including a reason for the denial (which does not have to be correct at law) as well as information about the dispute resolution process and a warning of the limitation period, the two year limit for disputing the benefit will be upheld. In cases of catastrophic impairment, following the Machaj decision, the limitation period will begin to run as long as the insured is informed of the consequences of the denial of catastrophic impairment which include no access to increased benefits.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.