Canada: Does "Privilege Of The Law Of Evidence" Include Solicitor-Client Documents?

Last Updated: November 25 2015
Article by Adam Chisholm and Mitch Koczerginski

A recent appellate case holds freedom of information rulings cannot override a party's claim of solicitor-client privilege.1 The Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave to appeal. 2 Will the Supreme Court empower Alberta's Information and Privacy Commissioner or, instead, buttress protections of privilege?

The Facts

The facts in University of Calgary v R. (J.) relate to an access request made by an individual to the University of Calgary under Alberta's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act ("FOIPPA"). The requester sought records in the University's possession which related to her while she was involved in a civil action against the University.

The University withheld certain records from the requester on the basis of solicitor-client privilege. The requester asked Alberta's Information and Privacy Commissioner to review the University's response. Ultimately, the Commissioner's delegate3 sought to compel the records over which the University asserted solicitor-client privilege.

The Commissioner argued that it had authority to compel such production pursuant to 56(3) of FOIPPA, which states:

Despite any other enactment or any privilege of the law of evidence, a public body must produce to the Commissioner within 10 days any record or a copy of any record required under subsection (1) or (2).

The Alberta Court of the Queen's Bench Decision

A Chambers Judge of the Alberta Court of the Queen's Bench was satisfied using a "modern approach" to interpretation of FOIPPA that the records should be released to the requester. 4 The modern approach requires consideration of both a contextual and purposive analysis to determine the Legislature's intent. 5 The Chambers Judge reasoned that section 56(3) unambiguously authorizes the Commissioner to compel production of any records, including those subject to solicitor-client privilege. The Chambers Judge also held that a strict approach to statutory intrusions into solicitor-client privilege should not be applied at first instance, unless there is ambiguity. 6 Lastly, the Chambers Judge held that the ordinary meaning of section 56(3) was that the Commissioner had the power to compel the production of records subject to an assertion of solicitor-client privilege. 7

The Alberta Court of Appeal Grants the Appeal

The University appealed the order forcing them to produce documents it alleged were solicitor-client privileged to the Court of Appeal.

The principal issue in the Court of Appeal's decision was whether to interpret section 56(3) using a modern approach or by adopting the rule of strict construction. The Court of Appeal disagreed with the Chamber Judge's approach to interpretation of FOIPPA. It permitted the University to withhold the records from the Commissioner's delegate.

The Court of Appeal was persuaded by the Supreme Court's decision in Blood Tribe Department of Health v Canada (Privacy Commissioner).8 In Blood Tribe, Justice Binnie held that section 12 of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act ("PIPEDA") (now section 12.1), was not specific enough to authorize the Commissioner to access solicitor-client communications. That provision authorizes the Commissioner to compel a person to produce any records that the Commissioner considers necessary to investigate a complaint "in the same manner and to the same extent as a superior court of record" and to "receive and accept any evidence and other information... whether or not it is or would be admissible in a court of law.9 The Supreme Court held that compelling production as a result of this language would essentially be foregoing privilege by inference. 10 The Supreme Court emphasized that a "general production" provision which does not specifically indicate that parties are to produce solicitor-client communications will not be sufficient to compel production. 11

On the basis of Blood Tribe, the Court of Appeal held that the starting point is that government is not presumptively entitled to solicitor-client information. The Court of Appeal held that any legislation displacing this presumption must have the "highest degree of clarity" in doing so. 12 In the Court of Appeal's view, specific reference to solicitor-client privilege is required in order for subsection 56(3) to authorize the Commissioner to compel records over which solicitor-client privilege has been asserted. 13 Such specific reference did not exist in FOIPPA and, as noted above, the University was not compelled to release the records.


The Court of Appeal's analysis was limited to interpretation of 56(3) of Alberta's FOIPPA. However, it is possible that the Court of Appeal's interpretation of FOIPPA may be followed by courts in other jurisdictions. Various access to information legislation in jurisdictions across Canada provide that provincial administrative actors may review claims of privilege by institutions. Some provincial legislation uses the phrase "privilege of the law of evidence" as Alberta's FOIPPA does. Other legislation uses different language. For reference, section 56(3) of the Alberta FOIPPA and the similar provisions from other Canadian jurisdictions are copied in the chart below. As a consequence, the Supreme Court's hearing of University of Calgary could have importance in many Canadian jurisdictions.

The Supreme Court has previously considered the ability of Ontario's Privacy Commissioner to review the exercise of discretion by Ontario's institutions when claiming privilege in Ontario (Public Safety and Security) v. Criminal Lawyers' Association.14 There, the Supreme Court upheld an institution's claim of privilege without the institution articulating what discretionary factors it relied on when claiming privilege. The Supreme Court said that "solicitor-client privilege must be as close to absolute as possible to ensure public confidence and retain relevance. As such, it will only yield in certain clearly defined circumstances, and does not involve a balancing of interests on a case-by-case basis."15 In Ontario (Public Safety and Security), the Supreme Court did not consider the issue specifically of whether Ontario's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act16 is sufficiently specific to force production of solicitor-client privileged communications.

Interestingly, the Court of Appeal considered the lack of legal training by the Commissioner's delegates in Alberta. 17 This was relied upon as "affirmation" of the Court of Appeal's reasoning. 18 Are determinations of privilege more legally difficult to tackle than other forms of matters decided by administrative actors? 19 Is any tribunal whose jurisdiction could be in opposition to claims of privilege required to have lawyers review those determinations? It is possible that this is one issue the Supreme Court intends to address when ruling on the University of Calgary appeal.

To view the full article, please click here.


1 University of Calgary v R. (J.), 2015 ABCA 118 [University of Calgary].

2 2015 CarswellAlta 2011.

3 The court disapproved of reference to the Commissioner's delegate as an "adjudicator" due to a conflict with a defined term in FOIPPA. Parties who deal with access requests in other provinces will be familiar with the reference to delegates of the Commissioner's office as "adjudicators". 

4 See also the Chamber Judge's explanation of statutory interpretation University of Calgary v JR, 2013 ABQB 652 at paras 122-132.

5 University of Calgary at para 12.

6 Ibid.

7Ibid at para.13.

8 2008 SCC 44 [Bloodtribe]. 

9 Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, SC 2000, c 5 at subsections 12(1)(a) and (c).

10 Blood Tribe at para 11.

11 Ibid at para 21.

12 University of Calgary at paras 26 and 48.

13 Ibid at para 48.

14 Ontario (Public Safety and Security) v. Criminal Lawyers' Association, 2010 SCC 23 [Ontario (Public Safety and Security)]. 

15 Ibid at para 75.

16 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, RSO 1990, cF 31.

17 Ibid at para 21.

18 Ibid at para. 50(1): "Neither the Commissioner nor her delegate need be a lawyer, and therefore may lack the formal legal training necessary to appreciating fully the central importance of solicitor-client privilege to the legal system, or to assessing whether solicitor-client privilege has been properly asserted over a communication."

19 Certainly solicitor-client privilege has been described as being a principal of fundamental justice and associated with constitutional rights. 

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2015

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Adam Chisholm
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.