Canada: Domain Name Dispute Resolution Under The CDRP – The First Five Years

Last Updated: November 28 2006

Article by Antonio Turco, © 2006, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Intellectual Property, November 2006

Like most domain name registries, the dot-ca registry, operated by the Canadian Internet Registration Authority (CIRA), has a dispute resolution policy. This article examines the CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the CDRP) as it approaches its fifth anniversary.

CIRA took over responsibility for the dot-ca registry on December 1, 2000. CIRA began development of a dispute resolution policy in 1999. A first draft of the CDRP was posted for public comment in September 2000. A significantly revised draft was posted for further public consultation in September 2001. The final CDRP was posted on November 29, 2001 and was (and is) substantially different from the 2000 draft. While similar in structure to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the UDRP) of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the final CDRP has some very crucial differences. The CDRP became operative on June 27, 2002.

The purpose of the CDRP is to address instances of bad faith registration in the dot-ca space in relatively inexpensive and quick fashion. Registrants must submit to a Complaint pursuant to the CDRP if an aggrieved trade-mark owner elects to challenge a dot-ca domain name registration. Disputes are also governed by the CIRA Dispute Resolution Rules.

CDRP – The Test

In order to succeed under the CDRP, a complainant must establish three things, on a balance of probabilities: (i) that the registrant’s dot-ca domain name is confusingly similar to a mark in which the complainant had rights prior to date of registration of the domain name and continues to have such rights; (ii) that the registrant registered the domain name in bad faith; and (iii) some evidence that the registrant has no legitimate interest in the domain name.

It is important to remember that, under the CDRP, certain key terms, such as "rights" and "mark", are defined terms. As well, the scope of "bad faith", "confusingly similar", and "legitimate interest" is circumscribed in the CDRP.


Inconsistency on "confusingly similar". The CDRP defines "confusingly similar" narrowly. A domain name is "confusingly similar" to a mark if it so nearly resembles the mark in appearance, sound or idea suggested by the mark as to be likely to be mistaken for the mark. The language of the test reflects the provisions of the Trade-marks Act governing "prohibited marks", and so differs from the traditional likelihood of confusion test relevant to ordinary trade-marks; resemblance is usually, but not always, narrower than confusion. Although early decisions used a likelihood of confusion test, instead of the resemblance test, an increasing number of recent decisions have adopted the resemblance test. In one case, a panel rendered a decision in which the majority used the likelihood of confusion test, while the dissenting panellist applied the resemblance test. As yet, there is no clear consensus.

Finding Bad Faith. "Bad faith" is narrowly prescribed under the CDRP by an exhaustive list of three factors. A domain name is registered in bad faith if, and only if, at least one of the three following factors is established: (i) that the registrant registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of transferring it to the complainant, or its licensor or licensee, or a competitor thereof, for amount in excess of the registrant’s actual costs in registering the domain name; (ii) that the registrant registered the domain name in order to prevent the complainant, or its licensor or licensee, from registering the domain name, provided that the registrant has engaged in a pattern of registering domain names to prevent others who have rights in marks from registering those marks as domain names; or (iii) that the registrant registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of the complainant, or its licensor or licensee, who is a competitor of the registrant.

However, many panels have found "bad faith" in circumstances which arguably do not fall within the scope of the factors listed in the CDRP. For example, in one case, the panel ignored the "bad faith" requirement altogether and ordered a transfer on the basis that the domain names were confusingly similar to the complainant’s marks and that the registrant had no legitimate interest in the domain names.

Such cases demonstrate that the narrow limits apparently prescribed by the CDRP regarding "bad faith" are not determinative where the facts of the case demonstrate bad faith in a broader sense.

Competitor. The third factor arises when the registrant registers the domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of the complainant, or its licensor or licensee, who is a competitor of the registrant. In this factor, the panel must assess not only whether the primary purpose was to disrupt the business of the complainant, but also the relationship between the complainant and the registrant, i.e., whether the registrant is a "competitor" of the complainant.

"Competitor" is not a defined term under the CDRP and has been considered in several decisions, without any consistency. Recent cases have expanded the definition of competitor beyond a traditional commercial competitor or someone who offers goods or services that compete with, or rival, the goods or services offered by the complainant. For example, a recent case found a registrant to be a competitor on the basis that the registrant was competing with the complainant for the attention of persons seeking certain services.

Legitimate Interest. A key difference between the CDRP and the UDRP is that the CDRP provides that, even if the complainant proves confusing similarity and bad faith registration, and produces some evidence that the registrant has no legitimate interest in the domain name, the registrant will nevertheless succeed if the registrant can establish that it has a legitimate interest. In other words, any legitimate interest of the registrant trumps the complainant, even if the registrant registered in bad faith a domain name which is confusingly similar to a mark of a complainant. A panel has yet to render a decision under the CDRP where bad faith and confusing similarity were found, but the legitimate interest of the registrant was used to justify denying the complaint.

Cancellation. In one case, involving the domain name , the domain name was not transferred and instead was cancelled. In this proceeding, although the complainant was successful, the panel found that it was not entitled to a transfer of the registration. The panel found that the domain name was a composite of two well-known marks owned by different entities and, although the complainant had demonstrated that it had rights in one of the marks, it had not shown that it had rights in the other so as to entitle it to the registration at issue.

Bad Faith Complaint. The CDRP allows a registrant to make an allegation that a proceeding under the CDRP was commenced for the purpose of attempting, unfairly and without colour of right, to cancel or obtain a transfer of a registration which is the subject of the complaint. If the registrant is successful in the proceeding, and can establish bad faith on the part of the complainant in commencing the proceeding, a panel may order the complainant to pay to the registrant an amount of up to CAD 5,000. Although several registrants have made allegations of bad faith, to date no panel has made such a finding against a complainant.

CDRP – By The Numbers

As of September 30, 2006, 63 decisions had been rendered pursuant to the CDRP, despite the fact that over 740,000 dot-ca domain names had been registered. This limited volume may suggest that potential complainants view the CDRP as more friendly to registrants than to complainants.

The complainant was successful (or partially successful) in securing transfer of the disputed domain name(s) 73% of the time (46/63). In the majority of those cases (38/46 or 82.6%) no response was filed by the registrant. In the contested cases, the transfer of the domain name was granted 64% of the time (16/25).

Generally, where the registrant failed to file a response, the complainant had an 81.5% success rate (31/38). However, in a little over 18% of the cases, the complainant failed to secure the transfer of the domain name, despite the failure of the registrant to file a response (7/38).

Where a complainant failed to secure the transfer of the domain name, the complainant’s inability to demonstrate bad faith on the part of the registrant was the primary reason for denying the complaint (11/17 or 64.7%). The second most common reason (5/17 or 29.4%) why a domain name was not transferred was that the complainant had failed to demonstrate that it had rights in a mark which would permit it to succeed. In the remaining case mentioned above, the complainant was successful on the complaint, but the domain name was cancelled instead of transferred.


In June 2006, CIRA announced that it intends to undertake a comprehensive review of the CDRP in order to assess and suggest reforms in terms of its fairness, understandability, accessibility and efficiency. The outcome of this review, and the growing body of case law under the CDRP, will determine whether the CDRP will live up to its stated purpose.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.