Canada: Lawful Access – Another Bill Expected?

Last Updated: November 23 2006

Article by Sunny Handa, © 2006, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Information Technology, November 2006

Immediately prior to the federal election in late 2005, the former Liberal government had introduced Bill C-74, Modernization of Investigative Techniques Act, known colloquially as the Lawful Access Bill (the Bill), for first reading. Key features of the Bill were that it obliged telephone and ISPs to have the capability to intercept all data that they transmit and required that this interception capability be upgraded as telecommunications service providers introduce more advanced communication technologies. However, due to the election, the Bill died on the order paper and the issue has received minimal attention until now. Recently, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada (PSEPC), the department that sponsored the Bill, made a statement confirming that they plan to revive the Bill in some form. This leaves open the question – exactly when will Canadian lawful access legislation be modernized and to what extent?


Currently, the Criminal Code and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act give law enforcement and national security agencies legal authority to carry out the interception of communications and for the search and seizure of information. Both pieces of legislation were passed at a time when methods for intercepting communications were relatively straightforward. According to a 2003 Consultation Document published by the Department of Justice, the lawful access initiative was prompted by the need to modernize these laws to better deal with new technologies in the ever changing landscape of the telecommunications industry.

The Canadian initiative began in 2000 and has since progressed in fits and starts. In 2002, the Department of Justice began consultations with non-governmental organizations, and by late that year, a formal consultation document was released. In 2003, a summary of industry, government and public recommendations was released after an extensive consultation period, and by 2005 the federal government had focussed its initiative and introduced the Bill.

What is lawful access? The PSEPC has outlined two main issues that the Bill intended to address – interception of communications and access to subscriber information. While little is known about the current government’s plans regarding a new lawful access bill, it is reasonable to expect that many of the same issues contained in the Bill will re-appear. PSPEPC may not want to alter the provisions in the Bill too much since the Bill was already extensively studied; any dramatic shift in thinking may require the expenditure of significant political capital to fight these battles again. Accordingly, it is helpful to understand some of the salient features of the Bill.

First, the Bill required telecommunications service providers to have intercept-capable networks. Interception includes listening to, recording or acquiring information. In essence, the Bill imposed two interception obligations on service providers: (i) a service provider would be forced to possess the ability to intercept all communications that it transmits, including the ability to provide authorized persons with the means to decode any encoded or encrypted communications, and to maintain this ability in as far as it introduces new technology to its systems; and (ii) service providers would be required to have the capability to enable authorized persons to intercept communications involving multiple users, including furnishing authorized persons from multiple national security and law enforcement agencies with the ability to make simultaneous interceptions of communications of multiple users.

The Bill also required a service provider to release any intercepted communication when requested to do so by an authorized person, including those authorized under the Criminal Code or the Canadian Security Intelligence Services Act to intercept communications. Failure to release intercepted communication in the form demanded could result in an offence including a fine of up to CAD 100,000 for individuals and up to CAD 500,000 for all other persons.

Second, the Bill would have required telecommunications service providers to provide certain officials, such as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Canadian Security and Intelligence Service and the Commissioner of Competition, with a subscriber’s contact information, including their name, address, and Internet Protocol address. In order to obtain such information, a request would have to be made by the official; the Bill contained a number of safeguards with respect to this request, the information that could be provided and the use of such information so that the Bill would, purportedly, not be in violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It was not clear, however, that the provision of customer information pursuant to the Bill would not offend Charter prohibitions on unreasonable searches and seizures, since the PSEPC has not publicly made a satisfactory case justifying that warrantless access to customer information is necessary; there do not appear to have been situations where unreasonable delays have occurred in gaining access to a judge for a search warrant.

In addition to the subscriber information listed above, the Bill also required that a telecommunications service provider supply, "... any other identifiers associated with the subscriber ...". The Bill did not specify what the term "identifiers" refers to and it is unclear whether this provision would require disclosure of sensitive personal information such as, unlisted telephone numbers, customer billing records or credit history. Arguably, in order to prevent unnecessary intrusions on customer privacy, the Bill ought to have clarified exactly what information, in the form of an exhaustive list, the telecommunications service provider would be required to disclose.

The Bill also allowed the Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Services (CSIS), the Commissioner of Competition and the chief or head of a police service constituted under the laws of a province to designate any employee of his or her agency, or a class of such employees whose duties are related to protecting national security or to law enforcement. A designated person responsible for collecting subscriber information could make such a request only in performing the duty and function of CSIS, a police service or of the Commissioner of Competition under the Competition Act. Oversight over these designated persons would consist of recording all the requests for subscriber information that are made and creating the prospect of audits on the use of this power.

Furthermore, the Bill permitted any police officer to request subscriber information, provided they act in accordance with the safeguards contained in the Bill, which require the police officer to reasonably believe that the urgency of the situation allowed for it and that the information requested is immediately necessary to prevent an unlawful act that would cause serious harm to any person or property. In addition, the requested information would have to directly concern either the perpetrator of the act that is likely to cause harm or the victim or intended victim of the harm. A police officer making such a request would be obliged to inform the telecommunications service provider of his name, rank, badge number and the agency in which he is employed and state that the request is made under the authority of the relevant section of the law.

The Bill also allowed CSIS or a law enforcement agency to furnish a service provider with equipment to intercept communications. Such service provider could not remove the provided equipment without notifying the applicable law enforcement agency if the equipment’s removal would result in decreasing its interception capability.

The Minister of Public Safety would have had the power under the Bill to designate inspectors to verify compliance with the Act. An inspector would have wide powers, including the power to enter any place owned by, or under the control of a telecommunications service provider provided it is not a dwelling place and the inspector had reasonable grounds to believe that there was information relevant to the enforcement of the Act, no warrant would be required. The owner or person in charge of a place entered or to be entered by an inspector would have to assist the inspector in his investigation; failure to do so would result in an offence and a corresponding penalty of up to CAD 15,000.

The Bill did not apply to all service providers. For example, where a telecommunications service was intended principally for use by its provider and the provider’s household or employees and not by the public, the Bill was not applicable. A service provider whose principal function is to provide services to registered charities, certain educational institutions, hospitals, retirement homes, places of worship or a telecommunications research network would also be exempted from the application of the Bill. However, the Bill’s definition of a service provider ("a person who, independently or as part of a group or association, provides telecommunications services") is very wide and potentially encompasses businesses who offer telecommunications services as an ancillary part of their business, likely having created onerous and costly obligations.

Although the Bill attempted to harmonize its requirements with the protections offered by the federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA), no reference was made to privacy guarantees pursuant to provincial legislation. While many telecommunications service providers are federally-regulated undertakings, there are organizations (for example, a Web site hosting provider) which may fall within the expansive definition of "telecommunications service provider", but be subject to provincial privacy legislation. In addition, the issue of whether provincial privacy laws will apply to federally-regulated organizations in respect of their operations in a province has not been conclusively determined.

Current Status

The Bill was circulated to interested parties, and a working group of the Canadian Bar Association (CBA) planned to respond before the call of the federal election last year, after which it died on the order paper. The Bill has only recently resurfaced as a priority of the current government, with few details provided. Interested parties such as the Canadian Association of Internet Providers and the Information Technology Association of Canada have cited problems with the Bill and have outlined issues they would like the new government to consider; similarly, the CBA continues to monitor the reintroduction of the Bill or a similar type initiative.

If the government reintroduces the Bill or something of a similar nature, there could be widespread implications for the telecommunications industry, the private sector and the public. Although there has been no definitive statement as to whether or not any new bill will mirror the one introduced last year, any new legislation that is introduced will likely require telecommunication companies to proactively create intercept-capable networks and disclose subscriber information if so requested. To the extent that these obligations will require carriers to implement, for example, software upgrades that are nonstandard and unique to Canadian legal requirements, significant costs will likely be imposed on telecommunications companies.

Given recent developments in other jurisdictions and in the context of the recent PSEPC statement, it is likely that lawful access will be back on the forefront of the public policy agenda in the near future.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

12 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Stories aren’t falsehoods. Stories are the root of all effective human communications: they motivate, animate and clarify. If you aren’t telling stories, you probably aren’t getting your point across.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions