Canada: The Point Of No Return: Terminating Employees For Dishonesty And Litigating Employee Fraud Claims

Last Updated: November 9 2015
Article by Christopher McKibbin and Stuart M. Woody

Employee embezzlement and fraud is a widespread problem, costing Canadian employers hundreds of millions of dollars in losses every year.  In Blaneys' March 2015 Employment Update, we canvassed several common "Red Flags" which may be indicative of employee dishonesty.1  This article addresses the employer's response once evidence of employee dishonesty has come to light.

First Things First: To Terminate or Not to Terminate?

Typically, the employer will wish to terminate the employee for cause immediately upon obtaining strong evidence of fraudulent activity.  The decision to terminate the employment relationship is a common and understandable response to such a discovery.

There are several reasons why employers seek to terminate immediately.  The termination of the employment relationship immediately puts an end to the employee's defalcations, while also sending a strong message that the employer does not condone dishonest conduct.  Moreover, the failure to terminate the employment relationship for a protracted period may adversely impact upon a future claim under the employer's fidelity insurance policy.

Employee theft is one of the few grounds for termination without notice in the common law provinces; as one trial court recently explained:2

More significantly, [the discovery of employee dishonesty] undermined the trust which was an essential ingredient of [the employee]'s relationship with [the employer]. Dismissal is justified where an employee's dishonesty violates an essential condition of the employment contract, breaches the faith inherent in the work relationship, or is fundamentally or directly inconsistent with the employee's obligations to his or her employer ...

Employers are entitled to hold high expectations regarding the trustworthiness of their senior or managerial employees. When a senior employee's conduct reveals character traits that undermine the employer's trust in the employee, summary dismissal may be warranted ...

This has been described as "revelation of a character flaw" ... In Jewitt, Smith J. expressed the view that dishonest conduct will almost always justify dismissal, and the more serious and responsible the position held, the more that honesty must not only be inherent, but patent.

However, the employer must weigh its options carefully in coming to this decision.  While employers should involve legal counsel from the outset of workplace fraud investigations, appropriate legal advice and guidance becomes even more critical as the employer gathers and assesses the evidence in coming to a decision on whether or not to terminate the employee.

The decision to terminate is not without its pitfalls.  First and foremost, the employer may find itself the subject of a wrongful termination lawsuit.  Further, if the employee is advised (or otherwise becomes aware) that he was, or will be, terminated for engaging in fraudulent conduct, the employee may swiftly move fraudulently-obtained assets beyond the reach of civil recovery efforts.

A key consideration in deciding when to confront and/or terminate an employee is whether the fraud investigation has ascertained what happened to the stolen funds, and whether there are likely to be any assets against which to recover.  In certain cases, it is possible to commence recovery steps before the employee is even aware that he has been "found out" (including, for example, where fraudulent conduct is discovered after the employee has left the employer for other reasons, such as resignation or retirement).  Given the element of surprise, such circumstances usually offer the best prospects for recovery.

Placing the employee on leave or administrative suspension pending further investigation of the alleged fraud may, in certain circumstances, constitute a reasonable (albeit temporary) fall-back position in preference to outright termination.  An employer should review the terms of the relevant employment contract and the collective bargaining agreement (if applicable) with counsel prior to taking any action.

Offsetting the Loss: Fidelity Insurance

Many Canadian employers have obtained fidelity insurance (also known as employee dishonesty or commercial crime coverage) to protect themselves in the event of a loss occasioned by the fraudulent conduct of an employee.  Generally, coverage under such policies is contingent upon providing prompt notice of the loss or suspected loss to the insurer.  An employer should advise its broker in the event of a suspected loss occasioned by employee dishonesty, to ensure that it complies with the policy's condition concerning timely notice of loss.

Offsetting the Loss: Civil Recovery Actions

Depending on considerations such as: the size of the loss; possible coverage issues under the fidelity policy; and any applicable policy deductible, an employer may decide to pursue legal action against the employee.  Such efforts may include:

  • obtaining a Norwich production order against the defaulter's financial institution(s) or others, to trace funds that have been misappropriated, including into other assets. Norwich orders can also be used to identify beneficiaries of the fraud and other potential defendants whom the employer may wish to pursue;
  • obtaining a Mareva injunction to freeze real and personal property; and,
  • obtaining and registering a Certificate of Pending Litigation (CPL) on title to real property owned by the defaulting employee.

Most fidelity policies include conditions requiring the insured to take reasonable steps to mitigate the loss.  Such steps can include pursuing a civil recovery action against the employee.  Where the fidelity insurer is involved at an early stage, it may be possible for the employer to work in tandem with the fidelity insurer's recovery personnel.  Prompt, well-executed legal action can result in substantial recoveries. 3

Traditionally, an employer alleging fraud on the part of its employee had to prove its case to a higher standard than the usual civil standard of proof.  However, the 2008 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in F.H. v. McDougall suggests that an employer need only prove fraud on the part of its employee on a balance of probabilities, consistent with the standard of proof in other civil cases.4

Nevertheless, much like the decision to terminate or not terminate the employment relationship, the decision to pursue legal action is not without potential pitfalls.

First, the employer must carefully and dispassionately consider the strength of its case.  An unsuccessful fraud claim will not only result in unrecoverable legal fees, but may also expose the employer to significant adverse costs sanctions.  A dispassionate assessment of the employer's claim in fraud is an essential check on the risk that a fraud investigation will be compromised by tunnel vision.  Most often raised in the criminal law context, tunnel vision occurs where an investigator searches solely for evidence confirming his initial theory of the case, and disregards evidence which contradicts that theory.  As the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench observed:5

The least objective defence evidence was from [the employer's investigator]. I find that her investigation was not the fact-finding mission she indicated it was, but rather an exercise in case-building against [the employee]...

[The investigator]'s testimony at trial indicates that she was dismissive of any explanation that [the employee]offered. I find that she was not prepared to consider any context at all or the fact that the discrepancies in the overall context of the Service Excellence program was a massive undertaking. Furthermore, the failure of [the employer] to provide administrative and logistical support when it clearly should have done so for prudent management if nothing else, suggests to this Court that the investigation she headed was clearly case-building.

Second, the employer must determine if the defaulting employee is in possession of assets against which the employer might look to execute to satisfy a civil judgement.  An asset investigation may be obtained to assist an employer in making this assessment.  Further, if the employee's bank records can be obtained via a Norwich production order, the records may enable the employer to ascertain whether there are sufficient recoverable assets to justify undertaking a civil recovery effort.  A motion for a Norwich production order need not be brought on notice to the employee, although the employer must have convincing prima facie evidence of wrongdoing.

Third, a fraud recovery action runs the risk of creating adverse publicity for the employer, by bringing attention to the fact that the employer's controls were compromised or circumvented.  The employer must weigh the potential reputational damage associated with disclosing the fraud in question with the potential recoveries it might obtain from its defaulting employee.

Given these potential pitfalls, an employer should retain counsel with experience in litigating such claims.  Where an employer has also submitted a claim in respect of the loss with its fidelity insurer, that insurer may be in a position to recommend experienced recovery counsel and/or to pursue recovery jointly with the insured under a mitigation agreement.

The Boomerang Effect: Wrongful Termination Claims and Counterclaims

Just as an employer must decide whether or not to commence legal proceedings against its defaulting employee, the employee must decide whether or not to commence legal proceedings against his former employer.  Often, a wrongful termination claim is advanced by the employee as a counterclaim to the employer's fraud recovery action, perhaps with the employee hoping to use the counterclaim as a "bargaining chip" in settlement negotiations.  As a practical matter, the evidentiary strength of the employer's fraud claim almost inevitably dictates the likely result of the employee's wrongful termination counterclaim.  However, the existence of a wrongful termination counterclaim can sometimes inject an element of unpredictability into the litigation.  If the value of the fraud pales in comparison to the value of the wrongful termination counterclaim, the employer may even find itself on the defensive, notwithstanding that it was the victim of the fraud.

These risks reinforce the importance of performing an early, dispassionate assessment of the employer's claim in fraud prior to the commencement of legal proceedings, as well as retaining legal counsel who is prepared to handle the challenges arising from the investigation of workplace fraud and the prosecution of civil recovery actions.


1 C. McKibbin, "Tell Tale Signs: The Red Flags of Employee Fraud" Employment Update (March 2015). []

2 Molloy v. EPCOR Utilities Inc., 2015 ABQB 356 at paras. 209-211.

3 See, for instance, the seven-figure recovery obtained by the victim of a civil conspiracy in Spartek Systems Inc. v. Brown, 2014 ABQB 526.

4 F.H. v. McDougall, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 41 at para. 40.

5 Chapell v. Canadian Pacific Railway, 2010 ABQB 441 at paras. 63 and 67.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Christopher McKibbin
Stuart M. Woody
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.