In its Global M&A Review, for the first nine
months of 2015, Thomson Reuters reports healthy global M&A
activity leading into the final quarter of fiscal 2015. The study
reports increases in both deal value and deal volume across most
jurisdictions and industry sectors.
Global increase in both deal volume and deal value
Thomson Reuters reports that global M&A has experienced its
strongest first nine months since fiscal 2007. Year-to-date, global
M&A topped US$3.2 trillion on just under 32,000 deals. Compared
to the same nine month period in 2014, this represents a 32%
increase in deal value and a 2% increase in deal volume. Large
deals have featured prominently this year. There has been a
96% increase in the number of deals with value over $10 billion,
which accounted for 36% of announced M&A value.
Although the pace of global M&A slowed somewhat in Q3 2015,
down 17% by value and 16% by volume compared to Q2 2015, Thomson
Reuters reports that this is the first time in over a decade where
there has been consecutive quarters each valued at greater than a
Cross-border M&A continues to be a driver of M&A
activity, accounting for 35% of overall M&A volume, an 18%
increase over 2014. This is a continuing trend from 2013, albeit a
more modest increase compared to the 99% increase from 2014 over
Increased activity across certain industry sectors
The report notes increases in global M&A in oil and gas,
energy and power, healthcare, and technology. Deal value in energy
and power increased by 20% year-over-year, totaling $476.1 billion.
Global M&A in healthcare increased 76%, while in technology it
Strong activity south of the border; mixed results in
The report notes a healthy increase in M&A activity in the
United States during the first nine months of 2015. U.S. M&A
value increased 46% year-over-year, with total deal value of $1.5
trillion, while M&A volume increased 33.3% year-over-year, on
account of 11,878 announced deals.
In terms of completed M&A in the first three quarters of the
year, Canada saw an increase in deal value from $66.1 billion to
$72.7 billion, primarily as a result of increased deal size
year-over-year. Deal volume was actually lower in Canada over the
period measured, decreasing from 1,014 to 860 year-over-year.
The author would like to thank Sam Zadeh, articling student,
for his assistance in preparing this legal update.
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice. We provide
the world's pre-eminent corporations and financial institutions
with a full business law service. We have more than 3800 lawyers
based in over 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada,
Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central
Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all
the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy;
infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and
innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.
Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global
business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to
provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of
our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of
Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia,
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South
Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright &
Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members
('the Norton Rose Fulbright members') of Norton Rose
Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein
helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright
members but does not itself provide legal services to
The content of this article is intended to provide a
general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be
sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Under the Income Tax Act, the Employment Insurance Act, and the Excise Tax Act, a director of a corporation is jointly and severally liable for a corporation's failure to deduct and remit source deductions or GST.
Under the Income Tax Act, the Employment Insurance Act, the Canada Pension Plan Act and the Excise Tax Act, a director of a corporation is jointly and severally liable for a corporation's failure to deduct and remit source deductions.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).