Canada: Private International Law – The Power Of A State Court To Grant Provisional Or Conservatory Measures, Where An Arbitrator Has Jurisdiction

Even where courts have no jurisdiction over the merits, courts, in some jurisdictions, will nonetheless have the power to grant provisional or conservatory measures such as, inter alia, interlocutory injunctions, Anton Pillar orders and seizures before judgment. In many cases, without these remedies, pursuing a lawsuit or claim could prove fruitless, irreparable damage is done, documents vanish, money and assets disappear.

In Quebec, a court however, has ruled that where the parties, by agreement, are bound by an arbitration clause, the courts did not have the power to issue an interlocutory injunction. The case is Jefagro Technologies inc. vs. Vetagro s.p.a. [2012] QCCS 2945.

The facts

An Italian company signed a 15 year licensing agreement with a Quebec company allowing the latter to make and distribute products over which the Italian company held certain intellectual property rights. Alleging that the Italian company had illegally cancelled the licensing agreement after only a few years, the Quebec company sued, in Quebec, the Italian company and one of the Quebec company's ex-employees, the latter bound by a non-competition and a non-solicitation clause in his employment contract.

The Quebec company sought an interlocutory injunction against the Italian company seeking an order for specific performance under the licensing agreement, and against the ex-employee (who went to work for the U.S. subsidiary of the Italian company) to stop violating the non-competition and non-solicitation clauses in the employment contract. Since the licensing agreement contained an arbitration clause, the Italian company argued that the Quebec Superior Court had no jurisdiction over it. Furthermore that the court could not render an interlocutory injunction despite Article 3138 of the Quebec Civil Code, because of the arbitration clause.

The decision

The court did not apply Article 3138, sided with the Italian company, declined exercising the power to grant the interlocutory injunction and dismissed the lawsuit of the Quebec company.

Article 3138 of the Quebec Civil Code reads as follows:

"Art. 3138. A Québec authority may order provisional or conservatory measures even if it has no jurisdiction over the merits of the dispute."

Another article of the Quebec Civil Code – Article 3148 – provides as follows:

"Art. 3148. In personal actions of a patrimonial nature, a Québec authority has jurisdiction where

  1. the defendant has his domicile or his residence in Quebec;
  2. the defendant is a legal person, is not domiciled in Québec but has an establishment in Québec, and the dispute relates to its activities in Québec;
  3. a fault was committed in Québec, damage was suffered in Québec, an injurious act occurred in Québec or one of the obligations arising from a contract was to be performed in Québec;
  4. the parties have by agreement submitted to it all existing or future disputes between themselves arising out of a specified legal relationship;
  5. the defendant submits to its jurisdiction.

However, a Québec authority has no jurisdiction where the parties, by agreement, have chosen to submit all existing or future disputes between themselves relating to a specified legal relationship to a foreign authority or to an arbitrator, unless the defendant submits to the jurisdiction of the Québec authority."

The last paragraph of this article in essence says that where another forum has been chosen by the parties, the courts have no jurisdiction, in personal actions of a patrimonial nature.

Reading Article 3138 in conjunction with Article 3148, one would perhaps conclude that if the court has the power to put in place provisional or conservatory measures, "even if it has no jurisdiction over the merits of the dispute", it would still have that power where it has no jurisdiction because of the existence of an arbitration clause.

Are the two articles inconsistent? The judge, in deciding there was no inconsistency, did not break new ground, he simply followed a Supreme Court of Canada decision which said that Article 3148 prevailed over Article 3139 of the Quebec Civil Code. And since Article 3138 was similar to Article 3139, the judge applied the reasoning of the Supreme Court of Canada. This is the case of GreCon Dimter vs. J.R. Normand Inc. et al. [2005]2 SCR 401.

The facts were that a Quebec sawmill operator entered into a contract with a Quebec supplier of woodworking machinery for the purchase of equipment. In turn, the Quebec supplier ordered the equipment from the German company that manufactures the equipment in question. Delays occurred in the delivery by the German manufacturer, the operator sued the Quebec supplier who in turn made a third party or warranty claim against the German manufacturer. The contract between the supplier and the German manufacturer contained a choice of forum clause and a choice of law clause. The forum clause gave jurisdiction to the German courts and the choice of law clause stipulated that any dispute would be decided in accordance with German law.

The German manufacturer sought by application, the dismissal of the third party claim against it on the basis of the choice of forum clause. The Superior Court of Quebec dismissed the application stating that the unity of the actions provided in Article 3139 must prevail over the contractual choice of court provided for in Article 3148, para. 2. The Quebec Court of Appeal affirmed that decision.

The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal of the German manufacturer, ruling that it was the reverse, Article 3148, para. 2 prevailed over Article 3139.

Article 3139 of the Quebec Civil Code reads as follows:

"Art. 3139. Where a Québec authority has jurisdiction to rule on the principal demand, it also has jurisdiction to rule on an incidental demand or a cross demand."

The Court considered that the Quebec legislature by enacting Article 3148, para. 2 (quoted above), recognized the primacy of the autonomy of the parties in situations involving conflicts of jurisdiction, in order to foster foreseeability and certainty in international legal transactions; that it is the expression of a "legislative policy of respect for the autonomy of the parties." The Court stated that it should therefore be interpreted broadly.

The purpose of Article 3139, says the Court, is "primarily to ensure the efficient use of judicial resources, and the provision is the product of domestic procedural considerations". That since this provision is an exception to the principle that a court must determine its jurisdiction on a case-by-case basis, it should be interpreted narrowly. The Court determined that Article 3139 "confers a discretion for the judge" who can decide to sever the principal action from the incidental action and that its language indicates its permissive nature.

In essence, the Court said that the choice of forum made by the parties should be respected despite procedural provisions. It applied the principle of the primacy of the autonomy of the parties.

It is also interesting to note that the Court disagreed with the Court of Appeal, as well, on the application of Article 3135 of the Quebec Civil Code which codifies the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The Court of Appeal had applied it to reconcile Article 3148, para. 2 with Article 3139. But the Supreme Court disagreed, stating that Article 3135 has "a suppletive function and is applicable only where the jurisdiction of the Quebec court has first been established". Which was not the case in that instance.


Based on this jurisprudence, the rule set out in Article 3138 that a Quebec court may order provisional or conservatory measures even where it otherwise would not have jurisdiction over the dispute, is valid law and applicable where the parties have not chosen a forum.

It is meant to provide quick remedies to prevent damage or preserve the status quo, while the case on the merits winds its way through a foreign court, where the rules of conflict of jurisdictions give no jurisdiction to the Quebec courts.

But should this goal set aside the will of the parties who have chosen another forum? According to the Supreme Court, no.

In the case before the Supreme Court, where the issue was whether or not the Quebec court would hear both the principal action and the third party claim, the consequences of separating them relate to cost and efficiency, since two courts instead of one will hear the parties' respective claims.

But ruling that where there is arbitration, no provisional or conservatory measures can be obtained, the consequences can be simply disastrous. Indeed, as mentioned above, not being able to apply to a Quebec Court for provisional or conservatory measures, a party to a dispute may suffer irreparable damages or be unable to enforce its judgment on the merits obtained from a court in a foreign jurisdiction, or an arbitrator.

Other countries


In France, Article 1449 of the Code of Civil Procedure partially deals with the issue. It reads as follows (simple translation):

As long as the arbitration tribunal is not yet constituted, the existence of an arbitration agreement does not prevent a party from applying to a state court in order to obtain instructions or a provisional or conservatory measure.

This provision was passed on January 13, 2011, as part of a reform of the French law on arbitration and codified established court precedent.

According to this text, the state courts only have the power to intervene in the context of an arbitration to make provisional or conservatory orders, before the arbitration tribunal is constituted.

It would therefore seem that the French state courts are excluded as soon as the arbitration tribunal is constituted.


With respect to Germany, the relevant provision is found in Article 1033 of the Code of Civil Procedure which reads as follows (simple translation):

An arbitration agreement does not prevent a court from ordering provisional or conservatory measures in respect of the subject matter of the arbitral proceedings before or during arbitration, if there is an application from one of the parties.

Under German law, therefore, the German state courts have the power to intervene before the constitution of the arbitration tribunal, as well as during arbitration, to make provisional or conservatory orders.

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, arbitration is governed by the Arbitration Act 1996.

Article 44 of this statute provides that state courts have the power to intervene during arbitration and issue provisional or conservatory orders, such as Anton Pillar orders, the seizure of property, interlocutory injunctions, the nomination of receivers, etc.

The parties to the arbitration agreement however, have the right to exclude the powers of the state courts listed in Article 44. The English state courts therefore, do have the power to intervene at any stage of the arbitration process, unless the parties have agreed otherwise.

The Act applies to any arbitration seated in the United Kingdom.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.