Canada: Court Should Have Declared IP Arbitrable

Last Updated: September 25 2006
Article by Barry Leon and Jana Stettner

Originally published in The Lawyers Weekly, September 15, 2006.

Canadian courts have, in numerous recent decisions, consistently reaffirmed their support for arbitration and indicated a strong judicial policy favouring arbitration. We’ve seen this support, along with corresponding deference to arbitral tribunals, in court decisions dealing with the jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal to determine its own jurisdiction, the scope of arbitration clauses, recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, and subject matter arbitrability.

Canadian courts have not specifically dealt with the arbitrability of one type of subject matter — namely, patent disputes. Recently, however, the Ontario Superior Court did hold in University of Toronto (Governing Council) v. John N. Harbinson Ltd. (2005), 78 O.R. (3d) 547 [Harbinson] that the parties’ particular dispute, which arose from a licence agreement covering two inventions, was arbitrable (see "Patent Act found to not cover IP dispute," in the Feb. 10 issue of The Lawyers Weekly). Unfortunately the court made its decision only on a contractual ground and not on the ground that patent disputes are arbitrable. While correct in the result, the court did not take advantage of an opportunity that was open to it. On the basis of existing authority and the nature of the university’s jurisdictional challenge to the arbitral tribunal, the court could have clearly stated that patent disputes in Canada are arbitrable between the parties.

In 2003 the Supreme Court, in Desputeaux v. Éditions Chouette (1987) Inc., [2003] 1 S.C.R. 178 [Desputeaux], held that copyright disputes are arbitrable and provided guidance as to when disputes arising under statutory regimes, such as the patent regime, are arbitrable. But the court in Harbinson made no reference to Desputeaux or to its reasoning, and stopped short of stating that patent disputes are arbitrable between the parties.

The dispute in Harbinson arose in the context of a licence granted by the University of Toronto to John N. Harbinson Ltd. (Harbinson Ltd.) to exploit two inventions involving the treatment of arboreal diseases. In the licence, the university warranted that one of its professors was the sole inventor of the invention and that to the best of its knowledge, the university owned these inventions. The licence provided that any dispute arising from it was to be settled by arbitration. Harbinson Ltd. claimed that the university had breached its warranty of inventorship, and sought to arbitrate this claim.

The university challenged the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal partly on the ground that the Patent Act required that the essence of Harbinson Ltd.’s claims be advanced before the courts or before administrative officials appointed under the Patent Act (that is, to the Office of the Commissioner). The tribunal rejected the university’s jurisdictional challenge.

The university then took its challenge to the Ontario Superior Court. It asked the court to determine that since under the Patent Act the Federal Court has exclusive jurisdiction in cases in which the plaintiff seeks to have a patent impeached or annulled, Harbinson Ltd.’s claim could not be decided by arbitration.

The impediment to arbitration of patent disputes asserted by the university arose from sections of the Federal Courts Act that prescribe the jurisdiction of the courts to determine patent issues. Subsection 20(1) gives the Federal Court exclusive original jurisdiction in cases of conflicting patent applications and in cases in which it is sought to impeach or annul any patent. Subsection 20(2) of the Act provides that in all other cases respecting patents, the Federal Court has concurrent jurisdiction with provincial superior courts.

The court dismissed the university’s jurisdictional challenge. It held that the dispute between Harbinson Ltd. and the university was arbitrable. But instead of doing so on the basis that patent disputes are arbitrable between the parties, the court made its decision only on the basis that the claims being asserted were for breach of contract – particularly, breach of the warranty of inventorship – and that Harbinson Ltd. was neither claiming to be the inventor nor seeking relief under the Patent Act.

Although neither the outcome nor the analysis in Harbinson is wrong, the court also could have based its decision on the arbitrability of patent disputes. It could have held that even if the university were correct that the disputes being raised were patent disputes, they would be arbitrable between the parties: the asserted impediment to arbitration was no impediment at all.

The court would have been on solid ground in making that decision. In Desputeaux, the Supreme Court had considered whether s. 37 of the Copyright Act – which provides that the Federal Court and provincial superior courts have concurrent jurisdiction to hear and determine all proceedings other than the prosecution of certain offences – precludes issues of copyright ownership from being determined by arbitration. The Supreme Court, reversing the Quebec Court of Appeal, held that the purpose of s. 37 was not to preclude copyright issues from being determined by arbitration by specifying that only the Federal Court and provincial courts had jurisdiction, but rather to identify the courts within the judicial system that have the requisite jurisdiction. The Supreme Court stated that if Parliament had intended to exclude arbitration of disputes in relation to the Copyright Act, it would have done so clearly.

According to the reasoning in Desputeaux, where the Federal Court and superior courts have concurrent jurisdiction and Parliament has not clearly excluded arbitration, disputes can also be determined by arbitration. Therefore, with respect to all patent law issues referred to in s. 20 of the Federal Courts Act, where the Federal Court and provincial courts have concurrent jurisdiction, an arbitral tribunal would also have jurisdiction.

Even on patent matters where the Federal Court has exclusive jurisdiction, such as in conflicting applications for patents or proceedings to impeach or annul any patent, superior courts are not precluded from determining comparable issues between disputing parties, such as the validity of a patent. But only the Federal Court can make a decision in rem – that is, a decision binding beyond the disputing parties. The superior court’s decisions in those kinds of cases cannot result in patents being expunged and cannot bind non-parties.

On the basis of the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Desputeaux, an arbitral tribunal has jurisdiction, just as a provincial superior court has jurisdiction, to make binding patent decisions between the parties. It is unfortunate that the court in Harbinson did not take advantage of the opportunity to state simply and clearly that patent disputes in Canada are arbitrable between the parties.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions