Canada: Call On Production Agreement Held Not To Be An "Eligible Financial Contract" Under The CCAA

Re Calpine Canada Energy Limited, 2006 ABQB 153 (Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench), February 24, 2006

An Alberta judge has ruled that an oil and gas "call on production" (COP) agreement is not an "eligible financial contract" (EFC) under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). Madam Justice Romaine of the Court of Queen’s Bench continued a trend established in the Blue Range and Androscoggin decisions by declining to provide a "bright line" test for determining whether physical commodity contracts are EFCs. As she put it:

There may well be criticism of a broad spectrum approach to the determination of whether a contract that is otherwise on a strict interpretation of section 11.1(1) an eligible financial contract is in reality such a contract in character and in the context of the CCAA itself. Such an approach [i.e. the one adopted here] may lead to uncertainty and a greater risk of litigation, at least until a body of case law is established. With respect to such concerns, a simple test that allows the purpose of the CCAA to be undermined with respect to certain types of commodity producers and those who deal with them is not the answer. In the absence of a more refined definition of eligible financial contract, the courts and CCAA parties will have to continue to deal with the difficult nature of the issue.

Market participants may be concerned about the lack of certainty suggested by this analysis, particularly Romaine J.’s emphasis on the "fairness of result" test—which was mentioned in Blue Range but has not previously been so central to a judicial decision in this area of law.

Determining EFC status

The court’s primary focus was on whether the COP Agreement was a commodity forward contract. If it were, it would qualify as an EFC. Naturally the judge closely examined Blue Range and Androscoggin, the two leading cases on physical commodity contracts. Blue Range, also an Alberta case, was welcomed by most market participants because it made it clear that the EFC protections applied to both physically-settled and financial agreements. While it stated that not all contracts for the sale of tangible products should be protected transactions, the Blue Range court held that the relevant factor was whether the contract dealt with a "commodity" in the relatively technical sense of the word. Blue Range defined "commodity" (in this context) as something interchangeable (fungible) that would normally trade on a futures exchange or as the underlying asset in an OTC derivatives transaction. In other words, there has to be an active and "volatile" market that allowed forward commodity contracts to be marked to market and their value determined.

In addition, Blue Range noted that a forward commodity contract typically contains terms particular to, and negotiated by, the parties (as distinct from an exchange-traded contract) and that its terms—including price, delivery and receipt points, and commodity volumes—are precisely defined (e.g. there must be a defined price or pricing mechanism).

In Androscoggin, the Ontario Court of Appeal agreed that physical commodity contracts could be EFCs, but stressed the presence of termination and netting rights as primary indicators of whether the parties had a "financial purpose" in entering into the transaction.

While citing both of these appellate level decisions with approval, Romaine J. may have added an additional degree of uncertainty here by emphasizing the fairness of result test more than they had.

Why the COP Agreement wasn’t an EFC

The COP Agreement was an ancillary agreement that had been negotiated and entered into when Calpine sold certain oil and gas rights to Pengrowth. As described by the court, it provided Calpine:

…with a reoccurring right of first refusal to purchase any portion of the gas or oil produced from the lands that were sold on market terms and conditions. The agreement remains in force for as long as gas and oil are produced from the lands, unless terminated sooner by the parties. It provides for a fixed delivery point and a price for the production spelled out by reference to current market prices. It does not compel Pengrowth to produce gas or oil from the lands.

The benefit to Calpine of the agreement was that prices were determined net of tolls and consequently there was what the court referred to as a "toll" kicker. Romaine J. held that the COP Agreement was not a forward commodity contract, and therefore not an EFC, because it lacked too many of the key indicia of an EFC:

  • The pricing, duration, contract quantity and delivery terms were too uncertain (pricing was calculated on the basis of market price, the term of the contract was uncertain, and Pengrowth was not required to produce anything);
  • Because the pricing was not predetermined, the COP Agreement could not be marked to market (thus lacking another important indicator that a contract is an EFC);
  • There were no netting provisions (Romaine J. stressed that netting rights are neither necessary nor sufficient conditions of an EFC but added nevertheless that the significant of their presence "cannot be overemphasized");
  • The lack of any offsetting hedging transactions entered into by Pengrowth was in the court’s view evidence that this was not the "type of contract that is part of the forward contract trade"; and
  • The fact that the COP Agreement was part and parcel of the original sale transaction and gave Calpine a "toll kicker" made it clear that it was not simply a stand-alone gas supply contract. It was burdensome to Pengrowth and beneficial to Calpine because of the toll kicker, not the fixing of any price.

Alternatively, Pengrowth argued that the transaction was a series of spot contracts. While spot agreements are listed as EFCs in s. 11.1 of the CCAA, Romaine J. insisted that the underlying purpose of the CCAA suggests that only some fall into that category—as she noted, many spot contracts have no "financial character" at all. Since spot contracts provide only for immediate physical delivery, they were unlikely to be too important in the context of the CCAA.

(The court did not consider whether the contract was a commodity option at the spot price which is a more accurate characterization than either a forward or spot contract.)

She added that the presence in the COP of a "termination upon insolvency" provision was not sufficient to elevate it into an EFC even though the absence of a similar provision had been one of the reasons for the adverse ruling in Androscoggin.

As noted above, however, it is Romaine J.’s use of the fairness of result test may be the most significant aspect of the ruling from the market participant perspective. She held that if Pengrowth were to terminate, it would benefit by being able to sell the gas without restriction, while Calpine would lose a valuable contract (because of the toll kicker presumably) without compensation, as well as a relatively secure supply of gas at market price. Continuing to stay the termination, on the other hand, would leave Pengrowth in the same position as other suppliers to goods and services to Calpine—something she considered "fair" but which might not seem that way to parties that have entered into similar agreements in the belief that they include termination rights.

Distinguishing this decision

Madam Justice Romaine’s emphasis on the fairness of result test is certainly not helpful to market participants in search of certainty. Fortunately, however, there are a hundred ways to Sunday to distinguish the COP Agreement in issue in this case from the typical gas forward or option. The fact that it was tied to the initial land sale agreement, that it included a "toll kicker", that it did not provide for the purchaser specific quantities of gas, that it was not documented under an industry standard master agreement, and that the parties were producer and end-user (not their risk management subsidiaries) were all important to the analysis. Also, this contract dealt with gas extracted from a particular parcel of land. If a financial institution or other market intermediary entered into a physical gas purchase contract or option for a fixed quantity of a gas whether at a spot or fixed price pursuant to an agreement such as a Gas EDI or ISDA master agreement, a court should characterize it as an EFC. Given the court’s comments regarding fairness, the presence of an ISDA Second Method type of calculation on termination would support the EFC characterization as well.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.