Canada: The Family Law Implications Of Estate Planning Strategies: The Net Family Property Freeze, Alter Ego Trusts And Joint Partner Trusts

The House of Lords, in Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Westminster (Duke) established the following fundamental principle of tax law:

"Every man is entitled if he can to order his affairs so as that the tax attaching under the appropriate Acts is less than it otherwise would be."1

People over the age of 60 have generally amassed the maximum wealth to be had in their lifetime and have planned prudently for their retirement, and ultimately their passing. As noted by John-Paul Boyd and Anna Laing, "ours is an aging population" and more people over the age of 60 are divorced or separated than ever before.2 While estate planning is both a legitimate and encouraged practice in Ontario,3 it is imperative to acknowledge the family law implications of the various estate planning strategies for a client who seeks to order their affairs in an effort to undermine their family law obligations prior to or upon the breakdown of a relationship.

Here we will examine the more common estate planning practices, their respective advantages and disadvantages and the treatment of these strategies by the courts in the context of the equalization of net family property. Part I will provide the statutory framework, under which the entitlement to an equalization of net family property arises. Part II will investigate the net family property freeze and the reticence of judges to deem 'gifted' freeze shares as an exclusion from net family property. Part III will analyze the utility of alter ego and joint partner trusts and the treatment of trust assets by the judiciary when equalizing net family property. Part IV will conclude by offering some practice tips, which may bridge the exposure gap between estate planning and avoiding family law obligations.


In the eyes of the court, a relationship is at an end upon the earlier of the following events:

  1. The date the spouses separate and there is no reasonable prospect that they will resume cohabitation;
  2. The date a divorce is granted;
  3. The date the marriage is declared a nullity;
  4. The date that one of the spouses commences an application under subsection 5(3) (improvident depletion) that is subsequently granted; or
  5. The date before the date on which one of the spouses dies leaving the other spouse surviving.4

In Schreyer v. Schreyer, the Supreme Court of Canada succinctly described the legislative efforts to construct a regime for the division of property upon the breakdown of a relationship:

"Every Canadian province has tried to address in some way the inequities or difficulties arising out of the distribution of family assets after the breakdown of a marriage or of a common law relationship to which the same rules apply. Broadly speaking, the provincial legislatures have chosen between two different models: equalization and division of property."5

In Ontario, the Family Law Act (the "FLA") governs the division of property upon a breakdown of a relationship. The preamble of the FLA establishes its primary objectives as inter alia, the recognition of the equal position of spouses as individuals within marriage and of marriage as a form of partnership, and to provide in law for the orderly and equitable settlement of the affairs of spouses upon the breakdown of a relationship.6 In setting the intention for an equalization scheme, the FLA recognizes that

"child care, household management and financial provision are the joint responsibilities of the spouses and that inherent in the marital relationship there is equal contribution, whether financial or otherwise, by the spouses to the assumption of these responsibilities, entitling each souse to the equalization of net family properties."7

The equalization of net family property is calculated per section 5(1) of the FLA, which stipulates that the spouse whose net family property is the lesser of the two net family properties is entitled to one-half the difference between them.8

'Net Family Property' is defined at section 4(1) of the FLA as the value of all property, except excluded property, that a spouse owns on the valuation date, after deducting the spouse's debts and other liabilities and the value of property, other than a matrimonial home, that the spouse owned on the date of marriage, after deducting the spouse's debts and other liabilities, other than debts or liabilities related directly to the acquisition or significant improvement of a matrimonial home, calculated as at the date of marriage.9

The assets constituting "Excluded Property" that are relevant to our present purposes are set out in section 4(2) of the FLA as follows:

  1. property, other than a matrimonial home, that was acquired by gift or inheritance from a third person after the date of marriage;
  2. income from property referred in paragraph (a), if the donor or testator has expressly stated that it is to be excluded from the spouse's net family property; and
  3. property, other than a matrimonial home into which property referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) can be traced.10

Pursuant to section 5(6) of the FLA, however, the court retains its discretion not to equalize net family properties in the event that the court is of the opinion that doing so would be unconscionable, having regard to the following equitable considerations:

  1. a spouse's failure to disclose to the other souse debts or other liabilities existing at the date of the marriage;
  2. the fact that debts or other liabilities claimed in reduction of a spouse's net family property were incurred recklessly or in bad faith;
  3. the part of a spouse's net family property that consists of gifts made by the other spouse;
  4. a spouse's intentional or reckless depletion of his or her net family property;
  5. the fact that the amount a spouse would otherwise receive under the equalization regime is disproportionately large in relation to a period of cohabitation that is less than five years;
  6. the fact that one spouse has incurred a disproportionately larger amount of debt or other liabilities than the other spouse for the support of the family;
  7. a written agreement between the spouses that is not a domestic contract; or
  8. any other circumstances relating to the acquisition, disposition, preservation, maintenance or improvement of property.11

In Ward v. Ward, the Ontario Court of Appeal emphasized that the discretion to order an unequal division of net family property pursuant to section 5(6) is strictly limited:

"The case law has made it clear that the intent of the section is not to alleviate every situation that may be viewed as in some ways unfair or inequitable, because equal sharing should occur in most cases. The Family Law Act creates a scheme for property sharing upon marriage breakdown that is intended to promote predictability and thereby discourage litigation. If courts were to deviate from the scheme of the Act wherever it gave rise to an unfair result, this would have the undesirable effect of encouraging parties to litigate their claims."12

Equalization of Net Family Property During Cohabitation

Section 5(3) of the FLA provides, that if during cohabitation there is a serious danger that one spouse may improvidently deplete his or her net family property, the other spouse may apply to have the difference between the net family properties divided as if the spouses were separated and there were no reasonable prospect that they would resume cohabitation.13

As interpreted by the Ontario Court of Appeal in the seminal case of Stone v. Stone, the effect of section 5(3) of the FLA is that where separation or death is certain, a spouse is under a duty not to deplete his or her net family property.14 Section 5(3) of the FLA therefore enables a souse in the face of such a threat to trigger the equalization scheme absent separation.

Equalization of Net Family Property Upon Death of a Spouse

When a spouse dies, if the net family property of the deceased exceeds the net family property of the surviving spouse, the surviving spouse is entitled to one-half the difference between them.15 Section 7 of the FLA further provides that on the application of a spouse, former spouse or deceased spouse's personal representative, the court may determine any matter respective the surviving spouse's entitlement to an equalization of net family property.16

Entitlement to an equalization of net family property is in personam as between the spouses, however, an application commenced before a spouse's death may be continued as against the deceased spouse's estate, and an application for an equalization of net family property may be made by or against the deceased spouse's estate, so long as the application is brought after the earliest of:

  1. two years after the day the marriage is terminated by divorce or judgment of nullity;
  2. six years after the day the spouses separate and there is no reasonable prospect that they will resume cohabitation; or
  3. six months after the spouse's death.17

Most importantly however, is section 6 of the FLA, which furnishes the surviving spouse with an option to take under the deceased spouse's will (or if the deceased spouse dies intestate, under Part II of the Succession Law Reform Act) or to elect an equalization of net family property.18 This availability is significant, as while the surviving spouse can pursue an equalization of net family property after the death of his or her spouse, the relief under section 5(3) of the FLA can only be pursued during the lifetime of the spouse.19

Fraudulent Conveyances Act

Section 2 of the Fraudulent Conveyance Act stipulates as follows:

"Every conveyance of real property or personal property and every bond, suit, judgment and execution heretofore or hereafter made with intent to defeat, hinder, delay or defraud creditors or others of their just and lawful actions, suits, debts, accounts, damages, penalties or forfeitures are void as against such persons and their assigns..."20

Thus, conveyances effected with the malintent indicated in section 2 of the Fraudulent Conveyances Act will be deemed invalid, unless pursuant to sections 3 and 4 of the Fraudulent Conveyances Act, the transferee can prove that the conveyance was effected for good consideration and in good faith without notice or knowledge of the intent to defeat, hinder, delay or defraud creditors or others.21 "Creditors or others" has been interpreted by the Supreme Court of Ontario to include judgment creditors, as well as persons who have actions pending against the transferor in which it is clear that they are certain to recover damages.22

To read this article in full, please click here.


1 Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Westminster (Duke), [1936] A.C. 1 (H.L) at p. 19.

2 John-Paul Boyd and Anna Laing "The Boomers are Coming: Economic and Other Issues of Older Individuals" (Paper presented to the National Judicial Institute Family Law Seminar: Financial and Property Issues, 4-6 February, 2015) at p. 1 and 3.

3 As pointed out by Martin Rochwerg and Leela A. Hemmings in "Trusts, Trustees, Trusteeships III: Use of Trusts as Will Substitutes" (Paper, 23 September 2008) [unpublished] ("Trusts") at p.2, "courts in other provinces have been less planner-friendly".

4 Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.3 ("FLA") at s. 4(1) "valuation date".

5 Schreyer v. Schreyer, [2011] S.C.J. No. 35 (S.C.C.) at para. 14.

6 FLA, supra note 4 at "Preamble".

7 Ibid at s. 5(7).

8 Ibid at s. 5(1).

9 Ibid at s. 4(1).

10 Ibidat s. 4(2) (a)(b) and (e).

11 Ibid at s. 5(6).

12 Ward v. Ward, [2012] O.J. No. 3033 (ONCA) at para. 25.

13 FLA at s. 5(3).

14 Stone v. Stone, [1999] O.J. No. 3502 (ONCA) ("Stone v. Stone") at pp. 27.

15 FLA at s. 5(2).

16 Ibid at s. 7.

17 Ibid at s. 7(2).

18 Ibid at s. 6.

19 Kimberly Whaley and Debra Stephens "Estate Planning & Fraudulent Conveyance: When Does Estate Planning Cross the Line and Become a Fraudulent Preference"(Paper delivered at the B'nai Brith Canada CLE for Lawyers and Accountants: Fraud and Estate Litigation, 4 June 2013) [unpublished] at p. 4.

20 Fraudulent Conveyances Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.29 at s. 2.

21 Ibid at s.3 and 4.

22 Hopkinson v. Westerman, [1919] O.J. No. 127 (S.C. ON) at para. 9.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.