With Canada Day fast approaching, it is an opportune time to
remind employers within the federal jurisdiction of the new
requirements under the Canada Labour Code for the
calculation of general holiday pay.
Changes to the "general holidays" provisions under the
Canada Labour Code and the Canada Labour Standards
Regulations came into force on March 16, 2015 and apply to
federally-regulated industries, such as banking, aeronautics,
railway, shipping, interprovincial transportation,
telecommunications, broadcasting, and federal Crown corporations.
These amendments change both the eligibility criteria for general
holidays as well as the calculation of holiday pay.
These changes remove the requirement that an employee work at
least 15 days in 30 day period prior to the holiday. Under the new
provisions, all employees are entitled to holiday pay if they have
completed 30 days' service with the employer.
In light of these changes, employees with irregular work weeks
who had not previously qualified for general holiday pay, such as
part-time, temporary, or casual employees, may now be entitled to
Calculating Holiday Pay
Using the new calculations, employees are generally to be
provided with at least 1/20th of their total earnings in the
four-week period immediately before the week in which the general
holiday occurs (excluding overtime pay).
However, employees who are paid on a commission basis –
whether in whole or in part – who have been employed for more
than 12 weeks are to be provided with at least 1/60th of their
total earnings in the 12-week period immediately before the week in
which the general holiday occurs (including commissions, but
excluding overtime pay). Commission-based employees who have been
employed less than 12 weeks are provided with at least 1/20th of
their total earnings in the four-week period immediately before the
week in which the general holiday occurs (including commissions,
but excluding overtime pay).
Please note that special rules exist for employers in continuous
operations and in the long-shoring industry which affect the
calculation and the eligibility criteria.
Employers would be wise to review their policies, practices,
and, if applicable, collective agreements, to ensure that they are
compliant with these new requirements under the Canada Labour
Code and the Canada Labour Standards Regulations.
While employers can still choose to provide a greater right or
benefit, they must not fall below these new statutory minimums.
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice. We provide
the world's pre-eminent corporations and financial institutions
with a full business law service. We have more than 3800 lawyers
based in over 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada,
Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central
Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all
the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy;
infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and
innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.
Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global
business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to
provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of
our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of
Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia,
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South
Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright &
Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members
('the Norton Rose Fulbright members') of Norton Rose
Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein
helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright
members but does not itself provide legal services to
The content of this article is intended to provide a
general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be
sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
A recent decision from the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority) 2017 BCSC 42, provides helpful clarification of the law on termination of probationary employees on the basis of "suitability" and sends a cautionary note about the importance of fair and objective assessments during probationary periods.
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently gave employees and employers a valuable reminder: a breach of an employment contract does not, in and of itself, constitute a constructive dismissal. Even if the breach translates into hundreds of thousands of dollars not being paid.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).